User talk:Cbaer

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Cbaer, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  -- Jeff3000 15:31, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Defender[edit]

Hi Defender, I made the mistake in not noticing there was a Defender (yacht) article. Since the links were to the Defender article which is a disambiguation page, which ideally nothing should be linked to, I changed the link to something else which I thought would be helpful in someone creating a page about the boat. I should have noticed that the Defender (yacht) article existed and changed the link to that. Regards, -- Jeff3000 15:31, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

>> Thank you, Jeff! And thanks for making the fix. I'm not sure how it was linked to the disambiguated page in the first place - had to have been my screw-up. I appreciate your suggested readings - I'll go through them! Cbaer 16:36, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External link on Pledge of Allegiance[edit]

Hi Chris! I must confess that when I looked at your external link I didn't notice that a large amount of the content of the book was available on the website. I just saw the table of contents of the book and thought it was basically an advertisement. My apologies. --Stormie 01:46, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Stormie - I appreciate it! Cbaer 14:34, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

James Shaw West[edit]

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article James Shaw West, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. ROGER TALK 19:05, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough - I moved the material as you suggested. The James Shaw West article may be deleted. Thanks for your eyes. Cbaer 13:04, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
May I mention how much I enjoyed reading these articles? Well-researched and very nicely written. Thank you. ROGER TALK 13:54, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]


The Original Barnstar
Your efforts are much appreciated ROGER TALK 14:00, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Thank you very much! I appreciate that! Cbaer 14:31, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK[edit]

Updated DYK query On July 16, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Monohansett (steamboat), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Blnguyen (bananabucket) 02:21, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK[edit]

Updated DYK query On 17 July, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Sankaty (steamboat), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Carabinieri 13:30, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Southampton_Island_1913.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Southampton_Island_1913.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:48, 23 December 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. OsamaK (talk) 20:48, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Thanks, OsamaK. I added additional source information that should better establish it as a public domain image. Cbaer (talk) 21:10, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Schooner Thomas W. Lawson[edit]

Image:Schooner Thomas W. Lawson 1902-1907 (loaded, later period).jpg

Hi, would you please have a look at the pic and possibly improve its (=my) "Commons" description to a rather "English" English? TX, -- WeHaWoe (talk) 13:46, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay - I did my best with it. See what you think! Cbaer (talk) 14:22, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Looks fine. TX. whwö -- WeHaWoe (talk) 15:33, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. It's been fun working with you on this article! Regarding your entry: Comer fathered at least one child while in Hudson Bay with a Inuit woman named Ooktok, Laurent Pameolik (1911-?). He was adopted by Shoofly and the shaman Angutimarik. were you going to add the citation? Thanks. Cheers. --Rosiestep (talk) 01:53, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I just found the citation and added it. You do great work! Keep it up!Cbaer (talk) 20:44, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hello again. Thanks for working on this article with me; awesome to see it on DYK! It was really nice to have someone else's perspective and your photos added a lot. I noticed that you've worked on other maritime articles and I'd be glad to edit with you again on some of those. No, I don't have a citations tool so I go back and forth with the wikitemplates, or just type out the four usuals: url/title/publisher/accessdate. If you come across a citations tool, would you let me know, as it sure would be helpful. Cheers, --Rosiestep (talk) 04:10, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
WikiProject Ships Barnstar
Cbaer, This barnstar is awarded to you because of your many contributions to maritime articles, but in particular, because of your collegial spirit co-editing Capt. George Comer with me to DYK caliber, and because, afterwards, you pointed me to look at my Gadgets, and there was refTool, the newly-created citations tool! Rosiestep (talk) 22:39, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much! And thanks for pointing out refTool! Cbaer (talk) 22:58, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Whaling Disaster of 1871[edit]

Updated DYK query On 9 April, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Whaling Disaster of 1871, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--BencherliteTalk 19:11, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cbaer. I know you have some maritime resources, and wondered if you had access to photos of the vessels discussed in the Howgate article that could be added there? I self-nomed Henry W. Howgate for DYK? so the admin folks should be looking at the article by 4/20/2008 for possible inclusion on the Main Page. Thanks, and Cheers, --Rosiestep (talk) 19:27, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rosiestep - Great article - quite a story! I spent some time digging around for any graphics of the Florence, the Gulnare, and the Proteus, without much luck. There is this: [1] - which might be P.D. but for some reason it's not coming up for me. Maybe their website is down. I'll keep my eyes peeled for more. Keep up the great work! And if you can add anything to Promise Island (Nunavut), Pitsiulartok, or Cape Fullerton, your expertise is always welcome! Cbaer (talk) 14:50, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nobska[edit]

Thanks! I know Wikipedians can be very picky, so I worked on it for some time before posting it and tried to find solid sources (NESF.... more of a primary source, too close to the Nobska). When I was a little kid, I recall coming into Nantucket on the Naushon when the Nobska was being towed out with a tug -- it is possible this is a manufactured memory, but I think it is right (given my age). I would love it if there were some photos, but, as far as I could tell the copyrights on the ones I saw online are not clear. Hopefully starting the page will allow someone who took photos to post them.--Wmjames (talk) 06:23, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PS: "Ran out of steam"! Awesome comment!--Wmjames (talk) 13:59, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PPS: Hey, have you had time to look for any photos of the Nobska that you have and have the copyright for? I have some photos on my computer, but they are all from the Internet and the copyright isn't at all clear for most of them, which is too bad. She was such a beautiful ship! (Imho.) If you had one nice one, if you could scan it and post it to the page, it would really be a huge contribution since people are so visually-inclined. One good photo would really complete the article. Alas, the Nobska....--Wmjames (talk) 15:48, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you are interested and have the time you might want to take a look at the above link. Another German to English article. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 03:06, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Green hand[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Green hand, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Largo Plazo (talk) 18:48, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cbaer. FYI, I made entries at Talk:Foxe_Basin, and on the Foxe Basin#Notable events editor's talk page, User talk:Lawrence Demichele. --Rosiestep (talk) 22:40, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

He was just blocked indefinitely for sock puppetry - I knew something wasn't right. I reverted the entry again. Thanks for your help. Cbaer (talk) 10:02, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Charles Bennett Ray[edit]

Updated DYK query On January 6, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Charles Bennett Ray, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 09:14, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

People from Martha's Vineyard[edit]

You seem to be adding this to many people who do not have an obvious connection with the place or just have a summer house there. For instance Edward Brooke and Lillian Nordica. Could you please (a) make sure the person has a strong connection ( as documented in the article ) before you add them and (b) perhaps give more information in your edit summary. - SimonLyall (talk) 18:58, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Southampton Island 1913.jpg[edit]

File:Southampton Island 1913.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Southampton Island 1913.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Southampton Island 1913.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 10:35, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"People from"[edit]

Greetings, Cbaer. I've always been "taught" those categories are only for birthplace. For instance, John Kerry is under Category:People from Aurora, Colorado, even though he's been a resident of Boston for most of his life. However, it seems other people will include "from" categories for longtime residents as well. For example, George W. Bush is under Category:People from New Haven, Connecticut and Category:People from Midland, Texas. So I guess it's up to you, and if you disagree with something I do, feel free to revert and/or bring it to my attention. What I do know is that, wherever a specific birthplace is known, we should make an effort to categorize by city/county. For instance, with this edit, you may disagree with my removal of several of the categories, but Category:People from Connecticut and Category:People from Massachusetts certainly do not belong there, as we have more specific sub-categories. - Biruitorul Talk 15:48, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Epenow[edit]

The DYK project (nominate) 18:03, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Makonikey aerial 2005.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Makonikey aerial 2005.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 16:48, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Vineyard Haven aerial 2005.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Vineyard Haven aerial 2005.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 16:48, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:West Chop MA aerial.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:West Chop MA aerial.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 16:51, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Hsl-Edgartown Airfield.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 15:09, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hsl West Chop Light.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hsl West Chop Light.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:51, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Cbaer. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Feiseen" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Feiseen. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 27#Feiseen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. FozzieHey (talk) 17:10, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Gretchen Baer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This person is not notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]