User talk:Chris O' Hare
|
Wikipedia and copyright
[edit]
Hello Chris O' Hare, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Ken Khouri have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.
- You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
- Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
- Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
- If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
- In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
- Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:12, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Chris O' Hare. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
January 2019
[edit]
Your addition to Walter Hugo Khouri has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 18:32, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
An extended welcome
[edit]Hi Chris O' Hare. Welcome to Wikipedia. I've added a welcome message to the top of this page that gives a great deal of information about Wikipedia. I hope you find it useful.
Additionally, I hope you don't mind if I share some of my thoughts on starting out as a new editor on Wikipedia: If I could get editors in your situation to follow just one piece of advice, it would be this: Learn Wikipedia by working only on non-contentious topics until you have a feel for the normal editing process and the policies that usually come up when editing casually. You'll find editing to be fun, easy, and rewarding. The rare disputes are resolved quickly and easily.
Working on biographical information about living persons is far more difficult. Wikipedia's Biographies of living persons policy requires strict adherence to multiple content policies, and applies to all information about living persons including talk pages.
If you have a relationship with the topics you want to edit, then you will need to review Wikipedia's Conflict of interest policy, which may require you to disclose your relationship and restrict your editing depending upon how you are affiliated with the subject matter. Regardless, editing in a manner that promotes an entity or viewpoint over others can appear to be detrimental to the purpose of Wikipedia and the neutrality required in articles.
Some topic areas within Wikipedia have special editing restrictions that apply to all editors. It's best to avoid these topics until you are extremely familiar with all relevant policies and guidelines.
I hope you find some useful information in all this, and welcome again. --Ronz (talk) 19:02, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
April 2020
[edit]
Your addition to History of the Jews in Lebanon has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. This is your final warning. Further violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy will result in you being blocked from editing.
— Diannaa (talk) 12:50, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
[edit]
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Biosequestration into Carbon dioxide removal. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 13:13, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
Red link categories
[edit]Hello, Chris,
Please do not add nonexistent, red link categories to articles. See WP:REDNO for more information. Sometimes, these categories have been deleted due to discussions at Categories for Discussion. If you would like to request a category be created, you can do so at Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Redirects and categories. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 20:25, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
[edit]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Henanton (talk) 22:21, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
[edit]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Chris_O'_Hare reported by User:Elizium23 (Result: ). Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 21:56, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
Category:Tennis players of Lebanese descent has been nominated for merging
[edit]
Category:Tennis players of Lebanese descent has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Nehme1499 02:33, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Levantine Arabic FAC
[edit]Hi Chris, I nominated Levantine Article for FAC. Given your interest in Lebanon, I thought you could be interested in reviewing this nomination. Thanks for any help you can provide. A455bcd9 (talk) 19:44, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Original research
[edit]Please engage in the discussion on Jerrier A. Haddad’s talk page.
Familysearch, is a user generated source and is generally unreliable, useing such a source is considered an original research. I already explained this on the edit summery which I’m sure you’ve read. Whatsupkarren (talk) 12:03, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 9
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Khouri, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page X.com.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:12, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.
[edit]There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User: Chris O' Hare. Thank you Whatsupkarren (talk) 22:17, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
August 2024
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. - You have engaged in a sexualized insult against another editor and ethnonationalist glorification. Cullen328 (talk) 20:24, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Please do not send me emails especially those containing rants about other editors. Please read the guide to appealing blocks in the block notice. Please follow those instructions @Cullen328:. Could not find A N I thread. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:33, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Found it. @Chris O' Hare: The incredibly bizarre rant against other editors in your e-mail is appalling and does not address the reasons for your block. I
- nstead, it is an even better reason to keep you blocked. Please address your own appalling behavior instead of attacking other users. In case you're having trouble with the subtext here ,I endorse the block. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:44, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Since I was tagged here, I will take this opportunity to share other repugnent nazi-like statements on Muslims, Syrians, and Arabs by this same user.
- Please check the first section of Arab Christians talk page:
- "Since certain Middle Eastern communities (mainly Arab and non-Arab Muslims, but also Syrian Orthodox Christians, Syrian Muslims and Lebanese Muslims also) seem to feel they have little achievements to show in the last 800 years including their diasporas of the 20th century (and I say seem to be, because that is what their behaviors show) and science and archeology is bringing out more and more truths about the history and legacy of the indigenous people of the Levant, they seem to feel insecure about it and, as they feel the need to improve their PR, they are choosing to just simply steal the history and legacy of other communities (aka the Lebanese Christians) by making a lot of personalities "Arab", or "identifies as Arab"."
- Yet despite these racist blanket statements, User:Chris O 'Hare still thinks they "don't have a history of incivility here"! Whatsupkarren (talk) 23:08, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
Chris O' Hare (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I feel an indefinite ban is a bit extreme in this situation. I feel both the administrator that commented on the report and the one that banned me rushed into their decision to ban me and did not take into consideration all the relevant history and the background of the situation as per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Civility#Blocking_for_incivility If the way I expressed myself was uncivil, I apologize. However, after going over the civility policy im not sure if making an analogy about someone's rush editing with a sexual behavior is an actual personal attack or uncivil behavior. If it is then it should be updated in the policy or I should have been given a warning and provided with a link to the relevant policy or guideline I broke.
If stating facts about a country/nationality that an editor is trying to undermine and/or inflict cultural appropriation to is "ethnonationalist nonsense" and considered uncivil behavior I guess there should be a policy that I should be directed towards so I dont use it again as a way to stop someone with a clear nationalist agenda as per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Civility#Blocking_for_incivility
Im not clear on whether it was proven I used "poor sourcing" and if its another reason for my ban as I was also reported for using familysearch as an unreliable source. I dont know how I have violated the poor sourcing policy since It clearly states in the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources that "FamilySearch also hosts primary source documents, such as birth certificates, which may be usable in limited situations, as well as a large collection of digitized books, which should be evaluated on their own for reliability". The user that reported me keeps claiming that familysearch is just a usergenerated website and thus totally unreliable when it clearly states in perennial sources that the database of official government documents is usable here as sources in some situations.
Primary sources such as birth, marriage, death and migration acts can be used with care when there are no secondary sources as stated in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_original_research#Primary. If this policy has changed I would like to be informed on this. If not, I would like to be clearly instructed on how I violated this policy.
I therefore request my indefinite ban to be lifted and replaced with a warning or a temporary ban if you feel necessary. To give more perspective to this incident, I can present the whole picture of what has been happening with Whatsupkarren since his topic ban was lifted in November 2023.
I dont have a history of uncivility here or of poor sourcing as per my understanding of the policies to which I have always adhered. I do have to admit that this particular user and another one with similar disruptive ways on the same topic of Syria have no doubt tested my patience and other editors patience here many times with their disruptive editing.
Best regards,
Chris
Chris O' Hare (talk) 20:05, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Your conduct was block worthy. You need to accept this. You need to stop blaming others. I am declining your unblock request. PhilKnight (talk) 04:52, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Chris O' Hare (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I dont think a block is necessary anymore as I have understood that sexualized and ethnonationalist comments are unncessary to reach consensus and considered uncivil, and therefore I will refrain from ever using them again. I would like to continue making contributions here as the policy abiding editor I have been for 6-7 years.
I take full responsibility for my behavior and I was not blaming others. I was just making sure that just as I adhere to follow the policies here, the involved administrators follow the Wikipedia:Blocking policy#Blocking and the Wikipedia:Civility#Blocking for incivility policies as well.
Best regards, Chris O' Hare (talk) 12:58, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Your agreement here is a start, but I'd like to see a little more discussion as to why, if you were a policy abiding editor for 6-7 years, you decided to go off the rails on this occasion. I'm also not sure if you should return to editing about ethnonationalist issues. 331dot (talk) 06:11, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.