User talk:Vrenator/2010 Archive

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

2010 Archive[edit]

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date).

User page[edit]

Many thanks for removing the vandalism. Pinethicket (talk) 12:24, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Vrenator, Can you Leave Charles on for the day, it's his birthday. He's part Welsh! Thanks, Yorkville —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yorkville (talk • contribs) 16:34, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the suggestion[edit]

Cheers for the suggestion, but every time i clicked "preview", it came out as i wanted it to. So i'd click "save" and it'd be slightly off. I'm sure somebody else can perfect what i was trying to do. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.166.222.163 (talk) 11:35, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FYI[edit]

Hello, this is to let you know that you have made a little mistake in reverting the wrong edit here. FYI, the IP editor (218.186.8.234) was actually correct in reverting the other IP editor (218.186.8.238) until you came along. Per WP:SYN, you cannot quote a different figure/statement from that of the quoted sources (provided here & here), please be more careful in future, thank you. Best. --Dave ♠♣♥♦№1185♪♫™ 17:27, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer permission[edit]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:41, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback[edit]

Hello, per your request, I've granted you Rollback rights! Just remember:

If you have any questions, please do let me know.

--HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:41, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Auto-reviewing[edit]

I noticed you auto reviewed both this and this edit as reviewed. Obviously one isn't right. The editor undid their own edits, but I'd suggest you be careful when reviewing pages, particularly when editors change factual errors. Shadowjams (talk) 09:11, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Many thanks, Vrenator, for all you do on Wikipedia—especially keeping my personal pages free of vandalism!!! Regards, Pinethicket (talk) 10:22, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Question[edit]

I noticed this user Bjoh249 (talk) vandalizing a couple of articles that I edit on Wikipedia. Another editor went ahead and reverted his/her edits. How does someone report a repeat offender? As you can see on his/her talk page, another editor has already warned him twice. What can be done? CreativeSoul7981 (talk) 21:31, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This page should give you the information you need:
Wikipedia:Guide to administrator intervention against vandalism Vrenator (talk) 21:46, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I will try to check out that link tonight. Strange, though, this user has several warning already on his/her page. Again, I appreciate the quick link. CreativeSoul7981 (talk) 22:01, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, what to do about a user posting the same thing on 3 different article pages? The previous user is making the same post on the Geneation X, Generation Y, and now the Strauss & Howe TALK pages. I thought there was some rule against doing that? Since, this same user was engaging in reverting edits, he then went on to vandalize the page and use foul language. What is the proper channel now? Report vandal? Edit warring? CreativeSoul7981 (talk) 01:24, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If the user vandalizes on the same page or different pages then warnings should be given. If there is a difference of opinion rather than vandalism it should be discussed on the article's talk page. I'm not an administrator but you may wish to discuss it with an administrator. Just look up the Help pages on Edit warring and vandalism and report it if necessary. Vrenator (talk) 06:29, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Thanks again, Vrenator, for watching my user page. That appears to be an IP user who just registered and their first edit was on my user page. I imagine they were a blocked IP address, and I had something to do with the block. It is a battle out there! Regards, Pinethicket (talk) 13:23, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive?[edit]

How am I acting disruptivly? It is my view that there is a total misuse of power going on here! A view that can't be removed from me,I've made no biased edits, engaged in discussion, and provided a fifth reference to the existing four in regards to Derry Airports irish name.--NorthernCounties (talk) 19:04, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ummm... make up your mind. In, or out? :-) --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 19:06, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Vrenator for the removal, I had written the above before I realised you had reverted, Cheers--NorthernCounties (talk) 19:17, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dum Spiro Spero[edit]

Some one else allocated the IP address I get when forget to log onPetebutt (talk) 13:10, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Author blanking[edit]

Please use G7 for articles in which the author blanks, especially if there is a {{db}} template. Thanks, Tommy! 18:29, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Forged signature[edit]

Hi. I am not sure if this is something you care about, but I thought I ought to let you know that an anonymous IP forged your signature on a warning template posted on the talk page of another anonymous user who hadn't actually done anything wrong: diff. I have removed the inappropriate warning and made it clear in the edit summary that it wasn't anything to do with you: hist. --DanielRigal (talk) 15:46, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that - it's a good job the history tells the true story! Vrenator (talk) 08:12, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The joy of anti-vandalism tools[edit]

You're having the same fun with Igloo that HJ Mitchell had, I see. For what it's worth, there's an outstanding request at User talk:Ale jrb/Scripts/igloo#suggestion 2 covering this. Uncle G (talk) 15:36, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Paris[edit]

I was actually correcting the article about Paris, see : [1]. DITWIN GRIM (talk) 09:33, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your Revert on Martin Luther Mathews[edit]

Just so you know, that revert should not have been made. The author of the content blanked the page, so it was not vandalism. The page should instead have been tagged for speedy deletion and deleted, which has now been done. So, just a reminder that when there is only one author of any substantial content on a page, and he blanks it, it can be tagged for speedy deletion. --Slon02 (talk) 16:10, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - i was in the process of undoing and putting on a speedy tag but you beat me to it Vrenator (talk) 16:24, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Omegle vandalism reverted, then re-reverted[edit]

It seems that you reverted vandalism to the Omegle article, and then reverted your own reversion. Why did you do that? If it was a mistake can you fix it? If not, can you explain why that change should stand? Thanks.—GraemeMcRaetalk 19:31, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I unintentionally reverted the edit so undid my own mistake - Feel free to revert if you wantVrenator (talk) 19:37, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
But it wasn't a mistake. By reverting vandalism, and then reverting your revert, you hid the vandalism from the community (and confused the heck out of me!) but all is well: on 9/26/2010, an IP spotted the error and fixed it here.—GraemeMcRaetalk 17:33, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Regulate_(song)[edit]

Hi, I saw that you reverted a deleting of the synopsis of "Dial M For Murder." The reason I deleted that section was to draw attention to the inconsistent and capricious deletion of the synopsis of the 1994 hip-hop song "Regulate" [Regulate_(song)]. Describing this rap song in neutral, encyclopedic language produced a comic effect, but as many people have noted in the discussion, it also served to further understanding of the song. Yet several passionate editors have been entirely deleting the synopsis section -- not making constructive edits -- and have cited "original research." Many of us who appreciated the synopsis --when I was 13 years old this song was #1 on MTV, but I had no idea what they were talking about and no way to find out -- have not been able to find a reason why this synopsis is deleted as "original research" but movie plot synopses are restored if they are deleted.

I am a passionate wikipedia user, and use it often, sometimes several times a day, in my job as a local magazine editor. Please help us to call attention within the wikipedia editor community to the apparent abuse of editing privledges with the article Regulate_(song).

Thanks --Mike —Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.162.98.124 (talk) 15:37, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This has nothing to do with the content you deleted. Vandalism of other pages should not be used as a way of getting a point acrossVrenator (talk) 15:43, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Thanks![edit]

Many thanks for deleting my vandalism the article about breadcrumbs. I don't know what got over me. I just felt an urge for a bit of vandalism! Thanks again :D Teabag mania (talk) 08:42, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User page vandalism[edit]

I see that your user page gets more than its share of vandalism. Would you like it to be semi-protected? JamesBWatson (talk) 14:39, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - that would be niceVrenator (talk) 14:55, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Unfortunately vandal fighting tends to provoke retaliation of this sort. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:58, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks![edit]

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Thanks for fighting vandalism and reverting the vandalism on my page and keep up the good work!--IGeMiNix (talk) 21:08, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work![edit]

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Nice job! You've beaten me a bunch of times, and I can see that to vandals you are a force to be feared. :P Keep it up! Lozeldafan (talk) 18:53, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks (my user page)[edit]

... for the RVV. --Tryptofish (talk) 19:46, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You![edit]

Thank you for reverting the Vandalism on my talk page

The Pack of Wolves Award
For your quick revert of the vandalism on my talk page, I award you a pack of wolves to assist you in your ventures, and vandal fighting. --Wolfnix • Talk • 19:14, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Wolfnix has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can Spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Wolfnix • Talk • 19:13, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, least I could do --Wolfnix • Talk • 18:58, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar[edit]

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
To Vrenator for keeping up the good reverts. I'm sorry if I caused any annoyance with huggle ><! Cheers Tommy! 16:03, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

sad face[edit]

wut

No problem.[edit]

You've now been attacked by a troll account. This means you're doing something right. Keep up the good work, and it shouldn't be too terribly long before you'll be mashing the block button yourself... and I can get back to watching it rain in your part of the world. (The Ryder Cup, I mean.) Courcelles 10:40, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Recent revert[edit]

Looking at this revert it didn't look like vandalism. Instead, that was a blatant copyright infringement, so I gave the IP the copyright warning as well. Minimac (talk) 15:51, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Zip file edits[edit]

Hello, I'm trying to re-write the zip file article so that the copy edit notice on the origins section can be removed. A lot of that information looks irrelevant, and I have now added a box to the talk page on the article. Is there a problem with my edit, and any information I removed which should be included? SmackEater (talk) 13:24, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies amigo[edit]

Tried to manually warn that user but you beat me-- keep it up! Tommy! 18:01, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem - You usually beat me to it anyway! Vrenator (talk) 18:04, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Northwoods Air Crash[edit]

You might want to revise the article that's what is clearly nonsense.

How could an Avro York fly from Malta to Northolt in 2 hours?

It isn't feasible. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.254.146.68 (talk) 11:20, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe so, but discussions should be put on the talk page and not in the article itself. You can edit the article yourself with the correct information providing it is properly sourced Vrenator (talk) 11:23, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK[edit]

Thanks for the followup. I've only started using huggle today, so I'm a noob at it. I am a violinist ♫ talk to me here! 13:38, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well have fun! It is a bit too easy to make hasty reverts as I've found out, so be careful! Vrenator (talk) 14:50, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Read the talk page to see why I made the change[edit]

I removed the sentence in cucumbers referring to phenylthiocarbamide because it was unsourced, illogical, and vague. I stated as much in the talk page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.73.67.129 (talk) 19:06, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your advice.[edit]

I'm sorry for all the fuss. I didn't know my User talk page. Now,I see what you're saying. --Koji Okada (talk) 19:08, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry[edit]

I have just created an account, i under no curcumstance realised that i was unable to edit any wrong in pages such as cromotography i was adding saftey notes and precautions into the text and also some corrections and facts, so that is made the research easier to read and take in. i am througly sorry for my mistake. please tell me what i can do on the site to help. because i am not really sure how to use it as i have only just recieved my account. please forgive me.User:Parkjd0 12:02, 10 October 2010

Any Edits you make must be reliably sourced and enclyclopaedic. This was certainly not true of this edit to Ooh La La - see welcome at top of this talk page for where to get guidance. Vrenator (talk) 11:11, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yet another message of appreciation[edit]

Hi Vrenorator!
Fine work here. (I've copied the Huggle warning template as a .txt file, as it's much better than the Twinkle templates. I actually have downloaded Huggle, but I can't figure out how to drive it :-( )
--Shirt58 (talk) 11:03, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your appreciation! I'm not an expert but there's guidance on Huggle here Wikipedia:Huggle/Manual. You need to have Rollback rights, if you haven't already - you can request them here Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback Vrenator (talk) 11:19, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you![edit]

Thank you for your very quick revert of the vandalism to my user page! @-`--,--`---
--bonadea contributions talk 12:45, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your Welcome Vrenator (talk) 12:53, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

why is the internet allowed to lie then[edit]

tell me who jodie elliott is as i know its a fake name —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gracejones6666 (talk • contribs) 12:47, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've no idea who Jodie Elliot is and The Wikipedia is not "The Internet". Most users put well sourced comments on Wikipedia but your edits are non-constructive and include unsourced un-encylopaedic content. That amounts to vandalism and that is why it has been reverted.Vrenator (talk) 12:52, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Thanks for reverting the possible vandalism on my user talk page! Wayne Olajuwon chat 19:40, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate revert[edit]

The change you reverted at https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Cyclic_redundancy_check?diff=390336046 is correct. The word "insecure" is easier than "non-secure" to parse when reading. Even if it wasn't it was inappropriate to revert and leave a message on my talk page as what I did was 100% constructive. You should have left the change as is and left a message on the talk page. Please discuss the change on the talk page if you don't like it.

Voomoo (talk) 20:26, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've left you a message on your talk page Vrenator (talk) 09:18, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Request[edit]

Hi, you may want to post the message about Cats101 on this page:User talk:24.25.234.207: on erik's talk page. There's a link to it on the page. You're welcome, now you can nip it in the bud. Ian (talk) 21:03, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you log in before doing any edits to avoid confusion. The edit was done by the IP so that's where the warning is placed. Vrenator (talk) 08:10, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010[edit]

Removing vandalism template I had placed here for an edit at Tunica-Biloxi. Looked deeper and realized you were reverting earlier vandalism and had missed one. Sorry for the inconvenience. Heiro 23:45, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I was being constructive! The Justin Bieber page actually includes one or more paragraphs about his effeminacy. 83.163.92.114 (talk) 16:11, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The page is about the term not a list of people who you think are effeminate - or it would be a huge listVrenator (talk) 16:15, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you delete my edits???[edit]

Why??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.184.43.37 (talk) 08:27, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Thrombus are not constructive. They are unsourced and unencyclopaedic.Vrenator (talk) 08:34, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SORRY MAN I STOP NOW[edit]

plz dont ban me plz plz —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hrocky101 (talk • contribs) 08:57, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

WikiThanks
WikiThanks

Thanks for handling the offensive vandalism to my user page. Fæ (talk) 09:13, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

no Problem Vrenator (talk) 09:15, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

what the hell man[edit]

wat r u doin —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bluekeeper (talk • contribs) 11:20, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Thanks!!! :D[edit]

Thanks for undoing the edit! :D and no prob about the mistake. it happens =) very few people here are willing to admit their mistakes. so props! =) Ciao! Pantsstoryboomayay (talk) 18:02, 20 October 2010 (UTC) Pantsstoryboomayay[reply]

Hyperinflation[edit]

All my edits had edit summaries. Please revert your revert. Thank you. NotAGroup (talk) 17:59, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I was editing as InsbrookeInstitute. Gigs told me to change me user name. I did that and continued editing. Gigs thanked me on my InsbrookeInstitute talk page for my construtive contributions. Please revert your revert. Thank you. NotAGroup (talk) 18:03, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have already reverted your revert - with an edit summary. Thank you. NotAGroup (talk) 18:12, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Thank you[edit]

for reverting the offence on my user page! :) --Avoided (talk) 19:30, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No Problem! Vrenator (talk) 19:54, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Recent change[edit]

The change was valid...someone had put moo, moo, moo...multiple times on the page instead of real birth information...and all I did was take out this and add birth information on John Jay's page. Why didn't you check before you reverted? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.28.172.86 (talk) 15:00, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry - I've corrected it.Vrenator (talk) 15:03, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CSD Declined - Tamasin Ramsay[edit]

Hi! Just to let you know that I have declined the speedy deletion of Tamasin Ramsay. Under the rules of WP:CSD#A7, if an article gives a credible assertion of notability (less stringent than verifiable claims), then it is not a candidate for speedy deletion. I would suggest PROD/AFD/Improve. Stephen! Coming... 16:03, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Correct Speedy deletion category[edit]

Hi! Thanks for nominating St john groom for speedy deletion. I have reviewed and deleted it, but not under A7 (non-notable), but as an attack page. The content of the article (which included the section ...walking the streets in London looking in dustbins ..., and that was one of the less nasty sentences) could not be described as encyclopedic, and was a definite violation of BLP.

Articles that are tagged as attack pages are dealt with much more promptly than those nominated for notability. I don't wish to discourage your efforts with new page patrolling (the more patrollers, the better!), but tagging articles correctly is even more beneficial.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to drop me a line. Stephen! Coming... 16:15, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Guru Gobind Singh College of Modern Technology[edit]

Hi. I have declined your G7 speedy on this, because the user who blanked it was not the only author of the article. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 14:26, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

WikiThanks
WikiThanks
Thank you for removing vandalism from my talk page. I must be doing something right to be accused of being a murderer. Fæ (talk) 10:39, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No problem! Keep on with the "War" on Vandalism! Vrenator (talk) 10:44, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Top engineering school[edit]

I have declined your G7 speedy, because although this was blanked by its original author, others have edited it. Instead, I have restored the PROD that was there before, because blanking was clearly not intended to contest deletion. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 11:46, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

...and even as I typed this, another admin zapped it. Oh well, it clearly needed to go... JohnCD (talk) 11:48, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The ClueBot mistakenly deleted my edits, confusing the title of another Wikipedia entry for an obscenity[edit]

Please do not revert the edit. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.40.29.2 (talk) 18:54, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Need to restore the atricle "Chromepet"[edit]

Hi..I just saw your message on my user talk page about the article "Chromepet". While I was editing, I mistakenly blanked out the page. Could you please restore it ASAP? Please.....

Thanks, Ashok —Preceding unsigned comment added by Freakyyash (talk • contribs) 16:13, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Chromepet[edit]

Thanks a lot. Just getting over-enthusiastic may be. Need to excersise restraint. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Freakyyash (talk • contribs) 16:18, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Update[edit]

Thanks for the roll back again. I was just trying to edit out the unwanted parts which was making the article look like its an advert page and also a few vandals. 121.242.63.4 (talk) 16:26, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Employee Assistance Program - revert[edit]

Hi Vrenator,

I would imagine that Wiki is only interested in developing articles that are factual and balanced.

I've noticed that in some cases Wiki articles start out as "advertisements" to sell a "product" or "service" with a "this is the greatest thing since sliced bread" spin, rather than something that is real world and based on research using multiple independent sources. What I wrote was supported by 2 different sources. Note how what existed prior to my involvement is unreferenced (and tagged as such) If an article starts out as an "advertisement" it is the "false neutral baseline" and when someone post something that different it appears as a controversial and as a NPOV (when in fact, the original work was NPOV).

Would it be possible for you to revert your revert. If someone wants to post a NPOV tag then they have that option.

Thanks Albertoarmstrong (talk) 13:05, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Why are you removing my addition?[edit]

Why do you remove my perfectly legitimate add-on to this article? Comparison_of_remote_desktop_software

Kantonus (talk) 10:40, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]


horrible bosses[edit]

his name in the movie is actually motherfucker jones

Message for Vrenator[edit]

Vrenator, I have just delted the contents of the Hugh Gannon page, He has contacted me and wants the page taken down. Although he is an Irish hurler, he wants to keep a lower profile and doesn't want any information about hoim on wikipedia. Thanks for your understanding Hurling19951997 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hurling19951997 (talk • contribs) 15:28, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The page has been edited and contributed to by other users so should not be just blanked. I have proposed it for deletion instead. Vrenator (talk) 15:30, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Message for Vrenator[edit]

Hi, just deleted the Hugh Gannon page at his request. Is this OK ? Hurling19951997 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hurling19951997 (talk • contribs) 15:31, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Supposed vandalism[edit]

I have not edited that page, so you are incorrect 78.149.139.188 (talk) 21:07, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

removal of catan subjects.[edit]

but a big part of the article is not true. i'm not spanish, but i do live there and i found out, the most of is a politicial batle and the subject catalan should be removed, catana is no language, but a dialect —Preceding unsigned comment added by NaturalDoody (talk • contribs) 16:46, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please answer the question[edit]

Somebody left a message for me and I am not able to answer that message when I go to that persons page. Why? Also, what is wrong woth what is written here? There is no abuse of any type. Is this website only meant for writing sweet-sweet flattering things about politicians? It is a fact that she has no public standing except as the wife of her husband. It is a fact that she defeated the chief minister only because of that. What is wrong in saying it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.182.169.249 (talk) 16:45, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted edit on Masturbation[edit]

You seem to have reverted my edit on masturbation, citing it was unconstructive. You even placed a level 1 vandalism note. I just removed a low-quality picture, that is uploaded by a user [2] who has done little more than uploading low-quality pictures and video of his genitalia. Can you please give me an explanation for the removal? MikeNicho231 (talk) 20:09, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted in error and have already undone my changes. Apologies for this Vrenator (talk) 20:10, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tanzania[edit]

Did you check my edit to Tanzania, which you reverted? I removed a copyright violation, which also consisted completely of original research and soapboxing. The section needed a complete rewrite to fit into Wikipedia, so I feel deletion was fully warranted. 83.84.195.88 (talk) 16:36, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies - I was a bit quick off the mark! I reverted my revert and removed the message on your talk page Vrenator (talk) 16:39, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ffynone and Oakleigh House Schools[edit]

Hi Vrenator. Ffynone House and Oakleigh House Schools are seperate schools owned by the same company that feed into each other. Ideally I would like to split them into seperate pages but don't know how to do that. 213.83.84.162 (talk) 12:42, 1 December 2010 (UTC) David[reply]

Currently Oakleigh House School redirects to Ffynone House. You would need to create an article for Oakleigh and then remove the redirect. The best way to create the article is to set it up in your user space by creating a page User:yourusername/Oakleigh House School. When it is ready move it to the correct place or request for it to be moved. Check out Wikipedia:Your first article. I would strongly suggest that you set up a username first. Vrenator (talk) 12:50, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What next?[edit]

Hi Vrenator. I've put together a page in my sandbox http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Damadge/Sandbox How would I ask for this to be transferred to the 'live' site please? I would then go back through the Ffynone House School page and remove unecessary references to Oakleigh House School (and probably add a small paragraph about the feeder relationship between the 2 schools as it is relevant). With thanks Damadge (talk) 16:46, 3 December 2010 (UTC)damadge[reply]

Thank You[edit]

Thank you for that Vrenator. I will start updating Ffynone page today. Regards Damadge (talk) 11:59, 8 December 2010 (UTC) damadge[reply]


216.73.66.133[edit]

This IP address has done NOTHING but vandalize pages. I don't know how to block him, but if you look at his history, all he does is vandalize. Vyselink (talk) 02:50, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Help with User page set-up[edit]

Hi, this is ClassArm, you were a great help to me in setting me up with a User page for editing corporate election--Thank You. Could you please help set me up with a user page for editing Conditional Preservation of the Saints. I am just wanting to change how it is referenced, it presently has {{ }} type and not the < > that is so often used and easier to later add or subtract from. This will take some time so I thought it would be best to make the changes in the editor first. Thanks,ClassArm (talk) 12:41, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On your User page User:ClassArm I've set up links to your Corporate election page and also for the new User:ClassArm/Conditional Preservation of the Saints page. This will stop being a red link when you put some information in it and you can then copy it back to the actual project page when you are ready. Vrenator (talk) 14:52, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

THANKS!ClassArm (talk) 16:36, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Charpy impact test ?[edit]

Hi,

I got your message about my edit of the "Charpy impact test" topic. Will I didn't do it. It is my first time I hear about such test.

Check again please ! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.231.244.1 (talk) 11:54, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mardom[edit]

I've changed your 'nonsense' tag to a db-inc. It's not nonsense, it's Polish - but about a furniture company which isn't shown to be notable and should go anyway... Peridon (talk) 14:55, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Check this out[edit]

[3] NHRHS2010 |  Happy Holidays!  17:06, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For Edward Fulton Denison[edit]

I think he was an important person as he was considered as a pioneer in the development of the United States National Income and Product Accounts and referred as "father of growth accounting". If this article needs expanding, let me try. Please do not delete it. Thanks.Heinrich ⅩⅦ von Bayern (talk) 12:39, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you feel it should not be deleted put a 'Hang on' notice on as perinstructions on the message on your talk page. Vrenator (talk) 12:43, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Arthur Sadoun[edit]

Hi. Just to let you know I've contested the CSD:A7 on Arthur Sadoun and have removed it, because I think CEO of one of France's major international companies is a sufficient claim of importance to avoid A7. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:21, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've intervened and removed the CSD tag. The A7 criteria, as I've learnt, is not applicable when there's an assertion of importance or significance, and there is in this case. I've sent it to AFD instead. Strange Passerby (talk • contribs) 12:46, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Vrenator/2010_Archive&oldid=1143539466"