User talk:Searchme

Retired

This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

Talks initiated on this page will be resumed on this page, unless otherwise noted or requested. This talk page will be archived whenever I dang well please. Please leave new messages at the bottom. Wikipedia ads file info – show another – #236 Portal:Horse racing Any chance you could alter the contrast between the background and text in the section headings. Possibly white text or lighten the present background. Thanks. Cuddy Wifter (talk) 22:49, 5 September 2010 (UTC) Hows that look? I'm still trying to figure out if I want to keep those colors, I was going for the look of the dirt and turf, but I don't think they go real well together. Joe I 22:52, 5 September 2010 (UTC) I think the shade of green for the background is good, and the white text makes it much more readable. You're doing a great job. Cuddy Wifter (talk) 23:14, 5 September 2010 (UTC) ok, thnx I appreciate the help Joe I 00:18, 6 September 2010 (UTC) I notice that you have made a start on the Topics section of the Portal. Unfortunately, I have also started on this section which is here. I am prepared to complete this section if you wish to work on other areas. What do you think? Regards Cuddy Wifter (talk) 09:05, 10 September 2010 (UTC) Ok, yeah. Yours looks much better than mine, I was starting to get alittle confused on how to put things, but yours looks good. Joe I 13:35, 10 September 2010 (UTC) Searchme, please do not put the horse racing portal into a bunch of article namespaces, especially given that we don't even put Portal:Horses there! It's a nice portal, but if you notice, Portal:Horses is discreetly transcluded into the WPEQ template that goes on the TALK pages. We don't want to be putting the portal into 3000 articles, putting in on the template is way easier and doesn't clutter up the article namespace. I think you ought to put the portal into the TB horse racing WikiProject's template, so it automatically gets placed in all the horse racing articles. You can also take the portal to [{WP:EQUINE|WPEQ's]] talk page and see if we want to add it to our template also. (or as an option within the template the way we have the horse breeds task force and horse training task force tags on some, but not all articles). I'm not trying to be harsh, I just don't want to have to either add the horses portal to 500 articles or remove yours from 500 articles...the templates are a MUCH better way to go! Montanabw(talk) 03:38, 12 September 2010 (UTC) Yeah, I can see some of that. Thats cool. Joe I 23:58, 13 September 2010 (UTC) Great. You're doing good work. The interaction between WPEQ and the horse racing stuff is not a direct correlation, some of us are in both projects, but not all. It's a good synergy because WPEQ could not possibly deal with all the racing sports stuff. It's a big tent. Montanabw(talk) 20:22, 14 September 2010 (UTC) The Milhist election has started! The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. You are cordially invited to help pick fourteen new coordinators from a pool of twenty candidates. This time round, the term has increased from six to twelve months so it is doubly important that you have your say! Please cast your vote here no later than 23:59 (UTC) on Tuesday, 28 September 2010. With many thanks in advance for your participation from the coordinator team,  Roger Davies talk 19:36, 17 September 2010 (UTC) WP Numismatics in the Signpost "WikiProject Report" would like to focus on WikiProject Numismatics for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Also, if you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. -Mabeenot (talk) 20:38, 13 October 2010 (UTC) WP Holidays in the Signpost "WikiProject Report" would like to focus on WikiProject Holidays for a Signpost article to be published at the end of November. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Also, if you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. -Mabeenot (talk) 22:24, 13 November 2010 (UTC) Invitation to join WikiProject United States Hello, Searchme! WikiProject United States, an outreach effort supporting development of United States related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been restarted after a long period of inactivity. As a user who has shown an interest in United States related topics we wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the United States. If you are interested please add your Username and area of interest to the members page here. Thank you!!! --Kumioko (talk) 04:04, 5 January 2011 (UTC) Speedy deletion of Template:Infobox note A tag has been placed on Template:Infobox note requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted. If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>). Thanks. — This, that, and the other (talk) 09:05, 10 February 2011 (UTC) Wikiproject:Chartalism proposal Since you have contributed to the article on Chartalism, you might be interested to know that a proposal has been put forward for a Wikiproject on Chartalism, in case you want to support it or participate in the project.-The Gnome (talk) 19:24, 21 March 2011 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:Numismatic Galleries Template:Numismatic Galleries has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. —Felix the Cassowary 14:26, 21 April 2011 (UTC) MfD nomination of Portal:Employment Portal:Employment, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Employment and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Employment during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions) 00:55, 9 July 2011 (UTC) September 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States The September 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.   --Kumioko (talk) 01:15, 7 September 2011 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue LXVI, August 2011 Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Carthage and Australia in Palestine Op-ed: Remembering 9/11 To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 18:40, 11 September 2011 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue LXVII, September 2011 Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews: Nick-D and Ian Rose look at Australian air power Op-ed: Buggie111 ruminates about WikiLife and WikiDeath To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 02:46, 27 October 2011 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue LXVIII, October 2011 Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D analyzes three books from Osprey Publishing Review essay: Nick-D reviews the new Bundeswehr Military History Museum To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 08:45, 28 November 2011 (UTC) December 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States The December 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.   --Kumioko (talk) 02:59, 13 December 2011 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue LXIX, November 2011 Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors – MHotY coming; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at the Congolese Wars Review essay: Ian Rose goes to El Alamein Op-ed: DCI's call to revitalize WikiProject History The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 21:07, 27 December 2011 (UTC) Military Historian of the Year Nominations for the "Military Historian of the Year" for 2011 are now open. If you would like to nominate an editor for this award, please do so here. Voting will open on 22 January and run for seven days. Thanks! On behalf of the coordinators, Nick-D (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 00:24, 16 January 2012 (UTC) You were sent this message because you are a listed as a member of the Military history WikiProject. January 2012 Newsletter for WikiProject United States and supported projects The January 2012 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.   --Kumi-Taskbot (talk) 19:41, 16 January 2012 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue LXX, January 2012 Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D Nick-D looks into two recent Milhist books Review essay: Kirill Lokshin, the first coordinator Op-ed: Hchc's English Castles The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 00:41, 23 January 2012 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue LXXI, February 2012 Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks into two recent Milhist books Op-ed: Ian Rose discusses article assessments The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 10:27, 21 February 2012 (UTC) Ichthus: January 2012 ICHTHUS January 2012 In this issue... From the Editor What are You doing For Lent? Fun and Exciting Contest Launched Spotlight on WikiProject Catholicism Ichthus is the newsletter of Christianity on Wikipedia • It is published by WikiProject Christianity For submissions contact the Newsroom • To unsubscribe add yourself to the list here The Bugle: Issue LXXII, March 2012 Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks into two recent Milhist books Op-ed: Hawkeye on Wikipedia collaborating with the AWM The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 02:39, 24 March 2012 (UTC) Military history coordinator election The Military history WikiProject has started its 2012 project coordinator election process, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of the current coordinators on their talk page. This message was delivered here because you are a member of the Military history WikiProject. – Military history coordinators (about the project • what coordinators do) 09:51, 10 September 2012 (UTC) Wikipedia Loves Libraries Seattle Decemmber 8 - Wikipedia Loves Libraries Seattle - You're invited Seattle Public Library Date Saturday, December 8, 2012 Time 10 a.m. – 3 p.m. Location Seattle Public Library Meeting Room 1 on Level 4, Central Library, 1000 4th Avenue, Seattle WA, 98104 Event An editathon on Seattle-related Wikipedia articles with Wikipedia tutorials and Librarian assistance on hand. Hashtag #wikiloveslib or #glamwiki. Registration http://wll-seattle.eventbrite.com or use on-wiki regsistration. Yours, Maximilianklein (talk) 03:51, 1 December 2012 (UTC) Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 1 July 2013 (UTC) Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 25 July 2013 (UTC)