User talk:TheShadowCrow: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 18:37, 30 May 2012

All good

No problem mate, yeah absolutely excited for Vic's fight, with Alvarez-Cintron, Wlodarczyk-Green, Darchinyan-Moreno, Agbeko-Mares 2, Cotto-Margarito 2, Klitschko-Mormeck and Froch-Ward comming up, i can't remember a end of year program being topped off with so many consistently good fights on a weekly basis, soooo pumped!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aussieswimmer (talk • contribs) 01:17, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Alvarez by TKO I'm really getting the bandwagon with him since his last few fights, Green by decision in a epic war. Darchinyan by a wide points decision, as good as Moreno is, he's struggled with Monshipour and Cermeno so i figure Vic can go one better than them. Mares all the way, Agbeko is tuff but i get a feeling Mares is on the way up and Agbeko is one the way out. I'm pulling for Cotto but i'm worried me may not be able to hold off Margarito's aggression, if he boxes a disciplined fight and only occasional exchanges with him, then he can get revenge. Klitschko maybe gets easiest win of the last 5 years. And Froch-Ward, i keep going back and forth. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aussieswimmer (talk • contribs) 03:13, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

== Slight mistake with evander's reign Evander's longest reign (3 years) was actually his 3rd reign. For that title reign he just had wba, ibf, ring, He had the wbc in his first heavyweight reign, If we applied former titles for multiple reigns the table would be a giant unreadable mess. I could put former ibf if that's puts a but more clarity, no hard feelings, just following the way the table was created. god bless — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aussieswimmer (talk • contribs) 02:03, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not replace pages with blank content, as you did with this edit to Tommy Gunn, as this is confusing to readers. The page's content has been restored for now. If there is a problem with the page, it should be edited or reverted to a previous version if possible; if you think the page should be removed entirely, see further information. Thank you. Kubigula (talk) 22:02, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't trying to replace it with blank content, I was trying to make the article about the actual fictional character Tommy Gunn so it didn't have to redirect to Rocky V. Can I still do that? I won't accidently erase the page this time. Sorry about that. TheShadowCrow (talk) 22:11, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Vic Darchinyan .jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Vic Darchinyan .jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 19:40, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Jake lamotta 240x230 021005.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Jake lamotta 240x230 021005.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:06, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:325px-lamotta joey (2).jpg

Thanks for uploading File:325px-lamotta joey (2).jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:07, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:325px-LaMotta Joey.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:325px-LaMotta Joey.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:07, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In Vanes Martirosyan, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Alexander Abraham (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In Khoren Gevor, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Ian McLeod (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Assistance

Hey, can you please delete this:Talk:Tube worm (body plan)? thanks. --109.232.72.49 (talk) 21:09, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Vic Darchinyan .jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Vic Darchinyan .jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:16, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Artur Grigorian, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Halle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Artyom Hovanessyan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Glendale, Var, Montebello, Woodland Hills, Civic Auditorium (<- Check disam. later) and Nokia Theater

Vanes Martirosyan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Amir Khan

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Recep Tayyip Erdoğan. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Cocoaguy ここがいい 21:42, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

James J. Jeffries (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Jim Corbett and The Arena

Randy Turpin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Leamington

Sam Langford (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Tommy Burns

Vanes Martirosyan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Juan Diaz

Vic Darchinyan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Carson

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:51, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

a note

Please refrain from personal attacks even if the other user is blocked and causing trouble.[1][2]]. If you can't keep your cool, wait for others to revert for what on the face on it are often style changes, avoiding thus the impression that you're personally out to enforce them. Just an example: Here, you're just reverting thus defending a fluffy and poorly sourced statement with an inappropriate edit summery.[3] Thanks.--Tikiwont (talk) 21:23, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Don't think I'm being tricked. He has been edit warring and harassing you so he stays rightly indefinitely blocked and may indeed be banned permanently if they don't sop socking. I spent also part of my my time here assuring that. Please check out the relevant terms as you're confusing them. I was just curious if I see a glimmer of reason on their side.

Anyways and regardless of the quality of your contributions that I do not want to evaluate, but which we certainly don't measure byte by byte, if they're good others will agree. But your rights to edit do not include that to personal attacks in edit summaries. In short, my post above was referring only to you and only for you as I expect you to do better. The next content or style dispute will come up, some troll will show up or find an free IP or open proxy etc.--Tikiwont (talk) 09:04, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Juan Manuel Márquez. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. This also applies to comments in the article edit summary. Zarcadia (talk) 00:14, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Marvelous Marvin Hagler, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Counterpunch (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Gegard Mousasi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Armenian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Caps

Many edits by UkBoxen change caps in Super Middleweight, etc. I understand that the weight categories should be lowcase, but titles might be capped (?). Is there a guideline on that? Can you link it please? (this will save time later - sorry for asking, overload). Materialscientist (talk) 00:15, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jimmy Wilde

If an article is European we use European dates, 8 February 2012; not February 8, 1912. Thanks. FruitMonkey (talk) 23:53, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Arturo Gatti, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Italian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Rocky Marciano, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Colima, Mexico (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Jake lamotta 240x230 021005.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jake lamotta 240x230 021005.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 02:15, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:325px-lamotta joey (2).jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:325px-lamotta joey (2).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 02:15, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:325px-LaMotta Joey.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:325px-LaMotta Joey.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kelly ^hi! 02:16, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Archie Moore, makes articles harder to read. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You were told before that adding flags to acticles is a violation of MOS:FLAG. Arguing that they exist in other pages is not a justification to violate the MOS. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 02:11, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Jean Pascal. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Warned previously because of the same. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 02:11, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No personal attacks

Hey,

I came to thank you for your valuable edits to Vitali Klitschko. And also to remind you that you must avoid any personal attacks on fellow users - such as the unexcusable summary to your recent edit. Happy edits, Ukrained (talk) 21:42, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am doing nothing wrong. I am just reverting a vandal's work. He is swearing at me and I haven't back. You should be telling me this and banning him. --TheShadowCrow (talk) 21:45, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, you're doing everything wrong. You're eagerly returning insults. And, by doing this, you are exaggerating suspicions that your referenced edits are not that neutral;) which I believe are. As for the other guy, he's going to be blocked in a matter of hours as a personal-attacking anon. The only question is: will YOU be as well? Stay cool, Ukrained (talk) 21:55, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

On a somewhat related note, I've issued a rangeblock against that the editor said comment was directed at. They're evading a block on an account on a number of IP addresses, so hopefully this will at least slow them down a bit. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 21:45, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Flag Icons

Hi. Could you please read;

policy on assuming good faith and why you shouldn't describe edits as vandalism, simply because you don't like them.
guidelines on the use of icons as decoration and use of flags for no good reason.

Then, if you have any thoughts on my edits you can address them constructively and from an informed position. Thanks. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 23:42, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I see that your use of flags has already been pointed out to you as being in violation of the manual of style. Perhaps you could explain why it doesn't apply in these cases? --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 23:46, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The problem with the flags is that they are distractive icons that shouldn't be used. Of course people will recognize the Flag of the US or Canada, but would you recognize

or

? The flags are unneeded nationalisms that were forbidden from many infoboxes, and at the Infobox boxer or MMA event should apply as well. The "other article has it" argument is vague, it is in another article because somebody believe that it was correct as s/he saw it in another article. A common example is the "see release history" link that appears in many musical-related articles. WP:IBX states that these internal links shouldn't be used as the WP:TOC exists. The real thing to do is reach a consensus to remove all flags from infoboxes, as boxers aren't national teams or countries, where the flags are more relevant. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 00:59, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is not that bad. but neither that OK. The real place where you should be discussing this is either WT:MOS or Template talk:Infobox boxer. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 01:27, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring adn attacks

You've been warned above again on personal attacks but you also need to refrain form edit warring: An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Ukboxen edits are not exempt because they are not banned but blocked indefinitely and you still revert before accounts are blocked and tagged accordingly. I think I asked you to review WP:BLOCK, WP:BAN and WP:3rr in the past, in any case do so now.

The exceptions would be actions performed by banned users, their sockpuppets and by tagged sockpuppets of indefinitely blocked. This needs to be interpreted in your case narrowly as you feed the fire with your own attacks, underline repeatedly that you haven't been blocked yet and revert other users as well. Here you revert as with the exception of the flagicon...[4].

In other word, you should not claim exceptions from the three revert rule unless a third party has tagged that account, in which case they will often block and revert. If you continue to do multiple reverts yourself or leash out with attacks before reporting the issue to the relevant boards, you are part of the problem and next time you'll be blocked.

A lot of activity has been gone into keeping that guy off the pages and your back, and I understand that it is frustrating but the page histories for some boxers are now a disgrace, so yes, this is a final warning for you: Do not edit war, do not issue any other attack. Don't even call content edits by a blocked user vandalism. If you can't do that move them from your watch list. Thanks --Tikiwont (talk) 20:48, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Juan Manuel Márquez, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indonesian people (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 4

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Dariusz Michalczewski (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Halle and Altona

Joe Calzaghe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Romanian and Ricardo López

Carlos Monzón (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Colombians

James J. Corbett (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Spartans

Karo Parisyan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Thomas Denny

Winky Wright (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Puerto Ricans

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lennox Lewis

Greetings,

Please discuss the links you added at Talk:Lennox_Lewis#Overlinking.

Also, regarding your edit summary: don't call people names and make accusinations. Please read WP:FAITH and assume of good faith.--Jahalive (talk) 22:44, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for Edit warring with and personal attacks on good-faith editor after final warning as you did at Lennox Lewis. There was even an invitation to the talk page. I also note that you didn't react to above friendly post doing another edit afterwards. As you know, I'm aware of the harassment, but stuff like this must not happen. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked earlier, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Tikiwont (talk) 23:15, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Only warning

If you keep violating policy as you did with these changes to Joe Calzaghe it's next stop ANI for you. 2 lines of K₃₀₃ 13:49, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Klitschko's

Well, Vitali is gonna retire this year, so i only think he has one or two fights left. So I dont see the sense in making sections all the time. His career is ending soon, so i think it is right to make a final section, just like on Mike Tyson's & and Lennox Lewis' articles.

IF Wladimir wins the WBC, then I agree we have to make an new section called Unidsputed Heavyweight Champion. But his fights in 2012 are not going to be any significant. Fight against Mormeck, rematch vs. Tony Thompsons and then maybe Arreola?. Well I think it is best it just called After Haye. Because it really tells what happened after his fight with Haye.

Cheers David-golota David-golota (talk) 18:45, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well yeah, but just because other P4p boxers have many more sections, dosent make the article look better, only worse.

Look at Mike Tyson article. He dosent have so many articles and is clearly the most infamous boxer ever.

I think it only makes the articles looks worse and ugly with so many sections.

Look at the Sosnowski and Johnso sections. They are so short. It looks stupid.

David-golota (talk) 20:00, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Harut Grigorian.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via live help, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! B music ian 06:22, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

Hi. When you recently edited James J. Jeffries, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Brady (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:20, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Harut Grigorian, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Aaron Booth (talk) 17:46, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Tyson

The Manual of Style has guidelines against many of the links you are adding. See: WP:Overlink, specifically:"Generally, a link should appear only once in an article" and "Avoid linking the names of major ... locations."

There are also problems with link specificity (see WP:SPECIFICLINK) and unnecessary use of piped links.

Please talk about the changes you want to make and build consensus for them.--Jahalive (talk) 08:27, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 11

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Harry Greb (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Highland Park, Old City Hall and Skating Rink

Pongsaklek Wonjongkam (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Yala, Nonthaburi and Surin

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Haye

David Haye fills alot. Very much. He brought the exciment and attention back to the heavyweight divison. Media hype and all the old great stuff back. He is Wladimirs rival. And Wladimir never really had an rival like Ali or Tyson had. That is why Haye is so "important".

Cheers mate

David-golota (talk) 06:26, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Katsidis

Could you please provide an edit summary when you've made changes? You've made a lot of minor edits to this article, but at no point have you explained what you've changed, or why. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 14:40, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Capitalization

Hi. With regard to the Tyson article, I wanted to ask about this sentence:

"He was the first heavyweight boxer to simultaneously hold and only Heavyweight to individually unify the WBA, WBC and IBF titles."

Why do you have one use of the word "heavyweight" in lowercase and the other capitalized in the same sentence? For a casual reader like me, this just looks odd. -- James26 (talk) 00:39, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sure thing. Thanks. -- James26 (talk) 01:38, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Andre Ward

Dear User:TheShadowCrow, please see the comments I have added on the Talk:Andre Ward page. I'm not targeting anyone's edits in particular, and certainly not yours. You are welcome to add sources to verify your assessments. But without references, it often happens that opinions and descriptive comments fall short of WP:BLP guidelines. In my view (and I'm only one person and I may be wrong) some of this page did that. Please let me quote from those guidelines:

This page in a nutshell: Material about living persons added to any Wikipedia page must be written with the greatest care and attention to verifiability, neutrality, and avoidance of original research.

If you really want to replace all that commenary, I assure you I won't delete it again. I've never been in an edit war, and I don't want one now. I just encourage the full referencing of articles. By the way, if you were referring to my edits, I can assure you that the lineal stuff is not mine. Regards.GorgeCustersSabre (talk) 15:37, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. The fact that I put "back" then lineal stuff that you hated so much does not mean that I agreed with it either. You and I are not the only editors on that page. Someone else clearly wanted to add that lineal section. As I said above, I don't intend to get into edit wars even with people who make pages worse or violate Wikipedia guidelines. Best wishes.GorgeCustersSabre (talk) 14:18, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

AA2

Please be aware of Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2 before making further reverts. Thanks. Grandmaster 18:37, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 351: / Line 351: @@
 : Hi again. The fact that I put "back" then lineal stuff that you hated so much does not mean that I agreed with it either. You and I are not the only editors on that page. Someone else clearly wanted to add that lineal section. As I said above, I don't intend to get into edit wars even with people who make pages worse or violate Wikipedia guidelines. Best wishes.[[User:GorgeCustersSabre|GorgeCustersSabre]] ([[User talk:GorgeCustersSabre|talk]]) 14:18, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
+== AA2 ==
+Please be aware of [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2#Final decision|Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2]] before making further reverts. Thanks. [[User:Grandmaster|<span style="font-family:Arial;color:#464646">'''''Grand'''''</span>]][[User talk:Grandmaster|<span style="font-family:Arial;color:#808080">'''''master'''''</span>]] 18:37, 30 May 2012 (UTC)