User talk:AgentSuperGuy/Archive 1
|
This is an archive of past discussions with User:AgentSuperGuy. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
This archive is between 7 June 2016 - 30 June 2016.
Welcome!
Hello, AgentSuperGuy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! DAJF (talk) 13:56, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
June 2016
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to 209 series, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. DAJF (talk) 01:19, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
Taipei Metro articles
Hi i have move from Taipei Metro Line 1, Taipei Metro Line 2, Taipei Metro Line 3 and Taipei Metro Line 4 to Line 1, Taipei Metro, Line 2, Taipei Metro, Line 3, Taipei Metro and Line 4, Taipei Metro but i cannot move Taipei Metro Line 5 to Line 5, Taipei Metro. Administrators, i really need to move Taipei Metro Line 5 to Line 5, Taipei Metro. Because the example has happen like Line 6, Shanghai Metro and Line 3, Nanjing Metro. Administrators I need to help us move Line 5. I cannot move cause is not allowed.AgentSuperGuy (talk) 13:05, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
Bus spotting
Are you a bus spotter? Sorry if I bother you on something no related. Sbs882y Sbs882y (talk) 01:08, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
- No i'm not, thanks for asking meAgentSuperGuy (talk) 09:18, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Template:Taipei Metro Rolling Stock
Hi, i have made a new template, Template:Taipei Metro Rolling Stock, for the easier reference on the whole system's Taipei Metro between these eight rolling stocks: Taipei Metro C301, Taipei Metro C321, Taipei Metro C341, Taipei Metro C371, Taipei Metro C381, Taipei Metro VAL256, Taipei Metro CITYFLO650 and Taipei Metro Ansaldo STS, however Taipei Metro C371 and Taipei Metro Ansaldo STS hasn't been created once for a while, maybe I will create for Ansaldo STS while C371 will be somebody else.AgentSuperGuy (talk) 09:53, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Pages on Metro
Hi train enthusiasts, just to know for example like Taipei Metro Line 5 or Paris Métro Line 7 you post was this right, let me tell you some of them like Line 5, Guangzhou Metro, Line 3, Shanghai Metro, Line 2, Nanjing Metro or what so ever on each lines were the same. So i have moved ALL Taipei Metro and Paris Metro pages to align the correct way like Line 3, Shanghai Metro. Now formerly Paris Metro Line 7 was become as Line 7, Paris Métro. Do Not Revert that move ever again. Thank you for your cooperation.AgentSuperGuy (talk) 16:43, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
- @AgentSuperGuy: I've reverted your page moves, because there is currently no policy on how line pages like these should be disambiguated. If you're going to talk to other editors, talk on the WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Trains; WikiProject France), a list of which can be found on each article's talk page, or the article talk pages themselves. No one is going to look at your talk page for some random notice.
- If you would like to have a blanket move of all such line pages to (e.g.) "Line 1, Paris Métro" or "Line 1 (Paris Métro)", maybe you could ask (or file a request for comment or move request) on one of the article talk pages or Wikipedia:Village pump (policy). Jc86035 (talk • contribs) Use {{re|Jc86035}} to reply to me 03:09, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
- Omigosh!AgentSuperGuy (talk) 04:47, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
- I've started a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Trains § Naming of rapid transit lines. Jc86035 (talk • contribs) Use {{re|Jc86035}} to reply to me 13:11, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
- I'll not reply, your enthusiasts should reply.AgentSuperGuy (talk) 08:58, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
- Omigosh!AgentSuperGuy (talk) 04:47, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
June 2016
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Volvo B9TL, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Class455fan1 (talk) 18:29, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
- Ok nice try, but however that Euro III's CDGE bodywork section was appeared with the irrelevant content, Gemilang Coachworks B9TL, actually it is irrelevant. So that's why is relevant between SBS7440T and SBS7777Y, the Bodyworks wasn't the same at all.AgentSuperGuy (talk) 07:30, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
Traction motors on Automated People Mover Rolling Stock
However on the trains along like Line 1, Taipei Metro, Changi Airport Skytrain, Bukit Panjang LRT Line, The Plane Train or other Automated People Mover lines, the trains from Bombardier Innovia APM 100, Bombardier Innovia APM 200 and Crystal Mover uses APM-VVVF traction motors. Because you know from Bombardier Innovia APM 100 C801A trains were more like using GTO-VVVF motors. However as of today they were no longer using GTO-VVVF and were replaced to IGBT-VVVF or the latest PMSM-VVVF. So along like Bombardier Innovia APM 100 C801 or other stocks from these were using APM-VVVF.AgentSuperGuy (talk) 07:54, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
600V AC Third Rail
Hello, on Light Rail Transit (Singapore) systems they were used 600V AC Third Rail. NOT 750V DC Third Rail. This is to differentiate between MRT and LRT systems.AgentSuperGuy (talk) 09:18, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
- Please put your messages on the articles' talk pages, because it's probably quite difficult for editors who haven't watchlisted your talk page to find these notices. Thanks, Jc86035 (talk • contribs) Use {{re|Jc86035}} to reply to me 09:22, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello, the Bukit Panjang LRT uses 600AC while Sengkang, Punggol and Changi Skytrain uses 750VDC. Please check here https://www.mhi.co.jp/technology/review/pdf/e403/e403144.pdf and on SGtrains. Thanks. 33ryantan (talk) 10:29, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
- I didn't know that Sengkang LRT Line and Punggol LRT Line uses 750V DC Third Rail, because usually LRT lines were always using 600V AC Third Rail. This is a little bit confusing cause I thought all LRT lines uses 600V DC Third Rail cause 750V DC Third Rail was usually used on MRT systems.AgentSuperGuy (talk) 10:30, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
June 2016
Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (talk) 01:03, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
- I never noticed that Minor edit means edited using less words in one sentence. Minor edit means less than 500 bytes and what so ever. This minor edit that I always done was in Less words in one sentence and edited to some of them. I always been doing that. I never know that.AgentSuperGuy (talk) 09:59, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
Services on LRT pages
I think must be the Singaporean user, User:33ryantan, that fellow should be the Singapore Enthusiast but however he give us less details to all LRT pages which is the services. At Bukit Panjang LRT Line was forgotten direction but however no problems but however Sengkang LRT Line and Punggol LRT Line got less details. He didn't station to station. Like i added Cove to Damai, this is more specific. Like the next line is "This service will served till 3pm", it is also slightly specific. I have updated more details so that everyone know what is it about. You don't revert that. Thank you for your cooperation!AgentSuperGuy (talk) 10:26, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
You don't really have to comment on every single issue unless someone reverts your edit which I have not. Thanks. 33ryantan (talk) 13:41, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
- Hello! What did I say, this one right, people may revert that edit but actually our details that they were given was not good enough cause it may be poor to some of them like 'Anti-clockwise direction' instead of just only 'Anti-clockwise', this is not a valid sentence that we are used to write details, it's wasn't good at all. And i have added the direction following for two lines, Sengkang and Pungool which they didn't follow what direction they follow. This article does not only ply to Singapore, it also ply around the world. So pls have some respect! Nobody should revert my edits because they were appropriate and given more details on it.AgentSuperGuy (talk) 13:49, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
Also, there's no point commenting on your own talkpage, no one will see it. You should comment on the respective talk pages. And I never revert unless its completely wrong or poorly structured like what you did with the 750VDC. 33ryantan (talk) 14:05, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
Interchange with Thomson-East Coast Line
Hello train enthusiasts, i just want to know that some of the interchange stations connecting with Thomson-East Coast MRT Line and the existing MRT Lines right? However you should know by now that Thomson-East Coast MRT Line was having UNDER CONSTRUCTION to all stations. So during this construction, I have already added the (Under-Construction to all Thomson-East Coast Line stations) design until these line was COMPLETELY 100% done. From now i'll add a grey text which represents that it wasn't opened. At Stevens MRT Station, you know that Staff Level means Passengers were restricted from going in however I didn't put a grey text at Level B1 because some of the staffs will still use it. If you're having future interchanges with existing lines, pls put the grey text because it wasn't opened. Thank you for your cooperation!AgentSuperGuy (talk) 12:40, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello again. I have noticed from the line called Kelana Jaya Line placed as PUTRA Line right? Actually the real name was PUTRA LRT, this is a real name. However i have edited to all new stations, KJ25 to KJ37 , and all of the stations were completed construction 100%, so because of this, i have renamed to under testing instead of using completed. Because before the operation on 30 June 2016, they need to test the new stations along Kelana Jaya Line to be tested out before the passengers was served. So therefore i have changed to under testing instead of completed. Please remember to do these to the future lines which are nearly finishing construction on these railway or metro lines. Thank you for your cooperation!AgentSuperGuy (talk) 12:59, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
Tuas West Extension
Hello again. On the East West MRT Line pages which offered from three stations on Tuas West Extension which were not good are Gul Circle MRT Station, Tuas Crescent MRT Station and last but not least is Tuas West Road MRT Station, all these stations have to be added grey text when this train was not opened if not people think that the station was already opened. Make sure when the station was not opened, please put at grey text all times, but do not need to put grey bold text on the levels as it was useful us. Thank you for your own cooperation!AgentSuperGuy (talk) 14:01, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
- I would think that the regular (and more experienced) editors working around the Singapore MRT system's articles would be quite familiar with their own styling guidelines, and you're really wasting your time by giving them these grammatically confusing and mostly unnecessary notices. Jc86035 (talk • contribs) Use {{re|Jc86035}} to reply to me 14:08, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
Page moves
That's quite a few you've made recently. Can I ask where the consensus for them is, or the discussions have taken place? Muffled Pocketed 11:17, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
- It's from Talk:Singapore MRT C151. Thanks!AgentSuperGuy (talk) 11:18, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
- That is only one article (and even then, you just saying this is NOT a consensus. And why do you say 'we'? You have made ?hundreds of page moves, with no agreement from the community- and at least one has been reverted already as being against consensus. AND you only created your account on 7 June??? Thanks. Muffled Pocketed 11:26, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
- Yes i created an account on 7 June 2016? Why you so concerned, i'm an Autoconfirmed User, autoconfirmed users means can move pages or do something else. Anyway what's wrong?Agenttax1 11:31, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
- Please read WP:CONSENSUS, which explains how Wikipedia editors cooperate. Page moves as you have been performing should only be performed by experienced users and only with community consensus, except in cases of uncontroversial moves. The fact that you have already been reverted should demonstrate to you the possibility that they either are controversial or just plain wrong. Will you please revert all the page moves please? You should also tell us about the previous account you held here. Cheers! Muffled Pocketed 11:36, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
- What is the name of the previous account name? Cheers!Agenttax1 11:37, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
- I am asking YOU what your previous account was? Muffled Pocketed 11:39, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
- Can you let me revert all the pages first? Later i'll ask you. I'm very very busyAgenttax1 11:40, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
- I am asking YOU what your previous account was? Muffled Pocketed 11:39, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
- What is the name of the previous account name? Cheers!Agenttax1 11:37, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
- Please read WP:CONSENSUS, which explains how Wikipedia editors cooperate. Page moves as you have been performing should only be performed by experienced users and only with community consensus, except in cases of uncontroversial moves. The fact that you have already been reverted should demonstrate to you the possibility that they either are controversial or just plain wrong. Will you please revert all the page moves please? You should also tell us about the previous account you held here. Cheers! Muffled Pocketed 11:36, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
- Yes i created an account on 7 June 2016? Why you so concerned, i'm an Autoconfirmed User, autoconfirmed users means can move pages or do something else. Anyway what's wrong?Agenttax1 11:31, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
- That is only one article (and even then, you just saying this is NOT a consensus. And why do you say 'we'? You have made ?hundreds of page moves, with no agreement from the community- and at least one has been reverted already as being against consensus. AND you only created your account on 7 June??? Thanks. Muffled Pocketed 11:26, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
Task Completed
I'm already done reverting ALL of them. Now you're making me so tired. Now i'm getting back to my own work.Agenttax1 12:41, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
- And your signature. Muffled Pocketed 12:52, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
- I've changed back alreadyAgentSuperGuy (talk) 12:54, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
Signature Change
Hello everyone! I have change my signature from AgentSuperGuy to Agenttax1 as my new signature for now till 7 July 2016. I will be kept at Agenttax1 till 7 July 2016. If you want to see my old signature, you can look at the older messages with my older signature.Agenttax1 11:28, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
- Why is this necessary?
- I think you need to add at least one link in your signature to your userpage (User:AgentSuperGuy) or talk page (here), or otherwise it's confusing because it's difficult to tell who you are without checking a page's history. —Jc86035 (talk • contribs) Use {{re|Jc86035}} to reply to me 11:40, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
- No. Please read WP:SIGLINK- you must link to either your userpage or this page! Cheers, Muffled Pocketed 11:41, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
- Done reverting my signature to my original signature for now on.AgentSuperGuy (talk) 12:56, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Civility Barnstar | |
Well done on resolving multiple issues promptly and good-naturedly. Cheers! Muffled Pocketed 13:01, 29 June 2016 (UTC) |
Thank you!
More Barnstars
Hello when can I get more barnstars to be collected? You just only give me one barnstar which is civility. On 30 June 2016 i'll be archiving all my messages.AgentSuperGuy (talk) 13:20, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
- If you work well with the rest of the community maybe others will be nice and give some more barnstars to you. Or not. (I have yet to receive a barnstar – at least one with a coherent message, anyway – and it's been almost four years.) When you archive your talk page is entirely up to you and shouldn't really be anyone else's business. (You may want to look at Template:Setup auto archiving.) Jc86035 (talk • contribs) Use {{re|Jc86035}} to reply to me 13:42, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
- It's going to be end of June 2016, tomorrow is the last day of June then after that is New Month's Day July, so that's why I need to archive to differentiate between June and July. I need 7 archives this year then 12 for the next year then following year is 12.AgentSuperGuy (talk) 14:29, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
Kelana Jaya Line Extension
Hey everyone! Did you know that 13 stations along Kelana Jaya Line has opened, which has now upsized to 37 stations, and before the extension opens, they never update the date 30 June 2016, what is this? The person put this: [needs update], this is a lame instruction from us, we and I have to update before the new station along current and future extensions if not later the Wikipedians will forget their dates very well. I have added all to 30 June 2016 but however I didn't add 30 at the June 2016 for Subang Alam LRT Station and Putra Heights LRT Station as they placed 30 June 2016 as it was now very useful. In the future, take note if the new stations will going to be open in the future, please write the date instead of just put the Month and the year. It's not specific. Thanks for your cooperation!AgentSuperGuy (talk) 10:28, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
End of June 2016
We have come to the end of June 2016, June is always the sixth month with 30 days. I hope you have the marvellous month enjoyable time in June, next year June 2017 will be much happier and more adventurous and coming more and more to explore in 2017 compare to this year, The stages need to improve and improve. This is the end of June 2016, i hope you have the enjoyable whole month in June 2016. Stay tuned to July 2016 which it will be the seventh month. June will come back to you in 2017. Let's go to 31-day July 2016 for now, it will be super amazing and tell what is all about. Tne end of this archive.AgentSuperGuy (talk) 16:38, 1 July 2016 (UTC)