Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 March 31

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 31

[edit]


The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. RL0919 (talk) 02:01, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Groundbreaking submarines (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per comments on discussion here; largely because the template seems to be inherently subjective. On top of this, the items placed on the template appear to have been chosen largely on a whim, with no real criteria set out for determining what "groundbreaking" means.Jhbuk (talk) 20:52, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. RL0919 (talk) 01:49, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Groundbreaking destroyers (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per comments on discussion here; largely because the template seems to be inherently subjective. On top of this, the items placed on the template appear to have been chosen largely on a whim, with no real criteria set out for determining what "groundbreaking" means.Jhbuk (talk) 20:52, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:07, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Progress Party MPs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per WP:NAVBOX, I reckon that this template falls short of the reasons for having a navbox: "The goal is not to cram as many related articles as possible into one space. Ask yourself, does this help the reader in reading up on related topics? Take any two articles in the template. Would a reader really want to go from A to B?" and "They should be kept small in size as a large template has limited navigation value" (my emphasis). Not used in any article. Geschichte (talk) 10:18, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Wrong venue. Closing here and moving to WP:MFD, which is where userboxes are supposed to be discussed. The new discussion may be found at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:User dislikes semitic one god religions. RL0919 (talk) 21:27, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:User dislikes semitic one god religions (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:User dislikes monotheistic religions (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:User dislikes institutional religions (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Delete all three as WP:SPA created templates that are blatant examples of inappropriate and divisive soapboxing.
See also Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2010 March 30#Category:Wikipedians dislike monotheistic religions Jubileeclipman 00:42, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:49, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox road/ADHS/shield (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unnecessary subtemplate after ADHS merger Imzadi1979 (talk) 01:01, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:49, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox road/ADHS/link (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Infobox road/ADHS/abbrev (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Infobox road/ADHS name (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Infobox road/ADHS main (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Infobox road/ADHS links (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Infobox road/ADHS browse (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unnecessary subtemplate after ADHS merger Imzadi1979 (talk) 00:58, 31 March 2010 (UTC) Imzadi1979 (talk) 00:58, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:46, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:ADHS (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The constituent articles of the template have been merged into the parent article. Three remaining articles will be merged once they are summarized down in size, in the next day or so. Imzadi1979 (talk) 00:54, 31 March 2010 (UTC) Imzadi1979 (talk) 00:54, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.