User talk:210.55.76.21

New messages will appear at the bottom of this page.

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

Your host, 210-55-76-21.n4l.sparkdigital.co.nz (210.55.76.21), is registered to Network for Learning and may be shared by multiple users of an educational institution, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

If you are unable to create an account due to your institution's IP address being blocked, follow these instructions. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your network administrator or instructor and request that your school contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user.

Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using {{School block}}.

In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

Educational institution staff and network administrators wishing to monitor this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

February 2017

Hello, I'm Drewmutt. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Ian Jones (rugby union)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 23:26, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Ian Jones (rugby union). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —Non-Dropframe _talk 23:27, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Excirial. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Jeffrey Smart— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Excirial ^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 21:21, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jeffrey Smart. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Jeffrey Smart was changed by 210.55.76.21 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.956846 on 2017-02-13T21:22:13+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:22, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 23:35, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Boy in the Striped Pyjamas, you may be blocked from editing. Karlpoppery (talk) 02:16, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Our Lady of Fátima. KarlPoppery (talk) 00:51, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Do not using multiple accounts like what you did at Niyet' and stop putting in incorrect information about stars, like what you did at BI Cygni, KY Cygni, NML Cygni, and RS Persei. Your edits have been reverted by Lithopsian. Your edits have been interpreted as vandalism and you may be blocked. BTW, I am not an admin. Thank you. --Joey P. - THE OFFICIAL (talk) 21:08, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Even no ref says that BI Cygni is a yellow hypergiant and that P Cygni is 1,900 R_☉. You have already been blocked from editing. BTW, I am not an admin. --Thank you—Ynoss. - THE OFFICIAL* ★ ^{✉ discussion} / _CONTRIBS 15:33, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 02:40, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Thank you—Ynoss. - THE OFFICIAL ★ ^{✉ discussion} / _CONTRIBS 11:58, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

210.55.76.21 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please forgive us for what we have done. We promise not to do that again. We understand now what we have done is wrong.210.55.76.21 (talk) 23:09, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 23:31, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

October 2017

Please refrain from making disruptive edits in my subpages, even if you intend to fix them later. I have reverted your edit. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ----Joey P. - THE OFFICIAL 03:42, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Zapera ^DISCUSS _CONTRIBS 11:25, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2017

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for persistent vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Zapera _{(Talk/Contributions)} 12:08, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Chris Ward (sailor) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Chris Ward (sailor) was changed by 210.55.76.21 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.895058 on 2018-08-29T23:33:31+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:33, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Chris Ward (sailor), you may be blocked from editing. You have made a series of non-constructive edits to this article. Please cease. Nick Moyes (talk) 23:44, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Thank you. Joey717 ^(talk) 19:33, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bring back bring back bring back my diamonds to me to me

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

210.55.76.21 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

my diamonds lie over the ocean my diamonds lie over the sea my diamonds lie over the ocean oh bring back my diamonds to me bring back bring back bring back my diamonds to me to me bring back bring back bring back my diamonds to me 210.55.76.21 (talk) 22:39, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. 331dot (talk) 22:40, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

February 2020

Hello, I'm Everedux. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Road toll (Australia and New Zealand)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Everedux ^(talk) 22:55, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Hello, I'm Johand199. An edit you recently made to Refugees of Iraq seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Johand199 ^{(Talk • Contribs)} 22:49, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Prime Minister of New Zealand. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Canley (talk) 04:14, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Hello, I'm All hail Armok. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to History of Chinese currency have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. All hail Armok (talk) 02:45, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2020

Hello, I'm Chlod. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Judicial system of China have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Chlod (say hi!) 02:04, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Copyright. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. theinstantmatrix (talk) 23:37, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. gadfium 04:28, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Hello, I'm Wikipelli. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Akshat Singh—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Wikipelli ^Talk 00:13, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Hello, I'm Le Marteau. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Music of Mongolia—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Le Marteau (talk) 02:15, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 01:56, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.