Jump to content

User talk:AmericanEditor350

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, AmericanEditor350, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:AmericanEditor350, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 06:25, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:AmericanEditor350

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:AmericanEditor350 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 06:25, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cameroonian Canadian moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Cameroonian Canadian, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. RoanokeVirginia (talk) 17:37, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cameroonian Canadian (April 18)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Needs more to show notability
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 18:20, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, AmericanEditor350! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 18:20, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cameroonian Canadians (April 30)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Numberguy6 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Needs to be more than a bullet list of statistics and individual people.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Numberguy6 (talk) 03:31, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mozambicans in Portugal moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Mozambicans in Portugal, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. UnitedStatesian (talk) 00:21, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mozambicans in Portugal (June 6)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nearlyevil665 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Non-notable cross-categorization, no pass of WP:GNG, doesn't seem to merit a standalone article.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
nearlyevil665 13:23, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mozambicans in Portugal (June 8)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Greenman were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Please fix the references, address the notability concerns, and remove the mass of red links before any resubmission.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 20:36, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Badr Hari, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Moroccan. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Senegalese people in Germany moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Senegalese people in Germany, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mooonswimmer 21:16, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, it was me, AnericanEditor350 who was asking this question AmericanEditor350 (talk) 21:25, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bissau-Guineans in Portugal moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Bissau-Guineans in Portugal, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 22:49, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Senegalese people in Germany (June 23)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 13:58, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Senegalese people in Sweden for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Senegalese people in Sweden is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Senegalese people in Sweden until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Tow (talk) 14:43, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Malians in Italy for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Malians in Italy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malians in Italy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

MarioGom (talk) 16:09, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

[edit]
The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, AmericanEditor350! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Tow (talk) 16:32, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You’re welcome, sir. AmericanEditor350 (talk) 16:35, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Guineans in Italy for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Guineans in Italy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guineans in Italy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

PRAXIDICAE🌈 19:53, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

your creations

[edit]

You have created several unsourced or poorly sourced articles with nothing but stats (most of which are unsourced) that would be better included in the target article that I and several others have attempted to redirect to. Stop doing this, it's disruptive and unencyclopedic. If you continue, I will take this matter to WP:ANI. PRAXIDICAE🌈 19:54, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There are other articles like this with stats that I did not even create myself, and they are not wanting to delete those. AmericanEditor350 (talk) 20:19, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Senegalese people in Germany (June 25)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 20:27, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Guinean Canadians moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Guinean Canadians, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE🌈 23:44, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I thank you for that. Do you think you in any way can help me find more resourceful information for my article? If so, will you please help me on that? AmericanEditor350 (talk) 23:46, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I warned you earlier not to create these in mainspace - the onus is on you to find sources, you need to search books and similar reliable sources before publishing any content. PRAXIDICAE🌈 23:47, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
What does the word onus mean? AmericanEditor350 (talk) 23:52, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I really recommend you utilize google. PRAXIDICAE🌈 23:54, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I just looked up the word onus, and it means it is used to refer something as someone's duty/responsibility. And I will try to search for books and similar reliable sources as much as possible. AmericanEditor350 (talk) 23:56, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Also consider this a final warning, you cannot add unsourced categories or content about anything, but especially living people without reliable sources. PRAXIDICAE🌈 00:56, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. AmericanEditor350 (talk) 01:01, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Senegalese people in Sweden

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Senegalese people in Sweden requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, society, or group that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Tow (talk) 05:37, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from using talk pages such as Talk:List of The Fairly OddParents characters for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 23:57, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ghanaians in Sweden moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Ghanaians in Sweden, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Curbon7 (talk) 12:26, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sierra Leoneans in Sweden moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Sierra Leoneans in Sweden, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Curbon7 (talk) 12:34, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Sierra Leoneans in Sweden has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sierra Leoneans in Sweden. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 12:43, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Zimbabweans in Italy

[edit]
Notice

The article Zimbabweans in Italy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of any encyclopaedic value. Appears to be WP:OR synthesised from two sources both of which return a 404 error.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Velella  Velella Talk   15:19, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nigerians in France moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Nigerians in France, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Curbon7 (talk) 15:58, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

xxx people in Country

[edit]

Just saw that you created Senegalese people in Norway. I appreciate your eagerness to create articles, but generally these types of articles are deleted at WP:Articles for deletion. I urge you to draftify the article, at least for now. Ovinus (talk) 00:44, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To be honest with you, I don't mean to violate Wikipedia's policies in any way, shape, or form. AmericanEditor350 (talk) 00:54, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I believe you! It's just that we do have guidelines on what topics are notable, the most important being the general notability guideline. There are some special considerations for lists, but for an article like Sengalese people in Norway, we need to find sources which specifically discuss Senegalese people in Norway as a group, rather than trying to find such people and make a list out of them. If you're interested in these kinds of statistics, they might belong in articles like Lebanese diaspora for Lebanon, but it needs to be pretty brief. What's not kosher, though, is just lists of people when sources don't exist discussing such a list. Ovinus (talk) 03:44, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Senegalese people in Sweden for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Senegalese people in Sweden is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Senegalese people in Sweden (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Tow (talk) 00:59, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Senegalese people in Norway for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Senegalese people in Norway is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Senegalese people in Norway until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Curbon7 (talk) 15:42, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cameroonians in Norway for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cameroonians in Norway is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cameroonians in Norway until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Curbon7 (talk) 12:52, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kenyans in Norway

[edit]
Notice

The article Kenyans in Norway has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable group; fails WP:GNG. Wikipedia is not a database for every expat group under the sun.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Curbon7 (talk) 16:57, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I also PRODed Beninese people in Italy, Kenyans in Italy, and Sierra Leoneans in Italy. Curbon7 (talk) 17:02, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop creating articles

[edit]

Please stop creating articles until responding and having a full discussion here. I know you are making them in good faith, but they do not follow Wikipedia's guidelines. At least two editors (one being me) have explained this. If you keep creating articles without a discussion first, this will likely escalate. Ovinus (talk) 17:05, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I see you've also now removed all the prods - I suggest you take today to actually source them properly before this makes its way to ANI. PRAXIDICAE🌈 18:24, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
What does ANI stand for? AmericanEditor350 (talk) 18:32, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
WP:ANI - which is where this is headed. PRAXIDICAE🌈 18:35, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@AmericanEditor350 perhaps I was unclear in my many messages, or you are unable to parse what you're being told by multiple editors. Stop creating these articles, it's getting disruptive and you're wasting everyone's time because it's forced into an AFD with an obvious outcome. If you continue, I will be taking this to ANI and requesting an outright block of your account or an indefinite mainspace block/editing restriction (which means you will be unable to edit in mainspace or create articles directly.) PRAXIDICAE🌈 17:07, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Please understand that I am not trying to violate any Wikipedia guidelines at all. AmericanEditor350 (talk) 17:09, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Good intentions don't negate disruption. Competency is required and you seem wholly unable to take any form of criticism or listen to experienced editors, so the next message from me is going to be your notification of the ANI thread. PRAXIDICAE🌈 17:12, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Articles on ethnic groups by country

[edit]

While I really appreciate your enthusiasm, a lot of these articles appear to be on subjects that aren't notable. I would recommend collaborating more with other editors and running potential articles past them first before creating them. I'd be willing to help. Rubbish computer (Ping me or leave a message on my talk page) 19:19, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kenyans in Norway for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kenyans in Norway is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenyans in Norway until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

PRAXIDICAE🌈 19:55, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sierra Leoneans in Italy for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sierra Leoneans in Italy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sierra Leoneans in Italy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Curbon7 (talk) 14:05, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Malians in Sweden for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Malians in Sweden is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malians in Sweden until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

PRAXIDICAE🌈 17:06, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Zimbabweans in Italy for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zimbabweans in Italy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zimbabweans in Italy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

PRAXIDICAE🌈 17:09, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cameroonians in Italy for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cameroonians in Italy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cameroonians in Italy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

PRAXIDICAE🌈 17:10, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Guineans in Sweden for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Guineans in Sweden is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guineans in Sweden until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

PRAXIDICAE🌈 17:10, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ANI

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.PRAXIDICAE🌈 17:30, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Block

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for disruptive editing. Sorry, but with all the myriad WP:CIR issues, and promises to remedy these, the latest edit warring does not inspire confidence. This is not taking it slow; this is not good WP:COMMUNICATION. Any further problems after this short block expires, are likely to be met with a much lengthier block, possibly even one set not to expire. You really should take the day to familiarize yourself with the basics and to really absorb their essence and ethos (I recommend starting with WP:5P, WP:SIMPLE, WP:PG). Good luck. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  El_C 01:09, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No original research

[edit]

One of the main problems with your "people from country x living in country y" articles is that they are built on original research. That is not allowed in Wikipedia. For the articles about people from Mali, Senegal, and Guinea who live in Sweden, you used data from Statistics Sweden (SCB) on the country of birth for people who were registered as living in Sweden in 2021. Not their ethnicity, or their religion, or their languages – only which country they were born in.

Let's take the article Senegalese people in Sweden as an example. The first sentence says "Senegalese people in Sweden are people from Senegal who live in Sweden or Swedish people of Senegalese descent or origin." Whose definition is that? The article continues: "As of 2021 according to Statistics Sweden, there are 1,125 Senegalese people living in Sweden." That is not true, not with the definition you provided in the first sentence. SCB says that there were 1,125 individuals registered as living in Sweden, who were born in Senegal. It does not say anything about "Senegalese descent".

Are you aware of the fact that it is illegal to register people's ethnicity in many countries, including Sweden? As an American, you are perhaps reading things that aren't there into the SCB figures, because you might take it for granted that "country of origin" implies ethnicity. I don't know if that is how you reasoned, but it might be. In any case, the 1,125 individuals include people who were born in Senegal by Swedish diplomats, business people and others who lived in Senegal at the time, but have since moved back to Sweden. And the lists of "notable individuals" overwhelmingly consisted of people who were born in Sweden (so not part of the figures you got from SCB), in some cases with one parent or even just one great-grandparent from the country you associated them with – saying that the Leionhjärta twins are "Senegalese in Sweden" is a case in point. And some people you included in the lists were born in Sweden but have since moved abroad!

Even more concerning are the claims about religion – there is no verification of your claims about the religious affiliations of the various groups. It does look like you looked at the majority religions in the countries of origin and just slapped that onto the groups you created articles about. That's not even original research, it's guesswork. --bonadea contributions talk 22:57, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, country of origin pretty much implies ethnicity. AmericanEditor350 (talk) 01:19, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that is how I reasoned it. AmericanEditor350 (talk) 01:20, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
OK. Do you now understand that you misunderstood what the source said, and that "country of origin" does not imply ethnicity? --bonadea contributions talk 17:22, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
In some way, shape or form, yes. AmericanEditor350 (talk) 17:25, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Guinean Canadians (July 3)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
bonadea contributions talk 13:18, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

More advice

[edit]

Going forward, to prevent further conflict and blocks, I strongly advise you familiarize yourself with WP:V and WP:RS - every edit that you make which adds content should be sourced to a reliable source. PRAXIDICAE🌈 15:47, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I’m trying the best I can. And the next time I ever create an article related to an ethnic group, I will discuss it with someone and gather resources before doing so. AmericanEditor350 (talk) 16:29, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
And I’m not perfect at all. I don’t want to vandalize Wikipedia at all, or violate any policies. AmericanEditor350 (talk) 16:30, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Adventure and a few other notes

[edit]

Hi @AmericanEditor350, I hope this finds you well and does not feel like piling on at all as that is not my intention. I have a few suggestions fo ways to If you have not done so already, I would highly recommend doing The Wikipedia Adventure as it is can be quite helpful. A good way I found to start getting into editing was to find pages in topics that interest you that haven't been updated in a while or are stubs and expand them out. I would recommend if you're editing biographies to start with those of non-living people. Biographies of living people have particularly high sourcing requirements as improperly sourced (and thus potentially inaccurate information) in a biography of a living person as outlined at WP:BLP can be very detrimental to that living person. If you have any questions please ping me using {{u|TartarTorte}} or User:TartarTorte in your reply. All the best! TartarTorte 12:09, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You know, I am very interested in the African diaspora in Europe. Do you believe The Wikipedia Adventure can help me with this, TartarTorte?

AmericanEditor350 (talk) 14:08, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I would first do The Wikipedia Adventure to get your bearings a bit better including as it teaches things like WP:V which will be very helpful in writing future articles on the African Diaspora in Europe. I would recommend expanding a few articles after doing The Wikipedia Adventure as opposed to diving back into creating articles, but that last bit is just personal opinion. TartarTorte 15:48, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I just want to let you know that I’m currently taking a break from creating articles right now, TartarTorte. AmericanEditor350 (talk) 15:56, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good. I don't want to dissuade you from creating articles in the future, especially as it seems you have interests in topics that are not that widely covered on wikipedia, I just think that doing The Wikipedia Adventure and some article expansion will give you the background to be able to have your new articles pass page curation and not be taken to WP:AFD. Best of luck, and please feel free to ping me using {{u|TartarTorte}} whenever you need. TartarTorte 15:59, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I understand, TartarTorte. AmericanEditor350 (talk) 16:00, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ethnicity in the opening sentence

[edit]

Hello AmericanEditor350, I have noticed that on this edit on Karim Sow, you added that the player is a "Swiss professional footballer of Senegalese descent". Please do not do this, because it is in violation of WP:ETHNICITY. Him being of Senegalese descent is not relevant to him being notable. Generally, we leave out ethnicity in the opening sentence, but we can mention it in a "Personal life" or "Early life" section, for example. Thank you, Paul Vaurie (talk) 08:48, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I only added that because he was in the category of Swiss people of Senegalese descent. AmericanEditor350 (talk) 15:41, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Otherwise, I wouldn’t have added it. AmericanEditor350 (talk) 15:43, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You can not add claims based only on which Wikipedia categories an article is in. --bonadea contributions talk 08:23, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Sarah Atcho, you may be blocked from editing. Have you already forgotten the information you got on 15 July? Do not add irrelevant text on ethnicity to article leads. Did you read WP:ETHNICITY as requested above?

You should probably avoid making any edits that have to do with ethnicity or related concepts. bonadea contributions talk 07:37, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Franck Semou, you may be blocked from editing. Another WP:ETHNICITY violation – one of several such violations. It's also unsourced, but you added it to a sourced sentence, which in itself is completely inappropriate. bonadea contributions talk 08:15, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mozambicans in Portugal

[edit]

Information icon Hello, AmericanEditor350. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mozambicans in Portugal, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:02, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Senegalese people in Germany

[edit]

Information icon Hello, AmericanEditor350. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Senegalese people in Germany, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ghanaians in Sweden

[edit]

Information icon Hello, AmericanEditor350. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ghanaians in Sweden, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Guinean Canadians

[edit]

Information icon Hello, AmericanEditor350. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Guinean Canadians, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sierra Leoneans in Sweden

[edit]

Information icon Hello, AmericanEditor350. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sierra Leoneans in Sweden, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:01, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mozambicans in Portugal

[edit]

Hello, AmericanEditor350. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mozambicans in Portugal".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:43, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Zambian Americans

[edit]

Information icon Hello, AmericanEditor350. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Zambian Americans, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:01, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Senegalese people in Germany

[edit]

Hello, AmericanEditor350. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Senegalese people in Germany".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:25, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ghanaians in Sweden

[edit]

Hello, AmericanEditor350. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ghanaians in Sweden".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:59, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Guinean Canadians

[edit]

Hello, AmericanEditor350. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Guinean Canadians".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 14:25, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Zambian Americans

[edit]

Hello, AmericanEditor350. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Zambian Americans".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 03:31, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Bissau-Guineans in Portugal

[edit]

Information icon Hello, AmericanEditor350. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bissau-Guineans in Portugal, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:01, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Cameroonian Canadians

[edit]

Information icon Hello, AmericanEditor350. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cameroonian Canadians, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:02, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Bissau-Guineans in Portugal

[edit]

Hello, AmericanEditor350. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bissau-Guineans in Portugal".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:00, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Cameroonian Canadians

[edit]

Hello, AmericanEditor350. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Cameroonian Canadians".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 00:43, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Nigerians in France

[edit]

Information icon Hello, AmericanEditor350. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nigerians in France, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:03, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Nigerians in France

[edit]

Hello, AmericanEditor350. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Nigerians in France".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:37, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AmericanEditor350&oldid=1187225466"