User talk:Jlujan69

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Christian God[edit]

Since the Christian God is used as the subject of the article, it's worth noting that even the Bible says that God is not capable of doing anything conceivable. It says, for example, that He can't sin since that would contradict His moral perfection. If His creating an unliftable stone would contradict His perfection (and it would), then He can't do it. Therefore, the Bible supports the position that God is "essentially" omnipotent. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jlujan69 (talkcontribs) 2006-01-09 21:46:56 (UTC)

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Jlujan69, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  The Rod (☎ Smith) 20:25, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

Jack Chick[edit]

Nice work on clarifying the outcome of Chick tracts. I hadn't noticed the error myself. Tijuana Brass¡Épa!-E@ 05:55, 28 April 2006 (UTC)


Christianity[edit]

It's considered bad form to make changes to an article while those changes are the subject of discussion on the article's talk page. Slac speak up! 05:10, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:102406LUNDGREN.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:102406LUNDGREN.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 00:04, 27 October 2006 (UTC)


Nice work on LA riots[edit]

Your edits look great! futurebird 04:08, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Three Revert Rule[edit]

You may want to review what is known as the "Three Revert Rule." [1] You have exceeded that with reverting the opening sentence of "Jehovah's Witnesses" more than three times today. Dtbrown 04:52, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Blocked for 24 hours for violation of the 3RR[edit]

Please take a look and review WP:3RR when you get a chance. You have been blocked for violating this policy, but after 24 hours, please come on back and edit wikipedia! There are probably more constructive ways of editing a controversial article than edit warring, and I encourage you to take a look at the extensive discussions taking place on Jehovah's Witnesses. joshbuddy, talk 05:38, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Men's Role in Childbirth[edit]

G'day. I'm wondering why you changed "male partner" to husband? "Male partner" is an inclusive term whilst "husband" is limited to only those who are married. Your change makes little sense in an article about birth when marriage has nothing to do with it. I've reverted your changes. Maustrauser 00:23, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Why are you deleting stuff from Talk:John Hagee?[edit]

Randomly deleting discussions isn't exactly the best way to deal with talk page sections, why are you deleting large discussions? Homestarmy 21:31, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

==See my reply on John Hagee discussion page.Jlujan69 23:20, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:070320 canyon hlg 6p.hlarge.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:070320 canyon hlg 6p.hlarge.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:04, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Invitation[edit]

You are cordially invited to participate in WikiProject Calvinism

The goal of WikiProject Calvinism is to improve the quality and quantity of information about Calvinism available on Wikipedia. WP:WikiProject Calvinism as a group does not prefer any particular tradition or denominination of Calvinism, but prefers that all Calvinist traditions are fairly and accurately represented.

John Calvin - Young.jpg

--Flex (talk|contribs) 16:01, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

IT2 Cruz Negron[edit]

Provide and cite a verifiable reliable source as required by Wikipedia policy in which we can see why IT2 Cruz Negron is to be considered notable. Until then please do add his name to the list. Me must respect the fact that this list is for "Famous or notable" Puerto Ricans. Thank you Tony the Marine 21:13, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

  • This is a Warning, you are on the verge of breaking Wikipeidas 3 revert rule and you may be blocked from editing. I'm trying to be civil with you about this. I am in charge of overseeing the names added to the military sections of these lists. Unless you can provide evidence that IT2 Cruz Negron meets notablility criteria, please do not add his name to the list. Your work is valued in Wikipedia, but you must maintain yourself within policy. Thank you Tony the Marine 23:24, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Chamorro Scouting[edit]

Can you help render "Be Prepared", the Scout Motto, into Chamorro? Thanks! Chris 15:02, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

April 2008[edit]

Information.svg Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Infant. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dravecky (talk) 07:08, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

May 2009[edit]

Information.svg Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Hypergamy. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. NJGW (talk) 06:31, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

April 2010[edit]

Information.svg Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Kent Hovind, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. NeilN talk to me 05:01, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Nuvola apps important.svg You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Kent Hovind. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 03:07, 22 April 2010 (UTC)