User talk:OfficiallyGoodenough

Welcome!

Hello, OfficiallyGoodenough! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 15:17, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

License tagging for File:RCSD OFFICAL Logo.png

Thanks for uploading File:RCSD OFFICAL Logo.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:06, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:East UR Logo.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:East UR Logo.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:06, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Eastlogo notag.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Eastlogo notag.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:07, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You will need to deal with these issues or these files will be deleted. At least in the case of this particular image, it appears to be a valid fair use. So please take care of the paperwork. I'll leave you a link to a Q&A forum for new editors where you can request some help. I know how to upload it right but do not know how to fix it if it is uploaded incorrectly. Ask at Teahouse. Thanks. John from Idegon (talk) 18:11, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! OfficiallyGoodenough, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! John from Idegon (talk) 18:11, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Your recent editing history at List of WWE personnel shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Chris "WarMachineWildThing" ^{Talk to me} 14:22, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at List of WWE personnel. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 14:38, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

Your recent editing history at Royal Rumble (2017) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Chris "WarMachineWildThing" ^{Talk to me} 01:39, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:PW 205 is Not a brand, you are edit warring. Chris "WarMachineWildThing" ^{Talk to me} 01:43, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Royal Rumble

You are fully engaged in an edit war. Truth is, we only know of Raw and Smackdown participants. If NXT is revealed, then by all means add NXT, but the addition of them right now is unnecessary and just causing trouble. 205 Live, per the WWE wiki project, is a RAW brand. It is not just a talent exchange. The brands are RAW, Smackdown, and NXT, wherein 205 is a weekly program. I frankly agree, despite that, that there is value in specifying participants from 205 Live, but it is not worth the edit war. Just come back after and change it if you really need to. -Uncleben85 (talk) 01:59, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Royal Rumble

It's not worth it, man. Not worth the potential ban of the edit war. If it's simply for precautionary measures then place it as hidden text () and then reveal it when you need to. -Uncleben85 (talk) 02:05, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. JDC808 ♫ 02:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Royal Rumble (2017). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Bbb23 (talk) 02:14, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sami Zayn

Are you able to find a source with Sami Zayn's entry number. I could not. It would help. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 02:51, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

205 isn't a brand

Per discussions in the wrestling project 205 isn't a separate brand from RAW. Chris "WarMachineWildThing" ^{Talk to me} 21:24, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Just for clarification here is where consensus was reached for 205 live as being part of RAW and not a brand. Chris "WarMachineWildThing" ^{Talk to me} 00:48, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Your past edits are more than Minor edits Chris "WarMachineWildThing" ^{Talk to me} 02:52, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

John Cena

Hi...I don't mean to be argumentative, but Wiki policy has always been to list guys under the brand that they are assigned to as per WWE.com.

Yes, John Cena is promoted as a "free agent", but he is listed on the Raw roster on WWE.com, which is why he should be listed as such on the Royal Rumble (2018) article.

Consensus in past disputes on such matters has always pointed to WWE.com being the primary source to fall back on - so the fact is the brand John Cena is officially assigned to is Raw, thus that's how he gets listed here.

Just following established Wiki precedent.

Vjmlhds (talk) 00:03, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Look at the Raw section of the WWE.com superstars page...see who is listed there...why, it's JOHN CENA! So please stop with the disruptive editing. Vjmlhds (talk) 18:13, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Royal Rumble (2018).

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. ENOUGH! Vjmlhds 18:20, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Aplolgize Now!

I demand an apology for calling me a vandal.

That is a personal attack, and I will not stand for it.

Vjmlhds (talk) 18:25, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring on Royal Rumble (2018)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - Galatz ^Talk 18:31, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Galatz ^Talk 19:40, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The next time you edit war...

You will find yourself given a multi-month block. Same goes for calling other editors vandals. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 22:35, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@NeilN: He reverted my edit [1] and called it "vandalism" in the summary. It's definitely insulting to a multi-year contributor to be called a vandal unjustly. ☧Catholic Laitinen ☧ (talk) 03:41, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Lord Laitinen: I agree it's insulting and completely unwarranted. It came before my warning. If it happens again feel free to post on my talk page. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 03:53, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, OfficiallyGoodenough. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on List of WWE personnel. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. StaticVapor message me! 23:08, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Survivor Series (2019)

Hi can u please stop removing my edit.😠😠😠😠😠😠😠 Tag-Mod 13 (talk) 02:42, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi still here. #Shelton Benjamin ain't no stopping me now.

November 2019

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:34, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Survivor Series (2019) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
You have a history of edit warring so I would tread carefully. You may be looking at a long block if this continues. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:42, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2020 WWE Draft

R-Truth saying Charyl Caruso had been drafted to NXT UK was a joke. That's why it was removed from the page. - User:CageToRattle

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:43, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: D Billions (November 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Fifthapril was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:D Billions and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fifthapril (talk) 06:32, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:D Billions has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:D Billions. Thanks! Fifthapril (talk) 06:33, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions to WUHF has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reliable source. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 15:29, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:D Billions

Hello, OfficiallyGoodenough. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:D Billions, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:15, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:D Billions

Hello, OfficiallyGoodenough. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "D Billions".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:33, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on 2024 Republican Party presidential debates and forums

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2024 Republican Party presidential debates and forums, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 03:02, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on 2024 Republican Party presidential debates and forums

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2024 Republican Party presidential debates and forums, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL" error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 03:02, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Downtown no Gaki no Tsukai ya Arahende!!

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Downtown no Gaki no Tsukai ya Arahende!!, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 04:03, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]