User talk:Miggy72

September 2019

Hello, I'm Kuru. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Hurricane Joaquin, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kuru (talk) 13:31, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey the complex was joaquin Miggy72 (talk) 18:41, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hurricane Fabio (2018) (September 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Girth Summit was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft has no sources - references are required to satisfy WP:V. I'd also note that it needs a bit of a going over for spellings etc - that's not a bar to it being published, other users can help with that, but a quick spell check prior to resubmitting would be appreciated.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hurricane Fabio (2018) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hurricane Fabio (2018), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GirthSummit _(blether) 22:04, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Miggy72! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! GirthSummit _(blether) 22:04, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Greg Fuller

Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as Greg Fuller, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jalen Folf (talk) 22:15, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Jalen Folf (talk) 05:21, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Hurricane Fabio (2018)

Draft:Hurricane Fabio (2018), a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Hurricane Fabio (2018) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Hurricane Fabio (2018) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Jasper Deng (talk) 08:39, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Miggy72

A tag has been placed on User:Miggy72 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jalen Folf (talk) 16:06, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --Miggy72 (talk)It's my page and its about Hurricane Irma

I have declined the speed deletion request because "This user has made a number of edits to mainspace articles about hurricanes. Information from one of these does not seem "unrelated to Wikipedia" nor to justify a U5 Deletion". However you should be aware that it is not "your page" in an unlimited sense. It is the project's page, as all Wikipedia pages are. WP:OWN applies even to primary user pages. See WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:UPNOT. Content that looks like a copy of a mainspace article can be confusing, and is not encouraged. I urge you to consider revising the page, at least to adding a statement abiut who you are as an editor above the Irma content. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 19:35, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the Irma content because it could easily be confused with the actual article on the storm. Miggy72, it is imperative that you respond to inquiries about your behavior on your user talk page.--Jasper Deng (talk) 22:40, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from User:Miggy72, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Jalen Folf (talk) 16:11, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Noah^Talk 21:24, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits on Hurricane Irma and the 2017 Atlantic hurricane season pages appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Super Typhoon Eden^{Message me here!} 09:36 [UTC] - October 25, 2019.

Linking to drafts in mainspace

Please do not link to drafts from mainspace. Doing so is prohibited by the Manual of Style as drafts are meant to be works in progress, i.e. readers should not be looking at them yet. If you have completed a draft and wish to move it to mainspace, please submit it through Articles for Creation or ask an administrator to assist with the move. ~ KN2731 {talk · contribs} 09:10, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Miggy72's recognized European Countries

Hello Miggy72,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Lithopsian and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged an article that you started, Miggy72's recognized European Countries for deletion, because the article appears to be about something that you or someone you know personally invented, coined, or discovered, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important-enough and/or recognized-enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Lithopsian}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Lithopsian (talk) 19:34, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Hurricane Olaf (2015)

Hello, Miggy72. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hurricane Olaf".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 08:28, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Hello, I'm Calidum. An edit that you recently made to World War II seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Calidum 17:36, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding dubious claims to this article. You may be blocked if this continues. Please use the talk page to discuss your proposed changes. Nick-D (talk) 23:28, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fascist Italy

Hello, Miggy72. Thank you for being bold with renaming of pages about Fascist Italy, but the new titles you selected are not consistent with Wikipedia's article title policies and guidance, so I have reverted your moves of the disambiguation page. Also, the title of Fascist Italy (1922–1943) was the subject of several recent move discussions, as you can see on its talk page, so it should not be moved without consensus. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 13:45, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hurricane Teddy. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Can you stop changing images to poor-quality ones. Thanks. ~ Destroyeraa🌀 00:40, 15 October 2020

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 14:21, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Miggy72 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Miggy72". The reason given for Miggy72's block is: "Disruptive editing".

Blocking administrator: ‪Materialscientist‬ (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: Not autoblocked; you are blocked directly, and the block is clearly appropriate. We should consider extending the block, I see. Yamla (talk) 14:50, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

YOU little bleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeepppppppppppp

i swear i hate admins

That's a shame. I've extended your block indefinitely. Any admin is free to lift your block if they believe you'll stop with your disruption. Be warned, continued disruption here will result in your loss of talk page access. --Yamla (talk) 14:53, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You'll also need to account for this nonsense. --Yamla (talk) 14:55, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Banned

This user is now considered banned by the community. No admin is free to unilaterally lift the block. --Yamla (talk) 12:51, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Imperial Point, Fort Lauderdale

Please do not create hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:Imperial Point, Fort Lauderdale. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. SMB9 9thx my edits! 10:55, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Imperial Point, Fort Lauderdale

Hello, Miggy72. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Imperial Point, Fort Lauderdale, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Imperial Point, Fort Lauderdale

Hello, Miggy72. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Imperial Point".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 (talk) 18:28, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]