User talk:Xoegki

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Xoegki- AKA IP User Xoegki (talk) 18:18, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Peter Fiebag[edit]

Hello, Xoegki. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Peter Fiebag, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Peter Fiebag to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Wgolf (talk) 18:57, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Xoegki, you are invited to the Teahouse[edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Xoegki! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! SarahStierch (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:41, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 14 February[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:30, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

America Unearthed[edit]

Wolter's article was deleted at AfD and at Wolter's request. You are trying to recreate it in the AU article, please stop. Dougweller (talk) 06:06, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Alturas, California[edit]

Hi Xoegki: I reverted your newsworthy additions to Alturas today because Wikipedia is not a newspaper. The person taken into custody has living person rights of privacy. An arrest is not the same thing as a conviction. Cheers. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:28, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Peter Fiebag for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Peter Fiebag is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Fiebag until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Goblin Face (talk) 15:34, 23 February 2014 (UTC)


Hi, and thanks for your work on the English Wikipedia.

I noticed an article you worked on. Just a short note to point out that we don’t normally link:

  • dates
  • years
  • commonly known geographical terms (including well-known country-names), and
  • common terms you’d look up in a dictionary (unless significantly technical).

This applies to infoboxes, too.

Thanks, and my best wishes.

Tony (talk) 04:32, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

June 2014[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:Robert P. George, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Nat Gertler (talk) 13:27, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 5[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited George David Silva, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sinhalese. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Ruby Andrews[edit]

I don't know if you've read the message on the article talk page. Yes, she was clearly born in 1947 as stated in numerous sources - but she herself (apparently) persists in claiming she was born in 1956. Hence, I removed any reference to her date of birth. Clearly your information is correct, but we need to be aware of WP:BLP. Ghmyrtle (talk) 16:48, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)