User talk:Nforystek

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Nforystek, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! reddogsix (talk) 04:02, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Blacklawn[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Blacklawn requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Passengerpigeon (talk) 11:16, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

December 2012[edit]

Please do not blank your talk page and/or remove warnings from other editors. Doing so is considered evading scrutiny. --Passengerpigeon (talk) 11:36, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Roger, I'm just new and retarded, sorry about these two non sub-user posts, I should no better, it's not a free promoting site, lol. I agree with the delete. Nforystek (talk) 11:43, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's so fun though, makes you want to have something to post for the public. Nforystek (talk) 11:45, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, take a look at our notability guidelines. We look forward to your future contributions, if you plan to continue editing. Passengerpigeon (talk) 11:52, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nforystek, you are invited to the Teahouse[edit]

Hi Nforystek! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! SarahStierch (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:15, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of ALGEACLOSE[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as ALGEACLOSE, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Shirt58 (talk) 03:01, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(talk) 03:06, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

SOrry I hadn't posted in a while, I thought I was under my username/sandbox Nforystek Is there a way to modify the title from User/sandbox or whatever? So it is in my sandbox but displays like it would like? Nforystek (talk) 03:09, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nforystek/sandbox (January 28)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at User:Nforystek/sandbox.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Rankersbo (talk) 09:29, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Nforystek/sandbox[edit]

Hello Nforystek. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "sandbox".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|User:Nforystek/sandbox}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Rankersbo (talk) 10:05, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Max-FTP (April 25)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wikiisawesome was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of websites and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Nforystek/Max-FTP and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

wia (talk) 14:03, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Nforystek/sandbox[edit]

User:Nforystek/sandbox, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Nforystek/sandbox and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Nforystek/sandbox during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:06, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Nforystek/Max-FTP[edit]

Hello, Nforystek. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Max-FTP".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 20:59, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license[edit]

Unspecified source/license for File:Carotenoderma Nose (digital illistation symptoms).jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Carotenoderma Nose (digital illistation symptoms).jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 19:45, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Adolf Hitler. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Valenciano (talk) 19:19, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Nforystek/SoSweet[edit]

A tag has been placed on User:Nforystek/SoSweet requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DanielRigal (talk) 12:23, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Nforystek/MaxLand[edit]

A tag has been placed on User:Nforystek/MaxLand requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DanielRigal (talk) 12:23, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. I have skimmed your edits going back to 2012. You do not seem to have made any constructive edits to this encyclopaedia at all. You have used Wikipedia to host stuff about your personal projects that are unrelated to Wikipedia. You have recently been engaging in blatant vandalism. I'm not sure why you are on Wikipedia but it is clear that you are not here to help us make an encyclopaedia. DanielRigal (talk) 12:32, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm DoebLoggs. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Special needs trust have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. DoebLoggs (talk) 08:34, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at George W. Bush. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. DoebLoggs (talk) 08:49, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at John I of France. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Spyder_Monkey (Talk) 22:03, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at John I of France, you may be blocked from editing. Eric ^talk 11:53, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Adding in August) Ditto for edits to Lake Minnetonka article. Eric ^talk 12:03, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021[edit]

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Lake Minnetonka while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Your IP make a huge, unsourced addition to this article. I am inclined to support the comment made above by User:DanielRigal, "You do not seem to have made any constructive edits to this encyclopaedia at all". Magnolia677 (talk) 10:23, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021[edit]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Clementia of Hungary, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Please refrain from making test edits and from leaving long diatribes as edit summaries. Eric ^talk 11:46, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at John I of France, you may be blocked from editing. Eric ^talk 11:50, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at John I of France. Eric ^talk 12:42, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Anachronist (talk) 12:52, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nforystek (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You're right, and I'm sorry. I know when I am not being real to the purpose of this website before I post, and it is my fault, in other words I acted out and it's a like I feel like it's a public forum sometimes, like it's talking about me and I want to CORRECT IT. That's in my imagination. I've been really trying to restrict myself, to honest reference, I rarely ever have a edit, because I know that I don't have anything that you're missing in contribute, for anything, but who knows, lately, I actually have a edit that has stuck on Wikipedia for like a month or two! I'm so proud. Regardless, sorry again, may I still edit my user:nforystek ? If you find it in your unblock, I'll refrain from making edits on the main stuff searchable by the web. I've sort of been bummed out that the FTP Client I develop would make it in the list of FTP Clients, but I can't find the magazine reference with a colored screen shot and article about my software title Max-FTP. I was sent it in somewhere around year 2000, but I can't find it in searching or the actual magazine I had. I forget the title, it was something like P.C. Computing or P.C. Shopper sounding like that somewhat, Personal Computing maybe. The software only gained features in the past 20 years, not lost any, more well built too, was even signed for a while with a valid authority but it's too expensive for non profit so I made my own signature chain invalid authority, which cross browser platform allows one to continue at presented, verses bad cipher, it was a difficult chain actually to achieve in generate certificates, neotext.org the latest change I made is it fits on floppies! (extracting the downloaded with a archive program like 7zip, has internal parts of 1.44 floppy size and then also brings up the installation options interface if used that way, else it's short and sweet, installs on running the download no B.S.!). Backwards compatible to Windows ME and later. It rocks. Well, it's not the best for SSL. I've kind of stalled on grinding out SSL3, and SSL2 is a bias, if it even works for FTP, seems erratic or just that, least v3 is insecure. I can't find the reference anywhere on the web, in archives, ebay or where ever! :( Knowing one exists. Anyway, I was told I would just need one reference like that, to get my title into the list of FTP Clients. Nforystek (talk) 05:42, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No, we won't unblock you to just edit your userpage. The rest of your request seems to indicate you are indeed not here, and as such I am declining it. 331dot (talk) 07:46, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Since you continue to use this page to vandalize, I've removed talk page access. If you want your account unblocked you will need to file a request at WP:UTRS. RickinBaltimore (talk) 13:39, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]