User talk:Gongshow/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
User:Gongshow
User_talk:Gongshow
User:Gongshow/Barnstars
Special:Emailuser/Gongshow
Special:Contributions/Gongshow
Gongshow
Talk
Awards
Email
Contribs

DYK for Stoneground[edit]

Updated DYK query On April 3, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Stoneground, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 18:03, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for writing the Stoneground article; I had it on my list of to-dos. Ecphora (talk) 00:11, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sure thing; I was a little surprised there wasn't already an article for the band. It has a pretty good start - feel free to add any info I've missed.  Gongshow Talk 18:09, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your articles[edit]

A massive "thank you!" for your excellent article contributions! I'm poking someone to give you Autoreviewer status as we speak. Ironholds (talk) 21:49, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that's rather the point of autoreviewer :P. Keep up the good work! Ironholds (talk) 22:55, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mickey factz[edit]

Nice work on finding sources. You are way better than me at finding sources for music related articles. Heck, I think that you're one of the best. Joe Chill (talk) 22:00, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, coming from one of the best all-around AfD contributors, that means a lot.  Gongshow Talk 22:38, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MagicHollow.jpg[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MagicHollow.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:36, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Causing a Commotion GAR[edit]

Thank you for the review. I went ahead and addressed it. --Legolas (talk2me) 03:56, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the passing of "Causing a Commotion". As for the Madonna FAC, (keeping my fingers crossed), feel free to comment there if you want to. --Legolas (talk2me) 07:46, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. One request if you really wanna comment on the FAC, will you please do it in the link? Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Madonna (entertainer)/archive1. --Legolas (talk2me) 07:58, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thnk you for the comments. I went ahead and addressed them all. Take a looky :) --Legolas (talk2me) 03:48, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks a lot. :) --Legolas (talk2me) 04:46, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ha ha, thanks. I know, but the ultimate decision lies in the hand of the FAC delegates, there in I keep my fingers crossed. --Legolas (talk2me) 04:56, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I Miss You (Miley Cyrus song)[edit]

Thank you for taking your time to review the article. I fixed a few things and have been trying to reach you on the GA talk and can't edit it. Everytime I leave something it doesn't appear. Can you fix that please? -- ipodnano05 * leave@message 21:28, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What must I do to respond to your comments because I guess it's something that I'm not doing right, -- ipodnano05 * leave@message 00:19, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I think it's probably the way it is formatted. How many colons must I put? Anyways, the first wo comments for prose are taken care of. As for the third, Heather Phares of Allmusic wrote,

"Even though the title Hannah Montana 2/Meet Miley Cyrus seems a little self-defeating, it's true that the songs Cyrus sang as herself on the first soundtrack weren't especially memorable, so in a way her part of the set is a second chance to make a first impression. This time, the sound and the songs are better -- several tracks, such as 'GNO (Girls' Night Out)' and 'I Miss You,' could easily be Hannah Montana songs, but Cyrus' singing is lower and throatier, and the arrangements are more organic and rock-oriented."

The entire paragraph relates to each other and I know she only referenced "I Miss You" once. But, she is conveying the idea that her first songs were not memorable and this time around they are. Some songs could even be confused with quality of those of Hannah Montana. -- ipodnano05 * leave@message 20:31, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

O.K. That's great. I love it. -- ipodnano05 * leave@message 23:32, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Original research[edit]

The first comment, I think we just addressed it and the third, I removed the quotes but the sky background is seen in the image. -- ipodnano05 * leave@message 23:39, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And for the fifth, I moved the comment to the "Live performances" section. -- ipodnano05 * leave@message 23:41, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The fourth does stay that her songs are better than what's heard on Radio Disney and says that those songs includes "I Miss You" so that should not be removed. -- ipodnano05 * leave@message 23:43, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • First: On the side, it has teen pop as one of soundtrack's overall styles. Can we use that? And we can also just use rock music since it does say that.
  • Second: I'll see what I can do. The Oprah Winfrey Show shows that his passing was her inspiration. Does it suffice?
  • Third: O.K. Can we just describe the background as light blue rather than a sky? If not, deleting it is fine with me.
  • Fourth: I beg to differ. It adds to it. Can we say "Joseph P. Kahn of The Boston Globe mentioned that Cyrus' songs surpassed much of what is heard on Radio Disney, adding that Cyrus' writing in 'I Miss You' was a portrayal of it."?
  • Fifth:  Done -- ipodnano05 * leave@message 02:11, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

O.K. I think everything is taken care of. -- ipodnano05 * leave@message 05:01, 30 May 2010 (UTC) And thank you for actually reviewing the article with such thoroughness, not everyone would take their time to do that. -- ipodnano05 * leave@message 05:17, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Forgive Me (Leona Lewis song)/GA1[edit]

Thanks for your input! Adabow (talk) 06:55, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Movieswwwbeaub01.jpg[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Movieswwwbeaub01.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:54, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for So Close (Hall & Oates song)[edit]

— Rlevse • Talk • 12:02, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Downfall (game show)[edit]

— Rlevse • Talk • 12:03, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer[edit]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 01:38, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Downfall game show.jpg[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Downfall game show.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:17, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Catch21 2009logo.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Catch21 2009logo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Hugahoody (talk) 20:45, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Catch21 2009logo.jpg[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Catch21 2009logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:33, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rescue[edit]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Armageddon theology WritersCramp (talk) 13:11, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


The Redirect Barnstar
I took the liberty of reviewing your work, and you deserve recognition for all your hard work on WP. Happy editing, Obamafan70 (talk) 22:52, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hard work barnstar[edit]

For all your hard work, you deserve it. Obamafan70 (talk) 15:32, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Billboard's Hottest Hot 100 Hits[edit]

Hi Gongshow! I am Novice7. I noticed your contributions and usage of Billboard's Hottest Hot 100 Hits. I was wondering if you could help me out with some Whitney Houston articles. If I'm right, the book has information on lot of her songs. I usually work on her articles, so your help is much appreciated. Novice7 | Talk 13:03, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. From what I've known, the book has information on how the songs developed and how they were done (Background information). So, if it is possible, could you add that information for this and this? I hope I'm not causing a nuisance for you :) Novice7 | Talk 04:21, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Wow!!! Amazing... You're really amazing. Thank you so much!!! I would have never got that much even if I spent all day searching the web.. Novice7 | Talk 09:38, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Wow, Preacher's Wife is such a great film. A classic forever :) Novice7 | Talk 09:59, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Triangle[edit]

For Good Work on Triangle (The Beau Brummels album)
Presented by SilkTork

Take this brother, may it serve you well.....


A useful, informative and pleasant read. SilkTork *YES! 21:50, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback[edit]

This user has rollback rights on the English Wikipedia. (verify)

It can come in useful sometimes, and you appear trustworthy. Also, it's another step toward becoming an Admin. SilkTork *YES! 22:03, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks![edit]

Thanks! I really appreciate you taking the time to type that comment on my talk page, sorry about the trouble. And i see what your problem is now with it, thanks for narrowing it down, and I'm glad you like the genres i chose for my best friends girl because boy do The Cars use alot of genres, especially in theirs singles ("just what i needed" new wave, power pop, rock)("drive" synthpop ballad rock etc..) . But really, I'm glad you like the genres i chose for it, and i like to hear peoples opinion on what genre(s) i choose for a cars song, songs like bye bye love and just what i needed are really tough to label 1 or 2 genres to. Theirs not many bands out there like the cars that can mix or separately use genres such as rock, hard rock, art rock, power pop, synthpop, classic rock, rockabilly etc.. and still sound great. That's the thing about the cars, they had both a rock and pop side to them and sometimes their sides combined. take care!MajorHawke (talk) 21:14, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

References in golf articles[edit]

I truly think what Tewapack did to my edit on Keegan Bradley is nitpicking. First of all the accessdate of the article is totally unessential information. Does it tell readers anything important? Nope.

As to what news source it came from, its a wire service story posted to a sports website. ESPN isn't the originator of the story. Why give them credit.

Thirdly, I've been doing edits to golf tournament articles, Honda Classic Pensacola Open and Bob Hope Classic, just to name three, where I been putting tournament highlights sections. The highlights are all referenced without mention of the access date or what website or publication I got them from and Tewapack has gone through these edits to fix up any typos I made my KeeganWITHOUT putting in the access dates or news sources.

Then why does he revert my Keegan Bradley edit using that criteria? It's hypocritical clearly.

Tewapack may not like that I go into articles he has edited clearly wrong information and fixed them up. I tell him about it on his talk page. Recent examples of this are my fixes to articles on Calvin Peete and the 1975 U.S. Open. He had a wrong quote from Lee Trevino and trivial weather info in the article rather than the fact that Tom Watson tied the 36 hole scoring record in 75. The Peete article had Calvin working as a migrant farm worker instead selling jewelry to those people. I mean did he read the article he cited? Golf watchers in the 80's knew how Peete came to play golf.

Fix my edits if I got typos in them or factual mistakes, fine, if you're doesn't in no way changes the quality of the article, why do it and signal to me what I'm doing is a waste of time? Ask yourself- William 17:03, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Jivesh Here[edit]

Hi. I am Jivesh. I am on Wikipedia since two years. I have noticed that you usually make edits to Beyonce-related articles. May i invite you to join Wikipedia:WikiProject Beyoncé Knowles? Jivesh • Talk2Me 05:08, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's okay. Regards. Jivesh • Talk2Me 17:52, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Futuristics[edit]

You deleted this page because of poor sources but after reading the general notability guidelines I'm confused as to why. The Lonely Island webpage is a credible site by a notable group, which mentions this production team as having worked with them. Please help restore this Wiki article as it meets all sufficient guidelines. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.167.155.161 (talk) 01:13, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hi. I didn't delete the page actually, I just expressed an opinion in the discussion in favor of deletion at this time because there was no evident significant coverage for the producers in reliable sources, thus not meeting the WP:Notability or WP:MUSIC guidelines. By "significant coverage", Wiki editors typically try to find sources that "address the subject directly in detail [...] more than a trivial mention but it need not be the main topic of the source material." So, the coverage doesn't have to be 500+ words or anything, but it should be more than just a mention within a single sentence or listing. That's considered trivial, not significant. By "sources", secondary sources are preferred for establishing notability. An article in Billboard, Rolling Stone, The Source or some other notable magazine/newspaper, a write-up on MTV.com, Pitchfork, Stereogum or some other reputable website...those are some of the types of examples of getting "coverage" from outside, objective sources. Again, the Futuristics (as with any topic) don't have to be the main focus of the article, provided there is at least more than just a one-off mention. That's why, in my view, this production team needed more than a namedrop on the Lonely Island website (and other similar passing mentions in articles and/or directories) in order to sustain an independent article. It seems The Futuristics have worked with some notable people (The Lonely Island, Chris Brown, Cody Simpson, etc) so it may just be a matter of time before that type of coverage exists (if it doesn't already). If/when it does, I'll happily support an article. I hope that helps explain where I'm coming from. Take care,  Gongshow Talk 04:05, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nicki Minaj "Super Bass"[edit]

Hello,


I created this page because I was unable to get the current Super Bass page to reflect the correct information about the song because one of the editors continues to delete my changes. http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/charts/currentsingles/the-billboard-hot-100 lists First Born with the credits and he should get publicity for his production work. If possible, can this page be undeleted or may I recreate it so Wikipedia has the correct information?


Thanks,

Rashad Lilashad (talk) 20:29, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lilashad, I appreciate you wanting to avoid edit warring with another editor, but creating a virtually duplicate article in the meantime is not the solution. Since you've already tried to add the info to the "Super Bass" article, my advice is to state your case here on the article's talk page using any reliable sources you've found (perhaps like the Billboard link you mentioned). There's probably a reason why it's gotten removed, so the communication may help to reach an understanding and develop a consensus. Good luck.  Gongshow Talk 20:57, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for responding. I've tried to work with the page creator and he's not listening to what I have to say. Thanks again. Lilashad (talk) 02:05, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Alli Live/Alli L!ve[edit]

If you come on any more of these (and they are appearing at quite a rate) you can tag them WP:CSD#G4 because of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alli L!ve, way back in November. This is a very persistent socker/hoaxer - see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SharkEmpress01. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 09:34, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

g4 on the 4d motion cinema article[edit]

Hi Gongshow, just wanted to drop you a note. G4 does not apply to articles that were deleted by speedy, only to ones that were deleted through an AFD. In this case, the author still hasn't corrected the advertising tone that caused the article to be deleted in the first place so one could place a G11 notice (which I did). Hope this helps. Syrthiss (talk) 14:39, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Geraint Watkins[edit]

How about ADDING those sources you dug up in the Geraint Watkins AFD instead of making it somebody else's problem? Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 20:33, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've incorporated four of the sources (plus another that was cited earlier in the AfD) into the body of the article. Hope this helps.  Gongshow Talk 04:42, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 04:48, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome. I've also referenced another source mentioned elsewhere in the AfD.  Gongshow Talk 04:53, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Do It My Way Press Article http://refreshmagazine.typepad.com/my_weblog/2011/07/musical-moment-john-galea.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.149.19.235 (talk) 09:26, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Creeggan[edit]

Good WP:HEY job here. Where was all that stuff when I googled? Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 04:08, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 22 August 2011[edit]

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 23:39, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 29 August 2011[edit]

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 08:10, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 05 September 2011[edit]

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 23:53, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 12 September 2011[edit]

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 23:38, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 19 September 2011[edit]

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 09:43, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Better source request for File:Young the Giant - My Body.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Young the Giant - My Body.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 01:26, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 26 September 2011[edit]


Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:25, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 3 October 2011[edit]

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 05:13, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 10 October 2011[edit]

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:31, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 17 October 2011[edit]

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 10:22, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol survey[edit]

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Gongshow/Archive 2! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

  • If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
  • If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

New Page Patrol survey[edit]

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Gongshow/Archive 2! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

  • If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
  • If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

The Signpost: 24 October 2011[edit]

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 10:37, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Arrested Development - Mr. Wendal.jpg[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Arrested Development - Mr. Wendal.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:02, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 31 October 2011[edit]

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 17:18, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The Music Barnstar
message ★♛iluvselenagomez1234♛★ (talk) 19:36, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 7 November2011[edit]

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 12:23, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 14 November 2011[edit]

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 22:32, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 21 November 2011[edit]

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:52, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gongshow/Archive_2&oldid=1091510304"