User talk:Purplebackpack89

User talk: Purplebackpack89
Archives
2008
2009
2010 (Jan-Aug)
2010 (Aug-Dec)
2011 (Jan-Jun)
2011 (Jul-Dec)
2012 (Jan-Jun)
2012 (July-Dec)
2013 (Jan-Jun)
2013 (July-Dec)
2014 (Jan-Jun)
2014 (July-Dec)
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar may be awarded to those that show a pattern of going the extra mile to be nice, without being asked. This barnstar is awarded to Purplebackpack89, for his dedication to comprimise and his ability to work with other editors to come up with amicable solutions which satisfy everyone. Purplebackpack89, thank you for your valiant efforts in building this project. Ikip (talk) 07:48, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

		The Socratic Barnstar
		Though I doubt you're going to get anywhere in this debate due to the highly charged nature of the subject matter, your viewpoint on the issue and your line of reasoning shows you are thinker. Keep it up! And don't despair. The service of truth is the hardest service. NickCT (talk) 03:32, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

	The Barnstar of Diplomacy
	Thanks for putting forward the suggestion on ANI that we block, rather than ban, User:LiteralKa. It may or may not pass, but at the end of the day, you did the right thing by suggesting it. The Cavalry (Message me) 21:15, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

	The Special Barnstar
	For your battling abusive administrators and their sycophants. They do more destruction to Wikipedia than Joe can ever do and they know it. ...William 16:54, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	For all your hard work organizing and maintaining Wikipedia:Vital articles. You are an asset to the project; keep up the great work! GabeMc (talk|contribs) 19:16, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

		The Merging Barnstar
		Thanks for your recent work on multiple merge & redirects re: Yoko Tsuno. Much appreciated. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 13:25, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Drumpf - Trump - brothel owner and so on!

Drumpf isn't a family name that can be found in the whole area of Kallstadt. If you want to change something in de.wikipedia write in the topic discussion and show yours sources or literatur.

I'm working on the brothel issue(s): Donald Trump's grandfather ran Canadian brothel during gold rush He was running a brothel in USA then in Canada. The Canadians thrown him out. I think he wanted to do the same business in Bavaria. --Goetzmertz (talk) 00:59, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

It looks like you've followed me from German Wikipedia to here. Since you are here, you can check out the English-language sources that give his birth name as Drumpf, or suggest that we list his birth name as Trump (and providing sources of course). pbp 01:08, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

The english Version was fine till this: "Fredrick Trump Sr's real name was Friedrich Drumpf; Drumpf is a common name associated within the area of Kallstadt, 2nd German Empire, this an obvious ploy by Donald Trump or supporters to dissociated himself from his grand-fathers shady past". 1) Drumpf isn't a common name. 2) Donald's Grandpa was a brothel owner. 3) Donald's daddy was a liar about grandpa's origin and name.

I looked into the Kallstadt's graveyard books from 1650 - 1800: No "Drumpf" and 37 x "Trump". The Gwenda Blair's story about the 1600s lawyer Drumpf could be true. --Goetzmertz (talk) 01:41, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

@Goetzmertz: I'm a bit confused why you're talking to me about that. I didn't put the "common name" stuff in the article. The article isn't protected or anything, if you believe the "common name" part doesn't belong, you could remove it. Or you could discuss it on the talk page. pbp 01:45, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Also, the article Frederick Trump doesn't contain the "common name" verbage you were talking about. But, again, I say, if you don't like the way it's written, change it or discuss it at Talk:Frederick Trump. As for the "brothel owner" business, it is mentioned that he owned a brothel. I don't think you could get away with his pimping being said any more overtly than it currently is. pbp 01:49, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Here is your Link "common name": https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Frederick_Trump&type=revision&diff=692731106&oldid=692545024 Just won't disfigure articels in the future. Thank You! --Goetzmertz (talk) 02:08, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Random-ass fact

Donald Trump's Wikipedia article calls him a fascist in the lead. Fascism is mentioned 193 times in Mussolini's article, 4 (and not in the lead) in Hitler's. pbp 13:50, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

WikiCup 2016 is just around the corner...

Hello everyone, and we would like to wish you all a happy holiday season. As you will probably already know, the 2016 WikiCup begins in the new year; there is still time to sign up. There are some changes we'd like to announce before the competition begins.

After two years of serving as WikiCup judge, User:Miyagawa has stepped down as judge. He deserves great thanks and recognition for his dedication and hard work, and for providing necessary transition for a new group of judges in last year's Cup. Joining Christine (User:Figureskatingfan) and Jason (User:Sturmvogel 66) is Andrew (User:Godot13), a very successful WikiCup competitor and expert in Featured Pictures; he won the two previous competitions. This is a strong judging team, and we anticipate lots of enjoyment and good work coming from our 2016 competitors.

We would also like to announce one change in how this year's WikiCup will be run. In the spirit of sportsmanship, Godot13 and Cwmhiraeth have chosen to limit their participation. See here for the announcement and a complete explanation of why. They and the judges feel that it will make for a more exciting, enjoyable, and productive competition.

The discussions/polls concerning the next competition's rules will be closed soon, and rules changes will be made clear on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring and talk pages. The judges are committed to not repeating the confusion that occurred last year and to ensuring that the new rules are both fair and in the best interests of the competition, which is, first and foremost, about improving Wikipedia.

If you have any questions or concerns, the judges can be reached on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, on their talk pages, or by email. We hope you will all join us in trying to make the 2015 WikiCup the most productive and enjoyable yet. You are receiving this message because you are listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Figureskatingfan (talk), and Godot13 (talk).--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:47, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Wishing you all the best . . .

Merry Christmas, PBP, and may your holidays be merry and bright . . . . Cheers. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 06:47, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Thank you! pbp 11:59, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chuck Cooper (basketball), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Walter Brown (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Bob Verini listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bob Verini. Since you had some involvement with the Bob Verini redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. AldezD (talk) 21:17, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

@AldezD: I have undone your removal of the Verini and Newhouse sections from the Jeopardy! contestants article. Please do not again try to remove it. I have also added references to the Verini section, which you could have easily found yourself before claiming he wasn't notable. pbp 21:35, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

List of Jeopardy! contestants

In undoing the edits I made yesterday you reintroduced improper title formatting (MOS:ITAL) that was addressed in this this edit. Please be more careful when undoing and making revisions. AldezD (talk) 14:41, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

@AldezD: Maybe you shouldn't mix minor style changes with massive, inappropriate removals of content then. And stop referencing WP:N: it pertains to articles, not sections of articles. pbp 14:44, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Why do you feel it makes more sense for this article to be organized chronologically vs. alphabetically? AldezD (talk) 15:17, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Because I have a degree in history and think that way. Also because some of the articles on later contestants contextualize their achievements relative to earlier contestants. Though I will concede that the order of the contestants is not as important as making sure many of the influential contestants are mentioned in the article. pbp 15:19, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

For those contestants who once held records that were later eclipsed, do you feel it is still important to break them out into separate sections within the list article? (This does not apply to the WP:N status of the stand-alone articles, since WP:N#TEMP). For example, is it necessary to list Larissa Kelly in a separate section within the list article, or can her records that were later eclipsed by Roger Craig and Julia Collins be incorporated into those specific sections? AldezD (talk) 15:30, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

IMO, each contestant should have his/her own section.pbp 17:18, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

I agree. However, specific to those whose records have since been broken, do you feel those individual sections are necessary to be retained? AldezD (talk) 17:30, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

I see no reason not to. Would you delete Roger Bannister's Wikipedia article? His record's been broken. Frankly, I don't really understand why you want the Jeopardy! contestants article to contain as few people as possible (and please don't say navigability; there are plenty of ways around that). pbp 18:19, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

I'm not suggesting an article be deleted. I'm suggesting removing entries from List of Jeopardy! contestants if the individual's record has been broken or surpassed by another, and then noting the prior record that was broken in the new record holder's entry. AldezD (talk) 18:32, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

WikiCup 2016: Game On!

We are about to enter the second week of the 2016 WikiCup. The most recent player to sign up brings the current total to 101 contestants. Signups close on 5 February. If you’re interested, you can join this year's WikiCup here.

We are aware that in some areas the scoring bot’s numbers are a little bit off (i.e., overly generous) and are working to have that corrected as soon as possible.--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:03, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

WikiCup 2016: Game On!

We are about to enter the second week of the 2016 WikiCup. The most recent player to sign up brings the current total to 101 contestants. Signups close on 5 February. If you’re interested, you can join this year's WikiCup here.

We are aware that in some areas the scoring bot’s numbers are a little bit off (i.e., overly generous) and are working to have that corrected as soon as possible.--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:07, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

STOP.

Is there a reason why you and others like you stalk the trump page yet you have your politics on the opposite of him? STOP. Stop being biased and be neutral, we should only have independents on people's pages. Oh, and by the way, I wonder if you will make it to heaven with all that "education", get it? Thought so. :)75.172.175.106 (talk) 01:53, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

I don't think any of the changes I've made to Trump-related pages are particularly controversial, and, as such, I see no reason to stop editing the page. pbp 02:12, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

List of The Price Is Right pricing games

Please do not add trivia to this article. The article purpose is to describe the gameplay of each individual game. The other pricing game sections do not detail WP:IPC/WP:TRIVIA content. Additionally, the #Plinko section does not include references to the other innumerable appearances the game has made outside episodes of The Price Is Right. AldezD (talk) 17:21, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

@AldezD: Please do not remove sourced content from articles. The addition met the threshold of IPC; and IPC is just an essay and not policy anyway. There is no reason why the Price is Right article needs to be limited to gameplay; and if Plinko is such a cultural phenomenon, it probably should be spun off into its own article, one that includes all the references made elsewhere. Frankly, Aldez, I'm tired of you being the enforcer of all things game show; first with Bob Verini/other Jeopardy! contestants and now here. You didn't have consensus with Verini, what makes you think you have consensus on this? pbp 17:32, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Just because it's sourced does not mean it belongs there. The article does not contain other trivial appearances or pop culture references to the game. The article's purpose is to detail the rules of each individual game. AldezD (talk) 17:37, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

There is no reason for the article to be limited to that one specific purpose, and no policy that dictates that it must be. You're really just single-handedly making up a purpose for the article, and removing anything that doesn't fit your self-appointed purpose. What's completely unfathomable is that the content I added was some of the only sourced content in the article, and you're removing it. pbp 17:39, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

The parent article has sections that detail incidents unrelated to gameplay. The Price Is Right (U.S. game show)#Plinko board incident details an issue with the game related to usage of its props outside of production. That information is not included in List of The Price Is Right pricing games#Plinko because the List of The Price Is Right pricing games article details the rules of each game and does not include pop culture references, legal incidents, etc. AldezD (talk) 17:44, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

That is nonsensical organization and I oppose it. I am going to suggest that Plinko should become its own article again. pbp 17:52, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Additionally, you are bordering on WP:HOUND and WP:HA behavior in reverting my edits to articles which you had not previously edited, a pattern of behavior that has resulted in editing blocks in the past. [1] AldezD (talk) 17:47, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Maybe you should stop removing sourced content from articles, so I wouldn't have to go around cleaning up your messes. I am entitled to browse your recent contributions, just as you are to browse mine, and if I find something I don't like, I am entitled to change it. My block record is not really germane here as the people who performed said blocks have since resigned their tools, in part for...making bad blocks. pbp 17:52, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Again, just because it's sourced does not mean it belongs there. Please review the comments above regarding Plinko and the comments regarding Ketchum. AldezD (talk) 17:54, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Please review the comments I said that adding that content, if sourced, violates no policies, except for the "Aldez doesn't like it" policy (which isn't policy). pbp 17:57, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Oh, and one more thing: it's not hounding if it's just two pages, and the pages are thematically related. pbp 18:03, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Jeb? listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Jeb?. Since you had some involvement with the Jeb? redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 00:50, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

I think you should find something else to do with your time rather than patrolling redirects. IMO, it's splitting hairs. pbp 01:49, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Leading U.S. Advertisers in 2011 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Leading U.S. Advertisers in 2011 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leading U.S. Advertisers in 2011 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Conifer (talk) 04:11, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

WikiCup 2015 March newsletter

One of Adam Cuerden’s several quality restorations during round 1

That's it, the first round is done, sign-ups are closed and we're into round 2. Forty-seven competitors move into this round (a bit shy of the expected 64), and we are roughly broken into eight groups of six. The top two of each group will go through to round 3, and then the top scoring 16 "wildcards" across all groups.

Twenty-two Good Articles were submitted, including three by Cyclonebiskit (submissions), and two each by MPJ-DK (submissions), Hurricanehink (submissions), 12george1 (submissions), and Cas Liber (submissions). Twenty-one Featured Pictures were claimed, including 17 by Adam Cuerden (submissions) (the Round 1 high scorer). Thirty-one contestants saw their DYKs appear on the main page, with a commanding lead (28) by Cwmhiraeth (submissions). Twenty-nine participants conducted GA reviews with J Milburn (submissions) completing nine.

If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Thanks to everyone for participating, and good luck to those moving into round 2. Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs · email), and Godot13 (talk · contribs · email) --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:38, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

WikiCup 2016 March newsletter (update)

Along with getting the year wrong in the newsletter that went out earlier this week, we did not mention (as the bot did not report) that Cas Liber (submissions) claimed the first Featured Article Persoonia terminalis of the 2016 Wikicup. Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs · email), and Godot13 (talk · contribs · email).--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:05, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Wikiproject Food and Drink Newsletter – March 2016

The WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter Volume III, no. 4, March 2016 Note: To opt out from receiving future newsletters, please click here for instructions.
Project News Food- and drink-related CfD discussions, Cat meat, New Liquor portal, Recent Good article promotions and Unassessed articles. (more information below) Many project-related categories are presently listed at Categories for discussion. See the project's Article alerts for more information and links. A discussion regarding cat meat is occurring at Talk:Cat meat § Legality in Canada section. The new Liquor Portal was created in late November 2015 for liquor related topics. The following food and drink articles have been promoted to Good article-class in 2016: Carrot soup Crab dip English Cuisine Esparza's Grodziskie Lemon Drop Pizza cheese Plum cake Mrs Beeton's Book of Household Management Royal Stag There are presently 3,575 unassessed articles. Additional attention from the project's assessors is necessary and would be appreciated to reduce this backlog. Article alerts Wikipedia:WikiProject Food and drink/Article alerts Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Curabitur pretium tincidunt lacus. Nulla gravida orci a odio. Nullam varius, turpis et commodo pharetra, est eros bibendum elit, nec luctus magna felis sollicitudin mauris. Integer in mauris eu nibh euismod gravida. Duis ac tellus et risus vulputate vehicula. Donec lobortis risus a elit. Etiam tempor. Ut ullamcorper, ligula eu tempor congue, eros est euismod turpis, id tincidunt sapien risus a quam. Maecenas fermentum consequat mi. Donec fermentum. Pellentesque malesuada nulla a mi. Duis sapien sem, aliquet nec, commodo eget, consequat quis, neque. Aliquam faucibus, elit ut dictum aliquet, felis nisl adipiscing sapien, sed malesuada diam lacus eget erat. Cras mollis scelerisque nunc. Nullam arcu. Aliquam consequat. Curabitur augue lorem, dapibus quis, laoreet et, pretium ac, nisi. Aenean magna nisl, mollis quis, molestie eu, feugiat in, orci. In hac habitasse platea dictumst. Fusce convallis, mauris imperdiet gravida bibendum, nisl turpis suscipit mauris, sed placerat ipsum urna sed risus. In convallis tellus a mauris. Curabitur non elit ut libero tristique sodales. Mauris a lacus. Donec mattis semper leo. In hac habitasse platea dictumst. Vivamus facilisis diam at odio. Mauris dictum, nisi eget consequat elementum, lacus ligula molestie metus, non feugiat orci magna ac sem. Donec turpis. Donec vitae metus. Morbi tristique neque eu mauris. Quisque gravida ipsum non sapien. Proin turpis lacus, scelerisque vitae, elementum at, lobortis ac, quam. Aliquam dictum eleifend risus. In hac habitasse platea dictumst. Etiam sit amet diam. Suspendisse odio. Suspendisse nunc. In semper bibendum libero. Proin nonummy, lacus eget pulvinar lacinia, pede felis dignissim leo, vitae tristique magna lacus sit amet eros. Nullam ornare. Praesent odio ligula, dapibus sed, tincidunt eget, dictum ac, nibh. Nam quis lacus. Nunc eleifend molestie velit. Morbi lobortis quam eu velit. Donec euismod vestibulum massa. Donec non lectus. Aliquam commodo lacus sit amet nulla. Cras dignissim elit et augue. Nullam non diam. Pellentesque habitant morbi tristique senectus et netus et malesuada fames ac turpis egestas. In hac habitasse platea dictumst. Aenean vestibulum. Sed lobortis elit quis lectus. Nunc sed lacus at augue bibendum dapibus.	Feel free to welcome the new members who have recently joined the project. 18 new members!CamV8AeonxKar2016Lee788OmotechoLeuven2015Rich FarmbroughChiswick ChapAnna FrodesiakAtsmePrimaPreussenErpertSueDonemOff-shellBogger GunkartaBwtranchDebbiesw The project currently has 100 active members. Some recent food and drink new articles and content: White Tiger's Milk (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Legacypac (talk · contribs · new pages (80)) started on 2016-02-26, score: 10 Olive Oil Times (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Janestreet350 (talk · contribs · new pages (1)) started on 2016-02-22, score: 20 Terra Greens Organic (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Neetjash (talk · contribs · new pages (2)) started on 2016-02-19, score: 10 Mars Nederland Veghel (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by DinosaursLoveExistence (talk · contribs · new pages (16)) started on 2016-02-29, score: 10 Club Quilox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Eruditescholar (talk · contribs · new pages (11)) started on 2016-02-29, score: 30 Boston Tea Party (café chain) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by LegereScire (talk · contribs · new pages (3)) started on 2016-02-29, score: 10 Refermentation (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Rachelskit (talk · contribs · new pages (3)) started on 2016-02-28, score: 40 Graeme Burns (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Drchriswilliams (talk · contribs · new pages (8)) started on 2016-02-28, score: 10 Alex Brewster (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Drchriswilliams (talk · contribs · new pages (8)) started on 2016-02-28, score: 10 List of Georgian wine appellations (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Biwom (talk · contribs · new pages (12)) started on 2016-02-27, score: 20 Tvishi (wine) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Biwom (talk · contribs · new pages (12)) started on 2016-02-27, score: 20 Wok to Walk (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Xaosflux (talk · contribs · new pages (2)) started on 2016-02-26, score: 10 Pepsi Spire (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Rowanlovescars (talk · contribs · new pages (1)) started on 2016-02-26, score: 20 Kill Time (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Cattus (talk · contribs · new pages (160)) started on 2016-02-26, score: 10 Royal Dragon Vodka (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Onel5969 (talk · contribs · new pages (37)) started on 2016-02-25, score: 10 Arnbitter (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Gardar Rurak (talk · contribs · new pages (25)) started on 2016-02-25, score: 10 Brian Petruzzi (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by PorridgeJohnson1 (talk · contribs · new pages (1)) started on 2016-02-25, score: 20 2013 Northern Ireland Youth Soccer Tournament (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Sport and politics (talk · contribs · new pages (5)) started on 2016-02-24, score: 20 2012 Northern Ireland Youth Soccer Tournament (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Sport and politics (talk · contribs · new pages (5)) started on 2016-02-24, score: 10 2011 Northern Ireland Youth Soccer Tournament (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Sport and politics (talk · contribs · new pages (5)) started on 2016-02-24, score: 10 2010 Northern Ireland Youth Soccer Tournament (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Sport and politics (talk · contribs · new pages (5)) started on 2016-02-24, score: 10 2009 Northern Ireland Youth Soccer Tournament (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Sport and politics (talk · contribs · new pages (5)) started on 2016-02-24, score: 10 O-Aew (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Kwangkongkul (talk · contribs · new pages (1)) started on 2016-02-24, score: 10 Vazisubani (wine) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Biwom (talk · contribs · new pages (12)) started on 2016-02-24, score: 20 Monterebro (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by Onel5969 (talk · contribs · new pages (37)) started on 2016-02-24, score: 10 Predictive microbiology (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | tools) by MiriamRGarcia (talk · contribs · new pages (1)) started on 2016-02-24, score: 10 More... Past newsletters
Food and drink articles by quality and importance There are currently 34,340 articles attributed to the project, including 10,580 stubs. There are 38 articles at Featured article class, 176 are at Good article class and 3 are at Featured list class. Article statistics Food and Drink WikiProject article assessment Food and drink articles by quality and importance Quality Importance Top High Mid Low NA ??? Total FA 7 13 28 48 FL 2 1 3 FM 139 139 GA 13 24 73 251 5 366 B 56 235 331 581 64 1,267 C 81 389 955 2,725 467 4,617 Start 22 322 1,641 9,856 5 3,792 15,638 Stub 17 559 7,837 5,041 13,454 List 11 69 109 466 23 271 949 Category 9 1 7,609 7,619 Disambig 157 157 File 2,999 2,999 Portal 614 614 Project 384 384 Redirect 10 72 538 2,681 3,301 Template 947 947 Other 3 190 193 Assessed 183 1,084 3,754 22,286 15,748 9,640 52,695 Unassessed 20 1 1,964 1,985 Total 183 1,084 3,754 22,306 15,749 11,604 54,680 WikiWork factors (?) ω = 181,905 Ω = 5.14 Assessment log and Guide to Assessment Help on Editing and Sourcing Articles

– Sent by Northamerica1000 using mass messaging on 17:26, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Donald Drumpf RfD close

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 March 2#Donald Drumpf, four issues with the close: The closure was early and lacked the proper format (WP:RFD/AI), the closure was especially inappropriate for a non-administrator (WP:BADNAC/WP:NACD), and the discussion shouldn't be closed by an involved party who has even !voted (WP:INVOLVED/WP:CLOSE). I think a revert (self or otherwise) is warranted here. Regards,—Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 09:39, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

I fixed the formatting, but there's no point in reopening the discussion. It would just be closed the way I closed it a day or two later, as the consensus was clear and the Last Week Tonight votes had policy in addition to numbers behind them. You'll find that my vote was more of a "do not delete", rather than picking sides between Last Week Tonight and Trump himself. Also, you yourself favored the outcome I closed it as, so I don't really see why you're complaining. Good day. pbp 14:49, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Donald Drumpf WP:RFD

I'll get straight to the point: Will you please reopen the RFD for Donald Drumpf? You've closed the discussion prior to the recommended 7-day discussion recommendation and you could potentially be considered WP:INVOLVED in the discussion since you have posted a non-neutral comment in the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 17:05, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

I don't see any point in reopening it because I don't see any possibility of it being closed any other way. It won't be closed as a disambiguation because the only person who wants that is you; and also because two of the pages have been merged. It won't be closed as deleted because few, if anybody, want to delete it. It won't be closed as a redirect to Donald J Drumpf, because that is now a redirect. It won't be closed as a redirect to Donald Trump because only a handful of people support that redirect, and most of the ones who don't think that redirecting it there violates policy. Good day. pbp 19:38, 7 March 2016 (UTC)