User talk:Catsue

October 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Irving Penn has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. —MC10 (T•C•GB•L•EM) 00:35, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have revised your edit to the Andrew Koenig page

Hi,

I have revised your edit to Josh_Andrew_Koenig and moved the info about Walter to the Personal Life section where someone had already noted their relationship. Just fits better in that section since Walter's career stuff probably doesnt belong in Andrew's Career section.

Best, RobertMfromLI | User Talk 19:31, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

Welcome

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent edits, such as the ones to the page Isaac Mizrahi, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so on Wikipedia:Sandbox rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! 220.101.28.25 (talk) 21:26, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Isaac Mizrahi. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. --220.101.28.25 (talk) 21:26, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Shaun Casey. Thank you.--220.101.28.25 (talk) 21:26, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. JNW (talk) 00:03, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ione Skye

If you check some of the news sites regarding Ione Skye's marriage to Ben Lee, you see that they all say it's her second marriage with the first one being to Adam Horovitz. So she couldn't have been married to David Netto. Tabercil (talk) 22:06, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Catsue for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page.

November 2010

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Brad Pitt. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. John KB (talk) 13:15, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

American Restoration

Hi. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but we cannot accept unsourced material or original research, such as this edit of yours to American Restoration. Wikipedia requires that all material added to articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable sources explicitly cited in the text in the form of an inline citation, which you can learn to make here. Material lacking such sources, or obtained through personal knowledge or unpublished syntheses of previously published material, is not permitted. Sources whose content is user-generated, such as blogs, message boards, other wikis, imdb, etc., are not considered reliable. If you have any other questions about editing, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of my talk page. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 16:01, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Rachel Weisz. Thank you. Cntras (talk) 00:58, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Dorian Leigh. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. JohnInDC (talk) 17:48, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 28

Hi. When you recently edited Chris Penn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Footloose (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:37, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 2012

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Edith Flagg. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 01:10, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 19

Hi. When you recently edited Mark Gordon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Spencer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 03:35, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tameka Foster, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Usher (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Kelly Rutherford. Thank you.
The related edit (from 30 August) is here 220 of ^Borg 19:11, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced text or nonsense to articles about living persons, as you did to Maggie Rizer. Thank you. Quis separabit? 20:22, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

David Westerfield

On April 30 you added that Damon van Dam did not turn on the home’s alarm system, but you did not cite a source. The media reports I have seen (such as the San Diego Union Tribune) contain conflicting information (such as the times), but they all indicate that the alarm was turned on. The “Animal Witness” show stated that they don’t fully arm their alarm system, but even that show was clear that the system was on: both Damon and Brenda saw its alerts that a door was open.TheTruth-2009 (talk) 06:58, 9 November 2012 (UTC) See in particular pages 28-33 of the book “Rush to Judgement”.TheTruth-2009 (talk) 09:28, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Steve Garvey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tiffany (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

Hello, I'm SummerPhD. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Jan Hooks, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 13:59, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another request to include sources

Please note that I reverted your edit at Rodger Bumpass as the information you added is based on a hoax (see Talk:Rodger Bumpass). Please ensure you include reliable sources (not IMDb!) when adding personal information to articles - this has been requested of you before, it is absolutely necessary that you begin to do so.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:21, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dorian Leigh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Breakfast at Tiffany's. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1918 flu pandemic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Upstairs, Downstairs. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Gordon Cooper, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you.

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Gordon Cooper does not have an edit summary. (Not an accurate summary.) Please make sure the summary covers all edits you do, especially when they are not minor.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks!

Welcome to Wikipedia. I notice that you added some content to Gordon Cooper that appears to be a minority or fringe viewpoint. Unfortunately, this edit appears to give undue weight to this minority viewpoint, and has been reverted. To maintain a neutral point of view, an idea that is not broadly supported by scholarship in its field must not be given undue weight in an article about a mainstream idea. Feel free to use the article's talk page to discuss this, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You placed undue weight on Cooper's belief in UFO's by moving this section before the section on his NASA career, which is by far the most notable aspect of his life. JustinTime55 (talk) 17:21, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Un-sourced edits re persons death

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Wally Schirra, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article.
You cannot add infomation saying a person has died, in this case Schirras wife, without a source. Related edits are here. 220 of ^Borg 21:07, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note that I found a source [1] easily, and have now re-added the verifiable parts of your edits. See here. - 220 of ^Borg 21:42, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Original research?

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Wally Schirra. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions.
• In the edit here, you also added "and had been married sixty one years one of the few Mercury astronaut couples who did not divorce.", which was not in the cited source. 220 of ^Borg 21:17, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Final waring regarding sources

At this point you have had more than ample opportunity to familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's policies regarding biographies and the requirement for reliable sourcing, yet you continue to disregard them. This is an absolute last warning - if you continue to add unsourced content to articles, as you did at Deke Slayton, you will be blocked.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:27, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Totally ridiculous. This is a major person who died, like First Lady Nancy Reagan, not some "rumor" or "gossip." You can google when this person died. And I did put in the source material which was a newspaper in San Diego, CA. Obviously someone erased it or it didn't go through.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:18, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is the edit for which you received a final warning. The burden is on you, no one else, to include reliable sources when adding material to articles. The need for reliable sources has been explained to you here ad nauseum, yet you continue unabated. For these reasons you have been blocked from editing for 48 hours. When the block expires please ensure that content you add to articles, most specifically biography articles, are supported by reliable sources.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:18, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Burgess Jenkins, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jason Thompson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Michelle Dockery, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Talk. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:25, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Catsue. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

You added a very large amount of unsourced and unencyclopedic material to Dan Stevens. You've been blocked before for adding unsourced material to biographies. As far as I can tell, you continue to add such material to multiple biograpical articles. I've also observed that you do not talk to other editors or administrators. This is a very poor trait in a collaborative project. Consider this your final warning that if you do not edit per policy, you risk being blocked for much longer than the last time.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:57, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You don't listen. For your most recent edits to Dan Stevens, I've blocked you for one week. See WP:GAB for your appeal rights.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:54, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Judy Lewis

Please do not remove cited information from an article. Your edit has been reverted. Bookworm857158367 (talk) 02:14, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Block notice

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:18, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Catsue, despite previous blocks for the continued addition of unsourced personal information to biography articles, you continue to violate our policies and guidelines. Since you edit infrequently, and timed blocks have made no difference, I have blocked your account indefinitely. You can be unblocked if you provide a WP:GAB-compliant unblock request acknowledging the issues raised and assuring us you will use reliable sources when adding such content in the future.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:18, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]