Jump to content

User talk:Anachroliz/Archive 4

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4

Welcome!

Hi २ तकर पेप्सी! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 20:12, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Jaya Bhattacharya

I have undone your edits to Kaisa Hai Bhai 2 takar Pepsi 😅🤣😂, you added an unrelated citation in the lead section and removed the {{BLP sources}} tag from the article. Please see Help:Referencing for beginners & WP:BLP to understand more about BLPs. Cheers! 2405:201:4013:80AA:1081:181A:60BA:31C1 (talk) 20:30, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

I'm sorry. But I have given an reference. Why did you removed that. २ तकर पेप्सी (talk) 20:35, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Hello. Your reference was about her leaving a show, and did not pertain to the text you added it in front of. 2405:201:4013:80AA:1081:181A:60BA:31C1 (talk) 20:38, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

I'm sorry I will mind next time. Thankyou for guiding me out २ तकर पेप्सी (talk) 20:39, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Anytime! Also do check out this interactive session. It's a great guide for beginners. Cheers! 2405:201:4013:80AA:1081:181A:60BA:31C1 (talk) 20:41, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

You may want to check this guideline

WP:REDLINKS. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 20:50, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kolkatar Harry (September 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robertsky was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
See the notability guidelines for future films. The lowest hanging fruit is to include a Production section stating that the principal filming had started X, ended Y (if ended), and other notable details.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
– robertsky (talk) 10:54, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, २ तकर पेप्सी! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! – robertsky (talk) 10:54, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Hey robertsky I worked on the draft as per your comment and modified it. You can recheck this hope you do it soon. २ तकर पेप्सी (talk) 12:22, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Just a clarification, the work is paid by ZEE5, as what your declaration on your user page suggests? – robertsky (talk) 01:56, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

Yes sir/Ma'am all shows of zee mostly written by their wiki team if not someone writes before us. २ तकर पेप्सी (talk) 10:53, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

ehhh... did you just implied that this is a shared account? – robertsky (talk) 12:09, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

Mostly at starting but I use more. I have improved the draft as per your guidance. Can you check the draft. २ तकर पेप्सी (talk) 16:28, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) @Robertsky: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AnonymousIndiaz already exists and is on hold per their declaration of paid editing. 2405:201:4013:80F4:1DB:51CC:DE38:6D55 (talk) 13:48, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kolkatar Harry (October 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Krishnavilasom Bhageerathan Pilla was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This comes under WP:TOOSOON
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Pillechan (പിള്ളേച്ചനോട് പറ) 22:11, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

About retired banners and banned users

Would you care to explain this edit, in light of ANI discussion saying the banner may stay? —C.Fred (talk) 00:18, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Hey I edited as an administrator said not to add [[1]] so I changed. २ तकर पेप्सी (talk) 09:28, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

२ तकर पेप्सी, I suggest you do not make such edits in the future when you do not understand what you are doing. You have misunderstood the role of an administrator, the manner in which the Wikipedia community is self-governed or some other facet of the situation. Disagreements on Wikipedia are resolved by discussion, in which admins do not have special powers, except the very limited power to assess the outcome of a discussion (not to tell anybody what to do based on their own opinion). We encourage editors to be bold in many cases, but making a contentious change that draws further attention to a deeply unpleasant situation that has left many people here with wounds that are yet to heal is not encouraged. — Bilorv (talk) 19:07, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Krushal Ahuja (actor) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Krushal Ahuja (actor), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Additional note: the article in its current form does not meet notability guidelines for actors. – robertsky (talk) 10:38, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Krushal Ahuja (actor) (October 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
bonadea contributions talk 11:07, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

२ तकर पेप्सी (talk) 19:40, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
I strongly advise you to refrain from moving any draft articles to main space yourself without submitting them for review, or risk being blocked for disruption. I have moved it back to Draft:Umesh Chandra Padala and fixed the tag so that you now own the resubmission.
If you submit it, it will be declined. None of the cited sources are independent of the topic. They contain no bylines. The first and third are identical except for a PR statement at the end of one, indicating they were written by the subject. The second and fifth were clearly written by the subject, and the last one was published by a PR news outlet. None of these are acceptable sources. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:24, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Again, stop moving draft articles into main space. I have un-done your latest move as it is not ready for publication. If you have any association with Draft:Kolkatar Harry then you must not move it yourself. This sort of activity is what got your colleagues blocked. Don't let that happen to you. You need to have a lot more Wikipedia experience and familiarity with policies and guidelines before you can decide that drafts merit publication in article space. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:37, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Hi User:Anachronist draft has already submitted for review by ip user. I did few changes now what should I do? २ तकर पेप्सी (talk) 03:56, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

You wait. Or you improve the draft further, because in its current state a reviewer would decline it. The sources consist primarily of announcements about the film, brief coverage, and some interview quotes, nothing significant or in-depth. It would be best to wait for the film to be released, when it would likely get more coverage. It is WP:TOOSOON to be notable enough to meet the requirements of WP:GNG and WP:NFF. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:07, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

This still applies. Do not move drafts into mainspace, or create new articles in mainspace, if the topic has anything to do with ZEE5. Thank you. --bonadea contributions talk 14:08, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited B.D.Memorial International, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CBSE. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jovan (actor)

Hello २ तकर पेप्सी,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Jovan (actor) for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

JW 1961 Talk 20:36, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Information icon Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Jeet filmography. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 11:55, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

Will mind it from next time..२ तकर पेप्सी (talk) 16:21, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Michael J. Snarskis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Anachroliz/Archive 4. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Polyamorph (talk) 17:05, 19 November 2021 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

October 2021

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved without good reason. They should have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ✗plicit 03:41, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

Hey but is it ok to put birth year in the article name? २ तकर पेप्सी (talk) 15:45, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

No. David notMD (talk) 17:30, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jovan (actor)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jovan (actor) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Farhan Ahmed Jovan. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 01:25, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

The thing was 3years ago. Now he clearly passes all the criteria. Thank you २ तकर पेप्सी (talk) 01:32, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

It is now at Draft:Farhan Ahmed Jovan and submitted to AfC. David notMD (talk) 17:32, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hi २ तकर पेप्सी! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Adminstats, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

Click this link to read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, you can create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello !!! 2 Takar Pepsi 😅🤣😂

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Username

To change your signature, just go to:

  • 2 Takar Pepsi 😅🤣😂 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:4060:2E00:5351:0:0:58C8:A30A (talk) 12:44, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
  • "Preferences" (you'll see the link at the top right corner of the page)
  • On the first page, under "User Profile", scroll down to "Signatures".
  • There you will see a text box where you can customize your signature. For example, your username is apparently Hindi, and seems to translate to "2 up to Pepsi". If you wanted add that to your signature, then in that text box you would add;
    [[User:२ तकर पेप्सी|२ तकर पेप्सी/2 up to Pepsi]] ([[User talk:२ तकर पेप्सी|talk]])
    and then save. Your signature will then appear as:
    २ तकर पेप्सी/2 up to Pepsi (talk)

There are additional instructions at Wikipedia:Signature tutorial, and at the bottom of the page you will find a list of unique, colorful and creative signatures, just as you will see throughout Wikipedia, that may help give you some ideas.

If you need any further assistance, you can contact the Help Desk. I hope you find this useful and happy editing!. - wolf 00:56, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Ok

२ तकर पेप्सी talk 09:05, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

Non-notable actor

Information icon Hello. Your recent edit to List of Bollywood actors ‎ appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline.
Ayan Nayak does not have their OWN article, just a redirect to a TV series which features lots of people, but which does not even mention Ayan Nayak as a member of the cast. Please stop adding their name to lists, as such lists generally require the person to have their OWN article - Arjayay (talk) 14:09, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

Alright I didn't new it २ तकर पेप्सी (talk) 14:25, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

Uranium_mining_in_the_Bancroft_area

Hi, I see you did a large deletion of this article, but published that with no explanation and indicate it was a "minor" edit, when clearly it is not minor. I assume that was done in error, so have reverted. If you have legitiate cause to delete so much content, would ask that you start a discussion about why first. CT55555 (talk) 23:08, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

@CT55555 Yes it was my fault. I clicked minor edit by mistake also published without any summery, but provided now u can check it here [2] २ तकर पेप्सी (talk) 23:16, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for clarifying, also I over estimated the degree of initial editing, and my reaction was therefore over reacting too. All the best to you. CT55555 (talk) 00:02, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Ayan (actor)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Ayan (actor) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.imdb.com/name/nm12638791/bio?ref_=nm_ov_bio_sm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 10mmsocket (talk) 22:38, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

Hello, २ तकर पेप्सी,
I have removed the copyright violation from the article. Do not "borrow" content from another website or publication. All of the content has to be your original words. Liz Read! Talk! 05:19, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

AFC reviewing

Please formally apply at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation/Participants if you are interested in accepting or declining AFC submissions. While you're allowed to move drafts to mainspace, it's misleading to leave accept/decline templates on users' talk pages when you are not currently an AFC reviewer. DanCherek (talk) 00:52, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

@DanCherek: Thanks n Sorry I didn't knew that process, I have applied for it.२ तकर पेप्सी (talk) 01:13, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Megha Daw (January 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
There are too many weak sources in the draft. Adding seven citations at the end of the stub is not helpful to the reader, especially when those sources are poor. See WP:BASIC and WP:NACTOR for relevant notability criteria.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
bonadea contributions talk 07:10, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Hello

Your name २ तकर पेप्सी = 2 Rupee Pepsi. Where to get 2 Rupee Pepsi ? 42.106.237.13 (talk) 14:29, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

January 2022

Information icon Hello, २ तकर पेप्सी. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. 2402:3A80:1A48:F5F2:430B:2659:78F3:E93B (talk) 04:43, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Ayan (actor)

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Template:Db-hoax, is considered vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 2402:3A80:1C42:6C5:C406:7A48:9A04:2B21 (talk) 05:06, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Please stop moving drafts to mainspace

You just moved Draft:First HelpCare into mainspace; it is nowhere near ready to be a Wikipedia article, and it has been moved back to draftspace. You have already been asked not to move drafts into mainspace. Focus instead on editing Wikipedia and learning more about sources, notability, and other important policies. Thank you. --bonadea contributions talk 21:06, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

@Bonadea: Sorry I saw some significant coverage so I thought it's eligible for the mainpage. ... २ तकरपेप्सी talk 21:25, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Well, if you thought that this was a viable article with significant coverage, I'm afraid that rather proves my point; none of the sources in the draft offers in-depth coverage, none of them is secondary, and only one is possibly independent – the others are not. Wikipedia guidelines and policies can be complicated. That's why brand-new editors can't create articles in mainspace, and the AfC process exists to give experienced editors a chance to review suggested new articles and help new editors.
You asked about on my talk page about the press releases in the draft; it looks like you were under the impression that all press releases have a standard disclaimer. That is not the case, but ethical publishers and news services will tell the reader that it is a press release. In Draft:First HelpCare, the press release from IANS is clearly marked as such, by the three publications that ran it: news18.com, National Herald, and Latestly. But even if the sources hadn't been labelled "IANS", you only need to read the first sentence in each of the sources to suspect that it's really the same text – and then it is very easy to confirm that by a spot-check of the rest of the text. You moved the draft to mainspace a couple of minutes after it had been submitted for review, and that is never going to be enough time to determine that a draft is ready for mainspace. It can be sufficient time to see that a draft is obviously not ready – evaluating that it is takes much longer. --bonadea contributions talk 12:59, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

February 2022

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 11:57, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Sure ... २ तकरपेप्सी talk 11:59, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

I had just noticed you responded to an AFD but didn't sign. Just a friendly reminder. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 13:57, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Raavan bengali film poster.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Raavan bengali film poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:54, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry

Information icon Hello, २ तकर पेप्सी, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Iyourpritam (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. 2402:3A80:1F09:9B10:C579:EE30:B7E5:D481 (talk) 18:43, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Could you provide evidence for this claim IP? ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 18:51, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
@Blaze Wolf: check this [3] to understand more the ip has personal hostility I guess. Aslo I don't know the the user doesn't comeup with real account. ... २ तकरपेप्सी talk 18:57, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
@Blaze Wolf: check the logs 2402:3A80:1F09:9B10:C579:EE30:B7E5:D481 (talk) 19:00, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

@2402:3A80:1F09:9B10:C579:EE30:B7E5:D481: what do you want to provide with this? The user created the draft after I did so it got deleted. If you don't trust call a admin. ... २ तकरपेप्सी talk 19:04, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Anachroliz/Archive_4&oldid=1080417261"