User talk:Usmanwardag

License tagging for File:Melvin Firm -Upper Left-, P. Minieri -Upper Right- Herman Sokol -Lower Right.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Melvin Firm -Upper Left-, P. Minieri -Upper Right- Herman Sokol -Lower Right.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:05, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:BroadSpectrumAntiobiotic.PDF

Thanks for uploading File:BroadSpectrumAntiobiotic.PDF. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:05, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Hayden+Photo.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Hayden+Photo.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 05:11, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Watch naruto episodes

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Watch naruto episodes, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Shirt58 (talk) 11:17, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy at Watch naruto episodes

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for taking the time to contribute.

I'm a bot designed by another Wikipedia editor, and I'm here to help you with our deletion process. I noticed that while working on an article recently, you removed a speedy deletion template that tagged it for deletion. Don't get discouraged! Deletion discussions happen on Wikipedia all the time.

If you don't want the article to get deleted, please click here.

The link will take you to the talk page, where you can explain why the article should be kept. If you have any questions about this or need help with editing, you can ask at the Help desk.

We really hope you'll stick around to help make Wikipedia better! Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 11:52, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Personyze

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Personyze, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Night of the Big Wind _talk 11:38, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Personyze

Hello, Usmanwardag, and thanks for contributing to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that some editors are discussing at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Personyze whether the article Personyze should be in Wikipedia. I encourage you to comment there if you think the article should be kept in the encyclopedia.

The deletion discussion doesn't mean you did something wrong. In fact, other editors may have useful suggestions on how you can continue editing and improving Personyze, which I encourage you to do. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Help Desk.

Thanks again for your contributions! Night of the Big Wind _talk 20:46, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Personyze

Hi, you removed the orphaned article-box. The problem is still existent: no other real articles (only talkpages and other kind of talkpages) linking to that article. Please remove only such maintain boxes if you addressed the probelm or if it is already solved. mabdul 11:59, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Usmanwardag. You have new messages at Mabdul's talk page.
Message added 15:50, 12 December 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

mabdul 15:50, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Watch Naruto Online

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Watch Naruto Online, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. L337p4wn ^{Talk to me!} 11:21, 2 January 2012 (UTC) [reply]

Hello, Usmanwardag. You have new messages at Mabdul's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Quick mini-survey about your editing experience

Hi Usmanwardag,

You are one of a number of users who recently received a message from SDPatrolBot. I'm curious to hear about your experience with the speedy deletion process and how you feel about the message you received. Specifically, I'd like to know...

Was the message clearly written?
Was it helpful in communicating what you should do to save your article from getting deleted?
Are there any changes you'd like to see made to such messages in the future that you think might make them more effective for new users?
Any other observations you'd like to make about contesting a speedy deletion? How did you find the process overall?

If you'd prefer not to answer in a public space, you can feel free to email me your response (mpinchukwikimedia.org), and I'll be sure to keep it private unless you indicate otherwise. Your observations and suggestions are really valuable for helping improve the new editor experience on Wikipedia, so any feedback you can give would be appreciated immensely! Thank you, Maryana (WMF) (talk) 00:57, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Usmanwardag. You have new messages at Mabdul's talk page.
Message added 11:46, 6 June 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

mabdul 11:46, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Usmanwardag, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style
Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Nathan2055 ^talk 17:05, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/DJ Super Duke.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! MJ94 (talk) 21:56, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Usmanwardag, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. Any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rachel D. Vancelette.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Jprg1966 ^(talk) 22:38, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of a comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jordan Older (2nd nomination)

Looks like you accidentally removed Starblind's comment from the AFD. I put it back for you, but please be more careful in the future. - MrOllie (talk) 15:40, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I was making a comment at the same time. Although I got the notification, I failed to comprehend it. Sure, I'll be more careful next time ;) Usmanwardag (talk) 15:47, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dude, you really need to stop.

You need to read WP:BLUDGEON and WP:STICK and you need to realise your comments are now just making you look ridiculous. I'm not trying to attack you - you are digging this hole all on your own. But making whole policies up and then claiming some great offence because someone breached your fictional policies is just silly. Accusing someone of breaking the rules (without evidence) can be considered a personal attack. Accusing someone of breaking a rule that doesn't exist (for which there cannot possibly be evidence) would almost certainly be considered a personal attack. I'm not going to template-message you because I think it's probably just a matter of you taking a step back and taking a big deep breath. But you are (quite seriously) on a fast-track to a block with your current conduct. You are way past the point where rational discussion in that AFD is possible. You need to understand people are just humouring you until the AFD is closed or you are blocked. Right now I'd say it's about even money as to which will happen first. Trust me when I tell you it's just not worth it. Stalwart111 10:19, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your comment came to me as an absolute shocker. What a hypocrite you are (Please note I'm retaliating in the same tone in which you tried to harass me). On the Afd page, I never attacked you personally. I never talked about anything that was related to you. I talked about the discussion and if you ask ANY natural person to read the afd discussion, you'll know who was being rational all the time. Afds are for humour? Facepalm. Expressing what you found offensive is harassment? Facepalm. Huh. You're one .... I have seen. I'll not say that. I am civilized. You are not. Think you can block me? Bring it on. We'll see. Usmanwardag (talk) 18:23, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Don't be silly, there are no threats in what I wrote. I just gave you friendly advice to stop behaving in a disruptive way. More friendly advice than many there would think you deserve. As for my motives, I'm just fed up with your behaviour in that AfD, just like everyone else there. Do you really seriously believe that your behaviour there is helping Jordan Older? (He might not by my "representative" but his summary was a good one... so I borrowed it). Stalwart111 23:17, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Thank you for the advice. I appreciate the tone of your comment now. And yes, I do believe I am. He is a legend and he deserves a mention in history.

P.S: If you are fed up with the discussion, then just leave it. If my arguments are that unconvincing (as you believe), then it will be deleted at some stage. You have nothing to worry about. Usmanwardag (talk) 05:10, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

He's a legend, huh? Too funny. Nice try though! Stalwart111 06:59, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 11:12, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rachel D. Vancelette for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rachel D. Vancelette is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachel D. Vancelette until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Someone not using his real name (talk) 17:45, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinitely blocked.

Blocked due to spam and excessive and unreasonable disruption. For more info, please see the discussion. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 18:11, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/DJ Super Duke

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/DJ Super Duke, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. DGG ( talk ) 18:06, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rachel D. Vancelette

A tag has been placed on Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rachel D. Vancelette, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

G6, routine maintenance. Already in mainspace

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. DGG ( talk ) 18:19, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]