User talk:Idot

ru:Обсуждение участника:Idot
This page is a soft redirect.

Evolva in Biopunk

why nobody mentioned evolva? (Idot (talk) 01:07, 3 July 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Do you have a reliable source (author stated, review, article - no blogs) that notes Evolva as being "biopunk"? Your personal opinion or simple obviousness doesn't count. --Loremaster (talk) 02:05, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

False vandalism accusations

Please do not come to my talk page using template messages about "vandalism" when I was removing non-notable trivia from an article following Wikipedia policy. See WP:NOT and WP:ENC if you still do not understand. DreamGuy (talk) 14:38, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

it is not false, as it is not a trivia (Idot (talk) 03:28, 21 June 2009 (UTC))[reply]

I see you rushed off to try to report me for vandalism, where the report was closed by an admin as not being vandalism. Therefore the accusation is false, as I told you. Please take the time to actually read our vandalism policy before making such accusations. You also don't seem to understand what trivia is either. Please spend more time acquainting yourself with how Wikipedia work before trying to edit one. DreamGuy (talk) 18:24, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

One more time: Do not put bogus warnings on my talk page accusing me of vandalism when an admin has already told you that your accusation has no merit. Putting false warnings on pages is a form of WP:WIKIHOUNDING, which can get you blocked for disruption. This is your last warning. DreamGuy (talk) 02:18, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that you feel strongly

...but please do not make this kind of edit: [1]. Encyclopedia articles and edit summaries are not the right place for shouted statements of conviction. In fact, no page at Wikipedia is appropriate for that. Simply use the talk page to discuss the issue civilly with other editors, and then after resolution is reached there, update the article accordingly.

Thank you for understanding that communication is much more productive when it's done in the right context. If you have any questions about this, please let me know. -GTBacchus^(talk) 03:44, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In fact user:DreamGuy refuses to discuss anything :-( what I should do? (Idot (talk) 05:14, 21 June 2009 (UTC))[reply]
- aha now he/she ready to discuss! thanks a lot! :-) I'll participate in the discussion as soon as I have time (now unfortunatelly I'm in hurry) Idot (talk) 05:19, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It was already discussed on that talk page, which you ignored by putting the trivia back into the article. On top of which, removing triia is a standard procedure on Wikipedia and one which normally does not need to be discussed. Once you were reverted you are the one who needs to get consensus to put the info there, not the other way around. DreamGuy (talk) 18:20, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

you removed it few times without ANY discussion! it was discussion Ian.thomson only, not with you! when I wrote in your page that before deletion a section you should discuss it, you just deleted from your page! (Idot (talk) 01:00, 22 June 2009 (UTC))[reply]

That's true, in kind of a limited way. Once there's a dispute, everyone needs to discuss to obtain resolution, and the version in place while the discussion goes on really doesn't matter. A trivia section is not like a BLP violation, and nobody is hurt by its floating around for a day or two. Once it's clear there's a dispute going on, all reverts count as edit warring, no matter what "side" you're on. -GTBacchus^(talk) 23:19, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2009

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Fallen angel. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Hrafn^Talk_Stalk^(P) 05:54, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

just I've fount that only one POV in Fallen angel presented, then I've tried to find related aricles and found peri. So you free remove unsourced info Fallen angel, but {{POV}}, {{judaism-stub}}, {{islam-stub}}, and {{myth-stub}} - are ought to be added to the artcile (Idot (talk) 03:09, 30 August 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Proposed deletion of Remember Tomorrow (disambig)

The article Remember Tomorrow (disambig) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Disambiguation page has only one bluelinked entry.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Durova³¹¹ 19:22, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

fixed (Idot (talk) 01:59, 7 September 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Korean carrot salad

Thanks for your edit. I made a new section "Cuisine" to include this information more prominently. By the way, I wonder if you can contribute something in this discussion: Talk:Koryo-saram#Viktor Tsoi's picture? Cheers, cab (talk) 08:23, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Centre stick vs side-stick

An article that you have been involved in editing, Centre stick vs side-stick, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Centre stick vs side-stick. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ahunt (talk) 19:06, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

@Ahunt 81.222.187.234 (talk) 23:52, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Idot. You have new messages at Jayjg's talk page.
Message added 01:54, 7 March 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Jayjg ^(talk) 01:54, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Idot. You have new messages at SunCreator's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Regards, SunCreator ^(talk) 02:53, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion wars

Hello Idot. I am not a fan of Wikipedia policy pages, I think there are too many already. Good luck with your wikipedia research work. Carrite (talk) 18:02, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Korean Cuisine

Hi I noticed you addition to this article. Unfortunately, I'm pretty sure someone is going to challenge for verifiability. Can you find a news article that mentions the Korean salad even in it's in Russian? I can help you add that to the article if you can provide a reference. Thanks.Melonbarmonster2 (talk) 02:22, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think you'd better look a section about cuisine in koryo-saram artilce. And this salad is the most well known korean dish in the former Soviet Union, and sold everywere as korean salad. Or search for "корейский салат" OR "корейская морковь" OR "морковь по-корейски" in google. E.g. [2] gives http://www.korsalat.ru/ whcih has lots of recpies of "Морковь по-корейски" (Idot (talk) 16:47, 31 July 2010 (UTC))[reply]

October 2010

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Uhlan. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Trafford09 (talk) 13:35, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Pasties. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Trafford09 (talk) 18:47, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

TOTD

Tip of the day...

Please summarize your work using the Edit summary box

If you make anything other than a minor edit to an article, it helps others if you fill in the edit summary. Edit summaries are visible in the page history, watchlists, and on Recent changes, so they help other users keep track of what is happening to a page.

If you use section editing, the summary box is filled in with the section heading by default (in gray text), which you can follow with more detail. You also can put links to articles in the edit summary. Just put double brackets around [[the article title]] like you would normally. The summary is limited to 255 characters, so many people use common abbreviations, such as sp for correcting spelling mistakes, rm for remove, ce for copy-edit, etc.

Prior tip – Tips library – Next tip

Re: discussion page

Yes, it is. The discussion page is for talking about shape of article, not discuss about game itself (Wikipedia is *not* a forum). Greetings, Sir Lothar (talk) 15:13, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

December 2010

Continued flouting of wp:ES#Always provide an edit summary

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Tamga. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page.

Wikipedia relies on wp:consensus, and our all adhering to its guidelines.

One such is wp:ES#Always provide an edit summary. Please adhere to it, or state why the consensus doesn't apply in your case. Very happy to discuss.

Idot (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - pie - global contribs

This month's hint


Wikipedia ads	file info – #2

Trafford09 (talk) 16:01, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alia

I would really appreciate it if you familiarized yourself with the relevant guideline before making any further edits to disambiguation pages. Best regards.--Muhandes (talk) 21:51, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Japanese armour

moved to Talk:Japanese armour moved again to appropriate page

I told you were to discuss! the discusion is about the article, not about me! even more even it were not about article it should be discussed at your

page as it was I wrote you first! (Idot (talk) 06:20, 16 December 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Chronology of 4X video games

Hi, as stated on the page the entries should be reliably sourced. The ones with Wikipedia entries will generally have sourcing on their pages however as the ones that don't have no references on this list they fall foul of WP:RELIABLE so shouldn't be included. Rescendent (talk) 22:27, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

now I see your point, but you'd better add {{fact}} to red links rather than delete 'em (Idot (talk) 01:27, 17 July 2011 (UTC))[reply]

PS probably we'd better discuss at talk:Chronology of 4X video games in order to look for better consensus (Idot (talk) 02:00, 17 July 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Fair point Rescendent (talk) 08:38, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK! may you move the discussion to the talk page and invite some people ? (Idot (talk) 12:55, 17 July 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Don't call users names such as "idiot", Idot

--Niemti (talk) 15:21, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't say that you idiot, I said do not do silly things! (Idot (talk) 16:10, 25 June 2012 (UTC))[reply]

moved to Talk:Wing Commander (franchise)

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Idot, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 16:40, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 28

Hi. When you recently edited Soviet cuisine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Black coffee (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:14, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Christianity in Kazakhstan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nestorian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Central Asia Addition

- Please do not add original research on "Central Asians" as you did in the article Asian people. The Scythian 00:29, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there

You probably shouldn't copy and paste the thread from the archive. I don't think it's standard practice. Biosthmors (talk) 12:37, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

how I cold else prevent archiving the ongoing discussion? (Idot (talk) 13:59, 6 August 2013 (UTC))[reply]

I can help. You could just start a new thread and go to the archives and find a WP:diff of our previous discussion to permanently link to for discussion purposes. For example, I went to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jimbo_Wales/Archive_139 and then "View history" and to that version to permanently link to the section of interest here. So with a permanent link to a section in the archive, you could use it as a point of reference but start a new discussion thread from where it left off. Best regards. Biosthmors (talk) 14:23, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank! I'll try! (Idot (talk) 14:25, 6 August 2013 (UTC))[reply]

Duplicate discussions

Please do not post the same message (or similar messages) at different locations because it fragments discussions. I have closed the discussions at WP:VPM and WP:VPP with the suggestion that any further discussion should be at User talk:Jimbo Wales. Johnuniq (talk) 08:12, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I just had no idea which place is more apropriate for the discussion, so Thanks! (Idot (talk) 09:26, 15 June 2014 (UTC))[reply]

Soft redirect

Just a suggestion but instead of the soft redirect at the top of this page, you can make it an interwiki link so that it shows up under languages there. In other words, I'd put ru:Обсуждение участника:Idot at the top of the page. A soft redirect makes it seem like we should only post on the Russian version and not here. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 18:44, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

it means that I visit English wikipedia usually not every day, but I visit every day Russian wikipedia, so if you write me something here, I'm not sure that I get to know about here (unless the bot informs me) Idot (talk) 19:00, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	I hereby award this medal to editor Idot for raising awareness of crucial questions affecting Wikipedia across all the different languages. Also for ground breaking analyses of deletionist psychology. FeydHuxtable (talk) 09:59, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! :-) Idot (talk) 11:09, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Help me create a Request for Comment asking that Jimmy Wales step down

I want to create a request for comment with some long term members of the Article Rescue Squadron.

This request for comment would argue that the only way to reverse the negative trend of deleting other editors good faith edits would be for Jimmy Wales to step down.

Please e-mail me if you are interested. Walterruss (talk) 08:03, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

see my answer at the Project and Jimbo's talk page (Idot (talk) 08:38, 4 October 2014 (UTC))[reply]

Gulnar

Per my comment at VPT, this is the entire text of the only non-redirect edit in the deleted history of the Gulnar page. Let me know if this isn't what you were looking for. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 16:23, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{R from move}} {{disambig}} [[ru:Гульнара]]

Please stop moving this article without a consensus. You can start a requested move discussion on the talk page, following the procedure laid out at Wikipedia:Requested moves#Requesting a single page move. Thanks, Jenks24 (talk) 16:51, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- is not a move, answered at Talk:Gülnar (Idot (talk) 16:55, 7 July 2015 (UTC))[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No personal attacks

If you had a problem with User:Yopie's edit at Sultan (which I agree was probably over-the-top, a quick proofread would have been better than a revert), you should have discussed it with them at their talk page or the article talk page. Instead, you went to Jimbo's talk and called Yopie names. Please strike your comments at User talk:Jimbo Wales. Fences&Windows 10:08, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Idot (talk) 14:33, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ruslan (given name), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arslan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Idot. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as you did at Wikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous), you may be blocked from editing. Chris Troutman (talk) 18:36, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

at which page I could notice people that something is going wrong at meta? (Idot (talk) 18:38, 7 February 2017 (UTC))[reply]

You seem to take issue with solar collectors and wind power. So far as I know Wikipedia has nothing to do with it. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia; we are not a method for you to complain about a public policy. If you have an issue with one of the articles on Wikipedia about those subjects then raise it on the talk pages for those articles. So far as I can see, your issue isn't with Wikipedia content but industry practices and we can't do anything about that. Chris Troutman (talk) 18:43, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am talking about voting at Meta of Wikipedia that suggest that Wikipedia should use reneweable power sources such as solar and wind plants (Idot (talk) 18:48, 7 February 2017 (UTC))[reply]

Then raise the issue there? I will also comment that your sensational presentation will likely get you nowhere. -- Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 23:03, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

How can I tell people that https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Environmental_impact is wrong and unfair? (Idot (talk) 02:30, 8 February 2017 (UTC))[reply]

You already have, and I suggest you stop now before you get blocked for being disruptive. You've voiced your opinion. Chris Troutman (talk) 02:38, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

as you deleted - I have not! I would have if you didn't deleted! (Idot (talk) 14:51, 8 February 2017 (UTC))[reply]

Your comments are very much visible on the talk page! Your insistence on changing the content of WMF's proposal is going to land you in trouble. Other editors are willing to listen to you but not if you try to force your way. Please, don't post anything more there unless someone wants to discuss it. Let editors make up their own minds about it. WMF has limited choices, anyway. Chris Troutman (talk) 14:57, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Idot. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Idot. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kanō Jigorō, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sambo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:31, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]