Jump to content

Talk:Pete McCloskey

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Kovic Claim

[edit]

Ron Kovic claims McCloskey gave him the passes that let him and other memebrs of the VVAW get into the RNC. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 132.241.245.49 (talk • contribs) .

Edit retracted

[edit]

https://jweekly.com/2002/02/22/adl-payout-finally-lays-9-year-old-lawsuit-to-rest/

https://www.arabnews.com/node/220294

Why isn't the law suit the ADL had to settle with McCloseky in this entry? https://cdnc.ucr.edu/?a=d&d=JW19981127.2.9&e=-------en--20--1--txt-txIN-------- --- An edit I made was retracted by another user as being a violation of the NPOV policy. That's not the case. The current article reads as if the quote taken from the IHR conference was entirely wrong and somehow substantively changed the reason why this is a controversy. I will make the edit again. If it is removed, I will ask that we get someone to help mediate this NPOV dispute, and failing that, look into wikipedia arbitration for this.

Finally, I'd like to note that this is actually a peculiar example of NPOV being raised in a systematic and decidedly non-neutral way. The same person is, with bias, policing the CNI link: first truncating any elaboration on CNI's relationship with the controversy in that entry with a "see McCloskey" remark (while removing pertinent material in CNI's entry about the organization's response to this incident), and then deleting material under the McCloskey entry. i.e.: First "this is better handled under McCloskey" and then deleting material here.

This is the first time I've done editing on these pages, and I was rather amazed at: 1. How quickly the user responded, and 2. How prolific the user has been in removing material in these entries. I would like to mediate this to see if we can come to a mutual agreement on a full account of why this has been a controversy and so that readers of these entries can get as full and non-biased (as possible) text. But, i'll frankly say this looks like a textbook case of an organization having someone police their wikipedia publicity, and I'll opt for arbitration if it appears that the interest in seeing a full and accurate entry isn't a shared motive. p.s. I'll go ahead and register a wikipedia user name to help with tracking this discussion and dispute. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.140.157.18 (talk • contribs) .


What you call "elaboration" is baldfaced violation of WP policy, as you should know if you'd read the documentation I'd linked for you. You inserted "CNI did not, at the time of McCloskey's speech, nor at any point later (while McCloskey served on the CNI board), distance itself from its founder and board member's decision to be the keynote speaker for the Holocaust denial group." That violates WP:OR. What if CNI did distance itself in some newspaper article that you happened to miss? Even if you say you have done careful enough research to announce with certainty that CNI never distanced itself from the IHR speech, why should Wikipedians believe YOU? Next time you add such statements, make sure you have reliable sources for them. Please keep your personal opinions out of the articles and keep your ad hominem attacks out of the talk pages. You'll be well advised to familiarize yourself with WP policy before further editing. Precis 23:39, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

---

IHR posts their statements as a matter of public record. There has been none distancing themselves from the McCloskey's actions. Public critiques of a lack of these are quite prolific and widely available. It's clear form the record of both this and CNI's entry that you are regularly policing and omitting material relevant to the controversy of both CNI and McCloskey which complies with NPOV standards, while at the same time authoring material that gives false impressions in its summaries and omissions.

If this isn't going to evolve into a back and forth of editing "war" -- and I have no interest in seeing wikipedia abused in that way--than this is going to require some outside dispute resolution, which exists within WIki. You're abuse of this resource needs to end. I'll start looking into options for that. I suspect that, what will surface, is a campaign not unlike Wikipedia saw with hill staffers "policing" the entry of the congress people they served. Wikipedia's processes for this ultimately did a wonderful job of outing them, and I suspect and look forward to what I imagine will be a parallel situaiton here. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.140.157.18 (talk • contribs) .


Keep your unsourced opinions out of Wikipedia. If available sources are prolific and widely available, then pray tell, why aren't you using them? Precis 20:27, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Succession

[edit]

The succession dates are wrong. Leo Ryan succeeded him in the 11th district in 1973, while McCloskey served in two other district numbers until he left office in 1983. 161.185.150.122 (talk) 03:02, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Pete McCloskey.jpg

[edit]

Image:Pete McCloskey.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:07, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Libel?

[edit]

Sued for libel by Pat Robertson who lost his case. -Sparky (talk) 16:29, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The long block quotation(?) with preface "His book "The Taking of Hill 610" put an end to Pat Robertson's 1988 Presidential run." seems to be inserted out of place. No source is given, but layout implies quotation. --P64 (talk) 19:22, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Pete McCloskey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:07, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Pete McCloskey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:38, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Pete McCloskey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:06, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Date of Great Grandfather's Immigration

[edit]

1953 can't be right… right? — iFaqeer (talk to or email me) 16:49, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is he dead?

[edit]

Any sources to back up this trending tweet? ~ AlaskaGal~ ^_^ 19:50, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Pete_McCloskey&oldid=1247813499"