User talk:Misaq Rabab/Archives/2008/May

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Karakoram Motors, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.karakorammotors.com/companyprofile.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:09, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Karakoram Motors

A tag has been placed on Karakoram Motors requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. SMS Talk 16:16, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Ghurki (Town), and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Ghurki. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:39, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the new articles, but it's time to act now

WikiProject Pakistan is highly thankful for updating Wikipedia with Pakistan-related new articles. The content you have created is valuable to us at the mentioned project. Please add yourself to the members list and collaborate on the project pages and the talk page. The more you collaborate, the more the project prospers. This way you would have done much better for Pakistan ;). Arun Reginald (talk · contribs) 03:03, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for adding your name in the members list. WP Pakistan sincerely welcomes you. Your participation would be highly appreciated if you participate at the talk page as well. Thank you. Arun Reginald (talk · contribs) 04:50, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Notability of Ahmad Ali Jinnah

A tag has been placed on Ahmad Ali Jinnah requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Accounting4Taste:talk 14:21, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

I see that you Sunnis are only bothered with the fact that Jinnah, Bhutto and Khan are Shias. As much as you hate it, these people are Shia Muslims and you people have no right to remove this from the article. Also, Pakistan is far from having a strong Muslim identity. It is the most fanatic, discriminating and anti-Shia society in the Muslim world.

Reverts

There has been vandalism in these articles, and obviously, you are bothered by the fact that these people are Shiites. Please refrain from vandalizing these articles further.LahoreKid (talk) 16:25, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia has to be accurate and has to state all the facts. And if you really claim that you are not sectarian, then why remove all the references to Shiism and not to Sunnism? LahoreKid (talk) 16:33, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Name

Category:Name, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. – Cgingold (talk) 22:35, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently copied the contents of a page and pasted it into another with a different name. This is what we call a "cut and paste move", and it is very undesirable because it splits the article's history, which is needed for attribution and is helpful in many other ways. The mechanism we use for renaming an article is to move it to a new name which both preserves the page's history and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. In most cases, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. If there is an article that you cannot move yourself by this process, follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Requested moves to request the move by another. Also, if there are any other articles that you copied and pasted, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. —Elipongo (Talk contribs) 03:14, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Kiani (cartoon), and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Kiani. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:31, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

May 2008

The recent edit you made to Bhutto family constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 15:12, 5 May 2008 (UTC))

Speedy deletion of Faryal Talpur

A tag has been placed on Faryal Talpur requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. RavichandarMy coffee shop 15:41, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Re: Duplicate categories of Pakistan television actors

Thanks for asking me! I am doing it in about 15 mins, because currently my AWB is already occupied. --SMS Talk 19:33, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

 Done --SMS Talk 21:05, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Adamjee Group, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Adamjee Group and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Bearian (talk) 21:50, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Link to Urdu Wikipedia on the Main Page of Sindhi Wikipedia

I have placed the link of Urdu wikipedia on the main page as you wished. Aursani (talk) 11:01, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Kayanis (Tribe)

Done. MBisanz talk 15:32, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

New task force for Military of Pakistan at WikiProject Military History

Hello! can you please look at this topic and sign in for support (or even oppose) for a new task force for Pakistani Military articles which are about 546 in number. Thanks! --SMS Talk 15:10, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Sorry I forgot to tell you that you need to be a member of the WikiProject Military History for voting. --SMS Talk 15:51, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
You can add your name here. --SMS Talk 16:55, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hmm...you didn't properly copy the section which is why the source didn't come up in Demographics of Pakistan. The last line falsely cites a source since no where does the article mention Pakistan. Otherwise the ratio given in Demographics of Pakistan does not match the one in Women in Pakistan, which I'm guessing is because its citing a 11 year old source (excluding the "1981", which is really outdated). I removed it from Demographics of Pakistan because it would be allow for a confusing template to be placed on the article (someone really messed up on this). I will find some uptodate sources and fix it later unless you want to fix it now :) --→ Ãlways Ãhëad (talk) 03:38, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Alor (Sukkur), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://allrss.com/wikipedia.php?title=Aror. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:25, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Lakhani

A tag has been placed on Lakhani requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Megapen (talk) 23:01, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

You aren't supposed to remove speedy tags from articles you have created, such as Lakhani. Use the {{hangon}} tag instead.--Fabrictramp (talk) 21:26, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Assistance needed in shaping policies for/against sectarianism on Pakistani articles

Please care to join the discussion on WP Pakistan about sectarianism in Pakistan-related articles. Your participation may be required as it may manage to make way for some concrete policies for Wikipedia's Pakistan-related articles. Thanks! Arun Reginald (talk · contribs) 06:45, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Notability of Nasim Wali Khan

A tag has been placed on Nasim Wali Khan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Ryanniemi (talk) 16:32, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Bangladesh Liberation War

Bangladesh Liberation War and Indo-Pakistani War of 1971 are two separate (though related) wars. They are not the same war. The former is between the Bangladeshi Mukti Bahini and Pakistan Army (March 25-Dec 16, 1971), the later is between India and Pakistan (December 3-16, 1971). Please do not replace categories linking to Bangladesh Liberation War with the Indo-Pak war category or wikilink. Thank you. --Ragib (talk) 20:15, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of China-Pakistan Power Plant Corporation, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.dawn.com/2008/05/09/top5.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:34, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Vandal edits :Massive deletion of categories from articles

You have selectively deleted or removed categories from over 200 articles .
The selective deletion of categories that you have deleted from articles include

  • Category:Pre-Islamic heritage of Pakistan
  • Category:Hindu and Buddhist heritage of Afghanistan
  • Category:Hindu history
  • Category:Ancient Greeks in Asia

Apart from this you have also deleted content from scores of articles which were earlier listed in these categories . This massive deletion amounts to vandalism on wikiprdia . Please stop this ,request please restore these categories to the articles which you have removed . Cheers
Intothefire (talk) 07:27, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Hi,
Please see my post on Category talk:Pre-Islamic heritage of Pakistan
Cheers
Intothefire (talk) 18:20, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article List of Pakistan friendship associations, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Stifle (talk) 22:38, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edit(s) to List of Pakistan friendship associations, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 22:38, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Reply

Salaam Misaq Rabab, thank you for your concerns. I reverted your changes to those articles because you attempted to distort or remove referenced and relevant information. For example, please take a look at your edits here. You unilatelarally changed British India to Pakistan when the sentence discussed the subcontinent in 1890. The former is correct and your changed was inaccurate. Similarly, you attempted to change the title of a published book that was used as a reference! In addition, you attempted to change an established term, i.e the Partition of India to Independence when both concepts are different and the former is widely recognised in academia. These changes were only to revert good standing articles to their neutral and accurate versions. Similarly, I reverted vandalism on the Saraiki language article because the anonymous IP address removed a large quantity of information that was buttressed with multiple references. If you feel more information should be added to the Uttar Pradesh or Bihar articles, you are more than welcome to do so. In fact, I would support your addition of information and references. Just because the Sindh article mentions an accurate fact does not give one the right to remove the information if an analogous article does not contain similar information. Rather, information should be added to the latter article in order to improve its quality. I hope this clears things up. I welcome you to Wikipedia and encourage your contributions; I only ask that you do not remove information. Thanks. With regards, AnupamTalk 23:56, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

PAKSTAN

I noticed that you are changing the text PAKSTAN to PAKISTAN in the context of the Pamphlet written by Chaudhury Rahmat Ali. If you look into what Ali exactly wrote, you'd see clearly that he used the term PAKSTAN ... and NOT Pakistan. The "I" was later added. So, please do not replace Pakstan with Pakistan. Thanks. --Ragib (talk) 07:41, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of Pakistan friendship associations

An article that you have been involved in editing, List of Pakistan friendship associations, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Pakistan friendship associations. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Ragib (talk) 17:46, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Re

No, I'm not following you around. Have I gone and changed ALL of your edits? Rather, I noticed a disturbing pattern in your edits, and have reverted many of the changes you made. I have also communicated each of the problems with your edits in this talk page. Please do not disrupt wikipedia by introducing incorrect info (as you did by changing quotations regarding PAKSTAN), or introduce non-notable entries (like the list of Pakistan friendship assocs), or remove requests for citations (as done in Muxlim). --Ragib (talk) 19:45, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Haroon Rashid

Misaq Rabab, I understand your concern at the name of Haroon Rashid. However, Haroon Rashid is a prominent British Muslim of Pakistani descent. His inclusion meets the Wikipedia guidlines for notable people. Furthermore, the various alternate spellings you have entered for the Caliph leave little room for ambiguity in the search for that particular individual. Blogs are for personal use, unlike the page for Haroon Rashid which was created after repeated requests from Coventry University students on the Foundation Degree programme. --Flailing123 (talk) 22:07, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Flu

Out of action due to flu. Misaq Rabab (talk) 23:46, 15 May 2008 (UTC)