Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 February 15

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Categories for discussion‎ | Log

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Qwerfjkl (talk | contribs) at 19:42, 23 February 2023 (→‎Category:Filipino women's volleyball Outside Hitters: Closed as delete (XFDcloser)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
< February 14 February 16 >

February 15[edit]

Category:Physician and comedian[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 19:10, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Overcategorization by intersection of unrelated traits. As always, the category system is not a tool for making lists of absolutely any intersection of traits that happens to describe two or more article topics -- just because some arbitrary number of people can be found who happen to have been both physicians and comedians (either at the same time or at different times in their lives) is not in and of itself a valid basis for a category. And even if there were a valid basis to keep this, it would still have to be renamed for accordance with Wikipedia's naming conventions for categories (i.e. pluralized) anyway. Bearcat (talk) 23:57, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Agree with Nominator. This category is not Notable OrewaTel (talk) 01:38, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Disagree with Nominator. Highly notable people are both, usually a doctor becoming a comedian. It is also an unusual, notable choice. .... 0mtwb9gd5wx (talk) 02:21, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    This information is most interesting. The best way to make it available to the reader will certainly be to write a list article of doctors who have been comedians, per the guideline on Categories. Place Clichy (talk) 10:53, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, it is an unusual combination, but trivial from an encyclopedic point of view. These people are notable as a physician, or as a comedian, or both, but not because of the combination. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:51, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, trivial category. Similar categories such as Polymaths were deleted repeatedly with a wide consensus: 2013 January 20, 2007 December 29. WP:SNOWBALL may apply. Place Clichy (talk) 10:53, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:CROSSCAT. - RevelationDirect (talk) 04:11, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete -- after ensuring that all articles appear in both categories (or a relevant sub-cat). This is a trivial intersection. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:58, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Deborah Carlos-Valencia[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 19:10, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Eponymous category for a person without a sufficient volume of spinoff content to warrant an eponymous category. There are just two things here besides the eponym herself, which is nowhere near sufficient to justify an eponymous category. Bearcat (talk) 23:52, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Nominator seems correct. I thought I was doing the right thing to create this to link the two organizations she founded, but reading the link in the nomination, I am inclined to agree with the nominator. CT55555(talk) 23:58, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:53, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete
    William Allen Simpson (talk) 05:16, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:FPJ's Ang Probinsyano cast[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 19:11, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: WP:PERFCAT for the cast of a television series. As always, we do not categorize actors for individual acting roles they may have had, as this would result in extreme category bloat as we added a category for every television series, and a category for every film, that they were ever in. Bearcat (talk) 23:50, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Namesakes of San Francisco streets[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 19:11, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Per WP:OCTRIVIA. Having a street named after someone is "unrelated or wholly peripheral to the topic's notability." User:Namiba 23:44, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • That is interesting but irrelevant for categorization. This is about whether people in the category are defined by having a street named after them and that is obviously not the case. Marcocapelle (talk) 10:53, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom as trivial. That's typically the kind of thing you would expect to find (if sourced) at the bottom of an article, in a section on homage received that may include the list of streets named after a person. In the other direction, a list of streets in San Francisco with links is also possible. Category? No. Place Clichy (talk) 20:25, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Feels more akin to WP:SHAREDNAME to me, but definitely not defining. - RevelationDirect (talk) 00:56, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete -- Too akin to WP:SHAREDNAME. There seems already to be a list, so no need to listify. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:00, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete — do not categorize every fact.
    William Allen Simpson (talk) 05:18, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Trade fairs in Gothenburg[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Events in Gothenburg. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 19:12, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: too granular. WP:SMALLCAT. This category has only 1 entry. Estopedist1 (talk) 21:14, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fairgrounds in Sweden[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Fairgrounds and Category:Event venues in Sweden. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 19:13, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Per WP:SMALLCAT. This category has only 1 entry. In addition: unique category name in Baltoscandinavia countries categories. Estopedist1 (talk) 20:32, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Auditoriums in Sweden[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Auditoriums and Category:Event venues in Sweden. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 19:14, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Per WP:SMALLCAT. This category has only 1 entry. In addition: unique category name in Baltoscandinavia countries categories Estopedist1 (talk) 20:29, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Song recordings arranged by Paul Buckmaster[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 19:14, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Not a developed scheme. Categories for production of song recordings take it to the producer level only. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 18:48, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Gary Clark Jr.[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 19:14, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Not enough content yet to warrant an eponymous category per WP:OCEPON. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 16:50, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Politics by city in Latvia[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. to Category:Politics by city and Category:Politics of Latvia. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 19:15, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: only major cities can have notable politics actions. Latvia is a small country and basically with only one major city: Riga. Category has no potential to grow. In addition: unique category in Baltoscandinavia countries categories Estopedist1 (talk) 16:23, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Residents of 10 Downing Street[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 19:16, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Delete as overcategorisation by address. 10 Downing Street is perhaps the best known address in the UK but shared addresses are overcategorisation. Note also that this is technically the official residence of the First Lord of the Treasury not the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom and the two posts have not always been held by the same person. In addition several post holders did not actually reside in Number 10 for various reasons, with some using existing London homes and others swapping with other ministers due to family requirements (e.g. Tony Blair resided at Number 11 which has a larger flat more suitable for a couple with several children). Timrollpickering (talk) 15:04, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, too much overlap with the prime ministers category. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:25, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - I was expecting a cat or two might have been added. It's particularly silly to add the whole of the topic category Category:Tony Blair (etc) as this adds all sorts of non-people to a people set category. Oculi (talk) 21:39, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete It simply comprises a list of Prime Ministers. If it included all the spouses, offspring and pets, it might serve a purpose but then I'd say it would not be notable. OrewaTel (talk) 01:35, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose The rational does not make sense at all. The category is following the List of residents of 10 Downing Street, not a list of prime ministers. Several of the residents were never Prime Ministers or Lords of the Treasury. The list includes residents from the 17th century, and several civil servants who were granted the residence. Dimadick (talk) 15:30, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Then let it be a list. That will certainly be better for user navigation, completeness of information and presentation of reliable sources, things that a category cannot guaranty. Place Clichy (talk) 20:53, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Categorizing people by the various street addresses they lived at is not a good idea. Wait, it's a famous address? Well, that's just because it is famous for PMs who lived there, who should be categorized as PMs. Other residents should be mentioned in the list article, the accidently-acquired additional notoriety is certainly not defining. BTW I believe that most governmental buildings in the old capitals of Europe (and maybe elsewhere) were (with exceptions) not purpose-built and have a history prior to their present use. This prior history will be better presented at the article about the building. Place Clichy (talk) 20:53, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete WP:OVERLAPCAT and WP:OCLOCATION Official positions are defining; whether they live at the official residence is not. - RevelationDirect (talk) 00:58, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - According to the article this has been the official residence of the First Lord of the Treasury (aka Prime Minister) since 1733, but listify those who were not Prime Minister, with explanations of why they appear. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:10, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fictional women soldiers and warriors[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. A new CfD nomination should be started for the other categories. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 19:25, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Consistency with parent Category:Fictional females and other Category:Fictional females by occupation categories. Although inconsistent with other women categories, in case of fictional characters "female" is more inclusive and preferred because not all fictional characters are human. There have been depictions of females from other species. --Wahspsneh (talk) 23:00, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Regarding nom's latter comment (just added), even in rare cases of fictional soldiers not being human, if there is a verifiable gender distinction then surely the characters are humanoid enough to refer to them as men and women. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:44, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • All should be adults because the category is currently named "women". In fact this is an extra argument for keeping it to women, in order to prevent overcategorization of fictional girl soldiers who are just fine in Category:Fictional child soldiers. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:43, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. The proposed rename to "female soldiers and warriors" sounds grammatically better than "women soldiers and warriors". And as someone else stated, it would also be inclusive of non-adult characters.--AHI-3000 (talk) 20:04, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong Oppose — move all the subcategories to "women". Since at least 2008, this has been affirmed repeatedly. Under Category:Gender, the pattern is fairly simple:
    1. Category:Female is only biology and sex.
    2. Category:Women are Category:People: by location, by occupation, and everything else.
    3. Category:Fictional characters are under Category:People.
William Allen Simpson (talk) 03:17, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 14:22, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Chinese Central Asia[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 February 23#Category:Chinese Central Asia

Category:Obi-Wan Kenobi (TV series) characters[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 19:31, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Non-defining. All characters are already in more appropriate Star Wars character categories so no merge is needed. ★Trekker (talk) 12:25, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. There are categories for a multidude of SW tv series characters. Unfortunate that it creates more category bloat, but I can see its use. Kbdank71 03:05, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • OTHERSTUFF exists isn't relevant. This specific series has no notable original characters.★Trekker (talk) 16:13, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete — created by a banned user.
    William Allen Simpson (talk) 04:33, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 14:15, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Landmarks in Sri Lanka by city[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 19:33, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Only contains 1 subcat "Buildings and structures by city", which are not all landmarks. – Fayenatic London 13:14, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Health in Sri Lanka[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 19:33, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: WP:SMALLCAT, only contain subcats for hospitals. – Fayenatic London 13:10, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, this does not add anything, it just hampers navigation. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:29, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete — by city, by district, and by province? Too many overlapping regions. I'd have some sympathy for future expansion, but its been several years. I'm so tired of folks building extensive unpopulated trees for the sake of having them. Articles first!
    William Allen Simpson (talk) 05:48, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Health in Moscow[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 19:33, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: WP:SMALLCAT, only contain subcats for hospitals. – Fayenatic London 11:53, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Hospitals in Chernihiv[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge/delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 19:34, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: WP:SMALLCAT, only one article. – Fayenatic London 11:39, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Small categories in Nigeria[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge/delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 19:35, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge all as WP:SMALLCAT, each has only one article apart from one that also has a list and the last which has 1 sub-cat.– Fayenatic London 10:46, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Modernist architecture in Lagos[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 19:37, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Merge as WP:SMALLCATs with only one or two pages. – Fayenatic London 10:22, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Gothic Architecture in Lagos[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 19:38, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: This is a WP:SMALLCAT with only two pages. Broadening out to the national level would allow the Neo-Gothic National Christian Centre to be added. – Fayenatic London 10:02, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Amateur theatre companies in Latvia[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge/delete.
Nominator's rationale: Per WP:SMALLCAT. This category has only 1 entry. By the way, the parent category:Amateur theatre companies by country is poorly developed, and rarely amateur theatre companies meets Wikipedia notability criteria Estopedist1 (talk) 09:16, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Aviation schools in Estonia[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 19:41, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: only one aviation school in Estonia. Category has no potential to grow Estopedist1 (talk) 08:11, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Professional wrestling events in Japan in 2008[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 19:41, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Per WP:SMALLCAT. This category has only 1 entry. No need to merge as it is already in other appropriate categories. User:Namiba 05:37, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Abuja architecture[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: manual merge to Category:Buildings and structures in Abuja. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 19:42, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Unclear definition, as there is no article describing Abuja architecture. User:Namiba 03:46, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Filipino women's volleyball Outside Hitters[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 19:42, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Unnecessary intersection between Category:Outside hitters and Category:Filipino women's volleyball players Engr. Smitty Werben 01:24, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • It seems a very narrow intersection indeed. If kept, at least remove the subcategories. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:47, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Reverted good faiths revisions by author. Category has been emptied. WP:OVERCAT. –Aidan721 (talk) 15:41, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Yes, this category has been emptied. Also, a day or so ago, I deleted a category with a similar name that was misspelled and mistitled. Liz Read! Talk! 01:51, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Not notable OrewaTel (talk) 02:39, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete
    William Allen Simpson (talk) 06:03, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2023_February_15&oldid=1141180565"