User talk:Abenezer inder

please make my biographical artical.abenezer inder (film director)Mumbai please delete my user page.abenezer inder

Already done. The latest version of your user page was deleted on 17 April. JamesBWatson (talk) 07:20, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Technical close, moot Mike Cline (talk) 14:14, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:Abenezer inder → Abenezer inder – ==this is artical,not personal prfile Abenezer inder (talk) 13:32, 4 March 2013 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of Abenezer_inder/sandbox ==[reply]

Hello Abenezer inder,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Abenezer_inder/sandbox for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Ironholds (talk) 08:39, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Article moved

You should be aware that the article you moved into mainspace is now in the following location: Abenezer Inder. However, you should also be aware that the writing of autobiographies is discouraged - please read WP:Autobiographies for details. Stephen! ^Coming... 09:26, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Abenezer Inder for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abenezer Inder is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abenezer Inder until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ironholds (talk) 09:34, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Abenezer inder/sandbox, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Indian and Rath (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Abenezer inder,khar west,mumbai.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Abenezer inder,khar west,mumbai.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 15:24, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Abenezer inder.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Abenezer inder.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 15:25, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Most recent page move

I have reverted your most recent attempt to move your page as your choice to move it into Wikipedia namespace was incorrect. Also, please remember that autobiographies are strongly discouraged on Wikipedia. --| Uncle Milty | talk | 13:29, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Because where you have chosen to write your article is actually your user page. If you wish to create an article, it is best to create it in your sandbox. You can find your sandbox here. However, keep in mind that autobiographies are strongly discouraged on Wikipedia. --| Uncle Milty | talk | 13:36, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Abenezer inder/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page that you created was tagged as a test page and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. smileguy91^talk 22:24, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your user page may not be appropriate to be indexed by external search engines as presently written. Typically, this could be because it appears promotional, or contains material in development or archived that doesn't yet meet policies and guidelines. I have tagged this page as __NOINDEX__, which allows editing but minimizes the page's inclusion in search engine results.

If you believe that your userpage does not violate our guidelines, please leave a note here and we can discuss it. As an alternative, you may add {{db-userreq}} to the top of the page in question and an administrator will delete it, you can change the page so that it more clearly meets Wikipedia guidelines, or you can edit it as normal and ignore the tag completely (it will not affect editing).

However, please do not remove the tag without discussion. Thank you. | Uncle Milty | talk | 11:51, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Block

All your recent edits suggest that you are simply using Wikipedia as a free host. I have therefore blocked you. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:04, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Abenezer inder (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have real reference for article.please unblock this page

Please include a decline or accept reason.

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Abenezer inder (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

my biography is not promotional artical

Decline reason:

We don't get to write about ourselves on Wikipedia. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 16:11, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Abenezer inder (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have good reference for make this page.apart from this, this unblocked page detecting in google search option while I typed my name,please remove unbloked page from google search. Abenezer inder (talk) 7:18 am, Today (UTC+1)

Decline reason:

It is not possible to remove any Wikipedia page from Google's search index, although Google does eventually de-index deleted pages. As long as you persist in your desire to use Wikipedia to write about yourself you will not be unblocked; in order for an appeal to be considered, you will need to:

convince the reviewing admin that you understand the reason for your block
undertake not to repeat the behaviour for which you were blocked
suggest areas of Wikipedia you might edit if unblocked

Until you fulfil these requirements, your appeals will not be actioned. Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yunshui 雲‍水 07:56, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Abenezer inder (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will not write about myself and auto biography, so please you do unblocked my user page Abenezer inder (talk) 10:06, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

See request below. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 16:50, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

OK, so what do you expect to write about, then? So far, you have done nothing but try to use Wikipedia to host promotional content about yourself, for over two years. Can you tell us briefly what you hope to do now that you have dropped the intention of doing that? JamesBWatson (talk) 11:06, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Abenezer inder (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

my name is abenezer inder,i am script writer and director,based in Mumbai,i would like to make my short biography in Wikipedia.i have good source,what can I do for this,please you do unblocked my user page because m not using this page as a promotional activitis.please you make my page Abenezer inder (talk) 12:53, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have been told that you are not going to be allowed to write about yourself here. Not now and not ever. If you want to write about anything else please say so in your next unblock request, if you choose to make one. Please note that repeated similar requests may lead to your loss of access to this page. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 16:50, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Abenezer inder (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock my account.we will follow all Wikipedia guidline and we will not write anything about self and personal biography.I had new user, so I didn't know about wiki policy.we are now prepared.I will edit accordingly wiki guidline

Decline reason:

Why do you sometimes refer to yourself as "we". Is this a shared account? What topics do you want to edit? PhilKnight (talk) 15:15, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{[[Template:reason=Sorry for "we" word use for self.Please unblock my account.i will follow all Wikipedia guidline and i will not write anything about self.I had new user, so I didn't know about Wikipedia policy.i am prepared.I want to edit indian geographical, historical and biography details with proper source, if any require will have come.If I vanished my user page,incase unblock page should be must.I am from Mumbai,India.also i am working in Indian film industry as an producer and script writer|reason=Sorry for "we" word use for self.Please unblock my account.i will follow all Wikipedia guidline and i will not write anything about self.I had new user, so I didn't know about Wikipedia policy.i am prepared.I want to edit indian geographical, historical and biography details with proper source, if any require will have come.If I vanished my user page,incase unblock page should be must.I am from Mumbai,India.also i am working in Indian film industry as an producer and script writer]]}}

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Abenezer inder (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock my account.i am following all Wikipedia guideline and I will not write and edit anything about self.i will edit some Indian history with reference and source

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you:
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. — Voice of Clam (talk) 09:29, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Only one open unblock request at a time, please. Additional requests will not speed up the review process, nor affect the result. Administrators are volunteers, and the queue of unblock requests is long. It may be several days or weeks before yours is evaluated. Until then, then is nothing for you to do except patiently wait your turn. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 14:49, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Abenezer inder (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sir, you are requested not to cancel the account unblock request again and again without any valid reason. I have told that when I created the account, I did not have all the information about Wikipedia policy.,I had told that Wikipedia policy and guidelines will be followed from now on, so why are you asking for "reason" every time. The administrator had alleged that the user page was used as a free host.Now the user page will not be used as a free host. I want to delete the account so I am sending an unblock request. I know many fake name editors who take money to create Wikipedia article pages and they create fake online references from fake online books and newspaper, why don't you take action against them.Abenezer inder (talk) 06:01, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Account deletion is impossible. The next best thing is courtesy vanishing, which you can request by filling out this form. You do not need to be unblocked to request courtesy vanishing. Best, House Blaster (talk • he/they) 05:35, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Abenezer inder (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Global user account vanish request rejected because this user account is blocked.without unblock this page,rename and delete page will have not done. this is basic knowledge and admin dose not co-operate, otherwise I will take legal action and send details to Wikimedia foundation

Decline reason:

Go right ahead. The legal threat is the last straw on this account. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 14:19, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

UTRS

UTRS appeal #95539 has been declined. JBW (talk) 16:24, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]