Jump to content

User talk:Valley2city/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3→Archive 5

Hi there. Welcome to Wikipedia. When you get a chance, drop us a note at Wikipedia:New user log to introduce yourself.

You can sign your name on talk pages by using " ~~~ " for your username and " ~~~~ " for your username and a timestamp.

You should also feel free to drop me a question on my talk page. I'll answer if I'm here.

Happy editing, 198.60.98.125 02:31, 24 October 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:Halivni.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 11:44, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject Judaism

Welcome to the WikiProject! Kari Hazzard (talk | contrib) 22:33, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:Halivni.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:01, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Image deletion

If you want an image deleted, you could add {{db-reason|Uploaded in error}}, or just ask a passing admin. Guy 15:54, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

Bubble Tea!?!?!

You drink bubble tea?!?! I suppose it is your right!!! Have you ever tried that drink ORbitz (which no longer exists)?? ... (Bubble tea is the most disgusting thing I have ever tasted!!) Shalom - Abscissa 14:40, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

Thank you very much

That was really nice to hear, happy to meet you. Amoruso 19:44, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Re: David Weiss Halivni: rescued fair use image

Hi Valley,

It seems to have been deleted in error. Try uploading it again, and let me know when you do so I can fix any copyright info. Cheers, TewfikTalk 00:40, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

I clarified the fair-use rationale, but it is best if there is actually a free image. Try to find one elsewhere online, or perhaps approach the photographer/copyright-holder for permission to use it. TewfikTalk 18:20, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject Israel userbox colors

Hi, I noticed you changed the border to a yellow color. Can you please point to a precedent? I checked out some other countries' WikiProjects and they don't seem to even have a userbox. I fail to understand why an Israel-related project must have a yellow border. The color needs to be at least somewhat symbolically relevant. -- Ynhockey (Talk) 19:15, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

Persian Jews

You've placed a notice on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Jewish history about that article. What in particular do you see as a problem? Beit Or 10:00, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Disengagement

I made the redirect Disengagement into a speedy deletion, because there had already been a vote for it. You can object on the talk page, but I will strongly object to the "confiscation" of the term for the Israel disengagement plan. It is a common general term and should remain that way. Andries 18:32, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

To answer some of your questions to me, please read the following Wikipedia:Redirects_for_deletion/Redirect_Archives/May_2006#disengagement_.E2.86.92_Israel.27s_unilateral_disengagement_plan Andries 23:00, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Epoch (reference date)

You recently edited the Epoch (reference date) article to state "The world was created around 3761 BCE (the year 0 in Judaism). The year, as of Rosh Hashanah 2006, is 5767."

First, I would like to ask if you can supply a source for this information? Information should be verifiable in a reliable source to remain in Wikipedia. Second, does your source indicate if these particular numbers are observed by all Jews, or if it varies by belief or region. Finally, you might want to rephrase it to state that Jews place the creation of the world in 3761 BCE, rather stating as a fact that the world was created in 3761 BCE; I seriously doubt you will get agreement even among all Jews that the world was actually created in 3761 BCE, never mind all the other readers of Wikipedia. --Gerry Ashton 17:38, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

CR Poconos

Appreciate the heads up! --yonkeltron 02:13, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

why single out Jews?

Hello there. I see on the We Didn't Start The Fire page that you reverted my deletion. I really don't understand why jews, but not other ethnic or religious groups, should be listed this way - it seems very POV. And if you check the discussion page, you'll see that I wasn't the only one who felt this way. Rather than just rv your rv, I was hoping you could make a convining argument, preferably on that page so a consensus can be reached. Take care, Rasi2290

Vote request

Please Vote, as per wiktionary the correct spelling is Wiktionary:anti-Semitic NOT Antisemitic. 70.49.86.196 22:28, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Vote

Please vote 67.70.71.160 10:26, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

You are so bias

you shouldn't be editing columbia university — Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.8.16.64 (talk) 11:52, December 14, 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject Harry Potter

RHB(AWB) 23:43, 30 December 2006 (UTC), on behalf of WPHarry Potter

User:Valley2city/Camp Ramah in the Berkshires

As the article stands at the moment, I'm afraid it's not suitable. Clearly the camp exists. Why is it notable? The article needs to both establish the camp's importance, if it has any, and provide referenced proof of that importance. Proto::► 22:45, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Alright, I'll find more people to work on it off my page. Valley2city 22:57, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Crazy old Jewish man

In response to your revert of my edit, where has he been "billed" as Jewish? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jnelson09 (talk • contribs) 03:50, 5 January 2007 (UTC).

User_talk:Gulabjaman - warnings

I noticed you put a notability template on User_talk:Gulabjaman's talk page. Their creation of Sab Sey Bari Chawal was clearly an attack page. Perhaps an attack template would have been more appropriate. RichMac (Talk) 06:22, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Re:Variety of tempaltes. I have the exact same problem, and have a tendancy to use the wrong templates or not even post warnings on talk pages, as I've noticed a lot of other people doing. However in this one instance I figured personal attacks should have a bit of a stronger stance. It also helps when another user notices warnings of a similar nature. It's too bad that text inserter at the bottom of the page doesn't have user talk templates. RichMac (Talk) 08:47, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

commons:User:Valley2city

I assert to be the same user as commons:User:Valley2city Valley2city 07:41, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Persian Jews

Hi, Please come and check my editions in Persian Jews article. Also look at my comment in talk page. I hope you have good Shabbat today. --Sa.vakilian 03:19, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

shofar

I just borrowed one of your userboxes!Elizmr 22:40, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Rick Mount

Hey, amigo, what's going on. Why to you refer to this as vandalism. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.73.197.29 (talk) 03:49, 27 March 2007 (UTC).

Oh, I apologize, I saw something positive changed to negative by an Anonymous IP address and I kind of quickly made the assumption that it was vandalism. I quickly realized, looking through the history of the article that this is in fact encyclopedic. Please accept my humblest apologies. --Valley2city₪‽ 03:56, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!

Admin coach?

Ah I kept on forgetting to respond to your comment. Thanks for your long comment on my talk page, it is appreciated since I spend a lot time doing each editor reviews. I'd be happy to be your admin coach, just ask me for opinions whenever you feel like. (I don't really like the process in WP:ADMINCOACH. AQu01rius (User • Talk) 22:20, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks so much! I'll be in touch. --Valley2city₪‽ 07:33, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Holocaust and Heroism National Remembrance Day in Israel (2007)

...is being observed this year on Monday, April 16, starting the evening before. (It seems your flyer was not in error after all.) I've added some further explanation at the Main Page Errors page for the sake of clarification, and in hopes the maintainers of On this day... will publish the corrected date tomorrow. Pharos has posted a pair of external links to the Israeli press there, and I'm adding that of the Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs website in English, so I wanted to bring this to your attention as well. -- Thanks, Deborahjay 19:02, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
Further: Regarding the upcoming Memorial Day and Israel Independence Day: my locally-printed calendar shows these on April 23 and 24, a Monday and Tuesday respectively (i.e. starting Sunday in the evening). I'll confirm with the appropriate authorities—which will probably take the remainder of this week—and report back to you and to the "On this day..." editors, and also update the respective pages. Thanks for bringing this to my attention. -- Deborahjay 23:19, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

{{Synagogue-stub}}

Hi - I see you have recently created a new stub type. As it states at Wikipedia:Stub, at the top of most stub categories, and in many other places on Wikipedia, it is recommended that new stub types are proposed prior to creation at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals, in order to check whether the new stub type is already covered by existing stub types, whether it is named according to stub naming guidelines, whether it reaches the standard threshold for creation of a new stub type, and whether it crosses existing stub type hierarchies. Your new stub type is currently listed at WP:WSS/D - please feel free to make any comments there as to any rationale for this stub type. And please, in future, consider proposing new stub types first! Grutness...wha? 01:04, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Are you serious?

I cannot add my own few on a movie which I share with many people, including ebert and roeper?---hiwhispees —Preceding unsigned comment added by hiwhispees (talk • contribs)

Reply to comment

No problem :O) Flowerpotman talk-wot I've done 01:21, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Talk Page

I just wanted to let you know that I thought the thing you did with your talk page, with the מגן דוד in the corner of the screen is awesome, and I'm using it on my talk page now also. :-) -- Amazins490 01:54, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

aiv report

Thank you for making a report about Patrickwhatley (talk · contribs · block log) on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators are generally only able to block users if they have received a recent final warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize even after their final warning, please report them to the AIV noticeboard again. In this particular case, the user has only made an edit to wikipedia:introduction after the final warning, and that area is supposed to be edited by new users. It's probably a good idea to keep an eye on this one, though. Thanks! — coelacan — 07:13, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Hey, coelacan. If you take a look at the log, there are two images that Patrickwhatley (talk · contribs · block log) uploaded after his final warning: "Image:M 1faf636f045c22857839189667fd0d27.jpg" and "Image:Lesbian couple.jpg". The captions for both were attack/libel so I sent a final violation to AIV after tagging the pics for CSD-G11 (they have since been deleted, which is why I have to rely on my Firefox history to locate the proof). Therefore, I think It was reasonable to send to AIV. --Valley2city₪‽ 07:41, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
Ahh! I see. Logs here. Potentially libellous, yes, and not good-faith uploads. I will indef block as a vandal-only account. I think many or most admins do not instinctively check upload logs, so you should probably call explicit attention to these things. And we can't see deleted pages unless we're pointed to them; they don't show up as redlinks in a user's contributions, or anything like that. So if you're reporting someone to AIV and their vandalism has already been completely deleted, be sure to point to where the deleted histories can be found. Thanks for clearing that up for me. I'll have to try to remember to look at upload logs too in the future. Peace, — coelacan — 09:56, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
Not a problem, my friend. Everyone makes mistakes; especially those of us using TWINKLE. --Valley2city₪‽ 16:05, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Re: Curtisobal

Thank you for making a report on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators are generally only able to block users if they have received a recent final warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize even after their final warning, please report them to the AIV noticeboard again. Thank you. fishhead64 01:03, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

As I mentioned on AIV: Final warning was in response to [1] at 00:47. He then vandalized yet again at 00:52, AFTER I sent the Final Warning, to which I responded with an AIV report. --Valley2city₪‽ 01:11, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

CSD tagging of blanked articles

About the warning you issued to Janjanthecheerleadingman (talk · contribs), if the original author blanks an article that is already CSD tagged, you shouldn't revert it and warn the user, but instead change the tag to {{db-blanked}}. And just another suggestion, you might want to {{welcome}} new editors so that their first message is something friendly instead of a warning. We want people to want to help out, even if their first edit was a mistake. =) -- Gogo Dodo 04:05, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, Gogo Dodo for the advice. You're right. Perhaps I've been a little too warn-happy with the burbas. Do you think I still notify them by using a Level 1 general note as opposed to a bland welcome? I am looking for all the advice I can get because I want to soon go for an RfA. --Valley2city₪‽ 04:20, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
What I do depends a lot of what the editor did. If it's a fairly innocent article creation and/or test edit, I'll leave the new editor a welcome sometimes skipping warning them entirely if it's something like simple like "test". However, if they do multiple test edits, I'll leave them a level 1 warning to give them a little nudge. If the first edits are vandalism or attack pages or something really bad, I'll skip the welcome entirely and jump right to the appropriate warning. It's a judgment call, but my opinion is to be nice to the ones who made AGF edits, but just didn't know the rules; don't be nice to the ones who are here to vandalize. =) -- Gogo Dodo 06:13, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Israeli pound

What is your opinion on this matter, Talk:Israeli lira#Requested move? Epson291 08:07, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Your NPWatcher Application

Dear Valley2city,

Thank you for applying for NPWatcher! Unfortunately, your application has been declined because I've checked your contribution, the concerns raised and I prefer to wait. Actually I cannot be sure that you understand totally the CSD policy. Sometimes you forgot to warn users that you have tagged page created by them as CSD, sometimes you mistake CSD reason. Nothing personally, feel free to resubmit your application in two weeks. Happy editing ;-)

Snowolf (talk) CON COI - 09:21, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Understood and your concerns are noted. As for the times I do not warn people for their CSD, those are on occasions that the article is such ludicrous vandalism that reminding them of the option to put a hangon tag would be a waste of time causing a backlog in CSD'd articles that really deserve an admin's glance. You are correct that I might on occasion choose the wrong CSD category; heck, we all do. However, I sometimes find that there is more than one category that an article may fall under and my understanding of CSD is similar to that of other wikipedia policies and guidelines as well as case law: there are many fuzzy gray areas and issues that don't fall under a predefined rubric. I just want to clean up Wikipedia from vandalism and vain fluff and I will continue for the time being through TWINKLE. --Valley2city₪‽ 02:39, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Valley2city/Archive_1&oldid=1193668535"