User:Merovingian/archive-31

Nomination of List of protective human features for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of protective human features is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of protective human features until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tom (LT) (talk) 00:53, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

"Wicipǣdia" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Wicipǣdia. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 15#Wicipǣdia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. TheAwesomeHwyh 18:15, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

"* Hepsi 2 (Two) (2006)" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect * Hepsi 2 (Two) (2006). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 20#* Hepsi 2 (Two) (2006) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:52, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

"* Bir (One)" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect * Bir (One). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 20#* Bir (One) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 13:59, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of List of fictional deities for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of fictional deities is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional deities until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:33, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago

Awesome

Ten years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:38, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Seel, Central Java

The article Seel, Central Java has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Apparent error, or possible hoax. Coords given are for West Java, not Central Java, and do not point to any place named Seel. Although GEOnet is referenced, a search for "Seel" in Indonesia actually produces no results on it (even when limiting to Central Java and using "contains" rather than "exact match").

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 02:01, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

"Disco Booty Junction" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Disco Booty Junction. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 4#Disco Booty Junction until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm _Bacon 04:05, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Projected to

Hello. If you look at all the prior elections and the wording used, we have always gone with a definite "win", "re-elected", or "elected", without weasel words. This election is the same as the others, except that we have a sore loser who is speculatively challenging the results without any disclosed evidence. Mr. Trump's opinion is unimportant to us and he is not a reliable source of information, nor is Mr. Giuliani, for any fact other than their own opinions. The target article covers their disputes, but these guys are pushing WP:FRINGE theories that have no credibility with reliable sources. Jehochman ^Talk 17:03, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

"Daddy Round-Round" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Daddy Round-Round. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 20#Daddy Round-Round until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm _Bacon 19:04, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Dull Ax Lake for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dull Ax Lake is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dull Ax Lake until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:41, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

"Sally Cowfarts" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Sally Cowfarts. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 31#Sally Cowfarts until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Phleg1 (talk) 02:07, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Swingers (2007 film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Swingers (2007 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swingers (2007 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Bearcat (talk) 13:49, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Airdeny

I proposed the deletion of the article for the following reasons:

1.No content (WP:SPEEDY reason A3) 2.No notability (See WP:NOTE)

I wanted to inform the author of the article about the edit Skeptical Sapien (talk) 05:59, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Buttock Batu

The article Buttock Batu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable "populated place". Couldn't really find any information about this place.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PepperBeast (talk) 22:28, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Buttock Batu for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Buttock Batu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Buttock Batu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

PepperBeast (talk) 20:28, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Shinji and Good Friends for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shinji and Good Friends is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shinji and Good Friends until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Boleyn (talk) 14:57, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

"The Wrightnows" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect The Wrightnows. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 8#The Wrightnows until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 16:28, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Maine, Maine for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Maine, Maine is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maine, Maine until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

wizzito | say hello! 21:07, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Beaver Crossing, South Dakota

The article Beaver Crossing, South Dakota has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable river crossing mislabeled as a community.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 20:18, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!

Happy First Edit Day, Merovingian, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Bobherry Talk Edits 23:37, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Apricot, Washington for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Apricot, Washington is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apricot, Washington until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Mangoe (talk) 01:40, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Islands of Zimbabwe

A tag has been placed on Category:Islands of Zimbabwe indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:49, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

Administrators will no longer be autopatrolled

A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Ryans Corner, Pennsylvania for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ryans Corner, Pennsylvania is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryans Corner, Pennsylvania until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

snood1205 20:16, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Negro Crossing, Texas

The article Negro Crossing, Texas has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Just a river crossing before it was flooded by a reservoir. Notability not established with substantive sources: citation does NOT mention this place in particular.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92^Talk 22:28, 2 January 2022 (UTC)