Jump to content

Talk:Mass Effect 2: Arrival

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleMass Effect 2: Arrival has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 15, 2012Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on September 17, 2012.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that one reviewer thought that the final battleground of video game Mass Effect 2: Arrival broke the laws of physics?

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Mass Effect 2: Arrival/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 10:30, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    "$6.99 USD " - repetition; how about "US$ 6.99"
    "and elite human soldier " - do you mean "an"?
    "and the fact that the pack mostly consists of linear combat sequences, " - perhaps "and too many linera combat sequences" or similar. The main issue is "the fact that the"; does not flow well
    "still praiseworthy" - I would remove "still" as you only mentioned story and sequences
    " in order to progress" - could be just "to progress"
    "Unlike most of the missions, Arrival introduces a new mission " - repetition of "mission". It is a bit confusing, so suggest replacing one of the words
    "a deep cover agent" - what does "deep" mean here?
    Can you explain that Shephard "has" two genders?
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall: A few minor suggestions and issues.--Kürbis (✔) 10:32, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    Pass/Fail:

Thank you for your review -- much appreciated. I've addressed the issues you brought up. Let me know if there's anything else. --Niwi3 (talk) 10:59, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Pass the article. Regards.--Kürbis (✔) 17:25, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

RfC: Mass Effect series capitalization of alien race names

[edit]

You're invited to join the discussion at Talk:Illusive Man#Request for comment. czar · · 03:07, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mass Effect 2: Arrival. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:06, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Mass_Effect_2:_Arrival&oldid=1208369290"