User talk:Zchrykng/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Zchrykng. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
A belated welcome!
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Zchrykng. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
- Editor's index to Wikipedia
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.
Again, welcome! MPS1992 (talk) 20:03, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
RE:ANI
Indeed. It appeared as if users were ignoring the Breakdown (judging from two of the comments from the three users that replied so far), an integral part of my explanation of what occurred from my point of view. To be safe, I added an Underlined note stating exactly where the Breakdown ends and begins, which serves a similar role to the Collapse Box. DarkKnight2149 22:26, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
Thank you
I just want to thank you for starting this report in WP:AN/3, that IP has been a pain in my rear for quite a while. He's also doing the same in Bessborough Reservoir, Playa del Rey, Los Angeles, Ramon Nomar, Playa Vista, Los Angeles (where the IP is edit-warring with multiple editors). As you can tell, this is one troublesome IP. (N0n3up (talk) 11:35, 3 May 2018 (UTC)) Update, he just got blocked for 48 hours. (N0n3up (talk) 12:07, 3 May 2018 (UTC))
Speedy deletion declined: Christian Academy (Honolulu)
Hello Zchrykng, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Christian Academy (Honolulu), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 explicitly excludes educational institutions. If you are interested in learning more about how speedy deletion works, I have compiled a list of helpful pages at User:SoWhy/SDA. You can of course also contact me if you have questions. Thank you. SoWhy 07:47, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
- @SoWhy: That makes sense, thanks! Sorry I missed that exclusion. I will just go the PROD route, if that seems like the best way.
{{u|zchrykng}} {T|C}
12:44, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Heinz Wolfgang Herzfeld
Hi Zchrykng, you put an A7 on a brand new article of mine. I had barely started it. Next time check with the filing editor how many articles they have created. The article was brand new. Your likely to get blocked if you keep making stupid mistakes like this again. scope_creep (talk) 06:16, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Scope creep: nothing personal, but if I see something that is noncompliant with wikipedia policy I am going to tag it. Main space isn't for early non-compliant drafts that will eventually become compliant. That is what user space is for. If this was in your user space, I would be happy to help expand it when I have more time.
{{u|zchrykng}} {T|C}
14:45, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
- Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
- Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
- Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
TonyBallioni (talk) 17:10, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks TonyBallioni :)
{{u|zchrykng}} {T|C}
20:21, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Evolver Music Inc.
Hello Zchrykng. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Evolver Music Inc., a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Having been founded by a notable person indicates importance/significance (WP:CCSI#CORP, WP:CCSI#ORG). Thank you. SoWhy 11:58, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
- @SoWhy: No problem, I wasn't the original tagger, just restored it when the editor who created the page removed it.
{{u|zchrykng}} {T|C}
14:31, 6 May 2018 (UTC)- Right you are. I'll leave a message with the original tagger as well. Regards SoWhy 14:59, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
Michael Serwa
I think I removed most of the non neutral content and added citations. Can you tell me if its safe to remove the tabs. If not can you be specific on what you mean by non neutral. Notthesteps (talk) 22:44, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Notthesteps: I removed most of the tags and did a little cleanup on spacing. Leaving the advert tag for now because of my reading of WP:PLUG, but someone with more experience than me should review it.
{{u|zchrykng}} {T|C}
00:36, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
Don't undo my edits
If you undo my valid sourced edits again or I will be forced to submit a ban user report. Psychedelia (talk) 18:43, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Psychedelia: I would recommend you actually follow WP:BRD rather than edit warring. You are more than welcome to take the question of if YouTube qualifies as an WP:RS in this case to the talk page. Also, I wouldn't care if you were an admin, if I see an edit that I think violates policy (especially BLP) I am going to revert it.
{{u|zchrykng}} {T|C}
18:54, 6 June 2018 (UTC)- @Zchrykng: I am following the source guidelines. You're the one that likes to constantly moderate other peoples work on subjects you know nothing of. It's a constant trait upon reviewing your history here on Wikipedia. None of my edits violate the policy as they are clearly videos of the person in question and there is no editing of their words to change their message. It's one of the highest rated sources for such information. As I said, if you undo my edit of a verified source again you will be reported for vandalism (which there are many cases of you doing this in your contribs which I'd be glad to stack onto the report). Also I don't think OneAmerica would be happy to learn what you do during business hours. :) Psychedelia (talk) 18:59, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Psychedelia: if you make another comment like that -- and I mean especially the last sentence -- you are very likely to be blocked from editing. Please do not do anything like that ever again on this wiki. MPS1992 (talk) 19:06, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
- @MPS1992: Have you heard of a thing called free speech? Thanks for trying to bully me into being silent but that doesn't work. If you bully me again I will be forced to report you for harassment. Psychedelia (talk) 19:09, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
- Yes I have heard of freedom of speech. Where I live -- the United Kingdom -- there are numerous sensible limitations on it, which appropriately restrict the rights of some few offensive north Americans (and others) to offend and upset people. Meanwhile, this wiki, and the nonprofit organization which hosts it, has its own rules regarding harassment. You will need to follow them if you wish to continue editing here. Feel free to report me to anyone you like. MPS1992 (talk) 19:17, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Psychedelia: if you think you have a case (I don't think you do, but that is beside the point) you are welcome to bring your concerns to AN/I. I would caution you about potential boomerangs though.
{{u|zchrykng}} {T|C}
19:21, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Psychedelia: if you think you have a case (I don't think you do, but that is beside the point) you are welcome to bring your concerns to AN/I. I would caution you about potential boomerangs though.
- Yes I have heard of freedom of speech. Where I live -- the United Kingdom -- there are numerous sensible limitations on it, which appropriately restrict the rights of some few offensive north Americans (and others) to offend and upset people. Meanwhile, this wiki, and the nonprofit organization which hosts it, has its own rules regarding harassment. You will need to follow them if you wish to continue editing here. Feel free to report me to anyone you like. MPS1992 (talk) 19:17, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
- @MPS1992: Have you heard of a thing called free speech? Thanks for trying to bully me into being silent but that doesn't work. If you bully me again I will be forced to report you for harassment. Psychedelia (talk) 19:09, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Psychedelia: if you make another comment like that -- and I mean especially the last sentence -- you are very likely to be blocked from editing. Please do not do anything like that ever again on this wiki. MPS1992 (talk) 19:06, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Zchrykng: I am following the source guidelines. You're the one that likes to constantly moderate other peoples work on subjects you know nothing of. It's a constant trait upon reviewing your history here on Wikipedia. None of my edits violate the policy as they are clearly videos of the person in question and there is no editing of their words to change their message. It's one of the highest rated sources for such information. As I said, if you undo my edit of a verified source again you will be reported for vandalism (which there are many cases of you doing this in your contribs which I'd be glad to stack onto the report). Also I don't think OneAmerica would be happy to learn what you do during business hours. :) Psychedelia (talk) 18:59, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Intellectual Dark Web
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Intellectual Dark Web, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. PRehse (talk) 13:11, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – July 2018
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2018).
- Pbsouthwood • TheSandDoctor
- Gogo Dodo
- Andrevan • Doug • EVula • KaisaL • Tony Fox • WilyD
- An RfC about the deletion of drafts closed with a consensus to change the wording of WP:NMFD. Specifically, a draft that has been repeatedly resubmitted and declined at AfC without any substantial improvement may be deleted at MfD if consensus determines that it is unlikely to ever meet the requirements for mainspace and it otherwise meets one of the reasons for deletion outlined in the deletion policy.
- A request for comment closed with a consensus that the {{promising draft}} template cannot be used to indefinitely prevent a WP:G13 speedy deletion nomination.
- Starting on July 9, the WMF Security team, Trust & Safety, and the broader technical community will be seeking input on an upcoming change that will restrict editing of site-wide JavaScript and CSS to a new technical administrators user group. Bureaucrats and stewards will be able to grant this right per a community-defined process. The intention is to reduce the number of accounts who can edit frontend code to those who actually need to, which in turn lessens the risk of malicious code being added that compromises the security and privacy of everyone who accesses Wikipedia. For more information, please review the FAQ.
- Syntax highlighting has been graduated from a Beta feature on the English Wikipedia. To enable this feature, click the highlighter icon () in your editing toolbar (or under the hamburger menu in the 2017 wikitext editor). This feature can help prevent you from making mistakes when editing complex templates.
- IP-based cookie blocks should be deployed to English Wikipedia in July (previously scheduled for June). This will cause the block of a logged-out user to be reloaded if they change IPs. This means in most cases, you may no longer need to do /64 range blocks on residential IPv6 addresses in order to effectively block the end user. It will also help combat abuse from IP hoppers in general. For the time being, it only affects users of the desktop interface.
- Currently around 20% of admins have enabled two-factor authentication, up from 17% a year ago. If you haven't already enabled it, please consider doing so. Regardless if you use 2FA, please practice appropriate account security by ensuring your password is secure and unique to Wikimedia.
Administrators' newsletter – August 2018
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2018).
- After a discussion at Meta, a new user group called "interface administrators" (formerly "technical administrator") has been created. Come the end of August, interface admins will be the only users able to edit site-wide JavaScript and CSS pages like MediaWiki:Common.js and MediaWiki:Common.css, or edit other user's personal JavaScript and CSS. The intention is to improve security and privacy by reducing the number of accounts which could be used to compromise the site or another user's account through malicious code. The new user group can be assigned and revoked by bureaucrats. Discussion is ongoing to establish details for implementing the group on the English Wikipedia.
- Following a request for comment, the WP:SISTER style guideline now states that in the mainspace, interwiki links to Wikinews should only be made as per the external links guideline. This generally means that within the body of an article, you should not link to Wikinews about a particular event that is only a part of the larger topic. Wikinews links in "external links" sections can be used where helpful, but not automatically if an equivalent article from a reliable news outlet could be linked in the same manner.
- The WMF Anti-Harassment Tools team is seeking input on the second set of wireframes for the Special:Block redesign that will introduce partial blocks. The new functionality will allow you to block a user from editing a specific set of pages, pages in a category, a namespace, and for specific actions such as moving pages and uploading files.
August GOCE newsletter
Guild of Copy Editors August 2018 Newsletter
Hello and welcome to the August 2018 GOCE newsletter. Thanks to everyone who participated in the Guild's June election; your new and returning coordinators are listed below. The next election will occur in December 2018; all Wikipedia editors in good standing may take part. Our June blitz focused on Requests and articles tagged for copy edit in October 2017. Of the eleven people who signed up, eight editors recorded a total of 28 copy edits, including 3 articles of more than 10,000 words. Complete results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. Thanks to everyone who participated in the July drive. Of the seventeen people who signed up, thirteen editors completed 194 copy edits, successfully removing all articles tagged in the last three months of 2017. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are here. The August blitz will run for one week, from 19 to 25 August. Sign up now! Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators, Reidgreg, Baffle gab1978, Jonesey95, Miniapolis and Tdslk. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
|
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:25, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – September 2018
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2018).
- None
- Asterion • Crisco 1492 • KF • Kudpung • Liz • Randykitty • Spartaz
- Optimist on the run → Voice of Clam
Interface administrator changes
- Amorymeltzer • Mr. Stradivarius • MusikAnimal • MSGJ • TheDJ • Xaosflux
- Following a "stop-gap" discussion, six users have temporarily been made interface administrators while discussion is ongoing for a more permanent process for assigning the permission. Interface administrators are now the only editors allowed to edit sitewide CSS and JavaScript pages, as well as CSS/JS pages in another user's userspace. Previously, all administrators had this ability. The right can be granted and revoked by bureaucrats.
- Because of a data centre test you will be able to read but not edit the wikis for up to an hour on 12 September and 10 October. This will start at 14:00 (UTC). You might lose edits if you try to save during this time. The time when you can't edit might be shorter than an hour.
- Some abuse filter variables have changed. They are now easier to understand for non-experts. The old variables will still work but filter editors are encouraged to replace them with the new ones. You can find the list of changed variables on mediawiki.org. They have a note which says
Deprecated. Use ... instead
. An example isarticle_text
which is nowpage_title
. - Abuse filters can now use how old a page is. The variable is
page_age
.
- The Arbitration Committee has resolved to perform a round of Checkuser and Oversight appointments. The usernames of all applicants will be shared with the Functionaries team, and they will be requested to assist in the vetting process. The deadline to submit an application is 23:59 UTC, 12 September, and the candidates that move forward will be published on-wiki for community comments on 18 September.
Thanks for your help
I am getting some more info to add on for citations this week for the Institute of Lutheran Theology page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JimMcG89 (talk • contribs) 23:35, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
- @JimMcG89: no worries. The article looked pretty good, just needs citations, figured bumping it to draft was better than letting someone tag it for deletion because it didn't have any references.
{{u|zchrykng}} {T|C}
23:38, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
Declined twice.
Declined twice. | |
Hello. zchrykng.
I feel like you keep declining my edits even though they are as accurate as possible. Jane Williamson-Roberts was an amazing author who wrote about Samuel de Champlain and I put her down as my reference. Although, she has written atleast 2 books about Samuel de Champlain, you decline my tiny change to article. Samuel de Champlain's middle name is 'Hunterry' (derived from german and late latin). I'm still unsure why you decline my changes. I hope to be approved because that is a huge part of Samuel's background. Sincerely, Nosli Wretnuh. Nosli Wretnuh (talk) 03:19, 9 September 2018 (UTC) |
- @Nosli Wretnuh: you also added "Hunterry" to Hirola. And you didn't actually add any citations or references to the article, you just put something in your edit summary. I have done some searching and have found zero evidence that you aren't just intentionally vandalizing the article. Please stop.
{{u|zchrykng}} {T|C}
03:37, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
the lions
Hi, Zchrykng!! You may want to have a look at this discussion : Talk:Lion#The newly classified subspecies, so to get an idea on the recent history of the dispute. I'm so tired of this and not interested in continuing this fruitless and ridiculous discussion on names, and the back and forth moving of page titles by the other editor, who invented names at personal gusto. -- BhagyaMani (talk) 15:42, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
I did not invent them. More details in the talk-pages. Leo1pard (talk) 16:18, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
Thank you
How I can create an articcle on wikipedia without vioulate the rules?
I tried many times but always fail
If you have any detailed explaination it will be useful
Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Waelabdelhamid (talk • contribs) 17:20, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Waelabdelhamid: this guide is actually really good. After you have reviewed it, I can try to answer any questions you have, but it might be more useful to visit the tea house since I'm more focused on content review rather than content creation. Let me know how I can help. :)
{{u|zchrykng}} {T|C}
19:36, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
Speedy Deletion notices
Hi,
You are right,
I got speedy Deletion Notice for changes I did to below pages.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urvashi_Kalyana
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ganeshana_Galate
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ganesha_I_Love_You
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ganesha_Matte_Banda
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ganesha_Matthe_Banda
Kindly undo my changes & revert them back to their older status.
Thanks in advance. Smjalageri (talk) 04:54, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Palmer Middle School
Hi. School notability is not very well defined in policy and guidelines, but quite well defined in practice. See WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. High schools are notable almost certainly, with minimal required sourcing much closer to WP:PLACE than WP:ORG. Lower schools are virtually never notable and must meet WP:ORG. In practice, the vast majority of lower schools that are notable are notable for reasons other than being a school. (Examples would be being located in a building that in itself is notable such as an architectural award winner or being on the NRHP).
A practice endorsed both in policy (ATD) and in school article guidelines and particularly appropriate for NPP is to simply BOLDly blank and redirect the article to the local school district for a public school, or to the education section of the appropriate settlement article for private schools or if as in this case a school district article doesn't exist. It saves a ton of adminstrative hocus pocus and editor time. If you get push back and your redirect is reverted, then go to AfD. When you boldly redirect a school article like that, please apply the {{r from school}} template to it, which will automatically list it in the proper categories. Thanks. John from Idegon (talk) 04:58, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- @John from Idegon: Thanks for the tips!
{{u|zchrykng}} {T|C}
05:20, 22 September 2018 (UTC)- Hey, sorry...I just noticed I had some facts twisted between this lower school deletion and another one on my plate. This one should be a redirect to the school district....my bad. I'm going to boldly close the AfD. Since it ended up at AN due to weirdness and no fault of yours, it's been voted on heavily enough IMO that consensus is indicated. John from Idegon (talk) 06:03, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Thanks again
Thanks for your answer& help :)
I will read your suggested articles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Waelabdelhamid (talk • contribs) 22:29, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- Ordinary pages can no longer be loaded as javascript. You could do this using
?action=raw&ctype=text/javascript
in the URL. Only fully protected pages in the MediaWiki: namespace or user javascript subpages can be loaded as javascript now. This is for better security. [1][2]
Problems
- New and updated translations from translatewiki.net will not reach the wikis for a while. You can still translate messages on translatewiki.net. The Wikimedia wikis will be updated with the new translations later. This is because of work on the translation system. [3][4]
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 2 October. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 3 October. It will be on all wikis from 4 October (calendar).
Meetings
- You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 3 October at 15:00 (UTC). See how to join.
- You can join the meeting with the Wikimedia Foundation Search Platform team. The meeting will be on 3 October at 15:00 UTC. See how to join if you want to know how the search function works or have questions.
Future changes
- Because of a data centre test you will be able to read but not edit the wikis for up to an hour on 10 October. This will start at 14:00 (UTC). You might lose edits if you try to save during this time. The time when you can't edit might be shorter than an hour. You can read more about this.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
17:34, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
You totally can delete "Wiki to Wiki" in 2 hours
This was more of an experiment. Give me two hours to get what I need out of it and it can be gone forever. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Book81able (talk • contribs) 18:21, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – October 2018
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2018).
- Justlettersandnumbers • L235
- Bgwhite • HorsePunchKid • J Greb • KillerChihuahua • Rami R • Winhunter
Interface administrator changes
- Cyberpower678 • Deryck Chan • Oshwah • Pharos • Ragesoss • Ritchie333
- Guerillero • NativeForeigner • Snowolf • Xeno
- Following a request for comment, the process for appointing interface administrators has been established. Currently only existing admins can request these rights, while a new RfC has begun on whether it should be available to non-admins.
- There is an open request for comment on Meta regarding the creation a new user group for global edit filter management.
- Partial blocks should be available for testing in October on the Test Wikipedia and the Beta-Cluster. This new feature allows admins to block users from editing specific pages and in the near-future, namespaces and uploading files. You can expect more updates and an invitation to help with testing once it is available.
- The Foundations' Anti-Harassment Tools team is currently looking for input on how to measure the effectiveness of blocks. This is in particular related to how they will measure the success of the aforementioned partial blocks.
- Because of a data centre test, you will be able to read but not edit the Wikimedia projects for up to an hour on 10 October. This will start at 14:00 (UTC). You might lose edits if you try to save during this time.
- The Arbitration Committee has, by motion, amended the procedure on functionary inactivity.
- The community consultation for 2018 CheckUser and Oversight appointments has concluded. Appointments will be made by October 11.
- Following a request for comment, the size of the Arbitration Committee will be decreased to 13 arbitrators, starting in 2019. Additionally, the minimum support percentage required to be appointed to a two-year term on ArbCom has been increased to 60%. ArbCom candidates who receive between 50% and 60% support will be appointed to one-year terms instead.
- Nominations for the 2018 Arbitration Committee Electoral Commission are being accepted until 12 October. These are the editors who help run the ArbCom election smoothly. If you are interested in volunteering for this role, please consider nominating yourself.
I have created article about open source software Minsky because I am user of that software. It was removed to draft because some reference issue. I have not much experience in making wikipedia articles so you are free to take my draft, edit it and write an article by yourself. You can also remove any reference which does not fit wikipedia standards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by K.G.K.G. (talk • contribs) 07:36, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
Template Removal
Assuming you actually read the revision log, I clearly gave reasons for the removal of the templates in question. You are welcome to dispute the removals, however, your reverting the edit without stating a reason why will be regarded as an intentional destructive act, and will be reverted per Wikipedia policy on vandalism. USN007 (talk) 05:09, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
- @USN007: if you believe that restoring maintenance templates that were improperly removed is "vandalism" you are more than welcome to report me. I would suggest reading Wikipedia:BOOMERANG first though.
{{u|zchrykng}} {T|C}
15:47, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- The Education Program extension was removed from all Wikimedia projects. You can use the Programs and Events Dashboard or the Fountain instead. [5]
Problems
- There was a problem when you copied and pasted from a table with the visual editor. It could add
href
where it shouldn't be. This has now been fixed. [6]
Changes later this week
- Because of a data centre test you will be able to read but not edit the wikis for up to an hour on 10 October. This will start at 14:00 (UTC). You might lose edits if you try to save during this time. The time when you can't edit might be shorter than an hour. You can read more about this.
- Because of the data centre test there will be no new version of MediaWiki this week. Changes for this week will come next week instead.
Meetings
- You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 10 October at 15:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
23:38, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
Request for assistance on The Club at Lac La Belle submission by User:IrishKopey
Not sure which phrases Zchryking believes is copyrighted material. many references were cited in research for the article. Sources used were references.IrishKopey (talk) 16:04, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
Can you advise which part of article to which you refer that violates a copyright? Many references were used in research for the article. This wikipedia creation is new for me. I want to be correct with these submissions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by IrishKopey (talk • contribs) 16:07, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
- IrishKopey, it looked like most if not all of the content was copied from some other source. What lead me to believe that was how garbled the text formatting appeared and how much was added in a singled edit.
- You might want to review WP:First article, it has many links to instructions on how to correctly create a Wikipedia article.
{{u|zchrykng}} {T|C}
22:02, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Problems
- Some pages, edits and users disappeared for a short while after the server switch. Missing content and users was fixed within a day. Some preferences and other things might take a few more days to fix. [7]
- Wikis are updated with new and updated translations from translatewiki.net again. This will happen once a week. The developers are working on fixing the problem so we can have translation updates more often again. [8]
Changes later this week
- When you create an abuse filter that prevents edits you can now write a specific error message for it. Before this all abuse filters that prevented edits had the same error message. [9]
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 16 October. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 17 October. It will be on all wikis from 18 October (calendar).
Meetings
- There will be no more meetings with the Editing team. This is because not enough Wikimedians were interested. To tell developers which bugs you think are the most important you can use Phabricator as normal. [10]
- You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 17 October at 15:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
22:40, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Addition to article on "Waltzing Matilda"
Greetings...
Regarding my addition to your Wikipedia article on the song "Waltzing Matilda" and your kind email about it:
What kind of "citation" were you looking for? I really didn't have any "source" for my addition, apart from having watched the movie in question itself (On the Beach, 1959) several times and having been struck by the poignancy of the use of the song at that critical moment in the film. Should you have never seen the film (based on the novel by Nevil Shute and set in and around Melbourne, Australia), do give it a look, as I think it is a significant use of the song... perhaps you would prefer to write such an addition yourself, which I quite understand.
Anyhow: many thanks and all best regards, J.P. Marmaro, Spring Hill, Florida, USA — Preceding unsigned comment added by JP Marmaro (talk • contribs) 19:47, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
- JP Marmaro, everything in wikipedia has to follow WP:RS, WP:OR, and WP:V. I'm sure what you added is 100% true, but we don't make edits based on personal subjective feelings/opinions. I hope that helps. :)
{{u|zchrykng}} {T|C}
19:51, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Waltzing Matilda in On the Beach
Hi again
Thanks for the technical advice. Here are some references:
A video clip of the scene from On the Beach:
from Wikipedia's own article on the film:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_the_Beach_(1959_film)
Frank Chacksfield's orchestral performance of the love theme from On the Beach was released as a single in 1960, reaching #47 on the Billboard Hot 100 chart. The song "Waltzing Matilda" became popular everywhere, as a result of the film, with many folk singers recording their own versions, including Harry Belafonte, Jimmie Rodgers (who had recorded two different versions of the song), and Tim Morgan. The Seekers, who are from Australia, recorded this song several times.
from https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0053137/reviews --
The primary power of this great movie to me is how well it conveys the idea that for us, on this beach, love and tender kindness are all that matter in the end, and the end is always near. The sheer kindness that Ava and Gregory's characters express for each other is surely the key element of their triumphant relationship.
The moment in which their relationship most completely triumphs, of course, occurs at the Narbethong Hotel. "On The Beach" achieves a cinematic moment of genius when the chorus singing "Waltzing Matilda" changes from a rowdy crowd of drunks to a magnificently harmonious group of fine male voices. As the sheer beauty of the music overwhelms us, it also overwhelms our characters, and we all unite together in a sublime moment of awareness that true love and kindness give us our only victory over imminent death. "You'll never take me alive," says the ghost.
The way Gregory Peck's character shifts from fumbling with the fire to turning toward Ava as the music inspires transcendence, and the way Ava smiles at him, make this scene unforgettably great.''
From the TCM site:
http://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/17688/On-the-Beach/articles.html
The basic formula for On the Beach proved successful enough for Kramer to repeat it again for two more acclaimed films, Inherit the Wind (1960) and Judgment at Nuremberg 91961), using a cast of stars to deliver a message many viewers weren't quite prepared to accept. It also generated worldwide awareness and popularity for its theme song, "Waltzing Matilda," an Australian standard adapted by composer Ernest Gold to increasingly chilling effect until its final haunting refrain in the unforgettable, desolate final scene.
Finally, a clip from the finale of the movie, again using the song:
https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=waltzing+matilda+on+the+beach&view=detail&mid=CD4FA736A09C645BE0DECD4FA736A09C645BE0DE&FORM=VIRE — Preceding unsigned comment added by JP Marmaro (talk • contribs) 09:23, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
I wonder, is that sufficient support? You can see why I felt any article on the song should include mention of its use in the film.
Thanks again and best regards, J P Marmaro
Please comment on Talk:List of missing aircraft
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of missing aircraft. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 23 October. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 24 October. It will be on all wikis from 25 October (calendar).
Meetings
- You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 24 October at 15:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
- The Community Wishlist Survey begins on 29 October. The survey decides what the Community Tech team will work on. You can post proposals from 29 October to 11 November. You can vote on proposals from 16 November to 30 November.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
23:11, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
NPR Newsletter No.14 21 October 2018
|
Hello Zchrykng, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!
- Backlog
As of 21 October 2018[update], there are 3650 unreviewed articles and the backlog now stretches back 51 days.
- Community Wishlist Proposal
- There is currently an ongoing discussion regarding the drafting of a Community Wishlist Proposal for the purpose of requesting bug fixes and missing/useful features to be added to the New Page Feed and Curation Toolbar.
- Please join the conversation as we only have until 29 October to draft this proposal!
- Project updates
- ORES predictions are now built-in to the feed. These automatically predict the class of an article as well as whether it may be spam, vandalism, or an attack page, and can be filtered by these criteria now allowing reviewers to better target articles that they prefer to review.
- There are now tools being tested to automatically detect copyright violations in the feed. This detector may not be accurate all the time, though, so it shouldn't be relied on 100% and will only start working on new revisions to pages, not older pages in the backlog.
- New scripts
- User:Enterprisey/cv-revdel.js(info) — A new script created for quickly placing {{copyvio-revdel}} on a page.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 20:49, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
You're bizarrely obsessed
with preventing mildly POV additions to an article that is already, by necessity, overflowing with POV expressions about an opera star. Why haven't you deleted every single adjective and adverb from the article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.147.61.36 (talk)
- Don't have the time or inclination to fix the article, but I can keep it from getting worse. It only ended up on my watchlist from recent changes patrolling. You are more than welcome to make actual improvements to the article. zchrykng (talk) 22:22, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
I did. You deleted them arbitrarily based on some fantastical "non-neutral POV" mirage inside your own mind. Cite for me even one WP page for a famous singer that is "non-neutral POV". Please, go ahead and find a single entry for any singer ever that lives up to your fantasy.
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- You can post proposals for the Community Wishlist Survey. The survey decides what the Community Tech team will work on. You can post proposals until 11 November. You can vote on proposals from 16 November to 30 November.
- The wikis now have a content security policy report. This means that you might get a warning in your javascript console when you load external resources in your user scripts. For security reasons it is recommended that you don't do this. It might not be possible to load external resources in your scripts in the future. [11]
Problems
- Your watchlist can show which changes you have already seen. This did not work for a few days. It has been fixed. [12]
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 30 October. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 31 October. It will be on all wikis from 1 November (calendar).
- The 2006 wikitext editor is no longer available. It will be removed from Special:Preferences. It has not been the standard editor for a long time. It was replaced by the 2010 wikitext editor. [13][14]
Meetings
- You can join the technical advice meeting on IRC. During the meeting, volunteer developers can ask for advice. The meeting will be on 31 October at 15:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
20:08, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Legal Project Management
Hi Zchrykng - thanks, first time contributor so sorry to cause problems - I've now commented on Praxidicae's talk page.
There is a issue with a small private consultant using this LPM page to mis-represent their position in the market (and Praxidicae had deleted their original content) - the content that I've provided is independently verifiable from multiple sources which are included.
I do have an industry voice on this area, so it's not me just shooting from the hip with opinions - but apologies if this has created the wrong impression.Pdombkins (talk) 04:46, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
- Pdombkins, thanks for being receptive to correction about how things work on Wikipedia! (You might be surprised how rare that is, but I digress)
- Let's keep the discussion on Praxidicae's talk page for now, just to make everyone's lives easier. Just a heads up, I will be adding another template to your page with lines to Wikipedia's conflict of interest guidelines and how disclosures need to be handled. zchrykng (talk) 04:50, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
- thanks Zchrykng; I'm hoping that we can get a degree of wider industry contribution to this page from the major top-tier law firms and large in-house teams, and have been reaching-out to make this happen. I thought my edits were useful, hopefully we can reach consensus. Pdombkins (talk) 04:56, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Pdombkins: I'm sure that at least some of the information can be added back in, just need to discuss it first. And you want to put those four tildes (~) at the end of your post, not the beginning (WP:TALKPAGE and WP:SIGNATURE might be helpful) zchrykng (talk) 05:09, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
- Zchrykng- a quick follow-up: I do work for a large law firm where I am Head of Legal Project Management, and had included links to a number of LPM initiatives from competitors (as well as my own employer). Is this ok, and what is the correct procedure for me to disclose this? Pdombkins (talk) 05:00, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Pdombkins: The information I put on your talk page should have a link about how to disclose. As for which links are appropriate, lets discuss that on Praxidicae's talk page. zchrykng (talk) 05:09, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
- thanks Zchrykng; I'm hoping that we can get a degree of wider industry contribution to this page from the major top-tier law firms and large in-house teams, and have been reaching-out to make this happen. I thought my edits were useful, hopefully we can reach consensus. Pdombkins (talk) 04:56, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
Thanks Zchrykng - as you'll see on Praxidicae's talk page, the existing contributor and I have resolved things amicably offline, and hope that we can move forward. Appreciate you holding my hand on this, I'll read the guides #noob Pdombkins (talk) 07:34, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – November 2018
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2018).
- A request for comment determined that non-administrators will not be able to request interface admin access.
- A request for comment is in progress to determine whether the Mediation Committee should be closed and marked as historical.
- A village pump discussion has been ongoing about whether the proposed deletion policy (PROD) should be clarified or amended.
- A request for comment is in progress to determine whether pending changes protection should be applied automatically to today's featured article (TFA) in order to mitigate a recent trend of severe image vandalism.
- Partial blocks is now available for testing on the Test Wikipedia. The new functionality allows you to block users from editing specific pages. Bugs may exist and can be reported on the local talk page or on Meta. A discussion regarding deployment to English Wikipedia will be started by community liaisons sometime in the near future.
- A user script is now available to quickly review unblock requests.
- The 2019 Community Wishlist Survey is now accepting new proposals until November 11, 2018. The results of this survey will determine what software the Wikimedia Foundation's Community Tech team will work on next year. Voting on the proposals will take place from November 16 to November 30, 2018. Specifically, there is a proposal category for admins and stewards that may be of interest.
- Eligible editors will be invited to nominate themselves as candidates in the 2018 Arbitration Committee Elections starting on November 4 until November 13. Voting will begin on November 19 and last until December 2.
- The Arbitration Committee's email address has changed to arbcom-enwikimedia.org. Other email lists, such as functionaries-en and clerks-l, remain unchanged.
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Elections and Referendums on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 00:30, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Joe Biden on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 08:30, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- Section translation now works on Bengali Wikipedia. It helps mobile editors translate sections of articles. It will come to more wikis later. The first focus is active wikis with a smaller number of articles. You can test it and leave feedback.
- Flagged revisions now give admins the review right. [15]
- When someone links to a Wikipedia article on Twitter this will now show a preview of the article. [16]
Problems
- Many graphs have JavaScript errors. Graph editors can check their graphs in their browser's developer console after editing. [17]
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 9 March. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 10 March. It will be on all wikis from 11 March (calendar).
- The New Discussion tool will soon be a new discussion tools beta feature for on most Wikipedias. The goal is to make it easier to start new discussions. [18]
Future changes
- There will be a number of changes to make it easier to work with templates. Some will come to the first wikis in March. Other changes will come to the first wikis in June. This is both for those who use templates and those who create or maintain them. You can read more.
- Reference Previews will become a default feature on some wikis on 17 March. They will share a setting with Page Previews. If you prefer the Reference Tooltips or Navigation-Popups gadget you can keep using them. If so Reference Previews won't be shown. [19][20]
- New JavaScript-based functions will not work in Internet Explorer 11. This is because Internet Explorer is an old browser that doesn't work with how JavaScript is written today. Everything that works in Internet Explorer 11 today will continue working in Internet Explorer for now. You can read more.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
17:50, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- Wikis that are part of the desktop improvements project can now use a new search function. The desktop improvements and the new search will come to more wikis later. You can also test it early.
- Editors who put up banners or change site-wide JavaScript code should use the client error graph to see that their changes has not caused problems. You can read more. [21]
Problems
- Due to database issues the Wikimedia Beta Cluster was read-only for over a day.
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 16 March. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 17 March. It will be on all wikis from 18 March (calendar).
Future changes
- You can add a newline or carriage return character to a custom signature if you use a template. There is a proposal to not allow them in the future. This is because they can cause formatting problems. [22][23]
- You will be able to read but not edit 12 wikis for a short period of time on 23 March at 06:00 (UTC). This could take 30 minutes but will probably be much faster.
- You can use Quarry for SQL queries to the Wiki Replicas. Cross-database
JOINS
will no longer work from 23 March. There will be a new field to specify the database to connect to. If you think this affects you and you need help you can post on Phabricator or on Wikitech. PAWS and other ways to do SQL queries to the Wiki Replicas will be affected later. [24]
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
23:20, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
Feedback requests from the Feedback Request Service
Your feedback is requested at Talk:British royal family on a "Wikipedia style and naming" request for comment, and at Talk:2021 West Bengal Legislative Assembly election on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:01, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- There is a Wikipedia app for KaiOS phones. They don't have a touch screen so readers navigate with the phone keys. There is now a simulator so you can see what it looks like.
- The reply tool and new discussion tool are now available as the "Discussion tools" beta feature in almost all wikis except German Wikipedia.
Problems
- You will be able to read but not edit twelve wikis for a short period of time on 23 March at 06:00 (UTC). This can also affect password changes, logging in to new wikis, global renames and changing or confirming emails. This could take 30 minutes but will probably be much faster.
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 23 March. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 24 March. It will be on all wikis from 25 March (calendar).
- Syntax highlighting colours will change to be easier to read. This will soon come to the first wikis. [25]
Future changes
- Flagged revisions will no longer have multiple tags like "tone" or "depth". It will also only have one tier. This was changed because very few wikis used these features and they make the tool difficult to maintain. [26][27]
- Gadgets and user scripts can access variables about the current page in JavaScript. In 2015 this was moved from
wg*
tomw.config
.wg*
will soon no longer work. [28]
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
16:51, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- Some very old web browsers don’t work well with the Wikimedia wikis. Some old code for browsers that used to be supported is being removed. This could cause issues in those browsers. [29]
- IRC recent changes feeds have been moved to a new server. Make sure all tools automatically reconnect to
irc.wikimedia.org
and not to the name of any specific server. Users should also consider switching to the more modern EventStreams. [30]
Problems
- When you move a page that many editors have on their watchlist the history can be split. It might also not be possible to move it again for a while. This is because of a job queue problem. [31]
- Some translatable pages on Meta could not be edited. This was because of a bug in the translation tool. The new MediaWiki version was delayed because of problems like this. [32][33]
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 30 March. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 31 March. It will be on all wikis from 1 April (calendar).
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
17:29, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Cultural Marxism conspiracy theory on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:34, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – April 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2021).
- Alexandria • Happyme22 • RexxS
- Following a request for comment, F7 (invalid fair-use claim) subcriterion a has been deprecated; it covered immediate deletion of non-free media with invalid fair-use tags.
- Following a request for comment, page movers were granted the
delete-redirect
userright, which allows moving a page over a single-revision redirect, regardless of that redirect's target.
- When you move a page that many editors have on their watchlist the history can be split and it might also not be possible to move it again for a while. This is because of a job queue problem. (T278350)
- Code to support some very old web browsers is being removed. This could cause issues in those browsers. (T277803)
- A community consultation on the Arbitration Committee discretionary sanctions procedure is open until April 25.
Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Rabies on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:31, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- Editors can collapse part of an article so you have to click on it to see it. When you click a link to a section inside collapsed content it will now expand to show the section. The browser will scroll down to the section. Previously such links didn't work unless you manually expanded the content first. [34]
Changes later this week
- The citoid API will use for example
2010-12-XX
instead of2010-12
for dates with a month but no days. This is because2010-12
could be confused with2010-2012
instead ofDecember 2010
. This is called level 1 instead of level 0 in the Extended Date/Time Format. [35] - The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 6 April. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 7 April. It will be on all wikis from 8 April (calendar).
Future changes
- PAWS can now connect to the new Wiki Replicas. Cross-database
JOINS
will no longer work from 28 April. There is a new way to connect to the databases. Until 28 April both ways to connect to the databases will work. If you think this affects you and you need help you can post on Phabricator or on Wikitech.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
19:39, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- Email to the Wikimedia wikis are handled by groups of Wikimedia editors. These volunteer response teams now use Znuny instead of OTRS. The functions and interface remain the same. The volunteer administrators will give more details about the next steps soon. [36][37]
- If you use syntax highlighting, you can see line numbers in the 2010 and 2017 wikitext editors when editing templates. This is to make it easier to see line breaks or talk about specific lines. Line numbers will soon come to all namespaces. [38][39][40]
- Because of a technical change there could be problems with gadgets and scripts that have an edit summary area that looks similar to this one. If they look strange they should use
mw.loader.using('mediawiki.action.edit.styles')
to go back to how they looked before. [41] - The latest version of MediaWiki came to the Wikimedia wikis last week. There was no Tech News issue last week.
Changes later this week
- There is no new MediaWiki version this week.
Future changes
- The user group
oversight
will be renamedsuppress
. This is for technical reasons. This is the technical name. It doesn't affect what you call the editors with this user right on your wiki. This is planned to happen in two weeks. You can comment in Phabricator if you have objections.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
16:48, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- Templates have parameters that can have specific values. It is possible to suggest values for editors with TemplateData. You can soon see them as a drop-down list in the visual editor. This is to help template users find the right values faster. [42][43][44]
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 27 April. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 28 April. It will be on all wikis from 29 April (calendar).
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
21:23, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Marjorie Taylor Greene on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 12:32, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Accessibility on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:30, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:2021 storming of the United States Capitol on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:30, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – May 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2021).
Interface administrator changes
- Following an RfC, consensus was found that third party appeals are allowed but discouraged.
- The 2021 Desysop Policy RfC was closed with no consensus. Consensus was found in a previous RfC for a community based desysop procedure, though the procedure proposed in the 2021 RfC did not gain consensus.
- The user group
oversight
will be renamed tosuppress
. This is for technical reasons. You can comment at T112147 if you have objections.
- The user group
- The community consultation on the Arbitration Committee discretionary sanctions procedure was closed, and an initial draft based on feedback from the now closed consultation is expected to be released in early June to early July for community review.
Administrators' newsletter – May 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2021).
Interface administrator changes
- Following an RfC, consensus was found that third party appeals are allowed but discouraged.
- The 2021 Desysop Policy RfC was closed with no consensus. Consensus was found in a previous RfC for a community based desysop procedure, though the procedure proposed in the 2021 RfC did not gain consensus.
- The user group
oversight
will be renamed tosuppress
. This is for technical reasons. You can comment at T112147 if you have objections.
- The user group
- The community consultation on the Arbitration Committee discretionary sanctions procedure was closed, and an initial draft based on feedback from the now closed consultation is expected to be released in early June to early July for community review.
You've been unsubscribed from the Feedback Request Service
Hi Zchrykng! You're receiving this notification because you were previously subscribed to the Feedback Request Service, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over two years.
In order to declutter the Feedback Request Service list, and to produce a greater chance of active users being randomly selected to receive invitations to contribute, you've been unsubscribed, along with all other users who have made no edits in two years or more.
You do not need to do anything about this - if you are happy to not receive Feedback Request Service messages, thank you very much for your contributions in the past, and this will be the last you hear from the service. If, however, you would like to resubscribe yourself, you can follow the below instructions to do so:
- Go to the Feedback Request Service page.
- Decide which categories are of interest to you, under the RfC and/or GA headings.
- Paste
{{Frs user|Zchrykng|limit}}
underneath the relevant heading(s), where limit is the maximum number of requests you wish to receive for that category per month. - Publish the page.
If you've just come back after a wikibreak and are seeing this message, welcome back! You can follow the above instructions to re-activate your subscription. Likewise, if this is an alternate account, please consider subscribing your main account in much the same way.
Note that if you had a rename and left your old name subscribed to the FRS, you may be receiving this message on your new username's talk page still. If so, make sure your new account name is subscribed to the FRS, using the same procedure mentioned above.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask on the Feedback Request Service talk page, or on the Feedback Request Service bot's operator's talk page. Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:03, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Feedback request: Wikipedia style and naming request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Rah on a "Wikipedia style and naming" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:31, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Iymen Chehade on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:30, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Aleksandar Vučić on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:32, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
Speedy
Not a problem. "Professional footballer" is an assertion of notability (even if the individual is not actually notable), so is not eligible. Let me know if you have any more questions. GiantSnowman 15:24, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello, about whether S4 is the least model companion of IPC...
Hi,
What do you think of this https://math.stackexchange.com/a/1465533/590921
Isn't that saying that Chagrov proved that S3 is actually the least model companion of IPC?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.91.149.167 (talk) 16:24, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
- I have no opinion on the quality of that link, but the article itself is not the place for discussion. Please comment on the article talk page instead. zchrykng (talk) 16:28, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Robert Lanza on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:31, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
GOCE June 2021 newsletter
Guild of Copy Editors June 2021 Newsletter
Hello and welcome to the June newsletter, our first newsletter of 2021, which is a brief update of Guild activities since December 2020. To unsubscribe, follow the link at the bottom of this box. Current events
Election time: Voting in our mid-year Election of Coordinators opened on 16 June and will conclude at the end of the month. GOCE coordinators normally serve a six-month term and are elected on an approval basis. Have your say and show support here. June Blitz: Our June copy-editing blitz is underway and will conclude on 26 June. Drive and blitz reports
January Drive: 28 editors completed 324 copy edits totalling 714,902 words. At the end of the drive, the backlog had reached a record low of 52 articles. (full results) February Blitz: 15 editors completed 48 copy edits totalling 142,788 words. (full results) March Drive: 29 editors completed 215 copy edits totalling 407,736 words. (full results) April Blitz: 12 editors completed 23 copy edits totalling 56,574 words. (full results) May Drive: 29 editors completed 356 copy edits totalling 479,013 words. (full results) Other news
Progress report: as of 26 June, GOCE participants had completed 343 Requests since 1 January. The backlog has fluctuated but remained in control, with a low of 52 tagged articles at the end of January and a high of 620 articles in mid-June. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Dhtwiki, Miniapolis, Tenryuu and Twofingered Typist, and from member Reidgreg. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
|
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors at 12:38, 26 June 2021 (UTC).