User talk:Editorzz

Welcome!

Hello, Editorzz, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Max Steel Turbo Battlers, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Nat Gertler (talk) 14:56, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Max Steel Turbo Battlers

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Max Steel Turbo Battlers, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Nat Gertler (talk) 14:56, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Editorzz, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Editorzz! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Ushau97 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:17, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Henry Kenneth Sloan

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Henry Kenneth Sloan, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jinkinson (talk) 15:33, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you create an inappropriate page, as you did at Big Moment Dash (band), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:16, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of Lab Rats episodes, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Falsifying viewing numbers Geraldo Perez (talk) 01:41, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting my changes with no reason given

Editorzz, please explain why you continue to revert my changes to Derek Jeter's page. You have done that twice now with no reason given either time. My change is legitimate, please explain why you believe otherwise. Alanfeld (talk) 07:25, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Derek Jeter, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:01, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistent disruptive editing, as you did at Derek Jeter. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 23:22, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Spencer^T♦C 19:41, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at 3,000 hit club, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. It was already explained to you that your "contributions" to the article violate WP:CRYSTAL. Read up on that before claiming you weren't told why. —Bloom6132 (talk) 00:46, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Las Vegas Ailens

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Las Vegas Ailens, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. m'encarta (t) 22:59, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Major League Baseball, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Also, I have reported you to AIV because you were blocked twice before. m'encarta (t) 23:08, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 23:10, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]