User talk:Secondhand Work
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Secondhand Work, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- Starting an article
- Your first article
- Biographies of living persons
- How to write a great article
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Help pages
- Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! ...William 15:14, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Eric "Badspot" Hartman
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Eric "Badspot" Hartman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ...William 15:14, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
Give advice here!
[edit]I do have wisdom, and I can help you.
Everyone needs some help on the journey of life, so post your needed advice here!
--Secondhand Work (talk) 14:50, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
- Make sure you get the copyright permissions correct, there are people who watch for non-free images closely.--Milowent • hasspoken 17:42, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
Secondhand Work, you are invited to the Teahouse
[edit]
|
Hi Secondhand Work! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
[edit]
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Technical 13 (talk) 15:12, 8 April 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).
Disambiguation link notification for January 23
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Radial Force Variation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Traction (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
An lune about ClueBot
[edit]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lune_(poetry) <--- for those that don't know what a lune is
ClueBot NG:
Bot of Wikipedia,
Stops vandals in their tracks,
Lightning speed edits.
But seriously. I just saw vandalism, I click on it to edit it. BAM. ClueBot beats me to the punch. Oh well. It really shows how fast that thing is. Give us human vandal-stoppers a chance! :c
Secondhand Work (talk) 23:31, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
[edit]
- Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 06:58, Saturday, November 2, 2024 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Rollbacker
[edit]
I have granted rollback rights to your account. After a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, contact me and I will remove it. Good luck and thanks. – Gilliam (talk) 16:18, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
Thank you very much. I will use rollback to the best of my ability, and try not to abuse it's power. Again, thank you. Secondhand Work 16:20, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
Welcome to STiki
[edit]|
Hello, Secondhand Work, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Here are some pages which are a little more fun:
We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (developer) and Widr (talk) 06:03, 16 February 2015 (UTC) |
|
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Secondhand Work. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Secondhand Work. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Reason for reverted edits
[edit]Hello, Secondhand Work. You have reverted some edits I have done to "Draft:Pan-Romance language" and I'd like to know why they "did not appear constructive" to you. I had added extra bibliography, essentially. I'm new in Wikipedia, so a clarification would be helpful. By the way, I've already done these edits twice, because when trying to save them for the first time someone else had been editing the page at the same time and I lost my work. Thanks. Jorcaiba (talk) 21:59, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Jorcaiba: I've checked my edit, and I realized I have made the revert in error. I must have not seen things or assumed it wasn't a draft due to how quick I sometimes revert vandalism. I deeply apologize and hope that your Wikipedia experience is a great one. I believe you should be able to recover your work through copying the text on the edit history window near the top of the page. Once again, I apologize. Thank you for letting me know. Secondhand Work 22:07, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Secondhand Work: Hi, Secondhand Work. I'm glad to read that it was just a mistake. Don't worry. Thanks for your reply! --Jorcaiba (talk) 00:21, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
Tarzan Triumphant
[edit]Hello, you reverted my edit to this page. I don't understand why you consider it disruptive. It is a valid link to a complete copy of the Burrough's book in several different formats. Fadedpage.com is a volunteer project. The site offers electronic editions of books in the public domain free of charge. There is no DRM attached to the books and all we ask people as that they read and enjoy the book. Fadedpage is very much like Project Gutenberg which offers a similar range of books for readers to download. There are 2000+ links to fadedpage on Wikipedia and 30,000+ links to Project Gutenberg. Thanks, LiteratureCompanion (talk) 01:33, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
- @LiteratureCompanion: I've checked the edit, and I have to say I'm really sorry. I did not know the book referenced Joseph Stalin, considering that I thought of the movie Tarzan and had never heard of the book before. My thought process thought it was essentially a slightly-more 'professional' comedy edit/vandal, and did not realize that it did indeed contain messages about him. My sincere apologies again, thank you for letting me know. If there's anything else I can do, let me know. Secondhand Work 03:37, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |