User talk:האופה
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, האופה, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Asi Abutbul did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.
If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome. Cjse23 (talk) 05:46, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
- Shouldn't the fact that this information is published in the Hebrew Wikipedia be considered adequate proof? האופה (talk) 05:54, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Welcome!
[edit]Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.
The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.
The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.
- Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
- It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
- If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
- Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
- When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
- If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
- Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.
Happy editing! Cheers, Julietdeltalima (talk) 15:33, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
November 2023
[edit]Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Raphi Cohen, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Cjse23 (talk) 05:38, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
- I didn't understand what I did wrong. I added a template to the article. האופה (talk) 05:40, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
CS1 error on Miriam Shatal
[edit]Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Miriam Shatal, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 09:05, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
Meir Adoni moved to draftspace
[edit]Thanks for your contributions to Meir Adoni. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jamiebuba (talk) 12:55, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Miki Shemo (November 18)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Miki Shemo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello, האופה!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jamiebuba (talk) 14:57, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Meir Adoni (November 18)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Meir Adoni and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
[edit] Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Funding of Hezbollah into Hezbollah-Iran relations. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:11, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
Also, please don't add copyright material copied from other websites to Wikipedia. Everything you contribute needs to be written in your own words please. — Diannaa (talk) 20:55, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
- OK. Thanks האופה (talk) 09:01, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- Is there anything I should do now? Or is it a note for the future? האופה (talk) 09:02, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- A note for the future. — Diannaa (talk) 14:23, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
CS1 error on Iranian influence in Lebanon
[edit]Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Iranian influence in Lebanon, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 09:13, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
CS1 error on Iranian influence in Lebanon
[edit]Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Iranian influence in Lebanon, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:02, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
CS1 error on Hezbollah-Russia relations
[edit]Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Hezbollah-Russia relations, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:54, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hello, האופה. Thank you for your work on Maor Cohen. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Good start
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 20:14, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 30
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nabil Qaouk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tyre. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:50, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
CS1 error on Israel–Hamas war in Israeli music
[edit]Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Israel–Hamas war in Israeli music, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 08:05, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hello, האופה. Thank you for your work on Shani Cohen. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Good start
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 14:04, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello האופה, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Gan Kofim, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gan Kofim.
Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}
. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 00:39, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Israel–Hamas war in Israeli music for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Israel–Hamas war in Israeli music until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Allan Nonymous (talk) 17:58, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics
[edit]You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
Selfstudier (talk) 16:37, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
April 2024
[edit]Hello, I'm Grabup. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to 2024 Israeli retaliatory strikes in Iran have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Grabup (talk) 05:40, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Your edits are showing biasesness to Israel. Why you removed the line “ itself an Iranian retaliation for the killing of senior officers in an Israeli airstrike in Damascus.” Grabup (talk) 06:17, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Grabup I didn't remove it, I moved it to the bottom part of the lead, I thought we should start by describing the event and then get into the backgroung. Please check again the same edit you shared here. HaOfa (talk) 06:22, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Why you added this line? “unprecedented missile and drone strike by Iran on Israel” this line shows that you are totally biased to Israel, and you are from Israel as your name is in Hebrew. Grabup (talk) 06:27, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Grabup I did not invent the use of "unprecedented" for this attack, I found it in reliable sources this morning. The Wall Street Journal article I used for my edits wrote today that: "Much remained unclear about the extent or impact of the Israeli action, meant as a response to an unprecedented direct attack by Iran on Saturday that involved more than 300 drones and missiles aimed at Israeli territory." The New York Times also says: "Iran's unprecedented attack on Israel." Is there any issue with my place of origin? Please withdraw your accusations, as they appear to be made in bad faith. HaOfa (talk) 06:35, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Read WP:NPOV, we can’t add everything what reliable sources say, in this geo-political controversial context, not at all. Grabup (talk) 06:53, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Grabup I did not invent the use of "unprecedented" for this attack, I found it in reliable sources this morning. The Wall Street Journal article I used for my edits wrote today that: "Much remained unclear about the extent or impact of the Israeli action, meant as a response to an unprecedented direct attack by Iran on Saturday that involved more than 300 drones and missiles aimed at Israeli territory." The New York Times also says: "Iran's unprecedented attack on Israel." Is there any issue with my place of origin? Please withdraw your accusations, as they appear to be made in bad faith. HaOfa (talk) 06:35, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Why you added this line? “unprecedented missile and drone strike by Iran on Israel” this line shows that you are totally biased to Israel, and you are from Israel as your name is in Hebrew. Grabup (talk) 06:27, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Grabup I didn't remove it, I moved it to the bottom part of the lead, I thought we should start by describing the event and then get into the backgroung. Please check again the same edit you shared here. HaOfa (talk) 06:22, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- האופה; I would also recommend that you build consensus in the talk page instead of engaging in edit wars.Ghazaalch (talk) 07:45, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Miki Shemo
[edit]Hello, האופה. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Miki Shemo, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:12, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Meir Adoni
[edit]Hello, האופה. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Meir Adoni, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:06, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Hanoch Daum moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, Hanoch Daum, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Maliner (talk) 09:35, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hi האופה. Thank you for your work on Dov Navon. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Nice work
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 13:47, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Meir Adoni
[edit]Hello, האופה. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Meir Adoni".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:49, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 26
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Environmental damage in the Gaza Strip caused by the Israel–Hamas war, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page JNS.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:00, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Shaul Amsterdamski moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, Shaul Amsterdamski, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Maliner (talk) 13:45, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Greetings
[edit]Hello האופה. — A belated welcome to Wikipedia. I took the liberty of adding an editor's start to your main user page. Now your user name doesn't appear as a red link. Hope this is all well for you. -- Gwillhickers (talk) 19:55, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Gwillhickers, thank you so much for the welcome and the help. Cheers! HaOfa (talk) 19:23, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Violating 1RR
[edit]You're clearly violating 1RR on the rescue operation page. I'm going to ask you to revert your edits. JDiala (talk) 18:59, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Hey, @JDiala, I've been very careful not to violate 1RR with any of my edits. Can you please share the exact diffs you think are 1RR vio? Thank you HaOfa (talk) 19:22, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- here, here. JDiala (talk) 19:29, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but this is not a violation of 1RR, but two unchallenged consecutive edits in a row. HaOfa (talk) 19:40, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- You're reverting the edit of the person who wrote it was the Gazan health ministry and are now claiming it was the Hamas media office. It's a revert. JDiala (talk) 19:47, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- I might actually be wrong here, in which case my apologies. I guess a revert requires a reversion back to a previous version. JDiala (talk) 22:22, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but this is not a violation of 1RR, but two unchallenged consecutive edits in a row. HaOfa (talk) 19:40, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- here, here. JDiala (talk) 19:29, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Erel Segal moved to draftspace
[edit]Thanks for your contributions to Erel Segal. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Youknowwhoistheman (talk) 06:39, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Erel Segal for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erel Segal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Youknowwhoistheman (talk) 11:28, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Radio stations
[edit]Hi, I'm Sammi. I've seen that you and some other editors have been expanding our coverage of Israeli radio stations.
I made a change to Galey Israel by adopting a "Notable presenters" list, in line with many UK stations. These lists should only contain people with articles (I'd also take interlanguage links to other Wikipedias). I would advise getting a citation for each presenter you list (especially for WP:BLP reasons). I also added some things to the infobox that should have been there.
As an editor amply familiar with radio stations but not Israel topics, I'm available as a resource if you have questions. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 03:19, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, Sammi, I'll reach out if needed. cheers HaOfa (talk) 18:02, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
prior accounts
[edit]Have you used any other account on Wikipedia? nableezy - 20:51, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
- No, sadly, I am having a great time HaOfa (talk) 18:00, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Hezbollah–syria relations
[edit]Hello, האופה. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hezbollah–syria relations, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:05, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
Don't you dare
[edit]Don't you dare accuse me of the very thing that you did: remove content without explanation. M.Bitton (talk) 11:23, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- I explained my reasons for removing the content. The text focuses on Israel and Zionism as settler colonialism, and I retained the section linking genocide accusations to this concept. On the other hand, you removed new content directly relevant to the topic, including criticism by renowned scholars, but the content needed balancing. I also tried to structure it in a more encyclopedic way: starting with an overview, moving on to the history of the claim, possible connection to genocide, and then summary of critcism. Can we work together to improve the article? Let's keep it collaborative :) HaOfa (talk) 11:28, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- You certainly didn't explain the content that you removed. I don't work with edit warriors who don't respect BRD. Are you going to self-revert and seek consensus for your massive changes? M.Bitton (talk) 11:32, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Shay Golden moved to draftspace
[edit]Thanks for your contributions to Shay Golden. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Youknow? (talk) 13:41, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Shay Golden moved to draftspace
[edit]Thanks for your contributions to Shay Golden. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and Please go through the AFC.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Youknow? (talk) 14:32, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Youknow, Thanks for helping improve the last few articles I've written. Shay Golden is a very well-known Israeli writer and media person. There are also sources that testify to this. He wrote 8 books in well-known publishers, he broadcasted on several Israeli media networks. I really don't think he should be in the draft.
- The article may not be perfect. But certainly not at the level of transferring to a draft.HaOfa (talk) 14:55, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @האופה, Thank you for your contributions.
- I searched extensively but could not find WP:SIGCOV from WP:RS. Therefore, I have drafted your article so that you can include reliable sources. Once you add these sources, you can submit it for AFC review, and the reviewer will likely accept your draft.
- Thank you and warm regards, Cheers! Youknow? (talk) 15:02, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
AE
[edit]Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Statement by Levivich (Nishidani) Levivich (talk) 16:01, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hi האופה. Thank you for your work on Hezbollah–syria relations. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Nice work
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 18:47, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hi האופה. Thank you for your work on Hezbollah–Syria relations. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Nice work
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 21:04, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
The talk in Israel
[edit]I think Selfstudier was talking about DMH, not you.
I saw what you wrote in the talk page in Israel and I wanted to say hello.
HaOfa, (do you bake? bread? cake?). O.maximov (talk) 15:02, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- By the way, there are very early signs of cereal grown in ancient Israel thousands of years ago. Interesting fact. Well goodbye. O.maximov (talk) 15:04, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Hello O.maximov!
- Thank you for your warm greeting! Indeed, I do bake - mostly bread, but occasionally cakes too. I'm glad to hear about the ancient cereal! Maybe I should try to recreate an ancient Israeli bread recipe? Who knows, it might become the next big thing!
- By the way, did you know that ancient grains are making a comeback in modern baking? There's something magical about connecting with our culinary past. HaOfa (talk) 15:30, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- I love bread. Also love cakes, but I'm careful not to eat too much! Ha! O.maximov (talk) 11:51, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- You know about ancient cereal and beer? There's a place in Ashkelon in which they make beer from ancient yeast. Here is the link to an article about them [1]. O.maximov (talk) 11:55, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Ah! Maybe one day we can work on an article on Ancient Beer in Israel? Or ancient cereal? O.maximov (talk) 11:56, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Yalla, let's do it. Open a draft or a sandbox and I'll hop in to help. HaOfa (talk) 07:42, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Ah! Maybe one day we can work on an article on Ancient Beer in Israel? Or ancient cereal? O.maximov (talk) 11:56, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
FYI Notice
[edit]There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Iskandar323 (talk) 19:26, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
The article 2024 Haret Hreik airstrike has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
WP:NOTNEWS, this is not an event which requires its own, independent article.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — The Hand That Feeds You:Bite 22:48, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
Violation of 1rr
[edit]You have violated 1rr at Assassination of Ismail Haniyeh:
- 13:01, July 31, 2024 . This edit reverts this one and moves arguments that the assassination violated international law.
- 11:40, July 31, 2024 reverted an earlier edit by Kashmiri.
Please self-revert, or I will report you.VR (Please ping on reply) 13:07, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Vice regent, hello friend, the first diff is not a revert. I just moved the content from section to section. Check yourself again, it's still on the article. HaOfa (talk) 13:16, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- It is a revert of this edit.VR (Please ping on reply) 13:21, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- How is that a revert? I haven't cancelled anything. The content you added is still on the article. I never removed it. The only revert is the 11:40 to Kashmiri. HaOfa (talk) 13:35, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- It is not necessary to remove something for it to be a revert.VR (Please ping on reply) 13:38, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- To revert means to undo someone's edit. I don't see how they reverted the edit you say they did. O.maximov (talk) 13:42, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- To revert is to undo the action of another editor, in whole or in part. Moving their comment from where they placed it to where you prefer it to be is obviously a revert and moving comments back and forth would constitute edit warring. M.Bitton (talk) 20:56, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- It is not necessary to remove something for it to be a revert.VR (Please ping on reply) 13:38, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- How is that a revert? I haven't cancelled anything. The content you added is still on the article. I never removed it. The only revert is the 11:40 to Kashmiri. HaOfa (talk) 13:35, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- It is a revert of this edit.VR (Please ping on reply) 13:21, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- This user has been engaging in multiple violation. Its time we report him. Astropulse (talk) 03:26, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
You have now made a 3rd revert[2]. I moved the "analysis" section under reactions[3] and you moved it back into a subsection.VR (Please ping on reply) 13:38, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- I see HaOfa already self-reverted themselves on this. I re-did their revert since. I think it was better this way. O.maximov (talk) 13:43, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- That's a self-revert of a third revert. They still haven't self-reverted the 1R violation. M.Bitton (talk) 13:45, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Which doesn't seem like 1R violation anyway O.maximov (talk) 13:53, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- I wasn't asking. M.Bitton (talk) 13:54, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Which doesn't seem like 1R violation anyway O.maximov (talk) 13:53, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- That's a self-revert of a third revert. They still haven't self-reverted the 1R violation. M.Bitton (talk) 13:45, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
It is not necessary to remove material for something to be a revert, moving a section from one place to another is also a revert because it undoes the work of another editor. It's not a particularly serious revert but it is still a revert and it would have been far better just to self revert than enter into this tedious argument here. Selfstudier (talk) 21:58, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Noting the absence of any reply and the editor continuing to edit, @Vice regent:, do you wish to pursue this? Selfstudier (talk) 10:04, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- I have no problem self reverting, I would like an admin's opinion on how the rule works. I'm pretty sure the first diff is not a revert, as I did not undid anything, just moved content in the article. If this is a revert, almost every article could be a revert... Therefore, I'm tagging @ScottishFinnishRadish. If I'm wrong, I'll of course self revert. HaOfa (talk) 12:33, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Would restoring their edit constitute a revert? M.Bitton (talk) 12:35, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Moving and shifting content is still a reversion for the purposes of edit warring. There have been plenty of edit wars over location of prose. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:47, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- I will rv at once. Thanks for clarifying. HaOfa (talk) 14:12, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- I have no problem self reverting, I would like an admin's opinion on how the rule works. I'm pretty sure the first diff is not a revert, as I did not undid anything, just moved content in the article. If this is a revert, almost every article could be a revert... Therefore, I'm tagging @ScottishFinnishRadish. If I'm wrong, I'll of course self revert. HaOfa (talk) 12:33, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
Israel
[edit]Please self-revert at Israel. What you restored is not the "last stable version," as claimed in your edit summary. What I restored was the "last stable version" before the ongoing RFC started, and I "proved" that with a permalink in the edit summary to the June 8 version. You restored to a later version, Special:Diff/1230554629, June 23, which was a change made during the RFC. Levivich (talk) 19:59, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
- When I said "the last stable version" I meant the first paragraph, with Jerusalem, Tel Aviv and so on, that were changed without discussions in the last two days. But, anyway, even if the 1948 framing you use was the last version before the RFC, it does not make it the last stable version. In fact, as far as I can remember, there was never consensus for adding Nakba to the lead... and per WP:ONUS, The responsibility for achieving consensus for inclusion is on those seeking to include disputed content. That's the very reason the RFC was started, because there was no consensus for inclusion of Nakba. So while I agree its better to use the last stable version before the debate surrounding Nakba started, it wasn't the version you used, since it was never stable. HaOfa (talk) 20:05, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
- I put it back to how it was when the RFC started. You re-instated a bold change made during the RFC. Either undo that, or I am going to report it at AE. If you think my version was not the right version and you want to go back to an earlier version as the "last stable version," that's fine with me, but re-instating the bold edit made during the RFC is not fine with me. Levivich (talk) 20:07, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Levivich, In a few checks of versions from May 2024 I found that there was no mention not only of Nakba but also of the expulsion and flight at all. For example: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Israel&oldid=1223018652, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Israel&oldid=1220108864, so I am unsure which earlier version should be restored exactly. I'll be okay with various different options from the past as long as their don't include the disputed use of Nakba/ethnic cleansing, which is the very reason for the current RfC, so please feel free to restore whatever old version you find as long as it doesn't include the disputed terminology. HaOfa (talk) 09:16, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
- I put it back to how it was when the RFC started. You re-instated a bold change made during the RFC. Either undo that, or I am going to report it at AE. If you think my version was not the right version and you want to go back to an earlier version as the "last stable version," that's fine with me, but re-instating the bold edit made during the RFC is not fine with me. Levivich (talk) 20:07, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
Anti Israel bias
[edit]Achi, Wikipedia is packed with anti Israel bias. I created a page about olives in Jewish history, and they wanted to delete it because of their political views. Wikipedia might be great for basic information, but when it comes to politics, it's the last place to look for anything unbiased. AhmedHijaziElSultani (talk) 15:57, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
- Lol. Selfstudier (talk) 16:28, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
- You're one of them btw. AhmedHijaziElSultani (talk) 19:22, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
- Idk anything about olives. Selfstudier (talk) 20:31, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
- It's not about Olives, it's about the leftist anti israel bias on Wikipedia. AhmedHijaziElSultani (talk) 20:41, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
- canvassing is not allowed on Wikipedia Nohorizonss (talk) 12:33, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- It's not about Olives, it's about the leftist anti israel bias on Wikipedia. AhmedHijaziElSultani (talk) 20:41, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
- Idk anything about olives. Selfstudier (talk) 20:31, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
- You're one of them btw. AhmedHijaziElSultani (talk) 19:22, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion
[edit]Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is האופה. Thank you. Levivich (talk) 20:46, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
Arbitration notice
[edit]You are involved in a recently filed request for clarification or amendment from the Arbitration Committee. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment#Amendment request: Referral from the Artibration Enforcement noticeboard regarding behavior in Palestine-Israel articles and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the Wikipedia:Arbitration guide may be of use.
Thanks,
— Red-tailed hawk (nest) 17:52, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- האופה, please provide a statement at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment § Statement by האופה. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:36, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- @ToBeFree: Editor has returned (and fwiw, makes a revert in the same section of an article that PeleYoetz edited the previous day). Selfstudier (talk) 17:03, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Selfstudier, thanks – this would be more upsetting if the discussion hadn't completely shifted away from האופה's behavior. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:30, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- האופה, I'm pretty sure you're reading this and are intentionally silently staying away from all the conduct discussions. This is currently not a huge issue because the discussion isn't primarily about you (anymore), but ignoring community input may quickly become disruptive. Editing an area while one's conduct in that area is under discussion is usually something to be done very carefully, if at all. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:31, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hey, I just responded now. I also explained why it took me so long. Thank you. HaOfa (talk) 07:56, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hi האופה, Thank you very much! I'm sorry to hear about the issues caused to your family by the war and wish you all the best. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:53, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hey, I just responded now. I also explained why it took me so long. Thank you. HaOfa (talk) 07:56, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- @ToBeFree: Editor has returned (and fwiw, makes a revert in the same section of an article that PeleYoetz edited the previous day). Selfstudier (talk) 17:03, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
New motion in the arbitration enforcement referral
[edit]Hello האופה. In the arbitration enforcement referral regarding Palestine-Israel articles, there is a new motion proposed which pertains to you. The motion would open a new arbitration case with you as a party. If you wish, you may comment on the motion. If a case is opened, you will have an opportunity to submit evidence at that time. SilverLocust 💬 23:18, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
1RR violation
[edit]Please self-revert your latest reversion on Yahya Sinwar to comply with 1RR: 1st revert (of this edit) and 2nd revert (of this edit). Makeandtoss (talk) 09:38, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Makeandtoss: This edit is definitely not a revert of this edit, it's called copy-editing. HaOfa (talk) 14:25, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- As the editor mentioned by @Makeandtoss regarding their edit being reverted, I can say that this is clearly not a revert, but a wording improvement. Makeandtoss, I think you should be a bit more careful when making such harsh allegations. OdNahlawi (talk) 14:49, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- A reversion is defined as any edit that undoes another editor's actions. Pinging @ScottishFinnishRadish: to kindly clarify, considering they had recently similarly clarified above that a move is still a revert. Makeandtoss (talk) 10:10, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- I don't see any undo, of any sort, with the first diff you presented. What I see is an editor changing the order of words in a sentence to make it more readable. ABHammad (talk) 08:42, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry about missing this. I wasn't available much of the weekend, and came back to ~100 pings and a couple hundred notifications. I plan on looking into this tomorrow. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 18:53, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- I do not see this as a revert of this.
− Ma'arivreported that during histimein prison,Sinwarenrolledinfifteen courses through the [[Open University of Israel]]overaspanofsevenyears,beginningin1995. Most were in history, covering topics such asthehistoryofthe Jews in the [[Second Temple period|Second Temple]] and [[Rabbinic period|Rabbinic periods]], the First Temple period, [[The Holocaust]], and [[Zionism]], along with a political science course on governance and Israeli democracy.+ [[Maariv (newspaper)|Ma'ariv]] reported that during his seven years in prison, starting in 1995, Sinwar took fifteen courses through the [[Open University of Israel]]. Most were in history, covering topics such as the Jews in the [[Second Temple period|Second Temple]] and [[Rabbinic period|Rabbinic periods]], the First Temple period, [[The Holocaust]], and [[Zionism]], along with a political science course on governance and Israeli democracy.- There is no change in attribution or facts, just copy editing that does not negate the effects of the edit. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 11:33, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- @ScottishFinnishRadish: Thanks for the clarification then, I will keep that in mind. Makeandtoss (talk) 14:12, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- There's a whole lot of grey area involved. If, for instance, the attribution to Ma'ariv was removed, then I would likely see it as a revert. There's also not a whole lot of broader community input, see Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#What is a revert? ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:15, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- @ScottishFinnishRadish: Interesting discussion, I had the same thought process in my mind a while ago. On the other hand I remember reading an advice some many months ago, probably on AE, that a revert can be considered almost anything, so it is better to avoid the entire sentence all together, which has been standard practice by most editors as far as I have observed. Makeandtoss (talk) 14:31, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- That is my general advice as well, but in this case we have all of the same information presented in very close to the same way. There was no shift of POV, attribution, or facts. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:33, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- For interest, bearing in mind that I really have no idea what is or is not a revert, I regard a Maariv (newspaper)|Ma'ariv -> Ma'ariv transform as a revert, because it changes the reader's access to information related to the source and removes the only internal link to the relevant article. Sometimes this might matter. Sean.hoyland (talk) 18:15, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Sean.hoyland: @ScottishFinnishRadish: In addition to what Sean mentioned, I personally believe a reordering of the structure of a sentence is a revert, but again, I am ready to accept whichever interpretation is most common and stick to it, by myself and everyone else. Makeandtoss (talk) 08:24, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
- If you want a broader array of admin input you can bring this to AE, but I think this case will firmly fall into the "not a revert" category. I may be incorrect, though. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 11:27, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
- @ScottishFinnishRadish: Thanks but is AE the right place; I am more interested in pursuing the general clarification of this point rather than a complaint against the user here? Makeandtoss (talk) 12:00, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
- That would be the discussion at VPP, but it doesn't seem to be drawing much participation. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:07, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
- @ScottishFinnishRadish: Thanks but is AE the right place; I am more interested in pursuing the general clarification of this point rather than a complaint against the user here? Makeandtoss (talk) 12:00, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
- If you want a broader array of admin input you can bring this to AE, but I think this case will firmly fall into the "not a revert" category. I may be incorrect, though. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 11:27, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Sean.hoyland: @ScottishFinnishRadish: In addition to what Sean mentioned, I personally believe a reordering of the structure of a sentence is a revert, but again, I am ready to accept whichever interpretation is most common and stick to it, by myself and everyone else. Makeandtoss (talk) 08:24, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
- For interest, bearing in mind that I really have no idea what is or is not a revert, I regard a Maariv (newspaper)|Ma'ariv -> Ma'ariv transform as a revert, because it changes the reader's access to information related to the source and removes the only internal link to the relevant article. Sometimes this might matter. Sean.hoyland (talk) 18:15, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- That is my general advice as well, but in this case we have all of the same information presented in very close to the same way. There was no shift of POV, attribution, or facts. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:33, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- @ScottishFinnishRadish: Interesting discussion, I had the same thought process in my mind a while ago. On the other hand I remember reading an advice some many months ago, probably on AE, that a revert can be considered almost anything, so it is better to avoid the entire sentence all together, which has been standard practice by most editors as far as I have observed. Makeandtoss (talk) 14:31, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- There's a whole lot of grey area involved. If, for instance, the attribution to Ma'ariv was removed, then I would likely see it as a revert. There's also not a whole lot of broader community input, see Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#What is a revert? ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:15, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- @ScottishFinnishRadish: Thanks for the clarification then, I will keep that in mind. Makeandtoss (talk) 14:12, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
Care with editing
[edit]This edit is substandard. Opinion material was added along with a citation needed tag. The edit has been reverted so no matter but please refrain from this type of editing in the future. Thank you. Selfstudier (talk) 16:19, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 26
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited October 2024 Israeli strikes on Iran, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Axios.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
November 2024
[edit]Hello, I'm GrabUp. I noticed that you recently removed content from November_2024_Amsterdam_attacks without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. You should not remove well-cited material from a controversial article; you removed many citations, like those from Times of Israel, BBC, and others. GrabUp - Talk 12:17, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- You removed information about the taxi driver, saying, ‘Sources don’t blame them.’ Here is a source from the BBC that mentions: ‘Peter Holla tells reporters in Amsterdam that Maccabi supporters attacked a taxi and set a Palestinian flag on fire on Wednesday.’ GrabUp - Talk 12:21, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Okay, that's a change from the original by Middle East Eye. Feel free to add it, with the right attribution HaOfa (talk) 12:21, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- You have violated WP:ARBPIA, reverted 2 times within 24 hours. GrabUp - Talk 12:23, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Oh, I see now. an edit conflict. thanks for noticing. I see it was restored anyway. By the way, the article is a huge mess right now, and a violation of POV I am afraid HaOfa (talk) 12:27, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- You have violated WP:ARBPIA, reverted 2 times within 24 hours. GrabUp - Talk 12:23, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Okay, that's a change from the original by Middle East Eye. Feel free to add it, with the right attribution HaOfa (talk) 12:21, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
1RR violations
[edit]There were two 1RR violations by yourself within 8 minutes at November 2024 Amsterdam attacks, so please revert all your latest edits to comply with 1RR. first revert: removing content, second: removing content, third: removing content. Makeandtoss (talk) 12:53, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Isabelle Belato; See. GrabUp - Talk 12:59, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Makeandtoss The editor has already acknowledged their mistake above. Why do you continue to fill users' pages with allegations that are either unverified or have already been resolved? You did it here on this same page just a few weeks ago. Why are we at it again? ABHammad (talk) 21:55, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
Arbitration motions regarding Palestine-Israel articles
[edit]The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:
When imposing a contentious topic restriction under the Arab-Israeli conflict contentious topic, an uninvolved administrator may require that appeals be heard only by the Arbitration Committee. In such cases, the committee will hear appeals at ARCA according to the community review standard. A rough consensus of arbitrators will be required to overturn or amend the sanction.
Uninvolved administrators may impose word limits on all participants in a discussion, or on individual editors across all discussions, within the area of conflict. These word limits are designated as part of the standard set of restrictions within the Arab-Israeli conflict contentious topic. These restrictions must be logged and may be appealed in the same way as all contentious topic restrictions.
All participants in formal discussions (RfCs, RMs, etc) within the area of conflict are urged to keep their comments concise, and are limited to 1,000 words per discussion. This motion will sunset two years from the date of its passage.
Following a request at WP:ARCA, the Arbitration Committee directs its clerks to open a case to examine the interaction of specific editors in the WP:PIA topic area. Subject to amendment by the drafting arbitrators, the following rules will govern the case:
- The case title will be Palestine-Israel articles 5.
- The initial parties will be:
- Aoidh will be the initial drafter
- The case will progress at the usual time table, unless additional parties are added or the complexity of the case warrants additional time for drafting a proposed decision, in which case the drafters may choose to extend the timeline.
- All case pages are to be semi-protected.
- Private evidence will be accepted. Any case submissions involving non-public information, including off-site accounts, should be directed to the Arbitration Committee by email to Arbcom-enwikimedia.org. Any links to the English Wikipedia submitted as part of private evidence will be aggregated and posted on the evidence page. Any private evidence that is used to support a proposal (a finding of fact or remedy) or is otherwise deemed relevant to the case will be provided to affected parties when possible (evidence of off-wiki harassment may not be shared). Affected parties will be given an opportunity to respond.
- Addendum
In passing motion #5 to open a Palestine-Israel articles 5 case, the Committee has appointed three drafters: Aoidh, HJ Mitchell, and CaptainEek. The drafters have resolved that the case will open on November 30. The delay will allow the Committee time to resolve a related private matter, and allow for both outgoing and incoming Arbitrators to vote on the case. The drafters have changed the party list to the following individuals:
- BilledMammal (talk · contribs)
- Iskandar323 (talk · contribs)
- Ïvana (talk · contribs)
- Levivich (talk · contribs)
- Nableezy (talk · contribs)
- Selfstudier (talk · contribs)
- האופה (talk · contribs)
- AndreJustAndre (talk · contribs)
- IOHANNVSVERVS (talk · contribs)
- Alaexis (talk · contribs)
- Zero0000 (talk · contribs)
- Makeandtoss (talk · contribs)
- Snowstormfigorion (talk · contribs)
The drafters reserve the right to amend the list of parties if necessary. The drafters anticipate that the case will include a two week evidence phase, a one week workshop phase, and a two week proposed decision phase.
The related Arbitration enforcement referral: Nableezy et al request has been folded into this case. Evidence from the related private matter, as alluded to in the Covert canvassing and proxying in the Israel-Arab conflict topic area case request, will be examined prior to the start of the case, and resolved separately.
For the Arbitration Committee, SilverLocust 💬 05:26, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
- Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Arbitration motions regarding Palestine-Israel articles
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
historic Palestine
[edit]is a bolded aka at Palestine (region). Therefore it is not a POV term, what is POV is your revert with a false reason. Selfstudier (talk) 19:46, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Selfstudier. It is bolded at Palestine (region) because Iskandar323 added it as an 'alt name,' citing highly opinionated sources in this edit from last July. I agree with @האופה that this term is largely a POV term, with many sources distancing themselves from it, as it often originates from pro-Palestinian political discourse (and should be moved from its current aka position at Palestine to an etymology section, alongside Land of Israel). Wikipedia is not a reliable source, particularly on ARBPIA topics, which I believe have been subject to major CPUSH campaigns in recent years. There's a reason we have an incoming case on PIA. ABHammad (talk) 07:05, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- You have a complaint about something on some page, deal with it at that page. Selfstudier (talk) 10:36, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- So why did you go to @האופה's page to complain about something on some page, doing exactly the opposite of what you're asking for here? ABHammad (talk) 06:17, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- I'm sure they can speak for themself. Selfstudier (talk) 15:13, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- Well, I've also asked for their reasoning on the talk page 10 days ago & have been periodically checking for a reply, both here & there, so the issue seems to be drive-by editing without discussion. Butterscotch Beluga (talk) 17:26, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- So why did you go to @האופה's page to complain about something on some page, doing exactly the opposite of what you're asking for here? ABHammad (talk) 06:17, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
- You have a complaint about something on some page, deal with it at that page. Selfstudier (talk) 10:36, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Palestine-Israel articles 5 arbitration case opened
[edit]You were recently listed as a party to a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 5. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 5/Evidence. Please add your evidence by 23:59, 14 December 2024 (UTC), which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 5/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Party Guide/Introduction. For the Arbitration Committee, SilverLocust 💬 05:42, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
Hang in There
[edit]Just saw all the harrassment and attacks that have been directed at you. Thank you for your work here and I hope this doesn't drive you away. Hang in there! Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 01:18, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
Palestine-Israel articles 5 updates
[edit]You are receiving this message because you are on the update list for Palestine-Israel articles 5. The drafters note that the scope of the case was somewhat unclear, and clarify that the scope is The interaction of named parties in the WP:PIA topic area and examination of the WP:AE process that led to two referrals to WP:ARCA
. Because this was unclear, two changes are being made:
First, the Committee will accept submissions for new parties for the next three days, until 23:59, 10 December 2024 (UTC). Anyone who wishes to suggest a party to the case may do so by creating a new section on the evidence talk page, providing a reason with WP:DIFFS as to why the user should be added, and notifying the user. After the three-day period ends, no further submission of parties will be considered except in exceptional circumstances. Because the Committee only hears disputes that have failed to be resolved by the usual means, proposed parties should have been recently taken to AE/AN/ANI, and either not sanctioned, or incompletely sanctioned. If a proposed party has not been taken to AE/AN/ANI, evidence is needed as to why such an attempt would have been ineffective.
Second, the evidence phase has been extended by a week, and will now close at 23:59, 21 December 2024 (UTC). For the Arbitration Committee, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 03:20, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. The WordsmithTalk to me 06:05, 12 December 2024 (UTC)האופה (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I was blocked for no reason! I've been here for a year and have written hundreds of articles. I've invested days and nights into Wikipedia. I have no idea who this Icewiz is or why would anyone say me and him are the same person. Same about AB.Hamed!
I was blocked solely because for political reasons, there's no other way to describe it. Check my edits, and you'll understand why I have nothing to do with them!
Are you kidding me? This block is based on the filing of Makeandtoss, who is a side to an ARBCOM case, PIA5, about their interactions with other users.
This block is just madness. I hope that one day, Israelis and Jews will be allowed to write on Wikipedia without being blocked just for being Israelis after lobbying by editors who want the content here to fit their ideology. HaOfa (talk) 08:43, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This request is absolute nonsense. 331dot (talk) 09:18, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.