Jump to content

Perovskite solar cell

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Yobot (talk | contribs) at 10:06, 26 November 2016 (→Hysteretic current-voltage behavior: WP:CHECKWIKI error fixes using AWB). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

A perovskite solar cell is a type of solar cell which includes a perovskite structured compound, most commonly a hybrid organic-inorganic lead or tin halide-based material, as the light-harvesting active layer.[1] Perovskite materials such as methylammonium lead halides are cheap to produce and simple to manufacture.

Solar cell efficiencies of devices using these materials have increased from 3.8% in 2009[2] to 22.1% in early 2016,[3] making this the fastest-advancing solar technology to date.[1] With the potential of achieving even higher efficiencies and the very low production costs, perovskite solar cells have become commercially attractive, with start-up companies already promising modules on the market by 2017.[4][5]

Features

The performance of metal halide perovskite solar cells has made rapid increases in energy conversion efficiency, improving from under 4% efficiency in 2010 to a record efficiency of 22% in 2016. Because of the high absorption coefficient, a thickness of only about 500 nm is needed to absorb solar energy. In July 2015 major hurdles were that the largest perovskite solar cell was only the size of a fingernail and that they degraded quickly in moist environments.[6]

Materials

Crystal structure of CH3NH3PbX3 perovskites (X=I, Br and/or Cl). The methylammonium cation (CH3NH3+) is surrounded by PbX6 octahedra.[7]

The name 'perovskite solar cell' is derived from the ABX3 crystal structure of the absorber materials, which is referred to as perovskite structure. The most commonly studied perovskite absorber is methylammonium lead trihalide (CH3NH3PbX3, where X is a halogen atom such as iodine, bromine or chlorine), with an optical bandgap between 1.5 and 2.3 eV depending on halide content. Formamidinum lead trihalide (H2NCHNH2PbX3) has also shown promise, with bandgaps between 1.5 and 2.2 eV. The minimum bandgap is closer to the optimal for a single-junction cell than methylammonium lead trihalide, so it should be capable of higher efficiencies.[8] A common concern is the inclusion of lead as component of the perovskite materials; solar cells based on tin-based perovskite absorbers such as CH3NH3SnI3 have also been reported with lower power-conversion efficiencies.[9][10][11]

In another, recent development solar cells based on transition metal oxide perovskites and heterostructures thereof such as LaVO3/SrTiO3 are studied.[12][13]

Processing

Perovskite solar cells hold an advantage over traditional silicon solar cells in the simplicity of their processing. Traditional silicon cells require expensive, multistep processes, conducted at high temperatures (>1000 °C) in a high vacuum in special clean room facilities.[14] Meanwhile, the organic-inorganic perovskite material can be manufactured with simpler wet chemistry techniques in a traditional lab environment. Most notably, methylammonium and formamidinium lead trihalides have been created using a variety of solvent techniques and vapor deposition techniques, both of which have the potential to be scaled up with relative feasibility.[15][16]

In one-step solution processing, a lead halide and a methylammonium halide can be dissolved in a solvent and spin coated onto a substrate. Subsequent evaporation and convective self-assembly during spinning results in dense layers of well crystallized perovskite material, due to the strong ionic interactions within the material (The organic component also contributes to a lower crystallization temperature). However, simple spin-coating does not yield homogenous layers, instead requiring the addition of other chemicals such as GBL, DMSO, and toluene drips.[17] Simple solution processing results in the presence of voids, platelets, and other defects in the layer, which would hinder the efficiency of a solar cell. Recently, a new approach[18] for forming the PbI2 nanostructure and the use of high CH3NH3I concentration which are adopted to form high quality (large crystal size and smooth) perovskite film with better photovoltaic performances. On one hand, self-assembled porous PbI2 is formed by incorporating small amount of rationally chosen additives into the PbI2 precursor solutions, which significantly facilitate the conversion of perovskite without any PbI2 residue. On the other hand, through employing a relatively high CH3NH3I concentration, a firmly crystallized and uniform CH3NH3PbI3 film is formed. Another technique using room temperature solvent-solvent extraction produces high-quality crystalline films with precise control over thickness down to 20 nanometers across areas several centimeters square without generating pinholes. In this method "perovskite precursors are dissolved in a solvent called NMP and coated onto a substrate. Then, instead of heating, the substrate is bathed in diethyl ether, a second solvent that selectively grabs the NMP solvent and whisks it away. What's left is an ultra-smooth film of perovskite crystals."[19] In another solution processed method, the mixture of lead iodide and methylammonium halide dissolved in DMF is preheated. Then the mixture is spin coated on a substrate maintained at higher temperature. This method produces uniform films of up to 1 mm grain size.[20]

In vapor assisted techniques, spin coated or exfoliated lead halide is annealed in the presence of methylammonium iodide vapor at a temperature of around 150 °C.[21] This technique holds an advantage over solution processing, as it opens up the possibility for multi-stacked thin films over larger areas.[22] This could be applicable for the production of multi-junction cells. Additionally, vapor deposited techniques result in less thickness variation than simple solution processed layers. However, both techniques can result in planar thin film layers or for use in mesoscopic designs, such as coatings on a metal oxide scaffold. Such a design is common for current perovskite or dye-sensitized solar cells.

Both processes hold promise in terms of scalability. Process cost and complexity is significantly less than that of silicon solar cells. Vapor deposition or vapor assisted techniques reduce the need for use of further solvents, which reduces the risk of solvent remnants. Solution processing is cheaper. Current issues with perovskite solar cells revolve around stability, as the material is observed to degrade in standard environmental conditions, suffering drops in efficiency (See also Stability).

Physics

An important characteristic of the most commonly used perovskite system, the methylammonium lead halides, is a bandgap controllable by the halide content.[8][23] The materials also display a diffusion length for both holes and electrons of over one micron.[24][25] The long diffusion length means that these materials can function effectively in a thin-film architecture, and that charges can be transported in the perovskite itself over long distances. It has recently been reported that charges in the perovskite material are predominantly present as free electrons and holes, rather than as bound excitons, since the exciton binding energy is low enough to enable charge separation at room temperature.[26]

Estimating the efficiency limit

Since perovskite bandgaps are tunable and can be optimised for the solar spectrum, these cells are able to attain the Shockley–Queisser limit radiative efficiency limit, also known as the detailed balance limit,[27][28] which is about 31% under an AM1.5G solar spectrum at 1000W/m2, for a Perovskite bandgap of 1.55 eV. This is smaller than the radiative limit of gallium arsenide of bandgap 1.42 eV which can reach a radiative efficiency of 33%.

According to the detailed balance model by Shockley and Queisser, the maximal output power of a solar cell can be achieved if the following set of hypotheses are fulfilled:

(1) Carrier populations obey Maxwell–Boltzmann statistics. Particularly, the quasi-Fermi levels of electrons and holes are uniformly split through the cell and the split equals the applied voltage. The assumption is reasonable if mobility of photocarriers (electrons and holes) are sufficiently large. Regarding perovskite materials, charge carrier mobility as high as 10 cm2 V−1 s−1 has been observed.

(2) Radiative band-to-band (monomolecular) recombination mechanism is the only one existing. Nonradiative recombination, such as Auger recombination, trap (defect) assisted recombination, etc., are ignorable. Different from silicon with an indirect bandgap, perovskite material has a direct band gap.[citation needed] Therefore, Auger recombination is sufficiently suppressed, which has been verified in recent experimental results.[citation needed] Moreover, light emission from perovskite solar cells is dominated by a sharp band-to-band transition that has a radiative efficiency much higher than that of organic solar cells.

(3) Internal conversion efficiency reaches 100%. When one photon is absorbed, it produces one electron-hole pair; and when one electron-hole pair recombines, it produces one photon. For perovskite solar cells, the internal quantum efficiency approaches 100%.[29]

(4) Photon recycling effect occurs in the cell. Although a photon will be created by one electron-hole pair recombination during the radiative recombination process, the photon can be reabsorbed at a different spatial location in the cell, which creates a new electron-hole pair. Designs of light trapping and angular restriction can improve the photon reabsorption process and thus maximize solar cell efficiency. For perovskite solar cells, the existence of a photon recycling effect is still unclear.

To analyze the efficiency limit of CH3NH3PbI3 solar cells, the detailed balance model [27][28] is given by

where is the applied voltage of the solar cell system. is the photocurrent (photogenerated current) due to absorption of incident sunlight. and describe current density losses due to the radiative emission and trap-assisted nonradiative recombination, respectively.

The photogenerated current is given by

where is the speed of light in free space, is the global AM1.5G spectrum of Sun (W•m-2•nm-1), is the wavelength and is the elementary charge. The absorptivity depends on light-trapping and angular-restriction designs.

According to Maxwell–Boltzmann statistics, the radiative current density is expressed as

where is the Boltzmann constant and is the Kelvin temperature. The above is the same as Shockley’s diode equation but the dark current should be represented with the aid of the black-body radiation law. Solar cells absorb photon energy and randomly generate electron-hole pairs, which are the physical original of dark current. Meanwhile, photons are emitted immediately after electrons and holes recombine with each other. Under thermal equilibrium condition, the quantity of absorbed photons should be balanced with that of emitted photons. Finally, the dark current is formulated as

The dark current shows a similar mathematical expression to the photocurrent except the sun spectrum should be replaced by the black-body (thermal) emission spectrum of solar cell .

For perovskite solar cells, the dominant nonradiative recombination process is the bimolecular (or Shockley-Read-Hall) recombination. Therefore, the nonradiative current can be expressed as

where is the monomolecular (recombination) rate, is the intrinsic carrier density, and is the cell thickness.

A MATLAB program for implementing the detailed balance model can be found at.[28]

Along with analytical calculations, there have been many first principle studies to find the characteristics of the perovskite material, numerically. These include but not limited to bandgap, effective mass, and defect levels for different perovskite materials.[30][31][32][33] Also there have some efforts to cast light on the device mechanism based on simulations where Agrawal et al.[34] suggests a modeling framework,[35] presents analysis of near ideal efficiency, and [36] talks about the importance of interface of perovskite and hole/electron transport layers. However, Sun et al.[37] tries to come up with a compact model for perovskite different structures based on experimental transport data.

Architectures

Schematic of a sensitized perovskite solar cell in which the active layer consist of a layer of mesoporous TiO2 which is coated with the perovskite absorber. The active layer is contacted with an n-type material for electron extraction and a p-type material for hole extraction. b) Schematic of a thin-film perovskite solar cell. In this architecture in which just a flat layer of perovskite is sandwiched between to selective contacts. c) Charge generation and extraction in the sensitized architecture. After light absorption in the perovskite absorber the photogenerated electron is injected into the mesoporous TiO2 through which it is extracted. The concomitantly generated hole is transferred to the p-type material. d) Charge generation and extraction in the thin-film architecture. After light absorption both charge generation as well as charge extraction occurs in the perovskite layer.

Perovskite solar cells function efficiently in a number of somewhat different architectures depending either on the role of the perovskite material in the device, or the nature of the top and bottom electrode. Devices in which positive charges are extracted by the transparent bottom electrode (cathode), can predominantly be divided into 'sensitized', where the perovskite functions mainly as a light absorber, and charge transport occurs in other materials, or 'thin-film', where most electron or hole transport occurs in the bulk of the perovskite itself. Similar to the sensitization in dye-sensitized solar cells, the perovskite material is coated onto a charge-conducting mesoporous scaffold – most commonly TiO2 – as light-absorber. The photogenerated electrons are transferred from the perovskite layer to the mesoporous sensitized layer through which they are transported to the electrode and extracted into the circuit. The thin film solar cell architecture is based on the finding that perovskite materials can also act as highly efficient, ambipolar charge-conductor.[24] After light absorption and the subsequent charge-generation, both negative and positive charge carrier are transported through the perovskite to charge selective contacts. Perovskite solar cells emerged from the field of dye-sensitized solar cells, so the sensitized architecture was that initially used, but over time it has become apparent that they function well, if not ultimately better, in a thin-film architecture.[38] More recently, some researchers also successfully demonstrated the possibility of fabricating flexible devices with perovskites,[39][40][41] which makes it more promising for flexible energy demand. Certainly, the aspect of UV-induced degradation in the sensitized architecture may be detrimental for the important aspect of long-term stability.

There is another different class of architectures, in which the transparent electrode at the bottom acts as cathode by collecting the photogenerated p-type charge carriers.[42]

History

These perovskite materials have been well known for many years, but the first incorporation into a solar cell was reported by Miyasaka et al. in 2009.[2] This was based on a dye-sensitized solar cell architecture, and generated only 3.8% power conversion efficiency (PCE) with a thin layer of perovskite on mesoporous TiO2 as electron-collector. Moreover, because a liquid corrosive electrolyte was used, the cell was only stable for a matter of minutes. Park et al. improved upon this in 2011, using the same dye-sensitized concept, achieving 6.5% PCE.[43]

A breakthrough came in 2012, when Henry Snaith and Mike Lee from the University of Oxford realised that the perovskite was stable if contacted with a solid-state hole transporter such as spiro-OMeTAD and did not require the mesoporous TiO2 layer in order to transport electrons.[44][45] They showed that efficiencies of almost 10% were achievable using the 'sensitized' TiO2 architecture with the solid-state hole transporter, but higher efficiencies, above 10%, were attained by replacing it with an inert scaffold.[46] Further experiments in replacing the mesoporous TiO2 with Al2O3 resulted in increased open-circuit voltage and a relative improvement in efficiency of 3–5% more than those with TiO2 scaffolds.[22] This led to the hypothesis that a scaffold is not needed for electron extraction, which was later proved correct. This realisation was then closely followed by a demonstration that the perovskite itself could also transport holes, as well as electrons.[47] A thin-film perovskite solar cell, with no mesoporous scaffold, of > 10% efficiency was achieved.[38][48][49]

In 2013 both the planar and sensitized architectures saw a number of developments. Burschka et al. demonstrated a deposition technique for the sensitized architecture exceeding 15% efficiency by a two-step solution processing,[50] and at a similar time Liu et al. showed that it was possible to fabricate planar solar cells by thermal evaporation, also achieving more than 15% efficiency.[51][52] Docampo et al. also showed that it was possible to fabricate perovskite solar cells in the typical 'organic solar cell' architecture, an 'inverted' configuration with the hole transporter below and the electron collector above the perovskite planar film.[53]

A range of new deposition techniques and even higher efficiencies were reported in 2014. A reverse-scan efficiency of 19.3% was claimed by Yang Yang at UCLA using the planar thin-film architecture.[54] In November 2014, a device by researchers from KRICT achieved a record with the certification of a non-stabilized efficiency of 20.1%.[3]

In December 2015, a new record efficiency of 21.0% was achieved by researchers at EPFL.[3]

As of March 2016, researchers from KRICT and UNIST hold the highest certified record for a single-junction perovskite solar cell with 22.1%.[3]

Stability

One big challenge for perovskite solar cells (PSCs) is the aspect of short-term and long-term stability. The instability of PSCs is mainly related to environmental influence (moisture and oxygen), thermal influence (temperature and intrinsic heating under applied voltage) and photo influence (Ultraviolet light).[55] There are several studies about PSCs stability have been performed lately, and some elements were proved to be important to the PSCs stability.[56][57] However, there are no standard stability protocol for PSCs.[55]

The water-solubility of the organic constituent of the absorber material make devices highly prone to rapid degradation in moist environments.[58] The degradation which is caused by moisture can be reduced by optimizing the constituent materials, the architecture of the cell, the interfaces and the environment conditions during the fabrication steps.[55] Encapsulating the perovskite absorber with a composite of carbon nanotubes and an inert polymer matrix has been demonstrated to successfully prevent the immediate degradation of the material when exposed to moist ambient air at elevated temperatures.[58][59] However, no long term studies and comprehensive encapsulation techniques have yet been demonstrated for perovskite solar cells. Beside moisture instability, it has also been shown that the embodiment of devices in which a mesoporous TiO2 layer is sensitized with the perovskite absorber exhibits UV light induced instability.[60] The cause for the observed decline in device performance of those solar cells is linked to the interaction between photogenerated holes inside the TiO2 and oxygen radicals on the surface of TiO2.[60] The measured ultra low thermal conductivity of 0.5 W/(Km) at room temperature in CH3NH3PbI3 can prevent fast propagation of the light deposited heat, and keep the cell resistive on thermal stresses that can reduce its life time.[61] The PbI2 residue in perovskite film has been experimentally demonstrated to have a negative effect on the long-term stability of devices.[18] The stabilization problem is claimed to be solved by replacing the organic transport layer with a metal oxide layer, allowing the cell to retain 90% capacity after 60 days.[41][62] Besides, the two instabilities issues can be solved by using multifunctional fluorinated photopolymer coatings that confer luminescent and easy-cleaning features on the front side of the devices, while concurrently forming a strongly hydrophobic barrier toward environmental moisture on the back contact side.[63] The front coating can prevent the UV light of the whole incident solar spectrum from negatively interacting with the PSC stack by converting it into visible light, and the back layer can prevent water from permeation within the solar cell stack. The resulting devices demonstrated excellent stability in terms of power conversion efficiencies during a 180-day aging test in the lab and a real outdoor condition test for more than 3 months.[63]

Hysteretic current-voltage behavior

Another major challenge for perovskite solar cells is the observation that current-voltage scans yield ambiguous efficiency values.[64][65] The power-conversion efficiency of a solar cell is usually determined by characterizing its current-voltage (IV) behavior under simulated solar illumination. In contrast to other solar cells, however, it has been observed that the IV-curves of perovskite solar cells show a hysteretic behavior: depending on scanning conditions – such as scan direction, scan speed, light soaking, biasing – there is a discrepancy between the scan from forward-bias to short-circuit (FB-SC) and the scan from short-circuit to forward bias (SC-FB).[64] Various causes have been proposed such as ion movement, polarization, ferroelectric effects, filling of trap states,[65] however, the exact origin for the hysteretic behavior is yet to be determined. But it appears that determining the solar cell efficiency from IV-curves risks producing inflated values if the scanning parameters exceed the time-scale which the perovskite system requires in order to reach an electronic steady-state. Two possible solutions have been proposed: Unger et al. show that extremely slow voltage-scans allow the system to settle into steady-state conditions at every measurement point which thus eliminates any discrepancy between the FB-SC and the SC-FB scan.[65] Henry Snaith et al. have proposed 'stabilized power output' as a metric for the efficiency of a solar cell. This value is determined by holding the tested device at a constant voltage around the maximum power-point (where the product of voltage and photocurrent reaches its maximum value) and track the power-output until it reaches a constant value. Both methods have been demonstrated to yield lower efficiency values when compared to efficiencies determined by fast IV-scans.[64][65] However, initial studies have been published that show that surface passivation of the perovskite absorber is an avenue with which efficiency values can be stabilized very close to fast-scan efficiencies.[66][67] Initial reports suggest that in the 'inverted architecture', which has a transparent cathode, little to no hysteresis is observed.[42] This suggests that the interfaces might play a crucial role with regards to the hysteretic IV behavior since the major difference of the inverted architecture to the regular architectures is that an organic n-type contact is used instead of a metal oxide.

The observation of hysteretic current-voltage characteristics has thus far been largely underreported. Only a small fraction of publications acknowledge the hysteretic behavior of the described devices, even fewer articles show slow non-hysteretic IV curves or stabilized power outputs. Reported efficiencies, based on rapid IV-scans, have to be considered fairly unreliable and make it currently difficult to genuinely assess the progress of the field.

The ambiguity in determining the solar cell efficiency from current-voltage characteristics due to the observed hysteresis has also affected the certification process done by accredited laboratories such as NREL. The record efficiency of 20.1% for perovskite solar cells accepted as certified value by NREL in November 2014, has been classified as 'not stabilized'.[3] To be able to compare results from different institution, it is necessary to agree on a reliable measurement protocol, as it has been proposed by [68] including the corresponding Matlab code which can be found at GitHub.[69]

Perovskite in tandem cells

A perovskite cell combined with bottom cell such as Si or copper indium gallium selenide (CIGS) as a tandem design can suppress individual cell bottlenecks and take advantage of the complementary characteristics to enhance the efficiency. For example, Using a four terminal configuration in which the two sub-cells are electrically isolated, Bailie et al.[70] obtained a 17% and 18.6% efficient tandem cell with mc-Si (η ~ 11%) and copper indium gallium selenide (CIGS, η ~ 17%) bottom cells, respectively. A 13.4% efficient tandem cell with a highly efficient a-Si:H/c-Si heterojunction bottom cell using the same configuration was obtained.[71] Mailoa et al. used a c-Si bottom cell in a two terminal tandem design to demonstrate a 13.7% cell.[72]

There have been some efforts to predict the theoretical limits for these traditional tandem designs using perovskite as top cell of c-Si[73] or a-Si/c-Si heterojunction bottom cell.[74] Also to show that even further output power enhancement is possible; a bifacial structure has been studied. It was concluded that by a practical albido reflection 8% extra output power can be extracted from the bifacial structure.[75]

In May 2016, IMEC and its partner Solliance announced a tandem structure with a semi-transparent perovskite cell stacked on top of a back-contacted silicon cell.[76] A combined power conversion efficiency of 20.2% was claimed, with the potential to exceed 30%.

See also

References

  1. ^ a b Collavini, S., Völker, S. F. and Delgado, J. L. (2015). "Understanding the Outstanding Power Conversion Efficiency of Perovskite-Based Solar Cells". Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 54 (34): 9757–9759. doi:10.1002/anie.201505321.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  2. ^ a b Kojima, Akihiro; Teshima, Kenjiro; Shirai, Yasuo; Miyasaka, Tsutomu (May 6, 2009). "Organometal Halide Perovskites as Visible-Light Sensitizers for Photovoltaic Cells". Journal of the American Chemical Society. 131 (17): 6050–6051. doi:10.1021/ja809598r. PMID 19366264.
  3. ^ a b c d e "NREL efficiency chart".
  4. ^ Oxford Photovoltaics (June 10, 2013) Oxford PV reveals breakthrough in efficiency of new class of solar cell
  5. ^ Wang, Ucilia (September 28, 2014). "Perovskite Offers Shot at Cheaper Solar Energy". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved May 7, 2015.(registration required)
  6. ^ Sivaram, Varun; Stranks, Samuel D.; Snaith, Henry J. "Outshining Silicon". Scientific American (July 2015): 44–46.
  7. ^ Eames, Christopher; Frost, Jarvist M.; Barnes, Piers R. F.; o'Regan, Brian C.; Walsh, Aron; Islam, M. Saiful (2015). "Ionic transport in hybrid lead iodide perovskite solar cells". Nature Communications. 6: 7497. doi:10.1038/ncomms8497. PMC 4491179. PMID 26105623.
  8. ^ a b Eperon, Giles E.; Stranks, Samuel D.; Menelaou, Christopher; Johnston, Michael B.; Herz, Laura M.; Snaith, Henry J. (2014). "Formamidinium lead trihalide: a broadly tunable perovskite for efficient planar heterojunction solar cells". Energy & Environmental Science. 7 (3): 982. doi:10.1039/C3EE43822H.
  9. ^ Noel, Nakita K.; Stranks, Samuel D.; Abate, Antonio; Wehrenfennig, Christian; Guarnera, Simone; Haghighirad, Amir-Abbas; Sadhanala, Aditya; Eperon, Giles E.; Pathak, Sandeep K.; Johnston, Michael B.; Petrozza, Annamaria; Herz, Laura M.; Snaith, Henry J. (May 1, 2014). "Lead-free organic–inorganic tin halide perovskites for photovoltaic applications". Energy & Environmental Science. 7 (9): 3061. doi:10.1039/C4EE01076K.
  10. ^ Wilcox, Kevin (May 13, 2014). "Solar Researchers Find Promise in Tin Perovskite Line". Civil Engineering. Archived from the original on October 6, 2014. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  11. ^ Meehan, Chris (May 5, 2014). "Getting the lead out of Perovskite Solar Cells". Solar Reviews.
  12. ^ Elias Assmann; Peter Blaha; Robert Laskowski; Karsten Held; Satoshi Okamoto; Giorgio Sangiovanni (2013). "Oxide Heterostructures for Efficient Solar Cells". Phys. Rev. Lett. 110: 078701. arXiv:1301.1314. Bibcode:2013PhRvL.110g8701A. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.078701. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |last-author-amp= ignored (|name-list-style= suggested) (help)
  13. ^ Lingfei Wang; Yongfeng Li; Ashok Bera; Chun Ma; Feng Jin; Kaidi Yuan; Wanjian Yin; Adrian David; Wei Chen; Wenbin Wu; Wilfrid Prellier; Suhuai Wei; Tom Wu (2015). "Device Performance of the Mott Insulator LaVO3 as a Photovoltaic Material". Physical Review Applied. 3: 064015. Bibcode:2015PhRvP...3f4015W. doi:10.1103/PhysRevApplied.3.064015. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |last-author-amp= ignored (|name-list-style= suggested) (help)
  14. ^ Is Perovskite the Future of Solar Cells?. engineering.com. December 6, 2013
  15. ^ Saidaminov, Makhsud I.; Abdelhady, Ahmed L.; Murali, Banavoth; Alarousu, Erkki; Burlakov, Victor M.; Peng, Wei; Dursun, Ibrahim; Wang, Lingfei; He, Yao; MacUlan, Giacomo; Goriely, Alain; Wu, Tom; Mohammed, Omar F.; Bakr, Osman M. (2015). "High-quality bulk hybrid perovskite single crystals within minutes by inverse temperature crystallization". Nature Communications. 6: 7586. doi:10.1038/ncomms8586. PMC 4544059. PMID 26145157.
  16. ^ Snaith, Henry J. (2013). "Perovskites: The Emergence of a New Era for Low-Cost, High-Efficiency Solar Cells". The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters. 4 (21): 3623–3630. doi:10.1021/jz4020162.
  17. ^ Jeon, Nam Joong; Noh, Jun Hong; Kim, Young Chan; Yang, Woon Seok; Ryu, Seungchan; Seok, Sang Il (2014). "Solvent engineering for high-performance inorganic–organic hybrid perovskite solar cells". Nature Materials. 13 (9): 897–903. doi:10.1038/nmat4014. PMID 24997740.
  18. ^ a b ZHANG, Hong; Choy, C.H.Wallace (2015). "A Smooth CH3NH3PbI3 Film via a New Approach for Forming the PbI2 Nanostructure Together with Strategically High CH3NH3I Concentration for High Efficient Planar-Heterojunction Solar Cells". Adv. Energy Mater. 5. doi:10.1002/aenm.201501354.
  19. ^ Zhou, Yuanyuan; Yang, Mengjin; Wu, Wenwen; Vasiliev, Alexander L.; Zhu, Kai; Padture, Nitin P. (2015). "Room-temperature crystallization of hybrid-perovskite thin films via solvent–solvent extraction for high-performance solar cells". J. Mater. Chem. A. 3 (15): 8178–8184. doi:10.1039/C5TA00477B.
  20. ^ Nie, Wanyi; Tsai, Hsinhan; Asadpour, Reza; Blancon, Jean-Christophe; Neukirch, Amanda J.; Gupta, Gautam; Crochet, Jared J.; Chhowalla, Manish; Tretiak, Sergei (January 30, 2015). "High-efficiency solution-processed perovskite solar cells with millimeter-scale grains". Science. 347 (6221): 522–525. doi:10.1126/science.aaa0472. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 25635093.
  21. ^ Chen, Qi; Zhou, Huanping; Hong, Ziruo; Luo, Song; Duan, Hsin-Sheng; Wang, Hsin-Hua; Liu, Yongsheng; Li, Gang; Yang, Yang (2014). "Planar Heterojunction Perovskite Solar Cells via Vapor-Assisted Solution Process". Journal of the American Chemical Society. 136 (2): 622–5. doi:10.1021/ja411509g. PMID 24359486.
  22. ^ a b Liu, Mingzhen; Johnston, Michael B.; Snaith, Henry J. (2013). "Efficient planar heterojunction perovskite solar cells by vapour deposition". Nature. 501 (7467): 395–8. doi:10.1038/nature12509. PMID 24025775.
  23. ^ Noh, Jun Hong; Im, Sang Hyuk; Heo, Jin Hyuck; Mandal, Tarak N.; Seok, Sang Il (March 21, 2013). "Chemical Management for Colorful, Efficient, and Stable Inorganic–Organic Hybrid Nanostructured Solar Cells". Nano Letters. 13 (4): 130321112645008. doi:10.1021/nl400349b.
  24. ^ a b Stranks, S. D.; Eperon, G. E.; Grancini, G.; Menelaou, C.; Alcocer, M. J. P.; Leijtens, T.; Herz, L. M.; Petrozza, A.; Snaith, H. J. (October 17, 2013). "Electron-Hole Diffusion Lengths Exceeding 1 Micrometer in an Organometal Trihalide Perovskite Absorber". Science. 342 (6156): 341–344. doi:10.1126/science.1243982. PMID 24136964. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |displayauthors= ignored (|display-authors= suggested) (help)
  25. ^ "Oxford Researchers Creating Simpler, Cheaper Solar Cells". SciTechDaily.com. November 12, 2013.
  26. ^ D’Innocenzo, Valerio; Grancini, Giulia; Alcocer, Marcelo J. P.; Kandada, Ajay Ram Srimath; Stranks, Samuel D.; Lee, Michael M.; Lanzani, Guglielmo; Snaith, Henry J.; Petrozza, Annamaria (April 8, 2014). "Excitons versus free charges in organo-lead tri-halide perovskites". Nature Communications. 5. doi:10.1038/ncomms4586. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |displayauthors= ignored (|display-authors= suggested) (help)
  27. ^ a b Sha, Wei E. I.; Ren, Xingang; Chen, Luzhou; Choy, Wallace C. H. (2015). "The efficiency limit of CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite solar cells". Appl. Phys. Lett. 106 (22): 221104. doi:10.1063/1.4922150.
  28. ^ a b c "MATLAB Program of Detailed Balance Model for Perovskite Solar Cells". doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.17132.36481. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  29. ^ Yang, Bin; Dyck, Ondrej; Poplawsky, Jonathan; Keum, Jong; Puretzky, Alexander; Sanjib, Das; Ivanov, Ilia; Rouleau, Christopher; Duscher, Gerd; Geohegan, David; Xiao, Kai (July 9, 2015). "Perovskite Solar Cells with Near 100% Internal Quantum Efficiency Based on Large Single Crystalline Grains and Vertical Bulk Heterojunctions". J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137 (29): 9210–9213. doi:10.1021/jacs.5b03144.
  30. ^ Mosconi, Edoardo; Amat, Anna; Nazeeruddin, Md. K.; Grätzel, Michael; Angelis, Filippo De (July 1, 2013). "First-Principles Modeling of Mixed Halide Organometal Perovskites for Photovoltaic Applications". The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 117 (27): 13902–13913. doi:10.1021/jp4048659.
  31. ^ Lang, Li; Yang, Ji-Hui; Liu, Heng-Rui; Xiang, H. J.; Gong, X. G. (January 10, 2014). "First-principles study on the electronic and optical properties of cubic ABX3 halide perovskites". Physics Letters A. 378 (3): 290–293. doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2013.11.018.
  32. ^ Gonzalez-Pedro, Victoria; Juarez-Perez, Emilio J.; Arsyad, Waode-Sukmawati; Barea, Eva M.; Fabregat-Santiago, Francisco; Mora-Sero, Ivan; Bisquert, Juan (January 10, 2014). "General Working Principles of CH 3 NH 3 PbX 3 Perovskite Solar Cells". Nano Letters. 14 (2): 888–893. doi:10.1021/nl404252e.
  33. ^ Umari, Paolo; Mosconi, Edoardo; Angelis, Filippo De (March 26, 2014). "Relativistic GW calculations on CH3NH3PbI3 and CH3NH3SnI3 Perovskites for Solar Cell Applications". Scientific Reports. 4. doi:10.1038/srep04467.
  34. ^ Agarwal, S.; Nair, P.R. (June 1, 2014). "Performance optimization for Perovskite based solar cells". Photovoltaic Specialist Conference (PVSC), 2014 IEEE 40th: 1515–1518. doi:10.1109/PVSC.2014.6925202.
  35. ^ Agarwal, Sumanshu; Nair, Pradeep R. (September 21, 2015). "Device engineering of perovskite solar cells to achieve near ideal efficiency". Applied Physics Letters. 107 (12): 123901. doi:10.1063/1.4931130. ISSN 0003-6951.
  36. ^ Minemoto, Takashi; Murata, Masashi (August 7, 2014). "Device modeling of perovskite solar cells based on structural similarity with thin film inorganic semiconductor solar cells". Journal of Applied Physics. 116 (5): 054505. doi:10.1063/1.4891982. ISSN 0021-8979.
  37. ^ Sun, Xingshu; Asadpour, R.; Nie, Wanyi; Mohite, A.D.; Alam, M.A. (September 1, 2015). "A Physics-Based Analytical Model for Perovskite Solar Cells". IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics. 5 (5): 1389–1394. doi:10.1109/JPHOTOV.2015.2451000. ISSN 2156-3381.
  38. ^ a b Eperon, Giles E.; Burlakov, Victor M.; Docampo, Pablo; Goriely, Alain; Snaith, Henry J. (2014). "Morphological Control for High Performance, Solution-Processed Planar Heterojunction Perovskite Solar Cells". Advanced Functional Materials. 24 (1): 151–157. doi:10.1002/adfm.201302090.
  39. ^ Docampo, Pablo; Ball, James M.; Darwich, Mariam; Eperon, Giles E.; Snaith, Henry J. (2013). "Efficient organometal trihalide perovskite planar-heterojunction solar cells on flexible polymer substrates". Nature Communications. 4. doi:10.1038/ncomms3761.
  40. ^ You, Jingbi; Hong, Ziruo; Yang, Yang (Michael); Chen, Qi; Cai, Min; Song, Tze-Bin; Chen, Chun-Chao; Lu, Shirong; Liu, Yongsheng (February 25, 2014). "Low-Temperature Solution-Processed Perovskite Solar Cells with High Efficiency and Flexibility". ACS Nano. 8 (2): 1674–1680. doi:10.1021/nn406020d. ISSN 1936-0851. PMID 24386933.
  41. ^ a b Zhang, Hong (2015). "Pinhole-free and Surface-Nanostructured NiOx Film by Room-Temperature Solution Process for High-Performance Flexible Perovskite Solar Cells with Good Stability and Reproducibility". ACS Nano. 10 (1): 1503–1511. doi:10.1021/acsnano.5b07043. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |year= / |date= mismatch (help)
  42. ^ a b Xiao, Zhengguo; Bi, Cheng; Shao, Yuchuan; Dong, Qingfeng; Wang, Qi; Yuan, Yongbo; Wang, Chenggong; Gao, Yongli; Huang, Jinsong (2014). "Efficient, High Yield Perovskite Photovoltaic Devices Grown by Interdiffusion of Solution-Processed Precursor Stacking Layers". Energy & Environmental Science. 7 (8): 2619. doi:10.1039/c4ee01138d.
  43. ^ Im, Jeong-Hyeok; Lee, Chang-Ryul; Lee, Jin-Wook; Park, Sang-Won; Park, Nam-Gyu (2011). "6.5% efficient perovskite quantum-dot-sensitized solar cell". Nanoscale. 3 (10): 4088–93. doi:10.1039/C1NR10867K. PMID 21897986.
  44. ^ Lee, M. M.; Teuscher, J.; Miyasaka, T.; Murakami, T. N.; Snaith, H. J. (October 4, 2012). "Efficient Hybrid Solar Cells Based on Meso-Superstructured Organometal Halide Perovskites". Science. 338 (6107): 643–647. doi:10.1126/science.1228604. PMID 23042296.
  45. ^ Hadlington, Simon (October 4, 2012). "Perovskite coat gives hybrid solar cells a boost". RSC Chemistry world.
  46. ^ Kim, Hui-Seon; Lee, Chang-Ryul; Im, Jeong-Hyeok; Lee, Ki-Beom; Moehl, Thomas; Marchioro, Arianna; Moon, Soo-Jin; Humphry-Baker, Robin; Yum, Jun-Ho; Moser, Jacques E.; Grätzel, Michael; Park, Nam-Gyu (August 21, 2012). "Lead Iodide Perovskite Sensitized All-Solid-State Submicron Thin Film Mesoscopic Solar Cell with Efficiency Exceeding 9%". Scientific Reports. 2. doi:10.1038/srep00591.
  47. ^ Ball, James M.; Lee, Michael M.; Hey, Andrew; Snaith, Henry J. (2013). "Low-temperature processed meso-superstructured to thin-film perovskite solar cells". Energy & Environmental Science. 6 (6): 1739. doi:10.1039/C3EE40810H.
  48. ^ Saliba, Michael; Tan, Kwan Wee; Sai, Hiroaki; Moore, David T.; Scott, Trent; Zhang, Wei; Estroff, Lara A.; Wiesner, Ulrich; Snaith, Henry J. (July 31, 2014). "Influence of Thermal Processing Protocol upon the Crystallization and Photovoltaic Performance of Organic–Inorganic Lead Trihalide Perovskites". The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 118 (30): 17171–17177. doi:10.1021/jp500717w.
  49. ^ Tan, Kwan Wee; Moore, David T.; Saliba, Michael; Sai, Hiroaki; Estroff, Lara A.; Hanrath, Tobias; Snaith, Henry J.; Wiesner, Ulrich (May 27, 2014). "Thermally Induced Structural Evolution and Performance of Mesoporous Block Copolymer-Directed Alumina Perovskite Solar Cells". ACS Nano. 8 (5): 4730–4739. doi:10.1021/nn500526t. PMID 24684494.
  50. ^ Burschka, Julian; Pellet, Norman; Moon, Soo-Jin; Humphry-Baker, Robin; Gao, Peng; Nazeeruddin, Mohammad K.; Grätzel, Michael (July 10, 2013). "Sequential deposition as a route to high-performance perovskite-sensitized solar cells". Nature. 499 (7458): 316–319. doi:10.1038/nature12340. PMID 23842493.
  51. ^ Liu, Mingzhen; Johnston, Michael B.; Snaith, Henry J. (September 11, 2013). "Efficient planar heterojunction perovskite solar cells by vapour deposition". Nature. 501 (7467): 395–398. doi:10.1038/nature12509. PMID 24025775.
  52. ^ "The Guardian: "The perovskite lightbulb moment for solar power"".
  53. ^ Docampo, Pablo; Ball, James M.; Darwich, Mariam; Eperon, Giles E.; Snaith, Henry J. (November 12, 2013). "Efficient organometal trihalide perovskite planar-heterojunction solar cells on flexible polymer substrates". Nature Communications. 4. doi:10.1038/ncomms3761.
  54. ^ Zhou, H.; Chen, Q.; Li, G.; Luo, S.; Song, T.-b.; Duan, H.-S.; Hong, Z.; You, J.; Liu, Y.; Yang, Y. (July 31, 2014). "Interface engineering of highly efficient perovskite solar cells". Science. 345 (6196): 542–546. doi:10.1126/science.1254050. PMID 25082698.
  55. ^ a b c Matteocci, Fabio; Cinà, Lucio; Lamanna, Enrico; Cacovich, Stefania; Divitini, Giorgio; Midgley, Paul A.; Ducati, Caterina; Di Carlo, Aldo (December 1, 2016). "Encapsulation for long-term stability enhancement of perovskite solar cells". Nano Energy. 30: 162–172. doi:10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.09.041.
  56. ^ Li, X., Tschumi, M., Han, H., Babkair, S.S., Alzubaydi, R.A., Ansari, A.A., Habib, S.S., Nazeeruddin, M.K., Zakeeruddin, S.M., Grätzel, M. "Outdoor Performance and Stability under Elevated Temperatures and Long-Term Light Soaking of Triple-Layer Mesoporous Perovskite Photovoltaics". Energy Technol. 3 (2015), pp. 551–555.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  57. ^ Tomas Leijtens, Giles E. Eperon, Nakita K. Noel, Severin N. Habisreutinger, Annamaria Petrozza, Henry J. Snaith. "Stability of Metal Halide Perovskite Solar Cells". Advanced Energy Materials. 5 (20 October 21, 2015).{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  58. ^ a b Habisreutinger, Severin N.; Leijtens, Tomas; Eperon, Giles E.; Stranks, Samuel D.; Nicholas, Robin J.; Snaith, Henry J. (2014). "Carbon Nanotube/Polymer Composites as a Highly Stable Hole Extraction Layer in Perovskite Solar Cells". Nano Letters. xx (x): xxx. doi:10.1021/nl501982b.
  59. ^ Van Noorden, Richard (September 24, 2014). "Cheap solar cells tempt businesses". Nature News.
  60. ^ a b Leijtens, Tomas; Eperon, Giles E.; Pathak, Sandeep; Abate, Antonio; Lee, Michael M.; Snaith, Henry J. (2013). "Overcoming ultraviolet light instability of sensitized TiO₂ with meso-superstructured organometal tri-halide perovskite solar cells". Nature Communications. 6: 2885. doi:10.1038/ncomms3885.
  61. ^ Pisoni, Andrea; Jaćimović, Jaćim; Barišić, Osor S.; Spina, Massimo; Gaál, Richard; Forró, László; Horváth, Endre (July 17, 2014). "Ultra-Low Thermal Conductivity in Organic–Inorganic Hybrid Perovskite CH3NH3PbI3". The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters. 5 (14): 2488–2492. doi:10.1021/jz5012109. PMID 26277821.
  62. ^ You, Jingbi; Meng, Lei; Song, Tze-Bin; Guo, Tzung-Fang; Yang, Yang (Michael); Chang, Wei-Hsuan; Hong, Ziruo; Chen, Huajun; Zhou, Huanping (2015). "Improved air stability of perovskite solar cells via solution-processed metal oxide transport layers". Nature Nanotechnology. doi:10.1038/nnano.2015.230.
  63. ^ a b Federico Bella, Gianmarco Griffini, Juan-Pablo Correa-Baena, Guido Saracco, Michael Grätzel, Anders Hagfeldt, Stefano Turri and Claudio Gerbaldi. "Improving efficiency and stability of perovskite solar cells with photocurable fluoropolymers". Science. 354 (6309), 203-206.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  64. ^ a b c Snaith, Henry J.; Abate, Antonio; Ball, James M.; Eperon, Giles E.; Leijtens, Tomas; Noel, Nakita K.; Wang, Jacob Tse-Wei; Wojciechowski, Konrad; Zhang, Wei; Zhang, Wei (2014). "Anomalous Hysteresis in Perovskite Solar Cells". The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters. 5 (9): 1511–1515. doi:10.1021/jz500113x. PMID 26270088.
  65. ^ a b c d Unger, Eva L.; Hoke, Eric T.; Bailie, Colin D.; Nguyen, William H.; Bowring, Andrea R.; Heumuller, Thomas; Christoforo, Mark G.; McGehee, Michael D. (2014). "Hysteresis and transient behavior in current-voltage measurements of hybrid-perovskite absorber solar cells". Energy & Environmental Science. 7 (11): 3690–3698. doi:10.1039/C4EE02465F.
  66. ^ Noel, Nakita K; Abate, Antonio; Stranks, Samuel D.; Parrot, Elizabeth S.; Burlakov, Victor M.; Goriely, Alain; Snaith, Henry J. (2014). "Enhanced Photoluminescence and Solar Cell Performance via Lewis Base Passivation of Organic–Inorganic Lead Halide Perovskites". ACS Nano. 8 (10): 9815–21. doi:10.1021/nn5036476. PMID 25171692.
  67. ^ Abate, Antonio; Saliba, Michael; Hollman, Derek J.; Stranks, Samuel D.; Wojciechowski, Konrad; Avolio, Roberto; Grancini, Giulia; Petrozza, Annamaria; Snaith, Henry J. (June 11, 2014). "Supramolecular Halogen Bond Passivation of Organic–Inorganic Halide Perovskite Solar Cells". Nano Letters. 14 (6): 3247–3254. doi:10.1021/nl500627x. PMID 24787646.
  68. ^ Zimmermann, Eugen; Wong, Ka Kan; Mueller, Michael; Hu, Hao; Ehrenreich, Philipp; Kohlstaedt, Markus; Würfel, Uli; Mastroianni, Simone; Mathiazhagan, Gayathri; Hinsch, Andreas; Gujar, Tanji P.; Thelakkat, Mukundan; Pfadler, Thomas; Schmidt-Mende, Lukas (2016). "Characterization of perovskite solar cells: Towards a reliable measurement protocol". APL Materials. 4: 091901. doi:10.1063/1.4960759.
  69. ^ Zimmermann, Eugen. "GitHub Repository". GitHub.
  70. ^ Bailie, Colin D.; Christoforo, M. Greyson; Mailoa, Jonathan P.; Bowring, Andrea R.; Unger, Eva L.; Nguyen, William H.; Burschka, Julian; Pellet, Norman; Lee, Jungwoo Z. "Semi-transparent perovskite solar cells for tandems with silicon and CIGS". Energy Environ. Sci. 8 (3): 956–963. doi:10.1039/c4ee03322a.
  71. ^ Löper, Philipp; Moon, Soo-Jin; Nicolas, Sílvia Martín de; Niesen, Bjoern; Ledinsky, Martin; Nicolay, Sylvain; Bailat, Julien; Yum, Jun-Ho; Wolf, Stefaan De. "Organic–inorganic halide perovskite/crystalline silicon four-terminal tandem solar cells". Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 17 (3): 1619–1629. doi:10.1039/c4cp03788j.
  72. ^ Mailoa, Jonathan P.; Bailie, Colin D.; Johlin, Eric C.; Hoke, Eric T.; Akey, Austin J.; Nguyen, William H.; McGehee, Michael D.; Buonassisi, Tonio (March 23, 2015). "A 2-terminal perovskite/silicon multijunction solar cell enabled by a silicon tunnel junction". Applied Physics Letters. 106 (12): 121105. doi:10.1063/1.4914179. ISSN 0003-6951.
  73. ^ Schneider, Bennett W.; Lal, Niraj N.; Baker-Finch, Simeon; White, Thomas P. (October 20, 2014). "Pyramidal surface textures for light trapping and antireflection in perovskite-on-silicon tandem solar cells". Optics Express. 22 (S6): A1422. doi:10.1364/oe.22.0a1422.
  74. ^ Filipič, Miha; Löper, Philipp; Niesen, Bjoern; Wolf, Stefaan De; Krč, Janez; Ballif, Christophe; Topič, Marko (April 6, 2015). "CH_3NH_3PbI_3 perovskite / silicon tandem solar cells: characterization based optical simulations". Optics Express. 23 (7): A263. doi:10.1364/oe.23.00a263.
  75. ^ Asadpour, Reza; Chavali, Raghu V. K.; Khan, M. Ryyan; Alam, Muhammad A. (June 15, 2015). "Bifacial Si heterojunction-perovskite organic-inorganic tandem to produce highly efficient (ηT* ∼ 33%) solar cell". Applied Physics Letters. 106 (24): 243902. doi:10.1063/1.4922375. ISSN 0003-6951.
  76. ^ Electronics Weekly
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Perovskite_solar_cell&oldid=751540828"