Jump to content

User talk:MegaMack02

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

[edit]

Hello, MegaMack02, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 19:20, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Changhe CoolCar (June 23)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 19:20, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the tip. I’ve resubmitted the article. It should be at least better. MegaMack02 (talk) 05:24, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, MegaMack02! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 19:20, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: GTI Edition 35 (video game) (June 24)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mori Calliope fan was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Needs to be sourced to more than just user-submitted reviews.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Mori Calliope fan talk 06:00, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I edited the draft and replaced the reference with another reference other than a direct App Store review. MegaMack02 (talk) 18:55, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: GTI Edition 35 (video game) (June 24)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 19:32, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the tip. I’ve improved the page by adding the only 3 sources available on the web that I could find. Thank you. MegaMack02 (talk) 05:26, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline notices on drafts

[edit]

Hi, when a draft you created has been declined, please leave the notices and comments from the reviewer in the draft. If you resubmit and the draft is accepted, all old notices will be removed. Thanks, --bonadea contributions talk 19:59, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I will be sure not to do that next time. MegaMack02 (talk) 05:27, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: GTI Edition 35 (video game) (June 25)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Almost entirely unsourced.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
bonadea contributions talk 06:58, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
There were only 3 available sources online, and there is a sheer lack of any references of the game online. MegaMack02 (talk) 14:56, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Changhe CoolCar (June 25)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Almost entirely unsourced, and the sources that are there are not reliable.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
bonadea contributions talk 07:08, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: GTI Edition 35 (video game) (June 25)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Please do not resubmit without addressing the reasons it was declined.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
bonadea contributions talk 18:04, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Bonadea You might want to check your talk page. MegaMack02 (talk) 18:09, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Also, I added one more reference before resubmitting it for the fourth time. MegaMack02 (talk) 18:10, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You added one non-independent and primary source (as opposed to independent and secondary sources, which is what multiple reviewers have been telling you to add), which supported a statement that already had a source, while leaving all the remaining unsourced content in there. That's very, very far from what is required. --bonadea contributions talk 18:22, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The thread would have ended with the one decline if there were more sources available that I can use.

No one gets to use me as a warning example against other users of finding sources.

Due to the sheer lack of any reliable sources online, I am not working on this article anymore until I can find any reliable information which is going to take me ages to do. You may appeal by replying to this message within a week after. I am leaving Wikipedia for the week and will spend the entire week finding reliable sources for the game. Thank you and get out of my talk page unless you can appeal. MegaMack02 (talk) 19:03, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: GTI Edition 35 (video game) (June 25)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
And again. Final chance to show notability and add reliable, independent and secondary sources to support all information in the article (removing anything that can't be sourced) – resubmitting without doing that will probably lead to the draft being rejected. Throwing in a press release to support a statement that already had a source does exactly nothing to improve the draft in terms of sourcing.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
bonadea contributions talk 18:19, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The thread would have ended with the one decline if there were more sources available that I can use.

No one gets to use me as a warning example against other users of finding sources.

Due to the sheer lack of any reliable sources online, I am not working on this article anymore until I can find any reliable information which is going to take me ages to do. You may appeal by replying to this message within a week after. I am leaving Wikipedia for the week and will spend the entire week finding reliable sources for the game. Thank you and get out of my talk page unless you can appeal. MegaMack02 (talk) 19:03, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
EXTRA NOTE: I am suffering from self doubt due to all of this and I am either going to lose my sanity or leave Wikipedia for a time, but in either case, I will come back here soon enough. MegaMack02 (talk) 19:10, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo
Hello! MegaMack02, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz Read! Talk! 04:09, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, MegaMack02,
No one expects you to master Wikipedia in 3 days. I've been editing here for almost 9 years and I'm still learning new things. And you've chosen the hardest task to start editing on Wikipedia which is creating a well-sourced new article. Editors here work for years to master this! Creating well referenced articles on Wikipedia is not a skill you're born with or learn at school...it comes with a lot of trial and error.
I encourage you to visit the Teahouse to find support and advice from more experienced editors. If it wasn't for the Teahouse, I would have quit editing the first week I started. It's a place where you can ask questions and vent. I hope you enjoy your time away and come back with a new frame of mind. Good luck. Liz Read! Talk! 04:14, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I had to deal with a toxic reviewer who falsely pointed every nook and cranny of my flaws, and I didn’t want to cause trouble, so I ended the thread with the statement “get out of my talk page” because she expected no flaws when there can be flaws in work. And then when I realized how poor reviewers can be, I decided to leave Wikipedia by then (but now I’ve returned early). However,Thank you for the encouragement. Thanks to that, I am more confident to continue doing what I can, and I have returned way earlier than expected. I also left a question in the Teahouse waiting for assistance. (See Here) Have a good day! MegaMack02 (talk) 04:25, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Information icon Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Martin Motors. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 11:00, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reminder @Arjayay. I will try not to do that again. MegaMack02 (talk) 15:07, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Changhe CoolCar has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Changhe CoolCar. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 20:58, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Angry Tomatoes (video game) (June 27)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
—pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 02:50, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Changhe Freedom, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 20:45, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I will look for sources for the Martin Motors Freedom Cab. MegaMack02 (talk) 21:00, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Arjayay A thread indicating the Freedom Cab’s release is here:
https://www.chinacarforums.com/threads/martin-motors.3520/post-28997 MegaMack02 (talk) 21:07, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Changhe Freedom, you may be blocked from editing.

This user talk page contains more than 20 links to the reliable sources policy. It is a fundamental part of Wikipedia, and you should take the time to read it. I know you have been editing Fandom wikis, but the rules are very different there, even if the software is similar. bonadea contributions talk 06:22, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Bonadea Ah shit here we go again. Do I have to tell you to READ MY USER PAGE!? I am trying my best to create a good page. How would you like it if I pointed out every nook & cranny about every little flaw there is in your house? Would you let the perpetuator get off scot-free while you follow the misguided advice? In fact, because of this perfectionism you’re doing to me, and causing trouble in my talk page, the first thing I told you WAS TO F**K OUT OF MY TALK PAGE!
There is a difference between a draft creator and a perfectionist reviewer. If all you do in my talk page is cause trouble by your stupid shenanigans, you are not welcome to my talk page. MegaMack02 (talk) 15:09, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ecosse Moto Works

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ecosse Moto Works requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://ecossemoto.com/PDF/HISTORY.pdf. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – NJD-DE (talk) 23:39, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ecosse Moto Works moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Ecosse Moto Works, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:44, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the draft space move. For some reason I bypassed the article wizard and was somehow able to publish the page onto the Wikipedia network without realizing it was publicly released on the network. MegaMack02 (talk) 00:46, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ecosse Heretic moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Ecosse Heretic, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. bonadea contributions talk 05:41, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I somehow managed to bypass the draft stage, again, and Idk how I even do this, but I think that happened when I clicked on the create {{ARTICLENAME}} page and then it takes me right to the public page creator. MegaMack02 (talk) 05:44, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ecosse Moto Works (June 28)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Unsourced. Two of the three websites used as sources don't support any of the content, and are sales sites which can't be used as sources in Wikipedia ; the third site is WP:USERG and also worthless as a source. Where do all the details come from? The draft is not neutrally written, and some of the content is pure nonsense, e.g. "comparable to Area 51".
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
bonadea contributions talk 05:52, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ah shit here we go again. Do I have to tell you to READ MY USER PAGE!? I am trying my best to create a good page. How would you like it if I pointed out every nook & cranny about every little flaw there is in your house? Would you let the perpetuator get off scot-free while you follow the misguided advice? In fact, because of this perfectionism you’re doing to me, and causing trouble in my talk page, the first thing I told you WAS TO F**K OUT OF MY TALK PAGE!
There is a difference between a draft creator and a perfectionist reviewer. If all you do in my talk page is cause trouble by your stupid shenanigans, you are not welcome to my talk page. MegaMack02 (talk) 15:09, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ecosse Heretic (June 28)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Neither of the sources supports any of the content, and neither one is a reliable, independent, secondary source. This means that the draft is in fact unsourced.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
bonadea contributions talk 05:56, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ah shit here we go again. Do I have to tell you to READ MY USER PAGE!? I am trying my best to create a good page. How would you like it if I pointed out every nook & cranny about every little flaw there is in your house? Would you let the perpetuator get off scot-free while you follow the misguided advice? In fact, because of this perfectionism you’re doing to me, and causing trouble in my talk page, the first thing I told you WAS TO F**K OUT OF MY TALK PAGE!
There is a difference between a draft creator and a perfectionist reviewer. If all you do in my talk page is cause trouble by your stupid shenanigans, you are not welcome to my talk page. MegaMack02 (talk) 15:09, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Ecosse Moto Works has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ecosse Moto Works. Thanks! bonadea contributions talk 08:55, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Ecosse Moto Works

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Ecosse Moto Works requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://iconicmotorbikeauctions.com/auction/2006-ecosse-moto-works-heretic/ and https://crane-brothers.com/blogs/dispatch/ecosse-night-stalker. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. bonadea contributions talk 08:55, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ah shit here we go again. Do I have to tell you to READ MY USER PAGE!? I am trying my best to create a good page. How would you like it if I pointed out every nook & cranny about every little flaw there is in your house? Would you let the perpetuator get off scot-free while you follow the misguided advice? In fact, because of this perfectionism you’re doing to me, and causing trouble in my talk page, the first thing I told you WAS TO F**K OUT OF MY TALK PAGE!
There is a difference between a draft creator and a perfectionist reviewer. If all you do in my talk page is cause trouble by your stupid shenanigans, you are not welcome to my talk page. MegaMack02 (talk) 15:09, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Bonadea I give up. You’re not going to post on my talk page anymore since you’re blabbering about the same shit while not giving practical suggestions in the Teahouse, and finding any possible excuse to avoid going there. MegaMack02 (talk) 15:13, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry – I can't see anything on your user page that's relevant here? (Please remember to assume good faith and do not make personal attacks on your fellow editors.) This isn't perfectionism. It's a matter of respecting one of the most strict policies Wikipedia has, as you will know if you have read it. (It's here.) It's also not a matter of what I think. If that were the case, the admin reviewing the tags I placed would have removed the deletion templates instead of deleting the draft. I'm sorry you are experiencing so much frustration here, but you will have to read up on the sourcing and copyright policies; people are generally more than willing to help out because we all know that editing Wikipedia can feel like an endless set of hoops to jump through, but you also have to be willing to spend some time reading and understanding the guidelines and policies that people point you to. Not sure what your comment about the Teahouse means. Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 15:20, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Bonadea I’m sorry. It’s my fault to apologize. I overreacted, I saw your message and I did not want to cause chaos, but there I went running my big mouth, and I regret doing that. I will try to follow the guidelines as best as I can. MegaMack02 (talk) 15:50, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Bonadea On the Ecosse Heretic draft page I’ve searched for the most reliable sources I could find on the web, and changed an overredundant source that isn’t reliable. I am resubmitting the draft. If there are any needed changes, they may be stated, and I will try to find and correct them. MegaMack02 (talk) 15:54, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ecosse Moto Works (June 28)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
asilvering (talk) 23:39, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi MegaMack02! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Sources for the Changhe CoolCar draft, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.


See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ecosse Heretic (June 29)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Asilvering were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
No references at all for 2/3 paragraphs - we need footnotes to show where the information is coming from.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
asilvering (talk) 22:04, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:34, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I know this involves me. You see, I was really angry when I appealed my block several times, but was denied access to all rights. I didn’t want to cause any trouble, but there I went running my big mouth, and the inevitable happened. I am sorry for that. MegaMack02 (talk) 02:20, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 02:14, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MegaMack02 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am entirely sorry for the inconvenience. I know this involves me. You see, I was really angry when I appealed my block several times in Wikimedia Commons, but was denied access to all rights. I didn’t want to cause any trouble, but there I went running my big mouth, and the inevitable happened. I am so sorry for all of this. I am sorry for that. I made the Ecosse Heretic Page with based information and ready for review, but you deleted it. MegaMack02 (talk) 02:23, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You don't have to be offering something for sale or engage in aggressive marketing to be advertising, at least on Wikipedia. Merely telling about something is considered advertising here. Wikipedia primarily summarizes independent reliable sources about topics deemed notable by Wikipedia- it isn't for just telling about something. If you have a conflict of interest with this topic, please tell us what it is. You will also need to tell us how you will control your anger in the future. 331dot (talk) 02:48, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

And besides that, the Ecosse Heretic page was not even advertising, as it would convince readers to buy it, which it did not try to do. MegaMack02 (talk) 02:27, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
My account here is only a few days old, so I don’t know much about Wikipedia. Thank you for the tip. I’ve calmed down now, and have considered to just walk away from the situation when I get angry with a Commons admin or another person. MegaMack02 (talk) 03:00, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ecosse logo.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ecosse logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:17, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:GT Racing icon.webp

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GT Racing icon.webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:20, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry

[edit]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MegaMack02, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. 67.53.217.198 (talk) 21:32, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:GT Racing: Motor Academy

[edit]

Information icon Hello, MegaMack02. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:GT Racing: Motor Academy, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:01, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:GT Racing: Motor Academy

[edit]

Hello, MegaMack02. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "GT Racing: Motor Academy".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 07:53, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Changhe CoolCar

[edit]

Information icon Hello, MegaMack02. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Changhe CoolCar, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:01, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MegaMack02&oldid=1152852167"