User talk:Jebussez

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Jebussez! Thank you for your contributions. I am Rubbish computer and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Rubbish computer 19:35, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Canada Party logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Canada Party logo.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:15, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Jebussez. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New Wikiproject!

Hello, Jebussez! I saw you recently edited a page related to the Green party and green politics. There is a new WikiProject that has been formed - WikiProject Green Politics and I thought this might be something you'd be interested in joining! So please head on over to the project page and take a look! Thanks for your time. Me-123567-Me (talk) 21:49, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Bcltn.png

Thanks for uploading File:Bcltn.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 04:45, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited British Columbia general election, 2017, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andrew Weaver. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jebussez. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Stephen Lecce.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Stephen Lecce.jpg, which you've attributed to Zehavi Zynoberg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 18:48, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion pending for File:Stephen Lecce.jpg

Hello, Jebussez. Some time ago, a file you uploaded — File:Stephen Lecce.jpg — was tagged with {{OTRS pending}}, indicating that you (or perhaps the copyright holder if you did not create this image) submitted a statement of permission to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. Though there is often a backlog processing messages received at this address, we should have received your message by now.

If you have not submitted (or forwarded) a statement of permission, please send it immediately to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If you have already sent this message, it is possible that there was a problem receiving it. Please re-send it to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If we don't hear from you within one week, the file will be deleted. If we can help you, please feel free to ask at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 14:44, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Jebussez. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Douglas Lloyd Campbell.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:00, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dufferin Roblin.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:11, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WTF are you talking about???

When I saw your reasoning in this revision for the 2019 Manitoba general election page.

It sounded to me either too confusing for all your claims and/or being very too narrow mind for the current version of now Manitoba First that I did renamed for you and the other user if you kinda pleased?

Not in a mean way, but just only confusing? Especially the "not a major party" is sounded weirdly hypocritical as the Manitoba Liberal Party is currently hold 4 seats, but they aren't a major party too, even they currently in 3rd place for this moment in the polls; for the "no polling inclusion" claim, is very likely they merged as "other" grouping in these polls as summed up, I guess? And lastly for the final claim "no sitting MLAs", I don't know what going on Manitoban politics, but according to their provincial government website still listed Steven Fletcher in their party's former name and maybe technically Independent in the same page^[1]. Chad The Goatman (talk) 03:26, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That page says Fletcher is an independent, his party has no standing and he is not running again. Manitoba First currently has no running candidates according to Elections Manitoba. Please don't add them into the infobox until they a) run a full slate, or b) get included in polling. Standard is that minor parties even with sitting MLAs, such as the Trillium Party in Ontario 2018, don't get included into the infobox. Thanks. [1]

Yea, a course he's not planning to run again as their provincial party's candidate since the party as of right now is still rebranding process as Manitoba First in the past few weeks–as that user you writing to was assume treating their state as, and I got that; but in the same page I showed, still listed his current (but formerly name Manitoba Party) party first based on fact (de facto) by the government's site–but again it's likely didn't updated in the past month until the next provincial/general election this next following weeks, while in I guess their province's law (de jure) technically force registered him as a Independent because of their law's definition of 'non-elected but have members' MLAs see why they added rounded parentheses for a reason, solely due of his party switching history.

And what "full slate" means anyway, real candidates announced? Chad The Goatman (talk) 04:09, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Give me the source for Manitoba First being the same party, please, because I can't find one and I'd love it. Seriously, its written nowhere and the branding isn't evens similar. As for 'full slate', it means, are they running in anything close to 57 of 57 ridings? Or any currently? Because I've seen none, and they need 5 to keep their registration. Even then we don't put up the Communists in the infobox just for being registered; they need to have an obvious and clear reason for being there aside from "this guy who affiliated with the former brand of the party and isn't running for them again sat in the Legislature for a bit after crossing the floor." I'm trying hard not to be a snob here, but the Infobox is kind of a major parties only club - define that as, 'is polled for'. Manitoba First doesn't reach that at the moment, doesn't even have a re-running incumbent and their results in 2016 were piddly to begin with, note Manitoba Party isn't in the 2016 infobox. Can't justify it, sorry.

I literally can't for now too, because enough I find few Manitoba First pages, but not for the reform political party for some reason as my google research query goes. Along, okay thanks for the explaining the 'real candidates qualification' definition for me, even you going to the same site for the moment as only proof.

And for the "Major parties only club" as your undo reason has mentioned official party status as the reason they become a "major party" again, so its very more so a 'Official party statuses club' than the former, mainly thanks for the First Past The Post voting system of why this is for now, incorrectly calling them a "major party", despite literally right now they are still a third-party, both in the polls and position in legislature.

I really trying understand what your writing that madly (and even nearly crazy-like) for some reason. Chad The Goatman (talk) 04:46, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Major party doesn't mean "one of top two parties" - it means parties that hold significant sway in legislatures or elections. The easiest way to figure out what party is 'significant' is, are they polled for? The PCs, NDP, Liberals, and Greens are; Manitoba First is not, nor was the Manitoba Party before it. That's a pretty easy standard to follow, and MF fails it. There are exceptions of course, some of which I laid out on Talk:2019_Manitoba_general_election, but MF doesn't really meet them but for the fact that they had a MLA. If Fletcher was running again, I might say OK, as Canadian election pages have in the past included parties in the infobox for having MPs that crossed over - but they were running incumbents again. MF is not. It can't reach any reasonable standard for inclusion, so off it goes. Sorry bud. Jebussez (talk) 05:00, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, but that page does shows the national level only like Canada itself not including all of its provinces, and not all the Canadian provinces have a "major party" due of how strong the FPTP or the spolier effect has influenced the psychological mentality of the province's voter population like the last Alberta general election as despite the Alberta Party got enough popular vote (170,872), they didn't won any seats because of the mainstream voters are just insanely loyal to the province's real major party as a blantant example. Chad The Goatman (talk) 00:03, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't disagree with anything here, I'm a very avid pro-PR person myself - but its also incredibly irrelevant? Alberta Party got polled for, they get in the infobox; Manitoba First is barely recognized as a thing, let alone included in a single poll, so as of now, they don't get in the infobox. When that changes then we can pop them up there. Jebussez (talk) 00:41, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of BC Cascadia Party for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article BC Cascadia Party is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BC Cascadia Party until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 21:05, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Naveed Anwar

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Naveed Anwar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Me-123567-Me (talk) 02:11, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Manitoba Party

Hello, Jebussez

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username CollectiveSolidarity, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Manitoba Party, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|CollectiveSolidarity}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 16:21, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Jonathan Pedneault has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jonathan Pedneault. Thanks! Greenman (talk) 18:34, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jonathan Pedneault (February 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by InterstellarGamer12321 was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Since the last time the draft was declined, it has been improved, but not significantly. Large areas are still unsourced. Make sure to add independent sources with significant coverage of the subject before resubmitting.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jonathan Pedneault and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 16:40, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jebussez! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 16:40, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

^ "Hon. Steven Fletcher | Members of the Legislative Assembly of Manitoba". gov.mb.ca. Retrieved August 13, 2019. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url= (help)

[1] "Hon. Steven Fletcher | Members of the Legislative Assembly of Manitoba". gov.mb.ca. Retrieved August 13, 2019. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url= (help)

[1]