Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, when adding images to articles please take care to follow our guidelines for images Thank you. --Ronz (talk) 22:07, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
Could you please respond indicating that you've noticed the comments here? I've yet to find an image you've added that clearly meets MOS:IMAGES. Please take a look at our conflict of interest policy as well.
Wikipedia could gain a great deal with contributions from a talented photographer such as yourself. However, images need to be added so that they are indeed of value to the respective articles. --Ronz (talk) 03:46, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
- Yes hello, yes I have seen your mail, am I doing wrong, I just uploaded my old press photos and some others, what is the MOS: IMAGES, Regads "Jonnmann (talk) 05:36, 23 December 2012 (UTC)"
If I understand you correctly, my categorization of the images are not the best, and you are right, I have a little trouble with spelling in English, but with the help of google translator it works quite ok I think,"Jonnmann (talk) 02:44, 24 December 2012 (UTC)"
- I've reviewed your additions of images to articles, and have yet to find any additions that clearly meet MOS:IMAGES. Generally, you're adding images that are highly redundant to images already in the articles. I've been giving more specific concerns in my edit-summaries now that you've responded. --Ronz (talk) 17:53, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
- The image you added to Pigeon racing is worth keeping in my opinion. The article doesn't have any such images, and I think it is relevant enough to have them. The image displays rather blurry in the article. I'm not sure how to fine-tune it. I'd have thought that the 320 × 118 pixel version would alleviate the problems, but perhaps it's a bit too large to be totally effective? --Ronz (talk) 18:02, 24 December 2012 (UTC)