User talk:Libertylie
Welcome!
Hello, Libertylie, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.
I notice that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.
To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or any other editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.
One firm rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)
Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The plain and simple conflict of interest guide
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Simplified Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! (✉→BWilkins←✎) 09:32, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Polytechnic University of the Philippines College of Law
[edit]Hi there. I noticed that you nominated this for speedy deletion but I cannot understand the reasons you have done so. Do you mind letting me know (and if it was a mistake, do you mind removing the tag?) Thanks! Steven Zhang Help resolve disputes! 06:02, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Libertylie, you are invited to the Teahouse
[edit]
|
Hi Libertylie! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Your request for undeletion
[edit]Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that a response has been made at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion regarding a submission you made. The thread is Polytechnic University of the Philippines College of Education. JohnCD (talk) 10:45, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 13
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Polytechnic University of the Philippines Laboratory High School, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Swimming. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Polytechnic University of the Philippines
[edit]Good day Libertylie, my fellow Isko/Iska. The main point in summarizing and removing chunks of the article is that the section you tagged as "encyclopedic content" isn't encyclopedic at all, as it mostly has no references and are mere redundancy (or copied from the PUP Website). Wikipedia has rules, and we must follow it. As much as I want to say much about our Pamantasan, Wikipedia is not a place for promotion.
As for the Colleges you've added in the Template, refer to other templates such as those of UC Riverside where they did not include all of the colleges, but only those with Wikipedia article. But to avoid confusion, let us retain the all the colleges that was added back. Also, we don't need a list of officials for its administration section, only briefly explain how the school is governed and provide reliable sources.
As we vie for making PUP a Good Article, we must include references. Including the claim that PUP NDC is called as Rizal Campus, because as far as I know, Rizal Campus of PUP is in Sampaloc. The College of Engineering and CAFA doesn't even refer to that compound as Rizal Campus, nor does COC and ITECH. We will retain that info as sources are provided. We aren't even unsure of the count of student body, and it may be tagged as Original Research. Logos and symbols isn't encyclopedic. We don't need to add what Republic Act Governs PUP, it should be included in the State Universities and Colleges articles as all the state U are governed by the same Act. Also the source provided for Proclamation No. 482 (http://www.gov.ph/2003/10/06/proclamation-no-482-s-2003/) does not indicate that PUP was called as the National Comprehensive University, it only declared that October 1, 03-Oct 14, 2004 as the Centennial Year of PUP. There are many more flaws in the article, and hopefully, you can provide reliable references for them. As for now, many of these are considered as speculations and original research as no references are provided. We may discuss further changes on the talk page of PUP.
See you around fellow editor and Isko/Iska. God bless.
--PH 0447 (talk) 12:02, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of thePolytechnic University of the Philippines College of Political Science and Public Administration.png
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Logo of thePolytechnic University of the Philippines College of Political Science and Public Administration.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:31, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
You have blanked the page twice, so I reverted.Xx236 (talk) 11:14, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Libertylie. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Libertylie. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:National Museum PH logo.png
[edit]
Thank you for uploading File:National Museum PH logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.
ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:University of the Philippines Manila Logo.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:University of the Philippines Manila Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:49, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Banda Kawayan Pilipinas
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Banda Kawayan Pilipinas requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from URL. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. - Dents (talk2me 🖂) he/him btw!!! 13:48, 8 September 2024 (UTC)