User talk:Medicellis

Strike-through text

This user contributes to the Emergency medicine and EMS task force.

Emergency Medical Dispatcher

Hi Medicellis! Your article is now official rescued from deletion, expanded, photos added, and fully cited. It is now rated as 'B' High. Hope you like it. Happy to be of service! Emrgmgmtca (talk) 18:18, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Hey, wow very good job. Makes my original article seem like human feces....lol. Thanks for the help Medicellis (talk) 18:42, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

United States

Emergency medical services in the United States is now essentially complete. It has been completely reworked, and the level raised substantially. I have also gone over all of the articles that I've worked on to ensure that they meet the MoS standards, as I understand them. I have also done some tweaking to CEN 1789. Both articles are now resubmitted for reeval at a 'B' level. Someone managed to sort out the problem with the Emergency medical services in Australia linking, and it has now been evaluated at a 'B' level. This will mean that all of the articles that I have worked on will be at the 'B' level, including your target project, Emergency medical services. The only article from the original set that remains is the Emergency medical services in the United Kingdom article, and frankly, I'm still a bit reluctant to touch it after the last time, despite the fact that it's rated as a 'stub'. Looking at it in a LOT of detail, there doesn't seem to be much there other than lists (and I distinctly remember being told that Wikipedia was NOT a collection of lists). I'll have to give it some thought, and decide whether to 'take the bull by the horns', or just continue to ignore it and move on to the Paramedic by country articles. Oh well! Emrgmgmtca (talk) 17:33, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Australia

EMS in Australia is now essentially complete, and has been submitted for evaluation. Once again, a little problem, in that there is no 'Emergency medical services in Australia' title...that points to 'Paramedics in Australia'; a whole different thing! I'd like to rename the article and take the link away from 'Paramedics' in the interest of consistency for the series of articles, but I don't yet know how to do this. If you could help, that would be great. I am also awaiting reevals on Netherlands and Canada, which should bring them up to a 'B' also. The only two articles in the Emergency medical services by Country group that I haven't touched yet are the U.S. and the U.K.. I guess I'll be starting on those next. In the meantime, of the 12 articles in the series, 9 are 'B' level, and the other three have been submitted for 'B' level. Just letting you know my progress...but actually, I'm pretty pleased!!!Emrgmgmtca (talk) 18:06, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Israel

Emergency Medical Services in Israel is now essentially complete, and has been submitted for evaluation. I've run into one problem on this; as you know, the titles are case-sensitive, and the title used in the other articles 'Emergency medical services in...' is currently directed to an article entitled 'Magen David Adom'. Now MDA DOES run the EMS system in Israel, but this article involves a whole bunch of other stuff, including their blood bank operation, the international arguments over their symbol, their relationship with the ICRC, etc.. The article is useful and should be kept, but the new article is ACTUALLY ABOUT EMS in Israel. I'm not really sure how to sort this out, and I'm hoping that you can help with this, just so we have some consistency. I won't get a chance to look at this at all for the next several days, and when I do get back, my next project will be writing 'Emergency medical services in Australia' and then getting that up to a 'B'. Cheers! Emrgmgmtca (talk) 17:20, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Hong Kong

Emergency medical services in Hong Kong is now essentially complete. It turned out quite well, and I have submitted it for evaluation. I'll probably look to see what can be done with Israel next, then Australia. I'm leaving U.S. and U.K. until last. Both are still currently rated as 'stubs'. I'm reluctant to touch the U.K. article, because the couple of times I've started on it to bring it into line with the 'B' rated articles (which was my goal for ALL of the 'country' articles, and we're GETTING THERE...lol) someone keeps undoing my edits. Obviously while it isn't rated very highly, they apparently like it the way it is...dunno what to do about that! The other challenge will be doing a generic U.S. article that doesn't manage to upset those in each of the 246 models of service delivery and levels of certification! Oh well...I'll get to those two eventually. Cheers Emrgmgmtca (talk) 18:11, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Canada

Canada is now complete and submitted for reeval. I believe that both it and the Netherlands article should receive 'B' ratings. Haven't decided which one to push on with next. Cheers Emrgmgmtca (talk) 12:18, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Netherlands

Well, Norway is complete and resubmitted for reeval. I'm thinking that it meets the 'B' requirements. I picked up some useful information and so have added a new article, 'Emergency medical services in the Netherlands' which I think is also likely to get a 'B', and so has been submitted. Emrgmgmtca (talk) 18:21, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

More Progress

Well, I've managed to get both Emergency medical services in Italy and in France promoted to 'B' articles. Canada and Norway will be next! I've also added a whole section on Models of Care, suitably cited and all...to the Main Emergency medical services article. I don't know where you're hiding...lol...but I don't know how to get anything past a 'B', and I think we're ready to nominate the main article for Good Article status. Let me know what you think... Cheers Emrgmgmtca (talk) 18:15, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Progress

Hi again! Well, the South African EMS people seem pleased. Internally, the South Africa article has been reclassified to a 'B', and I have just finished expanding and extensive referencing of Emergency medical services in France, and have submitted that for reclassification as well. On reflection, I think that I am going to focus on getting the existing stuff all up to a 'B' before I push on and attempt to write Hong Kong or improve the other articles that I haven't touched yet. Emrgmgmtca (talk) 15:07, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

South Africa

Just to let you know, I managed to contact the Head of Training at West Cape Metro EMS in Capetown, and he has provided a whole set of photos (with licenses) for the article, which I have added. There is one odd-sized photo, that I don't know how to resize. He has also agreed to check the article for errors, omissions, etc.. They were pleased to be asked. This article is great...the best so far. Emrgmgmtca (talk) 20:23, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Emergency medical services in South Africa

Hi Medicellis! You've been pretty quiet over the last couple of weeks; I am assuming you've been busy with school. Just to let you know, the edit and rewrite of the above article is now substantially complete. It could do with some photos to pretty it up, but usable South African EMS photos are a little hard to find. You know, it might not be a bad task force project for someone to start contacting various EMS systems around the world and asking them to upload appropriate photos (medics working, vehicles) from their system, along with the appropriate permissions for their use. That would provide us with a great deal of new and fresh material for article illustrations. The next article that I will take on will be Hong Kong. You will also be pleased to note that all of the EMS by country pages that I have done have been classified, and have all gotten a 'C' rating, with the exception of Germany, which received a 'B'. The challenge with getting most of them above a 'C' is typically the citations, and the challenge there is language. My intent is to keep adding to all of them, until a 'B' minimum is achieved for each. Since all of these feed into the main page, in my opinion the higher quality they are, the higher the main page will be rated, in terms of the information that it provides access to. Treated collectively, they would already provide a pretty darn good reference source for a paramedic or EMT student doing a project comparing EMS systems, and it wlll get even better! Emrgmgmtca (talk) 09:56, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Emergency medical services

Just to let you know, I think that I've done pretty much everything that I can do with that article. It's certainly clearer and cleaner, and it reads a LOT better. I'm still waiting though, for someone to kill those dead citations, since they go to a reflist, and I have no idea how to edit one of those. Once that has happened, I think that it's probably ready for GA nomination. Let me know what you think. Emrgmgmtca (talk) 09:56, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

References and See Also

I have validated or invalidated all of the References. These were on a reference list, which I don't know how to edit yet. I have attached a complete list of findings on the discussion page, asked for someone to make the listed edits, and updated the 'to do' list. I also took the liberty of validating all of the See Also links, and they are all fine. Cheers. Emrgmgmtca (talk) 14:21, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

CEN 1789

Just to advise; I have just created my own very first article. CEN 1789 discusses the European standard for ambulance design and performance (similar to KKK 1822). All in all, I think it has come out pretty well, but as always, I'd value your opinion. It is linked to the EMS by country pages for several of the European countries, and to our Group. Also, as you requested, I have started looking at the main Emergency medical services page. I have generally cleaned up, edited for flow, expanded, and added citations to the Strategies for delivering care section, and I have removed the tag and entered my work on the list in the discussions page. Just wanted to let you know. Emrgmgmtca (talk) 17:14, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Emergency Medical Service in Norway

Just to let you know, the Norway page is now pretty much complete. It would benefit from additional input from Norwegian users (do we HAVE Norwegian users???) and there are a couple of really nice photos that I've found on the web that I'm not really sure how to get approval to use. At any rate, this page has now been expanded a bit, some citations and references added (and the tag removed), and reformatted to follow the same template as the others that I've done (and I think I'm getting better at following the MoS). Let me know what you think!!! Emrgmgmtca (talk) 14:06, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Emergency Medical Service in Italy

Hello again!!! Just to let you know, I now realize how importantly the Manual of Style is considered here, and I am trying to ensure that I use it correctly. It is somewhat different from the writing styles that I am accustomed to (primarily MLA and APA), so I don't expect to get it all down properly, right away. Please feel free to look over my work, and if you see any 'bloopers' or have any suggestions for improvement, please let me know. In the meantime, the "Emergency medical service in Italy" page is substantially complete, and hopefully we will begin to receive contributions from other users to fill in any gaps. I am now moving on to "Emergency medical service in Germany" as my next editing project. I will start out by getting the spelling, grammar and punctuation right for English-speaking readers in the existing article. Once that is complete, I will probably attempt to rearrange the material into the format that I have used on the other EMS by country pages. I have some other stuff happening in my real life (yes...lol...I DO have one!) so completing this is probably going to take a couple of days. Cheers. Emrgmgmtca (talk) 11:43, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

The Work Continues

Hi Medicellis!!! I hope that I'm not bugging you unnecessarily, but my impression up to this point is that you are sort of supervising this work. To let you know, I pushed forward and attempted to apply the same template to Emergency medical service in the United Kingdom. I had no sooner finished the edits when someone by the name of OwainDavies undid the whole thing. I left him a message, explaining what I was up to and asking him to revert it to the work that I had saved. His response (friendly enough) was that the format that I was using didn't meet Wikipedia standards. It looked to me like a good, accessible format for someone attempting to do actual research, but looking at his Wiki credentials, he seems to know what he's talking about, so now I am frankly confused. I have no interest or desire to get into an 'edit war' with anyone (life is just too short) and he seems to feel proprietary about that page (who knows? Perhaps he wrote it!). So for now I am just going to leave that page as he seems to want it, and move on to expand the Emergency medical service in Italy stub. Eventually I will finish the rest, and his will be the only one that doesn't follow the format, but if it's okay with him, it's fine with me! My only motivation is to make the sections on EMS and Paramedics, and my other area of interest Emergency Management, really shine, and I fully realize that I am not going to achieve that on my own, nor am I the only one with ideas on how this work should be done. I could, however, use a little bit of advice and guidance from someone who has been at this longer. Let me know what you think. Emrgmgmtca (talk) 18:16, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Emergency medical service in France

Hi Medicellis! I've just finished a major re-write of this page for content, accuracy, spelling and grammar. Let me know what you think. I've taken the liberty of using exactly the same heading format for this page that I used for the Canadian page, with an intent of re-doing all of the country pages to precisely the same format, for ease of both reference and navigation. (I've decided that I'm going to do the country pages, both EMS and Paramedic, first) Hopefully, others will jump in and add additional information, and I will keep it on my watch list. BTW I couldn't believe it, but some idiot actually went and vandalized the Paramedic page! The bot caught it and undid it. Do you get a LOT of that sort of thing around here? Just curious... Ah well! On to the next one!!! Emrgmgmtca (talk) 11:39, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Emergency medical service in Canada

Hi Once Again, I've just taken the time to completely rewrite this piece, expanding it from a stub to a half decent article, correcting for spelling, grammar, content and accuracy, and ensuring that everything is properly cited. I've also added a series of links to other Wikipedia pages for Canadian EMS services, and another list of links that are appropriate to those seeking more information...typically paramedic associations and that sort of thing. I will give this some more thought and see whether there is anything else that I might want to add, and any usable pictures to illustrate, but all in all, I'm pretty happy with the result! I'd welcome your feedback when you have a chance to have a look. What I propose to do next is to just wander around all of the Task Force associated pages, and to either clean up or rewrite to raise the standard, one at a time, as I see the opportunity. Emrgmgmtca (talk) 14:14, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Paramedic

Hi Again, Medicellis. I think that I'm pretty much done with the Paramedic page. I've done whatever I could to sort out the problems, make the information useful, accessible, and high quality. It's also sufficiently broad in scope now to provide a fairly accurate representation, and I have cleaned up the spelling, punctuation, grammar, and general 'flow'. To be honest, I'm quite pleased with it, but I would welcome your feedback on the finished result. Emrgmgmtca (talk) 14:24, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

I'm very impressed with the quality of the paramedic article, very nicely written and expanded! I will take some time/effort over the next several times and see if I can help add (which I highly doubt) and any other issues. I would love your help with expanded/copy-edit of Emergency medical services, which I hope to make a good article (GA). Again thanks for your help! Medicellis (talk) 03:35, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Paramedic

Hi Medicellis, and thanks for the invitation. As you can see I've joined the group. I've posted the stuff on the history of paramedicine on the main page now. If anyone suggests any additions etc., I will keep an eye on it. I also posted in the Talk section of the page on the Skills posting, making some suggestions to improve it...I'd be glad to know what you think. Also, just so you're aware, I've taken a shot at editing the U.S., Canada, and Australia pieces, just for grammar, clarity and readability. I will try to look in on a regular basis to see what work needs to be done, and what I think I can contribute. Emrgmgmtca (talk) 16:23, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Hypocalciuria

I have nominated Hypocalciuria, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hypocalciuria. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? - Jameson L. Tai ^{talk ♦ contribs} 01:59, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Mars2025, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://games.swirve.com/earth/help/govt.htm. As a copyright violation, Mars2025 appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Mars2025 has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Mars2025 and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Mars2025 with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Mars2025.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 04:35, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Again, please do not copy and paste text from other web sites, like http://www.mars2025.net/Help.aspx unless you follow the steps above. Thanks. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 04:46, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

DUDE I DO HAVE PERMISSON, please stop deleting the page Medicellis (talk) 04:49, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Dude, do I have to repeat the steps you need to do above? This is to ensure and prove that you say you are, and you are not some sort of copyright violator. Thanks. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 04:54, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

While you claim to have permission, confirmation from a person with OTRS access has not yet been placed on the talk page in question. Thus it is not currently possible to confirm your claim at this time. If you have sent the email then this issue will resolve itself with a little patience.

Once the copyright issues are resolved the article as you are creating it still had significant problems to be addressed to avoid further deletion. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a game guide or how to manual. As the source you are pulling from is a game guide, the scope and tone of the text is that of a game guide. This means that the article you are creating will need to be almost completely rewritten with only minimal portions of the text you are currently adding likely to survive. I would suggest you read Wikipedia:Your first article for basic information on creating and article on Wikipedia and contact Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games for articles on games similar to Mars 2025 that you can use as examples during the rewrite process. --Allen3 ^talk 02:25, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Mars2025

A tag has been placed on Mars2025, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Dusti^SPEAK!! 02:38, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles, as you did to Emergency medical technician. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" is strongly discouraged. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Bstone (talk) 02:38, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

• hello, I'm not associated with nor am advertising any program. I have expanded the article of CCEMTP to include more detailed discription of were the program was developed at. This isnt advertisment but demostrates noteability for inclusion into wiki. If you look at the orginal page I edited you will see that the article is wholly orginal and have only added the details of were the program is taken Medicellis (talk) 02:44, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
• Also for creditbility issues I'm currently a full-time paramedic and NREMT-P and hold certification in ACLS, PALS, ALSO, ATLS, NRP, and a instructor for ACLS, PALS. I currently work fulltime at Union EMSMedicellis (talk) 02:48, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg

Thanks for uploading Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 04:10, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Response

It took less than that to create what amounts to a directory entry, not an encyclopedia article. If you think they are notable, you're free to fix them. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 17:12, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Question

Hey! I had a question and was hoping you might know the answer :p. By 2015 in order to be a nurse practitioner, one will need to be a Doctor of Nursing Practice. If I have a BSN, will I still need an MSN to apply for a DNP? Because what purpose will a MSN serve other than a stepping stone? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sheepeh (talk • contribs) 23:46, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Hey Sheepeh, in most post baccalaureate programs will require a master to continue on before you will be aloud to enter a doctoral program. Right now the DNP is young (transitioning from Doctor of Nursing (ND)) and you will find limited direct BSN to DNP program probably less than mabe 5 in the US right now [1], [2]) although by 2015 you will find most CRNA programs direct BSN to DNP programs, and of course most colleges will have a BSN to DNP route. With this route though you will still have to complete entire MSN curriculum/courses, on the other hand this route will only have to defend one thesis (and not two as you would need to do completing separate MSN and DNP thesis's). As of right now other than a stepping stone completing your MSN will open your options up, in regards to schools obtaining a MSN is the best route. With all that stated, when the requirement of a DNP for NP and CRNA, will have a grandfather clause, meaning that if you are a MSN-NP you will be grandfathered in and will not have to obtain a DNP and still keep your credentials. At the present time a DNP is more of a research post-doctoral position, were you will get into teaching and nursing research. Medicellis (talk) 03:10, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks! That was by far the best answer I have received so far. Getting the DNP established by 2015 is a loft goal indeed. Good luck in nursing school! Sheepeh (talk) 03:35, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

No problem, I have looked alot into this as I plan on becoming a CRNA after couple years of critical care RN experience. As I have a B.S. in biology, I would rather not have to obtain a BSN on top of my BS as well as a MSN and DNP. So I see were you are coming from. Medicellis (talk) 03:38, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

templates

Wikipedia:Template messages/Sources of articles

AGF

I dispute I committed vandalism. Geo Swan (talk) 04:11, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

entry was un-cited and per WP:V can be removed. Medicellis (talk) 04:20, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

I resent you characterizing it as "vandalism". Geo Swan (talk) 04:22, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

I'm sorry you resented the entry removal, it looked like vandalism and was un-cited, so I removed the entry Medicellis (talk) 04:24, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

New WikiProject

A New WikiProject has been proposed as a sub-project of Medicine. Your opinion would be appreciated as you are listed as a "intrested User" on the Project page. Please take part in the discussion, located here. Exit2DOS2000^•T•C• 03:23, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Emergency medical services in Germany

Hi, I saw you categorized the above mentioned article as a stub. I don't want to appear vain, but doesn't the extent of the text an the information given there at least qualify for a "Start"? Thanks for your answer. Winnie-MD (talk) 09:25, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Hi winnie, I have marked the article not for the quality of the written text, but for the lack of secondary cites and references, I'm sure there is a lot of them out there, but I have just started to go through all the EMS/emergency medicine, and haven't started to improve the articles as of yet. As I hit each page, I will be updating with appropriate clean-up tags, which I have done for this page. With 3-6 cites this page could easly hit "C" class on the assessment scale! Thanks for your questions, Cheers -- Medicellis (talk) 15:14, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Well, that should be possible. However, since most sources would be in German, I don't think it would provide any significant advance. But I'll see what I can do.Winnie-MD (talk) 13:47, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

New week, new article... Hi, I just finished my work on the redo of the EMS article. Please feel free to have a look and, of course, check out the spelling and grammar. Greetings, Winnie-MD (talk) 13:14, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Hi Winnie and Medicellis! I have just finished a major edit of Emergency medical service in Germany. I have primarily rewritten to increase clarity in your use of English, and to make sure that it is grammatically correct and that it 'flows' properly when read, Winnie. May I say that the information that you provided is absolutely outstanding, Winnie! I got a useful insight into German EMS that I have never obtained before, and it was absolutely fascinating. Thank you! I also reformatted the article to provide the same consistent format that I've been using for the other EMS by country pages. This provides a consistent way of looking for information, but this one has far more information than most! My personal opinion is that the article deserves even more than the C class that you were suggesting, Medicellis. Would both of you please look at the article, and let me know what you think? I'm particularly hopeful that you will approve, Winnie...your article is absolutely great, and all that I did was attempt to tidy it up and do it justice. Emrgmgmtca (talk) 13:50, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Paramedics in Germany

Dear Medicellis, I just reverted your last edit in the above stated article. Not because it is wrong or vandalism, but I think the information you supplied there is either misplaced (belonging to Emergency medical services in Germany or (in my personal opinion) more of an item list than an encyclopaedic entry. However, I will review the items you have listed and incorporate them into the Paramedic and EMS entries within the week. Please don't get me wrong, you didn't make any downright false statements, but with German EMS being my profession, it is...well, just not quite right and I just can see it written like that. But I will use the topics you mentioned for further refinement of these two articles.Winnie-MD (talk) 06:02, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Winnie, that is fine as I have little experience in Germany EMS I have no prob with you refining the information. As you can see from my edit summary, this information was merged from information that was from a delete/merge from another page, I have no doubt that there is mis-information, I welcome a native editor changing the information!! The Paramedics in Germany was the most appropriate place to put this information. I hope that you can help in expanding the document, and please consider joining the EMS wikiproject (WP:EMS) as we desperately need editors from other nations! thanks for your comments, cheers! Medicellis (talk) 11:35, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

I just rewrote the artice in my own Sandbox, what do you think now? Greetings, Winnie-MD (talk) 11:29, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Wow, very nicely written Winnie, prob would qualify for C class article, both the Germany EMS re-write and the Germany paramedic page are very nicley written, once you post them I will go through for some minor copyedit stuff. Very well done. I hope you help with the Emergency medical services GA drive we have going on! Medicellis (talk) 13:41, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Hi Winnie and Medicellis! I have just finished a major edit of Emergency medical service in Germany. I have primarily rewritten to increase clarity in your use of English, and to make sure that it is grammatically correct and that it 'flows' properly when read, Winnie. May I say that the information that you provided is absolutely outstanding, Winnie! I got a useful insight into German EMS that I have never obtained before, and it was absolutely fascinating. Thank you! I also reformatted the article to provide the same consistent format that I've been using for the other EMS by country pages. This provides a consistent way of looking for information, but this one has far more information than most! My personal opinion is that the article deserves even more than the C class that you were suggesting, Medicellis. Would both of you please look at the article, and let me know what you think? I'm particularly hopeful that you will approve, Winnie...your article is absolutely great, and all that I did was attempt to tidy it up and do it justice. Emrgmgmtca (talk) 13:50, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Star of life2.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Star of life2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:30, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to WikiProject Fisheries and Fishing

Hello Medicellis, and welcome to WikiProject Fisheries and Fishing! Please see the navigation sidebar on our main project page for information about our project guidelines, resources, and pending tasks. You can post any questions at the project talk page. Thank you for joining - we look forward to working with you! Geronimo20 (talk) 12:26, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Greetings from WikiProject Medicine!

Welcome to WikiProject Medicine!

I noticed you recently added yourself to our Participants' list, and I wanted to welcome you to our project. Our goal is to facilitate collaboration on medicine-related articles, and everyone is welcome to join (regardless of medical qualifications!). Here are some suggested activities:

• Read our Manual of Style for medical articles
• Join in editing our collaboration of the week (the current one is Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease)
• Discuss with other members in the doctor's mess
• Have a look at some related WikiProjects
• Have a look at the collaboration dashboard

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the project talk page, or feel free to ask me on my talk page.

Again, welcome!  --Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 08:11, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:EFDpatch.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:EFDpatch.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:13, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:EMDpatch.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:EMDpatch.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:13, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:EMPpatch.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:EMPpatch.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:14, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:ETCpatch.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:ETCpatch.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:14, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs SMUR William Randal Cremer Munson Medical Center Alva Myrdal Search and rescue Medic Pediatric surgery Vascular surgery Doctors' mess Klas Pontus Arnoldson James O. Page SAMU Social Tobias Michael Carel Asser Emergency Medicine Journal Pierrefonds, Quebec American College of Emergency Physicians Battlefield medicine KaNgwane Christian Lous Lange

Cleanup Culture of South Africa International emergency medicine Corrections Merge Wilderness first aid List of medical associations List of U.S. state fossils Add Sources Rescue squad Certified first responder Incident Command System Wikify Houston Fire Department Medical prescription Tsonga language Expand Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong Medical education in Australia Casualty movement

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:49, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

EMD deletion

The normal process is this:

• Talk to the person that deleted it. That would be Philosopher (talk · contribs). Just leave a nice note on the user's talk page.
• If User:Philosopher isn't cooperative, then you can make a formal request at deletion review. Give a good, clear, concise explanation of your reasons (much like what you told me).
• Alternatively, any Wikipedia administrator may undelete an article that went through {{prod}}. You can certainly find admins at the doctor's mess and may find one at WP:EMS. A friendly request for assistance is likely to be sufficient.

Hope this helps. WhatamIdoing (talk) 05:07, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

You have a new message at Philosopher's talk page

Hello, Medicellis. You have new messages at Philosopher's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Emergency Medical Dispatcher

I've left my suggestions for expanding Emergency Medical Dispatcher on its talk page. WhatamIdoing (talk) 18:03, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

thanks much!! Medicellis (talk) 20:56, 9 October 2008 (UTC)