User talk:Emeremma

Welcome!

Hi, Emeremma. Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. भास्कर्bhagawati Speak 13:04, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Emeremma, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Emeremma! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! SarahStierch (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:17, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Image of Billie Piper

Hi, Emeremma. Recently you changed the long standing image of Billie Piper to an image of her looking like she was scared and constipated. This doesn't really align with her goal of using the best images of BLP's. I hope you will reconsider this decision. In the meantime, I'm going to replace the image with a selection from the same shoot that does not make her look like she is squeezing one out on the toilet while spotting a mouse crawling across the tub. Thanks. Viriditas (talk) 20:45, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, DerivX is down, and I don't have time to hand code the pointer to the newer image so I just dropped the older image from 2006 back into the article. Viriditas (talk) 21:14, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but i really don't think that she looked how you described.

Hey

I was just wondering why you self reverted this edit? Seemed fine to me. -- MisterShiney ✉ 20:49, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Hurt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Doctor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:45, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

David Tennant

Just to let you know I've had to revert your edit to David Tennant. The 50th Special is not a feature film, it's listed as a TV episode not a feature film on its own page, and it's already listed on Tennant's page - adding it to the Film section creates a double listing. Please do not re-add it to that page unless you can provide an approved source officially confirming this episode is a feature film. The fact the TV episode will be screening in select cinemas does not make it a feature film. Thank you. Starhunterfan (talk) 17:17, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rebecca Breeds, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Water Rats (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Arthur Darvill, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Comic-Con (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation of ambiguous names

Hello, Emeremma. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia, including your work on Death Comes To Pemberley. You recently removed to {{dn}} (that is, 'disambiguation needed') templates from the page and added citation references. The 'dn' tag indicates that an internal link leads to a disambiguation page, a list of links to pages with potentially ambiguous names. In this case, 'Danny Cohen' redirects to a page including nine different people named Daniel or Danny Cohen, and 'David Thompson' lists more than two dozen different people of that name. It is not necessary to add a reference verifying the fact that men of those names worked on Death Comes To Pemberley (though reliable sources are always appreciated). What is needed in this case is to identify which Cohen and which Thompson worked on the program. Thanks, and happy editing, Cnilep (talk) 10:18, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Hobbit: There and Back Again.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! The Ukulele Guy - Aggie80 (talk) 14:37, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Faye Marsay, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Middlesborough (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Hello, I'm Elizium23. I noticed that you made a change to an article, The Bletchley Circle, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 00:20, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Faye Marsay, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spotlight (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:18, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Hello, I'm Bbb23. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living person on Amanda Abbington, but that you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Bbb23 (talk) 17:52, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Hobbit: There and Back Again concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Hobbit: There and Back Again, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:11, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Hobbit: There and Back Again (January 19)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit when you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Hobbit: There and Back Again.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! MatthewVanitas (talk) 00:16, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Louise Watson (March 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Louise Watson.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 19:30, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to members of the Kardashian family, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Do not add non-notable children or relatives to infoboxes like you did with North West. She is not notable. LADY LOTUS • TALK 17:24, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Louise Pentland

Hi . Good work with the creation of the Louise Watson page. However, in the state it's in right now, it'll likely be deleted due to notability concerns (as soon as someone who has no appreciation for youtube comes along) . The Career section needs to be trimmed down to *just* the facts - e.g., "...Sprinkle of Glitter has expanded and now provides a vast array of content weekly for it's subscribers" doesn't sound very encyclopedic. Secondly, you should provide a third party source for pretty much every sentence. Take a look at the Zoella page for example (which has 19 sources for less information)! A "third party" source means it comes from someone completely separate to the person in question - so newspaper, magazine and journal articles or interviews. Let me know if you've any questions! Cheers, Nik thestunned 10:29, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, just a quick note to say I reverted your change to this page. We don't include that level of detail for people's kids etc, due to privacy concerns. (See WP:DOB for some further information!) Cheers, Nik thestunned 09:57, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Hobbit: There and Back Again

Hello Emeremma. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "The Hobbit: There and Back Again".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Hobbit: There and Back Again}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 12:55, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Louise Watson concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Louise Watson, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Louise Watson

Hello Emeremma. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Louise Watson".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Louise Watson}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. TKK! bark with me! 04:05, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Emeremma. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]