User talk:Helleski

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jelena Vučković (November 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jelena Vučković and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jelena Vučković, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 16:47, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Helleski! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:47, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jelena Vučković has been accepted

Jelena Vučković, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 18:08, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Stanford University Department of Electrical Engineering

The Stanford Department of Electrical Engineering (also known as EE) is one of nine engineering departments that comprise Stanford University School of Engineering.

Stanford’s EE Department has bachelor’s, master’s and doctoral degree programs. They also offer coterminal BS and MS degrees; joint programs, such as EE MS/MBA and EE MS/JD. Students can also choose a part-time program; online graduate certificates; and non-degree options.

Helleski (talk) 21:05, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert Dutton (engineer) has been accepted

Robert Dutton (engineer), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Eagleash (talk) 06:54, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eric Pop (November 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vincent60030 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Eric Pop and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Eric Pop, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

VKZY^LUFan (talk) (Mind the Gap!) 03:42, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bernd Girod (February 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hell in a Bucket was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bernd Girod and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bernd Girod, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hell in a Bucket (talk) 01:09, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eric Pop (April 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Eric Pop and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Eric Pop, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:14, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bernd Girod has been accepted

Bernd Girod, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

scope_creep^Talk 17:50, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

File source problem with File:BerndGirod-portrait.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:BerndGirod-portrait.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 20:58, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Hello Whpq - Thanks for inquiring about File:BerndGirod-portrait.jpg. I have read the Media questions pages, and need some additional help (I'm hoping you will help me out). The photo was taken by a photographer (Rod Searcey), his info is in the metadata. I'm not really sure how to handle these images Rod provides faculty with. He takes the photos of faculty, then gives the file to the faculty for their use, as they see fit. How would you propose I resolve this? Thank you! Helleski (talk) 22:37, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Verification of permission from the photographer would be needed. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions. If you have additional questions, Wikipedia:Media copyright questions would be a good place to post them. You will likely get a faster response than waiting for me to answer here on your talk page. -- Whpq (talk) 00:18, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Jim Plummer

Hello, Helleski,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Willbb234 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Jim Plummer should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Plummer.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Willbb234}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Willbb234^Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 21:13, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dwight Nishimura

The article Dwight Nishimura has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

does not meet notability guidelines

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:04, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

Ada Poon

Your article about Ada Poon,makes the claim that she holds the rank of Professor at Stanford University. She does not. According to her official university web site she is an Associate Professor, a lesser rank. This might seem as if you are trying to promote her notability by undue puffery--or that you are unaware of the distinction--or possibly just careless .

I therefore think it reasonable to ask whether you have a conflict of interest with respect to this article, as specified in our rules WP:COI and WP:PAID? DGG ( talk ) 21:06, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Looking further, I see you do have a COI. It must be declared on the articles, not just your user page. And see my detailed advice below. DGG ( talk ) 18:00, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

General Advice about academic bios

Make sure the articles contain first the basic biographical information for birthplace and date, and if available, high school; parents names and professions are optional. Give a section for the the full sequence of degrees , and another for the full sequence of positions, both with dates, Do not list them in reverse chronological order. Academic press release give the immediately past institution first, and then somewhere later mention the earlier ones; business CVs often go in reverse chrological order; but encyclopedia articles go in sequence from earlier to the present so people can follow the career.

For the PHD, give the name of the thesis director, and the titleof the thesis. Link the director's name if they're in WP. These show the connections between people that is the basic network ofthe academic world. If the person has notable students, who have articles in WP, list them also somewhere. Do these in the article and --optionally in the infobox. The infobox is a quick summary, and all the information there must be in the text of the article also.

In the sciences, give the 5 most cited peer-reviewed articles, given in full with coauthors, full name of journals, and links, with the number of citations to each of them (in the humanities, we list all the books, with coauthors and publisher and isbn) . In most cases, it's the citation figures that show notability, and they should not be omitted. Try to give a reasonably full description of their research--their papers can be used as sources. The right length is one or two or three short paragraphs. DOn't explain why the field is important, just describe what they did, invluding links to our articles on the subjects.

Add national level awards--not junior awards or awards. from their own university) Very sparse articles attract skepticism. as do those using vague claims and superlatives, or those that list all possible internal and external committes. The way we look at it, patents are not particularly significant unless they have been substantially exploited. Commercial connections only go in if they are notable. Being on a company's advisory board is not encyclopedic material, nor is being on the board of any other institution, nor member of a societyif itsan ordinary not membership, not a fellow or other honor. . What does count is being President of a national society, or founder of a company,

Give names of all editorships--just editor-in -chief or co-editor-in chief. Editorial boards are not considered significant for an encyclopedia. For honors, be aware that press eleases from his own univeristy are not reliable sources--try to find the announcement from the society making the award,, and if possible, a newspaper or magazine story about it, preferably not from the cmpus paper. .

The appropriate external links are: the persons official university web page., and if relevant, the web page for their lab. The web page fo rthe department is unnecessary. We do not link to social media. If the full academic CV is available online, link to it. It's worth some effort in trying to find it.

As a matter of style, we do not use the word Prof. or Dr. within the article, whether for the subject or any coworkers. It's assumed from the description. We refer to people in article after their first mention by their last name only, not the full name unless there is some ambiguity. Don't repeat the name within a paragraph -- she he, she, or they, as appropriate. Avoid the terms "strongly supported" or "innovative" or state of the art" or other jargon. Never say "first" unless there's a third party source to prove it;. And avoid 1-sentence paragraphs--they belong in press releases, not encyclopedia articles

for citations

Please use web cite for citations. (or the other cite templates.(see Template:Cite web) for thedetails. ) Make sure you include a field for title= in all cases, and for websites a field for work= , and for journal articles a field for journal= . For books, it needs publisher= , and , isbn= . If these fields are omitted, the reader cannot tell what source you are citing without actually linking to it or reading the code. If you use archive-url, use it in adddition to the url for the original. There has to be enough information to findthe work both on the web and in print, if it is available in both formats.

In particular

Please go back and add this information where it has been omitted, both from the article, and from the references. In particular

for Olav Solgaard, add the dates of the positions, and the most cited papers, and add the work= information to the weblinks.

for S. Simon Wong, give his full name, give his sequence of positions and dates. List the most cited papers--you can get the infromation from GoogleScholar, but it is not the style in the English Wikipedia to simply link there.

for John Pauly, similarly: full sequence of positions and most cited papers.

for Jim Plummer, besides the above, remove the jargon from his accomplishments as chair. "Helped establish" . in particular, is meaningless. "During his tenure" is safer/.

For Bernd Girod. full sequence of positions and dates, indications of which patents have beee significant where, statement of research itnerests can not be sourced by implication for GS, but needs an actual source.

and similarly for all the earlier ones.

Conflict of interest

You MUST add the template {{connected contributor}} to each article. The general description of COI on your user page is not sufficient.

Furthermore, since you are writing these bios for pay from the Department, it is reasonable to expect you to do so properly and fully, and to make a special effort to avoid the style of a press release. An contributor who doesn't know much about the academic world who happens accidentally to write an academic bio can be excused for not knowing how to give the full information. Anyone, COI or not, who writes regularly articles in a special field should do it as well as possible, and follow our standard form. I have worked here for 12 years screening & fixing articles from those who don't know how to do it right, but as a regular contributor, you should be doing it yourself, DGG ( talk ) 04:15, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of S. Simon Wong

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on S. Simon Wong, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Harshil ^{want to talk?} 08:11, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

This was rescued by another Administrator. But the way you are writing these articles will lead to further deletions. Please see my advice above. DGG ( talk ) 17:58, 20 October 2019 (UTC)`

Proposed deletion of S. Simon Wong

Hello, Helleski

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Bensci54 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, S. Simon Wong, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion. The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to prevent the deletion:

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click the Publish changes button.

But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Bensci54}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bensci54 (talk) 16:56, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Eric Pop concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Eric Pop, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:25, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Copyright problem on H.-S. Philip Wong

Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from several online sources that are not released under a compatible license. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, quite a bit of content had to be removed. Content you add to Wikipedia should be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa (talk) 13:19, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

March 2020

Your addition to H.-S. Philip Wong has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 13:39, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Eric Pop

Hello, Helleski. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Eric Pop".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 17:40, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

Osgood

Can you improve the article on Brad Osgood to better show that he meets notability criteria as per WP:ACADEMIC? If not, it's gone. DS (talk) 16:31, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:50, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Eric Pop

Hello, Helleski. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Eric Pop".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:05, 1 March 2021 (UTC)