Jump to content

Talk:McIntosh (apple)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeMcIntosh (apple) was a Agriculture, food and drink good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 4, 2014Good article nomineeNot listed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 23, 2013.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the Apple Macintosh was named after the McIntosh apple (pictured), until recently the most popular variety of apple in northeastern North America?

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Melinda.an.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 03:41, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Early text

[edit]

A lot of this information might be more appropriate on Mac OS or its sub pages; not sure how to reconcile redundancies in those and this or which one should be REDIRECT. --justfred

A redirect is clearly wrong. "Macintosh" should talk about the hardware, and incidentally the company and the software. MacOS should talk about MacOS. --LDC

That's what I was thinking. Models, hardware design, etc. Market share might go either place (Mac OS for techies, Macintosh for marketers...) Moved the press release stuff (which may or may not be copywrong) to Mac OS/OS X --justfred


Untitled

[edit]

Can we add a source and more info to the origin of the apple? Ian01 22:26, 17 June 2007 (UTC) Can anyone explain why this cultivar is so popular in North America yet so rare elsewhere? I've never seen the fruit or saplings on sale in Britain, and I don't think it's grown commercially or as a garden tree anywhere in Europe. --80.176.142.11 (talk) 14:15, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The fruit is on sale in the UK, has been for years. Maybe not around your neck of the woods but I can get it, and I don't exactly live in the most diverse city in the country. A lot of ours seem to get labelled as Scottish Macs though, but it'll still be the same fruit. 86.12.21.157 (talk) 18:02, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good lord. The intro paragraph reads like a marketing blurb for the apple industry. Seriously? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 156.98.165.7 (talk) 18:31, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 01:47, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling

[edit]

Could somebody please confirm this apple's spelling. On this page it is listed as "McIntosh" but I just bought some of these apples and on the tag it says "Macintosh". It's not obviously a big matter, but I'm just curious as to what the true spelling is. Thank you

Laisinteresting (talk) 21:23, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I may not understand cultivars (or how the word descendant is used in this article), but spelling I can do.
Yes, indeed, McIntosh is the one and only correct spelling of this kind of apple.
After the Apple Macintosh computer mangled the spelling of the apple -- possibly to conform to trade name law -- a lot of people are now so used to seeing the Macintosh spelling that they probably often misspell the name of the apple.
But I can absolutely assure you that McIntosh is the apple (and Macintosh is the Apple).Daqu (talk) 06:51, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Eastern Canada? What, all of Quebec and all the maritimes provinces and possibly all of Nunvat as well? that's pretty big compared to New England. I don't think they grow apples in all the permafrost. Was this written by George Bush or something?--99.248.211.46 (talk) 23:53, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Macs began harvest here in southern and central Maine in early September. This article states that harvest is "late September". What geographic area is that assertion in reference to? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.78.53.160 (talk) 00:44, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Descendant

[edit]

A descendant is a relative in the direct line of descent. This includes grandchildren, great-grandchildren and so on. Ther must be thousands of descendants of the original Mcintosh around the world. While we would not call the offspring of a tree a "child", I would suggest "first-generation descendant". Any better suggestions?  Andreas  (T) 14:48, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone please explain?

[edit]

I kind of thought I knew what a cultivar is, but from this article I see that I don't.

Can someone please explain how, if the last surviving descendant of the "original" Mcintosh apple tree died in 2011, it is still possible to grow McIntosh apples?

Maybe the other 19 seedlings that didn't survive past 1830 had descendants themselves whose descendants still survive? Or please do explain.

Wait! Is it that trees grown from a McIntosh appleseed are not considered descendants of the tree that bore the apple whose seed it is?

I really don't know. Maybe if I'm so confused, other people might also be, so whatever the answer is, maybe it could be included in the article? (The article on cultivars wasn't much help with this question.)

Thanks.Daqu (talk) 06:37, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Volatile Composition of Mcintosh Apple Juice as a ...

[edit]

Volatile Composition of Mcintosh Apple Juice as a ...

"Where have you gone, Mr McIntosh?"

[edit]

"Where have you gone, Mr McIntosh?"

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:McIntosh (apple)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jamesx12345 (talk · contribs) 20:40, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]


I'll review this over the next few days. Jamesx12345 20:40, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • "bred it" - bred it could mean he created it on purpose, "sold cuttings from it" is less ambiguous.
  • "McIntosh combines well" - not entirely clear what this means (if it is a common technical term, a note would be nice.)
  • In the Cultivation section, there is info on cloning in the first and third paragraphs - could be combined.
  • "The original tree discovered by John McIntosh..." - this is also said earlier on, could be merged.
  • "cuttings from the last known first-generation McIntosh graft before it died in 2011 for producing clones" - McIntosh could be removed for readability - lots of words.

Very nice article, informative and well-written. Jamesx12345 21:06, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • This article is missing a lot of important data. First of all, is this JUST the fruit or the whole plant? It is missing a basic description of Malus domestica! It doesn't even cover the basic details of the cultivar as coming mainly from M. sylvestris and M. pumila. This article needs to really get to grips with the fact that the fruit itself is not the be all end-all of what this article should be. Even the claims of its genetic origins are lacking. The history is ruined by a tangential picture of Andrew McNaughton, one of the worst pictures you could possibly place in this article. Why not the portrait of John McIntosh?! Cultural significance is so-so, but I'd think a better description of the fruit and perhaps nutritional information would be more important to add. Though I think the process of grafting and explaining how production of the trees for their fruit really needs to be covered at least in some detail. Big, huge, gaping holes in coverage here of all easily sourced material. There are books dedicated to it after all. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 07:04, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • Okay, I'm going to withdraw this, as I can see there are some important aspects that need to be expanded, but: "Ruined" by "one of the worst possible pictures"? Give me a break! I almost ignored what you wrote entirely because of this hyperbolic horseshit. Curly Turkey ⚞¡gobble!05:58, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

More sources?

[edit]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on McIntosh (apple). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:05, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I would recommend checking the grammar and spelling of the article, as some sentences do not have commas and others resemble phrases. Moreover, I feel like it is possible to add another section ("Geography") to expand on the fruit's origin. This could include key coordinates of the locations it is grown on the planet or places where the McIntosh apple has distribution channels. In terms of the sources, there are some footnotes that have letters instead of numbers - I would definitely look into this because it may be from a technical glitch or a lacking source. When I looked at the relevant picture, I felt like the description could be more detailed than "An apple in a market". The description for this picture is very general and could relate to any apple in the world. I would also go back and change words like "ninety years" to "90 years". The general rule of thumb is to use numerical figures if the number is greater than ten. In the "History" section I could change "follow his love" because it sounds a little awkward to the reader. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Melinda.an (talkcontribs) 19:57, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on McIntosh (apple). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:23, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]