This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Welcome!
Hello, Patriccck, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.
I reverted your Samsung move as we don't include things like "Co. Ltd." in article titles, see WP:NCCORP. --David Biddulph (talk) 22:14, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hlavní strana. Since you had some involvement with the Hlavní strana redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. L293D (✉) 18:21, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
References
Hi. When you did the English version of the article on the album "Holomraz", you did the references completely wrong. I know you tried to copy them as they appeared in the Czech version, but you can't just copy numbers. You have to copy the entire references. Please read this guide on how it's done. DS (talk) 23:11, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Prima televize, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hotel Paradise (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add categories.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please could you improve the structure of this article and add some english language inline citations?
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Samsung devices until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —DIYeditor (talk) 18:09, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Samsung Wearables, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi, Giant I want to know the rating of my articles. I did not know that there was a user group New pages patrol, so I put it on the Administrator noticeboard. I created this page if Omniflakes did not rewies the pages. Is it against the rules? Patriccck 12:28, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
No, it was just unusual behaviour. GiantSnowman 12:32, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
On another subject, Patricck, you need to repair your signature to include a link to your user page and/or your user talk page. Please see WP:SIGLINK. Thanks —DoRD (talk) 12:50, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Patriccck. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Samsung Health, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 20:02, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
Ways to improve Nový obzory
Hi, I'm Boleyn. Patriccck, thanks for creating Nový obzory!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. It isn't yet clear that it meets WP:NSONG or WP:GNG.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
@Boleyn: Hi, the song was released an hour ago, so there are not still any sources. I'll add sources within a week. Until then, please do not delete the article, thank you. --Patriccck (talk) 17:02, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
The Simpsons (season 30)
I apologize if it seemed as if you and I were having an edit war. Because Wikipedia is not a WP:CRYSTALBALL, I wanted to redirect the article for now. However, now that I have proof that "Bart's Not Dead" is the season premiere, I restored the article. However, you cannot put unscheduled episodes in the episode guide. Please leave them as they are on List of The Simpsons episodes. JE98 (talk) 16:07, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
2100
I thought consensus at WT:YEARS is that years 2030 or later should be merged into decade articles. This means the 2100 should definitely NOT be created. Please revert. — Arthur Rubin(talk) 21:25, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
I think article 2100 should be here. Article 2099 was established on 21 November 2016, so that 2100 should not be hampered here. In addition, it has 32 interwiki. Patriccck (talk) 16:22, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
At this page is not any consensus. Patriccck (talk) 16:23, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
See the edit notes for 2100. An admin suggested that discussion should occur before changing it from a redirect. However, I've opened the merge (redirect) discussion at Talk:21st century#2100. — Arthur Rubin(talk) 21:02, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Simpsons (season 30) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- AlexTW 16:10, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on List of The Simpsons: Tapped Out events, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Rcsprinter123(discourse) 17:06, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
A page you started (Bart's Not Dead) has been reviewed!
Wikipedia editor Doomsdayer520 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Thanks for your new (and quick) article on the"Bart's Not Dead" episode. Note that the Plot section needs expansion to match the quality of articles on other Simpsons episodes.
To reply, leave a comment on Doomsdayer520's talk page.
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add more sources from reliable sources and expand the lead section
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Hello, Patriccck. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and pingme. Or, for broader editing help, you can talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
@Abishe: Thanks for review, I added references. And too Merry Christmas and Happy New Year. --Patriccck (talk) 13:29, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
WAM Postcard collection
Dear organiser,
Thanks for your patience, I apologise for the delay in sending the Google form for address collection. Please share this form and the message with the participants who created 4 or more than 4 articles during WAM. We will send the reminders directly to the participants from next time, but please ask the participants to fill the form before January 10th 2019.
Things to do:
If you're the only organiser in your language edition, Please accept your article, keeping the WAM guidelines in mind.
Please report the local Wikipedia Asian Ambassador (who has most accepted articles) on this page, if the 2nd participants have more than 30 accepted articles, you will have two ambassadors.
Please update the status of your language edition in this page.
Note: This form is only accessed by WAM international team. All personal data will be destroyed immediately after postcards are sent. If you have problems accessing the google form, you can use Email This User to send your address to my Email. Thanks :) --Saileshpat using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:15, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
An article you recently created, 2019 in photo, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 05:53, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
A page you started (Cima Sappada) has been reviewed!
2019 in photo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2019 in photo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. RhinosF1 (talk) 19:44, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
Invitation to Organize Wiki Loves Love 2019
Wiki Loves Love (WLL) is an International photography competition of Wikimedia Commons to subject love testimonials happening in the month of February 2019.
The primary goal of the competition is to document love testimonials through human cultural diversity such as monuments, ceremonies, snapshot of tender gesture, and miscellaneous objects used as symbol of love; to illustrate articles in the worldwide free encyclopedia Wikipedia, and other Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) projects. February is around the corner and Wiki Loves Love team invites you to organize and promote WLL19 in your country and join hands with us to celebrate love and document it on Wikimedia Commons. The theme of 2019 is Festivals, ceremonies and celebrations of love.
To organize Wiki Loves Love in your region, sign up at WLL Organizers page. You can also simply support and spread love by helping us translate the commons page in your local language which is open for translation.
The contest starts runs from 1-28 February 2019. Independent from if there is a local contest organised in your country, you can help by making the photo contest Wiki Loves Love more accessible and available to more people in the world by translating the upload wizard, templates and pages to your local language. See for an overview
of templates/pages to be translated at our Translations page.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Tagishsimon (talk) 19:19, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
A page you started (The Girl on the Bus) has been reviewed!
@Doomsdayer520: I only created redirect. :) I am not author of the text in the article. --Patriccck (talk) 13:04, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
Sorry, that whole thing is an automatic process that sends a message to whoever is listed first in the article history. On the good side, at least the team has transformed your early redirect into a solid article, as is usual for the Simpsons project. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 14:23, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
Unblock
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
I want edit Wikipedia with proxy. I use TunnelBear. Can someone please unblock me? My IP address is 165.227.64.98. Patriccck (talk) 20:16, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You are not blocked but the IP address that you wish to use is blocked as an open proxy. We do not permit editing through such proxies unless there is a legitimate reason. Since you have been editing, as recently as today, you clearly can edit without using a proxy so I regret that your request is declined. Just Chilling (talk) 20:58, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Why?
Please ecplain why you moved the page about Flow to Wikipedia:Structured Discussions. Somrting like that really should be discussed first.If this has anything to do with it being April 1st a page move like that is one of the things that should not occur. MarnetteD|Talk 15:55, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Please do not create any new pages or redirects until you have responded to the question here or to the ANI thread. MarnetteD|Talk 16:27, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi, Patrick. Thanks for your attempts to update Wikipedia:Flow. However, that page is not being updated for a reason: Structured Discussions/Flow was rejected by English Wikipedia, and does not exist on this project. Therefore, the corresponding page is not outdated, but obsolete. It is only preserved for historical reference. ~Swarm~ 🐝 {sting · hive} 17:11, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I thought I can move page, but I cant add new informations to the page. (Btw. my name is Patrik, not Patrick) --Patriccck (talk) 18:09, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Nothing about a historically-archived page should be updated. Swarm–Sting · Hive 🐝🐝🐝 13:31, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
.svg){kind=spacer}
