Jump to content

Geology of Venus

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 129.7.106.20 (talk) at 23:45, 17 October 2023 (→Ancient liquid water: combined duplicate citations). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Radar global map of the surface of Venus
The hemispheric view of Venus, as revealed by more than a decade of radar investigations culminating in the 1990–1994 Magellan mission, is centered at 180 degrees east longitude.

The geology of Venus is the scientific study of the surface, crust, and interior of the planet Venus. Of all the other planets in the Solar System, it is the one nearest to Earth and most like it in terms of mass, but has no magnetic field or recognizable plate tectonic system. Much of the ground surface is exposed volcanic bedrock, some with thin and patchy layers of soil covering, in marked contrast with Earth, the Moon, and Mars. Some impact craters are present, but Venus is similar to Earth in that there are fewer craters than on the other rocky planets that are largely covered by them. This is due in part to the thickness of the Venusian atmosphere disrupting small impactors before they strike the ground, but the paucity of large craters may be due to volcanic re-surfacing, possibly of a catastrophic nature. Volcanism appears to be the dominant agent of geological change on Venus. Some of the volcanic landforms appear to be unique to the planet. There are shield and composite[citation needed] volcanoes similar to those found on Earth. Given that Venus has approximately the same size, density, and composition as Earth, it is plausible that volcanism may be continuing on the planet today, as demonstrated by recent studies.[1]

Most of the Venusian surface is relatively flat; it is divided into three topographic units: lowlands, highlands, and plains. In the early days of radar observation the highlands drew comparisons to the continents of Earth, but modern research has shown that this is superficial and the absence of plate tectonics makes this comparison misleading. Tectonic features are present to a limited extent, including linear "deformation belts" composed of folds and faults. These may be caused by mantle convection. Many of the tectonic features such as tesserae (large regions of highly deformed terrain, folded and fractured in two or three dimensions), and arachnoids (those features resembling a spider's web) are associated with volcanism.

Eolian landforms are not widespread on the planet's surface, but there is considerable evidence the planet's atmosphere causes the chemical weathering of rock, especially at high elevations. The planet is remarkably dry, with only a chemical trace of water vapor (20 ppm) in the Venusian atmosphere. No landforms indicative of past water or ice are visible in radar images of the surface. The atmosphere shows isotopic evidence of having been stripped of volatile elements by off-gassing and solar wind erosion over time, implying the possibility that Venus may have had liquid water at some point in the distant past; no direct evidence for this has been found. Much speculation about the geological history of Venus continues today.

The surface of Venus is not easily accessible because of the extremely thick atmosphere (some 90 times that of Earth's) and the 470 °C (878 °F) surface temperature. Much of what is known about it stems from orbital radar observations, because the surface is permanently obscured in visible wavelengths by cloud cover. In addition, a number of landers have returned data from the surface, including images.

Topography

Venus topography
Main article: Mapping of Venus

The surface of Venus is comparatively flat. When 93% of the topography was mapped by Pioneer Venus Orbiter, scientists found that the total distance from the lowest point to the highest point on the entire surface was about 13 kilometres (8.1 mi), about the same as the vertical distance between the Earth's ocean floor and the higher summits of the Himalayas. This similarity is to be expected as the maximum attainable elevation contrasts on a planet are largely dictated by the strength of the planet's gravity and the mechanical strength of its lithosphere, these are similar for Earth and Venus.[2]: 183 

According to data from the Pioneer Venus Orbiter altimeters, nearly 51% of the surface is located within 500 meters (1,600 feet) of the median radius of 6,052 km (3,761 mi); only 2% of the surface is located at elevations greater than 2 kilometres (1.2 mi) from the median radius.

The altimetry experiment of Magellan confirmed the general character of the landscape. According to the Magellan data, 80% of the topography is within 1 km (0.62 mi) of the median radius. The most important elevations are in the mountain chains that surround Lakshmi Planum: Maxwell Montes (11 km, 6.8 mi), Akna Montes (7 km, 4.3 mi) and Freya Montes (7 km, 4.3 mi). Despite the relatively flat landscape of Venus, the altimetry data also found large inclined plains. Such is the case on the southwest side of Maxwell Montes, which in some parts seems to be inclined some 45°. Inclinations of 30° were registered in Danu Montes and Themis Regio.

About 75% of the surface is composed of bare rock.

Based on altimeter data from the Pioneer Venus Orbiter probe, supported by Magellan data, the topography of the planet is divided into three provinces: lowlands, deposition plains, and highlands.

Highlands

Aphrodite Terra topography

This unit covers about 10% of the planet's surface, with elevations greater than 2 km (1.2 mi). The largest provinces of the highlands are Aphrodite Terra, Ishtar Terra, and Lada Terra, as well as the regions Beta Regio, Phoebe Regio and Themis Regio. The regions Alpha Regio, Bell Regio, Eistla Regio and Tholus Regio are smaller regions of highlands.

Some of the terrain in these areas is particularly efficient at reflecting radar signals.[3]: p. 1  This is possibly analogous to snow lines on Earth and is likely related to temperatures and pressures there being lower than in the other provinces due to the higher elevation, which allows for distinct mineralogy to occur.[note 1] It is thought that high-elevation rock formations may contain or be coated by minerals that have high dielectric constants.[3]: 1  The high dielectric minerals would be stable at the ambient temperatures in the highlands, but not on the plains that comprise the rest of the planet's surface. Pyrite, an iron sulfide, matches these criteria and is widely suspected as a possible cause; it would be produced by chemical weathering of the volcanic highlands after long-term exposure to the sulfur-bearing Venusian atmosphere.[5] The presence of pyrite on Venus has been contested, with atmospheric modeling showing that it might not be stable under Venusian atmospheric conditions.[6] Other hypotheses have been put forward to explain the higher radar reflectivity in the highlands, including the presence of a ferroelectric material whose dielectric constant changes with temperature (with Venus having a changing temperature gradient with elevation).[7] It has been observed that the character of the radar-bright highlands is not consistent across the surface of Venus. For example, Maxwell Montes shows the sharp, snow line-like change in reflectivity that is consistent with a change in mineralogy, whereas Ovda Regio shows a more gradual brightening upwards trend. The brightening upwards trend on Ovda Regio is consistent with a ferroelectric signature, and has been suggested to indicate the presence of chlorapatite.[8]

Deposition plains

Deposition plains have elevations averaging 0 to 2 km and cover more than half of the planet's surface.

Lowlands

The rest of the surface is lowlands and generally lies below zero elevation. Radar reflectivity data suggest that at a centimeter scale these areas are smooth, as a result of gradation (accumulation of fine material eroded from the highlands).

Surface observations

Ten spacecraft have successfully landed on Venus and returned data; all were flown by the Soviet Union. Venera 9, 10, 13, and 14 had cameras and returned images of soil and rock. Spectrophotometry results showed that these four missions kicked up dust clouds on landing, which means that some of the dust particles must be smaller than about 0.02 mm. The rocks at all four sites showed fine layers, some layers were more reflective than others. Experiments on rocks at the Venera 13 and 14 sites found that they were porous and easily crushed (bearing maximum loads of 0.3 to 1 MPa)[note 2] these rocks may be weakly lithified sediments or volcanic tuff.[4]: 1709  Spectrometry found that the surface materials at the Venera 9, 10, 14 and Vega 1 and 2 landing had chemical compositions similar to tholeiitic basalts, while the Venera 8 and 13 sites chemically resembled alkaline basalts.[4]: 1707–1709 

Impact craters and age estimates of the surface

Radar image of Danilova crater in relief

Earth-based radar surveys made it possible to identify some topographic patterns related to craters, and the Venera 15 and Venera 16 probes identified almost 150 such features of probable impact origin. Global coverage from Magellan subsequently made it possible to identify nearly 900 impact craters.

Danilova, Aglaonice and Saskja craters

Compared to Mercury, the Moon and other such bodies, Venus has very few craters. In part, this is because Venus's dense atmosphere burns up smaller meteorites before they hit the surface.[11] The Venera and Magellan data are in agreement: there are very few impact craters with a diameter less than 30 kilometres (19 mi), and data from Magellan show an absence of any craters less than 2 kilometres (1.2 mi) in diameter. The small craters are irregular and appear in groups, thus pointing to the deceleration and the breakup of impactors.[11] However, there are also fewer of the large craters, and those appear relatively young; they are rarely filled with lava, showing that they were formed after volcanic activity in the area ceased, and radar data indicates that they are rough and have not had time to be eroded down.

Compared to the situation on bodies such as the Moon, it is more difficult to determine the ages of different areas of the surface on Venus, on the basis of crater counts, due to the small number of craters at hand.[12] However, the surface characteristics are consistent with a completely random distribution,[13] implying that the surface of the entire planet is roughly the same age, or at least that very large areas are not very different in age from the average.

Taken together, this evidence suggests that the surface of Venus is geologically young. The impact crater distribution appears to be most consistent with models that call for a near-complete resurfacing of the planet. Subsequent to this period of extreme activity, process rates declined and impact craters began to accumulate, with only minor modification and resurfacing since.

A young surface all created at the same time is a different situation compared with any of the other terrestrial planets.

Global resurfacing event

Age estimates based on crater counts indicate a young surface, in contrast to the much older surfaces of Mars, Mercury, and the Moon.[note 3] For this to be the case on a planet without crustal recycling by plate tectonics requires explanation. One hypothesis is that Venus underwent some sort of global resurfacing about 300–500 million years ago that erased the evidence of older craters.[14]

One possible explanation for this event is that it is part of a cyclic process on Venus. On Earth, plate tectonics allows heat to escape from the mantle by advection, the transport of mantle material to the surface and the return of old crust to the mantle. But Venus has no evidence of plate tectonics, so this theory states that the interior of the planet heats up (due to the decay of radioactive elements) until material in the mantle is hot enough to force its way to the surface.[15] The subsequent resurfacing event covers most or all of the planet with lava, until the mantle is cool enough for the process to start over.

Volcanoes

Main article: Volcanism on Venus
Radar image of pancake domes in Venus's Eistla region. The two larger ones are approximately 65 km (40 mi) wide and rise less than 1 km (0.62 mi) above the surrounding plain. These wide and fairly low, flat-topped volcanoes are a type of landform that is unique to Venus. They were probably formed by extrusions of highly viscous lava that was too sticky to flow very far down-slope from their vents.
Computer generated perspective view of pancake domes in Venus's Alpha Regio. The domes in this image are up to 750 m high and average 25 km in diameter.
Arachnoid surface feature on Venus

The surface of Venus is dominated by volcanism. Although Venus is superficially similar to Earth, it seems that the tectonic plates so active in Earth's geology do not exist on Venus. About 80% of the planet consists of a mosaic of volcanic lava plains, dotted with more than a hundred large isolated shield volcanoes, and many hundreds of smaller volcanoes and volcanic constructs such as coronae. These are geological features believed to be almost unique to Venus: huge, ring-shaped structures 100–300 kilometers (62–186 miles) across and rising hundreds of meters above the surface. The only other place they have been discovered is on Uranus's moon Miranda. It is believed that they are formed when plumes of rising hot material in the mantle push the crust upwards into a dome shape, which then collapses in the centre as the molten lava cools and leaks out at the sides, leaving a crown-like structure: the corona.

Differences can be seen in volcanic deposits. In many cases, volcanic activity is localized to a fixed source, and deposits are found in the vicinity of this source. This kind of volcanism is called "centralized volcanism," in that volcanoes and other geographic features form distinct regions. The second type of volcanic activity is not radial or centralized; flood basalts cover wide expanses of the surface, similar to features such as the Deccan Traps on Earth. These eruptions result in "flow type" volcanoes.

Volcanoes less than 20 kilometres (12 mi) in diameter are very abundant on Venus and they may number hundreds of thousands or even millions. Many appear as flattened domes or 'pancakes', thought to be formed in a similar way to shield volcanoes on Earth.[citation needed][note 4] These pancake dome volcanoes are fairly round features that are less than 1-kilometre (0.62 mi) in height and many times that in width. It is common to find groups of hundreds of these volcanoes in areas called shield fields. The domes of Venus are between 10 and 100 times larger than those formed on Earth. They are usually associated with "coronae" and tesserae. The pancakes are thought to be formed by highly viscous, silica-rich lava erupting under Venus's high atmospheric pressure. Domes called scalloped margin domes (commonly called ticks because they appear as domes with numerous legs), are thought to have undergone mass wasting events such as landslides on their margins. Sometimes deposits of debris can be seen scattered around them.

On Venus, volcanoes are mainly of the shield type.[citation needed] Nevertheless, the morphology of the shield volcanoes of Venus is different from shield volcanoes on Earth. On the Earth, shield volcanoes can be a few tens of kilometers wide and up to 10 kilometers high (6.2 mi) in the case of Mauna Kea, measured from the sea floor. On Venus, these volcanoes can cover hundreds of kilometers in area, but they are relatively flat, with an average height of 1.5 kilometres (0.93 mi).

Other unique features of Venus's surface are novae (radial networks of dikes or grabens) and arachnoids. A nova is formed when large quantities of magma are extruded onto the surface to form radiating ridges and trenches which are highly reflective to radar. These dikes form a symmetrical network around the central point where the lava emerged, where there may also be a depression caused by the collapse of the magma chamber.

Arachnoids are so named because they resemble a spider's web, featuring several concentric ovals surrounded by a complex network of radial fractures similar to those of a nova. It is not known whether the 250 or so features identified as arachnoids actually share a common origin, or are the result of different geological processes.

Tectonic activity

Despite the fact that Venus appears to have no global plate tectonic system as such, the planet's surface shows various features associated with local tectonic activity. Features such as faults, folds, and volcanoes are present there and may be driven largely by processes in the mantle.

The active volcanism of Venus has generated chains of folded mountains, rift valleys, and terrain known as tesserae, a word meaning "floor tiles" in Greek. Tesserae exhibit the effects of eons of compression and tensional deformation.

Unlike those on Earth, the deformations on Venus are directly related to regional dynamic forces within the planet's mantle. Gravitational studies suggest that Venus differs from Earth in lacking an asthenosphere—a layer of lower viscosity and mechanical weakness that allows Earth's crustal tectonic plates to move. The apparent absence of this layer on Venus suggests that the deformation of the Venusian surface must be explained by convective movements within the planet's mantle.

The tectonic deformations on Venus occur on a variety of scales, the smallest of which are related to linear fractures or faults. In many areas these faults appear as networks of parallel lines. Small, discontinuous mountain crests are found which resemble those on the Moon and Mars. The effects of extensive tectonism are shown by the presence of normal faults, where the crust has sunk in one area relative to the surrounding rock, and superficial fractures. Radar imaging shows that these types of deformation are concentrated in belts located in the equatorial zones and at high southern latitudes. These belts are hundreds of kilometers wide and appear to interconnect across the whole of the planet, forming a global network associated with the distribution of volcanoes.

The rifts of Venus, formed by the expansion of the lithosphere, are groups of depressions tens to hundreds of meters wide and extending up to 1,000 km (620 mi) in length. The rifts are mostly associated with large volcanic elevations in the form of domes, such as those at Beta Regio, Atla Regio and the western part of Eistla Regio. These highlands seem to be the result of enormous mantle plumes (rising currents of magma) which have caused elevation, fracturing, faulting, and volcanism.

The highest mountain chain on Venus, Maxwell Montes in Ishtar Terra, was formed by processes of compression, expansion, and lateral movement. Another type of geographical feature, found in the lowlands, consists of ridge belts elevated several meters above the surface, hundreds of kilometers wide and thousands of kilometers long. Two major concentrations of these belts exist: one in Lavinia Planitia near the southern pole, and the second adjacent to Atalanta Planitia near the northern pole.

Tesserae are found mainly in Aphrodite Terra, Alpha Regio, Tellus Regio and the eastern part of Ishtar Terra (Fortuna Tessera). These regions contain the superimposition and intersection of grabens of different geological units, indicating that these are the oldest parts of the planet. It was once thought that the tesserae were continents associated with tectonic plates like those of the Earth; in reality they are probably the result of floods of basaltic lava forming large plains, which were then subjected to intense tectonic fracturing.[4]

Magnetic field and internal structure

Cutaway diagram of possible internal structure

Venus's crust appears to be 70 kilometres (43 mi) thick, and composed of silicate rocks.[4]: 1729  Venus's mantle is approximately 2,840 kilometres (1,760 mi) thick, its chemical composition is probably similar to that of chondrites.[4]: 1729  Since Venus is a terrestrial planet, it is presumed to have a core made of semisolid iron and nickel with a radius of approximately 3,000 kilometres (1,900 mi).[citation needed]

The unavailability of seismic data from Venus severely limits what can be definitely known about the structure of the planet's mantle, but models of Earth's mantle have been modified to make predictions. It's expected that the uppermost mantle, from about 70 to 480 kilometres (43 to 298 mi) deep is mostly made of the mineral olivine. Descending through the mantle, the chemical composition remains largely the same but at somewhere between about 480 and 760 kilometres (300 and 470 mi), the increasing pressure causes the crystal structure of olivine to change to the more densely packed structure of spinel. Another transition occurs between 760 and 1,000 kilometres (470 and 620 mi) deep, where the material takes on the progressively more compact crystal structures of ilmenite and perovskite, and gradually becomes more like perovskite until the core boundary is reached.[4]: 1729–1730 

Venus is similar to Earth in size and density, and so probably also in bulk composition, but it does not have a significant magnetic field.[4]: 1729–1730  Earth's magnetic field is produced by what is known as the core dynamo, consisting of an electrically conducting liquid, the nickel-iron outer core that rotates and is convecting. Venus is expected to have an electrically conductive core of similar composition, and although its rotation period is very long (243.7 Earth days), simulations show that this is adequate to produce a dynamo.[16] This implies that Venus lacks convection in its outer core. Convection occurs when there is a large difference in temperature between the inner and outer part of the core, but since Venus has no plate tectonics to let off heat from the mantle, it is possible that outer core convection is being suppressed by a warm mantle. It's also possible that Venus may lack a solid inner core for the same reason, if the core is either too hot or is not under enough pressure to allow molten nickel-iron to freeze there.[4]: 1730 [note 5]

Lava flows and channels

Lava originating from Ammavaru caldera (300 km outside the image) overflowed the ridge left of center and pooled to its right.
An anastomosing 2-km-wide lava channel in Sedna Planitia

Lava flows on Venus are often much larger than Earth's, up to several hundred kilometers long and tens of kilometers wide. It is still unknown why these lava fields or lobate flows reach such sizes, but it is suggested that they are the result of very large eruptions of basaltic, low-viscosity lava spreading out to form wide, flat plains.[4]

On Earth, there are two known types of basaltic lava: ʻaʻa and pāhoehoe. ʻAʻa lava presents a rough texture in the shape of broken blocks (clinkers). Pāhoehoe lava is recognized by its pillowy or ropy appearance. Rough surfaces appear bright in radar images, which can be used to determine the differences between ʻaʻa and pāhoehoe lavas. These variations can also reflect differences in lava age and preservation. Channels and lava tubes (channels that have cooled down and over which a dome has formed) are very common on Venus. Two planetary astronomers from the University of Wollongong in Australia, Dr Graeme Melville and Prof. Bill Zealey, researched these lava tubes, using data supplied by NASA, over a number of years and concluded that they were widespread and up to ten times the size of those on the Earth. Melville and Zealey said that the gigantic size of the Venusian lava tubes (tens of meters wide and hundreds of kilometers long) may be explained by the very fluid lava flows together with the high temperatures on Venus, allowing the lava to cool slowly.

For the most part, lava flow fields are associated with volcanoes. The central volcanoes are surrounded by extensive flows that form the core of the volcano. They are also related to fissure craters, coronae, dense clusters of volcanic domes, cones, wells and channels.

Thanks to Magellan, more than 200 channels and valley complexes have been identified. The channels were classified as simple, complex, or compound. Simple channels are characterized by a single, long main channel. This category includes rills similar to those found on the Moon, and a new type, called canali, consisting of long, distinct channels which maintain their width throughout their entire course. The longest such channel identified (Baltis Vallis) has a length of more than 6,800 kilometres (4,200 mi), about one-sixth of the circumference of the planet.

Complex channels include anastomosed networks, in addition to distribution networks. This type of channel has been observed in association with several impact craters and important lava floods related to major lava flow fields. Compound channels are made of both simple and complex segments. The largest of these channels shows an anastomosed web and modified hills similar to those present on Mars.

Although the shape of these channels is highly suggestive of fluid erosion, there is no evidence that they were formed by water. In fact, there is no evidence of water anywhere on Venus in the last 600 million years. While the most popular theory for the channels' formation is that they are the result of thermal erosion by lava, there are other hypotheses, including that they were formed by heated fluids formed and ejected during impacts.

Surface processes

A map of Venus compiled from data recorded by NASA's Pioneer Venus Orbiter spacecraft beginning in 1978

Wind

Liquid water and ice are nonexistent on Venus, and thus the only agent of physical erosion to be found (apart from thermal erosion by lava flows) is wind. Wind tunnel experiments have shown that the density of the atmosphere allows the transport of sediments with even a small breeze.[17] Therefore, the seeming rarity of eolian land forms must have some other cause.[18] This implies that transportable sand-size particles are relatively scarce on the planet; which would be a result of very slow rates of mechanical erosion.[19]: p. 112  The process that is most important for the production of sediment on Venus may be crater-forming impact events, which is bolstered by the seeming association between impact craters and downwind eolian land forms.[20][21][22]

This process is manifest in the ejecta of impact craters expelled onto the surface of Venus. The material ejected during a meteorite impact is lifted to the atmosphere, where winds transport the material toward the west. As the material is deposited on the surface, it forms parabola-shaped patterns. This type of deposit can be established on top of various geologic features or lava flows. Therefore, these deposits are the youngest structures on the planet. Images from Magellan reveal the existence of more than 60 of these parabola-shaped deposits that are associated with crater impacts.

The ejection material, transported by the wind, is responsible for the process of renovation of the surface at speeds, according to the measurements of the Venera soundings, of approximately one metre per second. Given the density of the lower Venusian atmosphere, the winds are more than sufficient to provoke the erosion of the surface and the transportation of fine-grained material. In the regions covered by ejection deposits one may find wind lines, dunes, and yardangs. The wind lines are formed when the wind blows ejection material and volcanic ash, depositing it on top of topographic obstacles such as domes. As a consequence, the leeward sides of domes are exposed to the impact of small grains that remove the surface cap. Such processes expose the material beneath, which has a different roughness, and thus different characteristics under radar, compared to formed sediment.

The dunes are formed by the depositing of particulates that are the size of grains of sand and have wavy shapes. Yardangs are formed when the wind-transported material carves the fragile deposits and produces deep furrows.

The line-shaped patterns of wind associated with impact craters follow a trajectory in the direction of the equator. This tendency suggests the presence of a system of circulation of Hadley cells between medium latitudes and the equator. Magellan radar data confirm the existence of strong winds that blow toward the east in the upper surface of Venus, and meridional winds on the surface.

Chemical erosion

Chemical and mechanical erosion of the old lava flows is caused by reactions of the surface with the atmosphere in the presence of carbon dioxide and sulfur dioxide (see carbonate–silicate cycle for details). These two gases are the planet's first and third most abundant gases, respectively; the second most abundant gas is inert nitrogen. The reactions probably include the deterioration of silicates by carbon dioxide to produce carbonates and quartz, as well as the deterioration of silicates by sulfur dioxide to produce anhydrate calcium sulfate and quartz.

Ancient liquid water

NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies and others have postulated that Venus may have had a shallow ocean in the past for up to 2 billion years,[23][24][25][26][27] with as much water as Earth.[28] Depending on the parameters used in their theoretical model, the last liquid water could have evaporated as recently as 715 million years ago.[25] Currently, the only known water on Venus is in the form of a tiny amount of atmospheric vapor (20 ppm).[4][29] Hydrogen, a component of water, is still being lost to space today as detected by ESA's Venus Express spacecraft.[28]

See also

Notes

  1. ^ On Venus, for every kilometer of gain in elevation, the average temperature drops by about 8 K, so that the average temperature difference between the top of Maxwell Montes and the lowest basins is about 100 K. This dwarfs the average differences in temperature due to latitudes as well as the day-side and night-side temperature differences, both of which are hardly more than 2 K.[4]: 1707 
  2. ^ 0.3 MPa is about the amount of pressure exerted by water flowing out of a typical garden hose. 1 MPa is just under the pressure of the average human bite.[9][10]
  3. ^ Dating geological formations by crater counting is a long established and relatively inexpensive mainstay of planetary science. No rock from Venus has ever been dated using laboratory methods, as no meteorites from Venus are known and no spacecraft have ever returned samples from the planet to the Earth. The planet's considerable gravity and thick atmosphere mean this is unlikely to change in the near future.
  4. ^ But note the contrast: shield volcanism on Earth is associated with low viscosity lava, whereas Venusian domes are caused by very high viscosity, gummy lavas.
  5. ^ If there is no gradually freezing inner core, then there is no release of the latent heat of crystallization there to steepen the temperature gradient and increase convection.

References

  1. ^ Justin Filiberto; et al. (3 January 2020). "Present-day volcanism on Venus as evidenced from weathering rates of olivine". Science Advances. 6 (1): eaax7445. Bibcode:2020SciA....6.7445F. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aax7445. PMC 6941908. PMID 31922004.
  2. ^ de Pater, Imke; Lissauer, Jack J. (2001). Planetary Sciences (First ed.). Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0521482196.
  3. ^ a b Ivanov, Mikhail A.; Head, James W. (2010). Scientific Pamphlet, Geologic Map of the Lakshmi Planum Quadrangle (V–7), Venus (PDF). USGS. Retrieved 27 September 2016.
  4. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Basilevsky, A. T.; J. W. Head III (2003). "The surface of Venus" (PDF). Reports on Progress in Physics. 66 (10): 1699–1734. Bibcode:2003RPPh...66.1699B. doi:10.1088/0034-4885/66/10/R04. S2CID 250815558. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2006-03-27.
  5. ^ Zolotov, M.Y. (1991). "Pyrite Stability on the Surface of Venus". Abstracts of the Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. 22: 1569–1570. Bibcode:1991LPI....22.1569Z.
  6. ^ Fegley, Bruce (1997-08-01). "Why Pyrite Is Unstable on the Surface of Venus". Icarus. 128 (2): 474–479. Bibcode:1997Icar..128..474F. doi:10.1006/icar.1997.5744.
  7. ^ Shepard, Michael K.; Arvidson, Raymond E.; Brackett, Robert A.; Fegley, Bruce (1994-03-15). "A ferroelectric model for the low emissivity highlands on Venus". Geophysical Research Letters. 21 (6): 469–472. Bibcode:1994GeoRL..21..469S. doi:10.1029/94GL00392. ISSN 1944-8007.
  8. ^ Treiman, Allan; Harrington, Elise; Sharpton, Virgil (2016-12-01). "Venus' radar-bright highlands: Different signatures and materials on Ovda Regio and on Maxwell Montes". Icarus. MicroMars to MegaMars. 280: 172–182. Bibcode:2016Icar..280..172T. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2016.07.001.
  9. ^ "Wolfram-Alpha: Computational Knowledge Engine". wolframalpha.com.
  10. ^ "Wolfram-Alpha: Computational Knowledge Engine". wolframalpha.com.
  11. ^ a b Bougher, S. W.; Hunten, D. M.; Philips, R. J.; McKinnon, William B.; Zahnle, Kevin J.; Ivanov, Boris A.; Melosh, H. J. (1997). Venus II – Geology, Geophysics, Atmosphere, and Solar Wind Environment. Tucson: The University of Arizona Press. p. 969. ISBN 978-0-8165-1830-2.
  12. ^ Basilevsky, A. T.; Head, J. W.; Setyaeva, I. V. (1 September 2003). "Venus: Estimation of age of impact craters on the basis of degree of preservation of associated radar-dark deposits". Geophys. Res. Lett. 30 (18): 1950. Bibcode:2003GeoRL..30.1950B. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.556.5966. doi:10.1029/2003GL017504. S2CID 7746232.
  13. ^ Kreslavsky, Mikhail A.; Ivanov, Mikhail A.; Head, James W. (21 December 2014). "The resurfacing history of Venus: Constraints from buffered crater densities" (PDF). Icarus. 250: 438–450. Bibcode:2015Icar..250..438K. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2014.12.024. Retrieved 7 October 2016.
  14. ^ Strom, Robert G.; Schaber, Gerald G.; Dawson, Douglas D. (1994). "The global resurfacing of Venus". Journal of Geophysical Research. 99 (E5): 10899. Bibcode:1994JGR....9910899S. doi:10.1029/94JE00388.
  15. ^ Battaglia, Steven M. (March 2016). "Venus: Could Resurfacing Events be Triggered by Sun's Oscillations through the Galactic Mid-Plane?" (PDF). The 47th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference.
  16. ^ Stevenson, David J. (15 March 2003). "Planetary magnetic fields" (PDF). Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 208 (1–2): 1–11. Bibcode:2003E&PSL.208....1S. doi:10.1016/S0012-821X(02)01126-3.
  17. ^ Greeley, R.; et al. (1984). "Windblown sand on Venus". Icarus. 57: 112–124. doi:10.1016/0019-1035(84)90013-7; cited in Craddock, Robert A. (2012). "Aeolian processes on the terrestrial planets: Recent observations and future focus". Progress in Physical Geography. 36: 110–124 [111]. doi:10.1177/0309133311425399. hdl:10088/17607. S2CID 129491924.
  18. ^ Greeley, R.; et al. (1984). "Windblown sand on Venus". Icarus. 57: 112–124. doi:10.1016/0019-1035(84)90013-7; cited in Craddock, Robert A. (2012). "Aeolian processes on the terrestrial planets: Recent observations and future focus". Progress in Physical Geography. 36: 110–124 [112]. doi:10.1177/0309133311425399. hdl:10088/17607. S2CID 129491924.
  19. ^ Craddock, Robert A. (2011). "Aeolian processes on the terrestrial planets: Recent observations and future focus". Progress in Physical Geography. 36 (1): 110–124. doi:10.1177/0309133311425399. S2CID 129491924.
  20. ^ Greeley, R., et al., Aeolian features on Venus: Preliminary Magellan results. Journal of Geophysical Research 97(E8): 13319–13345. 1992.; cited in Craddock, Robert A. (2012). "Aeolian processes on the terrestrial planets: Recent observations and future focus" (PDF). Progress in Physical Geography. 36: 110–124 [112]. doi:10.1177/0309133311425399. S2CID 129491924.
  21. ^ Greeley, R., et al., 1995 Wind-related features and processes on Venus: Summary of Magellan results. Icarus 115: 399–420.; cited in Craddock, Robert A. (2012). "Aeolian processes on the terrestrial planets: Recent observations and future focus" (PDF). Progress in Physical Geography. 36: 110–124 [112]. doi:10.1177/0309133311425399. S2CID 129491924.
  22. ^ Weitz, CM, in Ford, et al. (eds). Surface modification processes. In: Guide to Magellan Image Interpretation. Pasadena, CA: NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory. NASA-CR-194340 JPL Publication 93-24: 57–73. 1993.; cited in Craddock, Robert A. (2012). "Aeolian processes on the terrestrial planets: Recent observations and future focus" (PDF). Progress in Physical Geography. 36: 110–124 [112]. doi:10.1177/0309133311425399. S2CID 129491924.
  23. ^ Hashimoto, G. L.; Roos-Serote, M.; Sugita, S.; Gilmore, M. S.; Kamp, L. W.; Carlson, R. W.; Baines, K. H. (2008). "Felsic highland crust on Venus suggested by Galileo Near-Infrared Mapping Spectrometer data". Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets. 113 (E9): E00B24. Bibcode:2008JGRE..113.0B24H. doi:10.1029/2008JE003134.
  24. ^ David Shiga (10 October 2007). "Did Venus's ancient oceans incubate life?". New Scientist.
  25. ^ a b Michael J. Way; et al. (26 August 2016). "Was Venus the First Habitable World of our Solar System?". Geophysical Research Letters. 43 (16): 8376–8383. arXiv:1608.00706. Bibcode:2016GeoRL..43.8376W. doi:10.1002/2016GL069790. PMC 5385710. PMID 28408771.
  26. ^ Michael Cabbage and Leslie McCarthy (11 August 2016). "NASA climate modeling suggests Venus may have been habitable". NASA. Retrieved 19 November 2016.
  27. ^ Shannon Hall (10 August 2016). "Hellish Venus Might Have Been Habitable for Billions of Years". Scientific American. Retrieved 19 November 2016.
  28. ^ a b "Where did Venus's water go?". European Space Agency. 18 December 2008. Retrieved 19 November 2016.
  29. ^ Bertaux, Jean-Loup; Vandaele, Ann-Carine; Korablev, Oleg; Villard, E.; Fedorova, A.; Fussen, D.; Quémerais, E.; Belyaev, D.; et al. (2007). "A warm layer in Venus' cryosphere and high-altitude measurements of HF, HCl, H2O and HDO" (PDF). Nature. 450 (7170): 646–649. Bibcode:2007Natur.450..646B. doi:10.1038/nature05974. PMID 18046397. S2CID 4421875.

Resources available online

Publications

  • The Face of Venus. The Magellan Radar Mapping Mission, by Ladislav E. Roth and Stephen D. Wall. NASA Special Publication, Washington, D.C. June 1995 (SP-520).
  • Surface Modification on Venus as Inferred from Magellan Observations on Plains, by R. E. Ardvison, R. Greeley, M. C. Malin, R. S. Saunders, N. R. Izenberg, J. J. Plaut, E. R. Stofan, and M. K. Shepard. Geophisics Research 97, 13.303. (1992)
  • The Magellan Imaging Radar Mission to Venus, by W. T. K. Johnson. Proc. IEEE 79, 777. (1991)
  • Planetary Landscapes, 3rd Edition, by R. Greeley. Chapman & Hall. (1994)
  • Venus – the geological story, 1st edition, by Peter Cattermole.UCL Press. (1994).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Geology_of_Venus&oldid=1180651835"