User talk:Podruznik

Welcome

Hello, Podruznik, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page Table Mountain (Butte County, California) have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and have been reverted. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

There is a page about the verifiability policy that explains the policy in greater detail, and another that offers tips on the proper ways of citing sources. If you are stuck and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Calaka (talk) 09:28, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am the source! Podruznik (talk) 17:27, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unless you published a news article about Table Mountain or wrote a book about it that is not good enough. You could very well be lying and Table Mountain might not even exist for all we know. Please cite refferences or sources to establish notability of the article. Thank you.Calaka (talk) 09:58, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I live by it, and go there all the time! And they filmed some scenes for Klansman there! I'll see if I can find something though! Podruznik (talk) 18:52, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Still, we need proof as we can't take a random person from the internets word for it. But yeah, if you can find something about it, that would be great! Kind regards! :)Calaka (talk) 08:13, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Images And Infoboxes

I am having some trouble with my images and infobox! Just the image link shows, but not the image! And all my infobox information isn't showing! It's on my edit page, but is not on the actual article! If anyone can help me, please do so! Thankyou! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phantom_Falls http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camuy_caves

Podruznik (talk) 19:04, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This might help: Wikipedia:Picture_tutorial. Good luck!

Thanks! But there was nothing there about images in infoboxes, so I have no idea! 01:10, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Replied here. Please sign your name on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~). Rivertorch (talk) 04:39, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Phantom Falls

A word to the wise: please don't revert someone's good-faith edits without explaining yourself. I used an edit summary to explain the reason for my edit. If you want to say more than will fit in the edit summary window, then the article's talk page is at your disposal. (Or you could leave a message at my talk page.

I know you're new here but want to do the right thing. My edit to Phantom Falls was intended to enhance the article's clarity and readability by correcting some awkward grammar. If you disagree with me, fine—we can discuss it—but reverting without explanation is a bit impolite and unhelpful. How do you think we should proceed now? Rivertorch (talk) 06:18, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nope :)

Your article needs some serious work first. It's not very wikified and even contains some inaccuracies. You're not just reverting my work on the article, but everyone else's too. Try and get me blocked if you feel like you need to. ;) Buddy23Lee (talk) 23:27, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why don't you just add your content to the current page instead of reverting the whole thing back to the beginning? It's not like all of your info is bad, you just need to format it for wikipedia. :) Buddy23Lee (talk) 23:45, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What do you want to see included in the article? I'd even be glad to add it myself if I knew what you thought was missing. We just need to remember that all of the content needs to be verifiable. I had to take out a lot of your original article because there were no sources and citations to back it up. I know it doesn't seem like there is a lot of content, but I'm sure that if we can document where it came from that it could stay on the page. Let me know. Buddy23Lee (talk) 00:09, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:Buddy23Lee. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Jamesofur (talk) 23:46, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Bald_Rock,_California. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Please stop reverting or you WILL be blocked for violating the 3RR rule, I will be warning the other user as well. If you have a problem with the article bring it to the talk page Jamesofur (talk) 23:48, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you add inappropriate external links, as you did with this edit to Bald Rock, California. NW (Talk) 23:48, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. -- Ed (Edgar181) 00:15, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Podruznik (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What happend to Freedom Of Speech?! He has the right to revert my edits, but I dont have the right to be angry! He even said I can go ahead and add my stuff, and then he deleted it when I did! If I'm blocked, then he should be blocked too, because he started it! Now I know why my History teacher hates Wikipedia, because assholes like him!

Decline reason:

Please show this to your History teacher, and perhaps he or she can explain to you how "Freedom Of Speech" does not require Wikipedia to provide a platform for personal attacks. Or even better -- call your History teacher an asshole, and see how far that gets you. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 00:54, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

How dare you call my History teacher an asshole! She's the kindest person ever! She wouldn't think it was fair that that asshole deleted my article! So you people are assholes!

Podruznik: I understand that you're upset, but you have to remember that I didn't delete your article, I just absorbed it into what is now the current page. I personally would've liked to keep all the info that your original article contained, but there were no sources to back it up (Just like what Calaka was talking about in one of your above conversations.) We can only keep the stuff that has sources/references on Wikipedia. What other stuff from your article did you want to keep anyway? The info about the wildlife? the info about the trails? or the story about the "demon"? If you let me know I can try to search for sources backing that stuff up so we can try to keep it on the page. Buddy23Lee (talk) 05:02, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What's the name of the book? Maybe I can help look it up to cite. If you want to cite the info yourself, just put it in this format:

| last = 
| first = 
| authorlink =
| title = 
| publisher = 
| language = 
| year = 
| pages = 
| isbn =

and put it into {{ }} and reference brackets. If you try it and it doesn't look right, me or someone else can fix it for you. We just need to show where your info comes from! :) Buddy23Lee (talk) 23:30, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

- Hey that's a good start. Now all we need to know is the name of the author of the article on Bald Rock and the date of the Magazine. It will end up looking something like this:

References

Breyer, Stephen (October 2006), "Hike Bald Rock", Adventure Magazine: Page 31

Then we just need to know what the article told you so we can cite the sentences with that reference. That should be pretty much it. So what parts of your story did the magazine article tell you about? Buddy23Lee (talk) 00:27, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, So just let me know the name of the author of the article and the date of the magazine (like what month was that issue) and I'll work on it tomorrow and see if we can include and properly cite some of that info! ;) Buddy23Lee (talk) 00:46, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 00:52, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Chateau_de_mores_in_medora.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Chateau_de_mores_in_medora.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:27, 16 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey (talk) 14:27, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Cottonwood_Forest_In_Theodore_Roosevelt_National_Park.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Cottonwood_Forest_In_Theodore_Roosevelt_National_Park.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. feydey (talk) 14:38, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Cottonwood_Forest_In_Theodore_Roosevelt_National_Park.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Cottonwood_Forest_In_Theodore_Roosevelt_National_Park.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:38, 16 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey (talk) 14:38, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Bald_rock_rock_house.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Bald_rock_rock_house.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:17, 16 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey (talk) 15:17, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: My Photos

I'm sure they are, but please use a summary when uploading Your own images, like:

File information
Description	Theodore Roosevelt's Maltese Cross Cabin in Billings County & McKenzie County, North Dakota, US.
Source	I (feydey (talk)) created this work entirely by myself.
Date	01 September 2009
Author	feydey (talk)
Permission (Reusing this file)	See below.

Description: What is the work of?
Date: When was the work made, or if you are uploading a photo, when was the photo taken?
Other versions: Optional. List any other versions of this work that have been uploaded (for example, a cropped, brightened, darkened, etc. version of a photo).
The "Source" and "Author" fields are automatically filled in for you.

This way other people know what the picture depicts. Do You know, that Wikimedia Commons is a collection of freely licensed images that are automatically available to all Wikimedia projects, such as Wikipedias in other languages. Best, feydey (talk) 15:45, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, I moved File:Theodore Roosevelt's Maltese Croos Cabin, TRNP, ND.jpg to Wikimedia Commons. And yes use that big box that says description. feydey (talk) 15:52, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You should edit the images' description page to include the needed info, like for File:Bald_rock_rock_house.jpg - here; others here and here. No need to upload them again. feydey (talk) 07:45, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removing a deletion notice from an article you created

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with The Black Cat (2008 Film). Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you.--ShelfSkewed Talk 05:10, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rambo

Welcome to Wikipedia! I am glad to see you are interested in discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Rambo are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. Erik (talk | contribs | wt:film) 14:59, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Table Mountain (Butte County, California)

Did you even look at the changes I made before undoing my edit? All my changes involved fixing capitalization and spelling errors and making sure links went to the correct articles. Why would you revert to a version that reintroduces numerous errors to the article?--ShelfSkewed Talk 15:27, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

More on September 2009

Please read WP:OWN. You seem to have some ownership issues with your contributions to Wikipedia. Also, lay off the "Undo" feature unless you are reverting vandalism edits (and so far, you have not been dealing with vandalism edits). BTW, your contributions are good and useful, and I'm glad you're here to make them, but note that you are releasing your contributions to be further edited by others. Use edit summaries and the article talk pages to work with other editors (instead of against them) to further improve Wikipedia. Cheers! -- JHunterJ (talk) 20:42, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked 1 week after this edit. Again, please read WP:OWN -- articles that you create are still not "your" articles. And then read WP:CIVIL about interacting with other editors. -- JHunterJ (talk) 14:10, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Saving Work

Dude! If I'm working on an article and can't finish it at the moment, is it possible to save the article and work on it later?

You can use a "user subpage" to save articles, if they are in such a state that you don't want to save it as a new version of the article yet. So if you're working on Phantom Falls and discover that you have to stop but don't want to save it, copy the text and edit User:Podruznik/Phantom Falls instead. Save that, come back later, and copy the text again back to a new edit on Phantom Falls. (And you can request speedy-deletion of your user subpage when you're done with it with a {{db-user}} tag.) -- JHunterJ (talk) 21:20, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Zamek Olsztyn

Castle Olsztyn (Polish: Zamek Olsztyn) is a medievil castle located in Southern Poland, about 6 miles from Częstochowa, and about 3 miles from the small village of Janow.

Phantom Falls (again)

Podruznik, your most recent changes to Phantom Falls are completely unacceptable. I warned you before and you failed to respond. For the last time, you must follow Wikipedia style guidelines or else explain why not, and you must not revert other editors' good-faith improvements without explaining yourself. Because you have contributed the beginnings of useful content to the encyclopedia, I am cutting you considerable slack, but the next time you revert to an unencyclopedic version of the article with no explanation given, I will take action to ensure that it cannot happen again. Let's not step over that line, okay? You'll get along fine here if you observe some basic house rules, and that includes communicating substantively and respectfully with your fellow editors. We have gone out of our way to be helpful to you, and you are seriously disrespecting us in return. Rivertorch (talk) 03:56, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(and again)

You're at it again. I explained to you the problem with your preferred wording and linked to that explanation in my edit summary. You, in turn, reverted using no edit summary and without replying to my explanation. My assumptions of good faith have limits. Last warning: use edit summaries, don't just revert—explain why, and stop treating it as if it's your article. Rivertorch (talk) 19:06, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New block

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for disruptive editing and edit warring stemming from misunderstanding ownership and civility, in particular this edit. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below.

-- JHunterJ (talk) 14:14, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Podruznik (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What? Why? Just because I told the guy what I wanted to tell him! It's true! If you believe that there is no private onwership of Wikipedia's articles and everything is public, then that's just like Communism! They may have the right to edit, change, or even delete them, but they are still technicaly mine! Everyone on Wikipedia has legal ownership of the articles they create! Also, I think you should give users the right to block too! Because the block feature should also be publically availiable!

Decline reason:

Well, you are wrong. If you use this website, you are required to be civil (as described at WP:CIVIL) and to agree that you do not own what you write (see the text below the edit box and WP:OWN). If you do not like these rules, you are free not to use Wikipedia. Sandstein 17:05, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

October 2009

Hello, please do not make threats to established users, as you did here, especially if you are the one providing incorrect information. According to both Fourteeners and Mount Elbert, Mount Elbert is the tallest point in Colorado, not Longs Peak. GlassCobra 16:59, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Modoc National Wildlife Refuge

My pleasure - thought it was high time we had coverage of some sort for every refuge on here. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 03:05, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Lava Beds In Television

If you filmed it, then what we have here is a WP:Conflict of interest, and you, since you are personally connected to it, should not be trying to advertise it here. Reywas92 ^Talk 22:20, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add promotional material to Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Please do not attack other editors. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Okay! Okay! So you should take all the Tv show articles off then! It's not promoting anything! It was only a one time showing, and they left the Lassen one! And I'm not attacking anybody!

Everything on here is promotional! It's promoting locations, tv shows, movies!

kelly Ridge Artcle

Kelly Ridge is a community of about 4,000 people located right near Lake Oroville in Northern California. The community is mostly home to retired people, but various age groups live there! The community also contains a country club, swimming pool, tennis courts, a restaurant, and a golf course. Because it lies right on the boundary of the Lake Oroville State Recreation Area, deer leave the park boundaries, and wonder into people's yards.

File source problem with File:Kelso dunes in mojave national preserve.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Kelso dunes in mojave national preserve.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 08:36, 19 December 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 08:36, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine! I didnt want it on Wikipedia anways! I just uploaded it so I could have access to it, to use on a school assignment!

File copyright problem with File:Feather River Salmon Hatchary.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Feather River Salmon Hatchary.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Skier Dude (talk) 08:03, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Beatson Falls On Table Mountain.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Beatson Falls On Table Mountain.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:20, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm! That's very strange! It's been up there for while now, and I shouldnt have any problems with it! Thanks for the notification! I'll take a look at that!

February 2010

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to the page Myrna fahey. Blank pages can confuse readers, and are overall not helpful to the Wikipedia project; furthermore, blanking a page is not the same as deleting it.

If the article you blanked is a duplicate of another article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalized, please revert it to the last legitimate revision. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please use the appropriate deletion process. Zhang He (talk) 20:05, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Beatson Falls On Table Mountain.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Beatson Falls On Table Mountain.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:22, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jan Dzierzon

Imie i nazwisko Dzierzona zostalo zmieniona na Johann Dzierzon, to jest pisownia niemiecka. Britanica podaje Jan Dzierżoń (http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/175400/Jan-Dzierzon) i tak powinno byc. Rowniez tu (http://bees.library.cornell.edu/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=bees;idno=5017629) angielskie tlumaczenie pracy Dzierzona podaje Dzierżon, Jan. Czy skontaktowales sie z museum w Kluczborku, albo przeczytales dowody i fotokopie w podanych pracach Brozka, Gladysza i ks. Mazaka? Pomijanie zrodel polskich jest niedopuszczalne. Ci ktorzy chca zmieniac artykul powinni uznac wage zrodel polskich wage a nie lawirowac na drugorzednych przekladach i niepelnych zrodlach. Podane tez sa wspolczesne artykuly w prasie polskiej i napisane przez Polakow. Trzeba je wniesc do tekstu. Niech chociaz bedzie widoczne ze spoleczenstwo polskie ma silne zdanie na ten temat. Podaje Ci e-mail jezeli chcesz powaznie pracowac bez udzialu szpiegow: erudra@hotmail.com. --Soujdspo (talk) 22:31, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Bierz zawsze pod uwage ze: 1) w okresie Bismarck'a zniemczano imiona celowo 2) Poszukiwania liczbowe zapisu imion na internecie sa falszywka - autorzy wtedy i dzisiaj powtarzaja to co zostalo zniemczone i wprowadzone w pismie, clowo, przez nieuwage lub niewiedze. Jedyna droga czy jego imie powinno byc pisane Jahann czy Jan jest stwierdzenie ze Dzierzon uwazal sie za Polaka i kultywowal polskos, i tak jest zgodnie z dokumentami opisanymi w pracach Brozka, Gladysza i ks. Mazaka etc. --Soujdspo (talk) 02:01, 12 April 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Soujdspo (talk • contribs)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Wild lupine on table mountain.JPG

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Wild lupine on table mountain.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 22:45, 30 April 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:45, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Las Plumas High School

What's the deal with your edits there? Do you just go there every few months and add another random animal? LP isn't a wildlife refuge like Butte College, and I've never seen any animal but birds and seeing-eye dogs on campus. So I don't know where you're getting this information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Baskilisk (talk • contribs) 21:11, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Purple sunset over kelly ridge.JPG

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Purple sunset over kelly ridge.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 10:17, 21 May 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:17, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Fly geyser location map.JPG

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Fly geyser location map.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 21:38, 24 May 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:38, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article List of So Weird episodes, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This is particularly important when adding or changing any facts or figures and helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. _Xeworlebi ^(t•c) 07:14, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Justin Bieber, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 20:02, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coral reef on culebra.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Coral reef on culebra.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:43, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:El yunque national forest.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:El yunque national forest.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:40, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Castillo san felipe del moro.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Castillo san felipe del moro.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:11, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fly geyser in nevada.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Fly geyser in nevada.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:03, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sabine national wildlife refuge.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Sabine national wildlife refuge.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:06, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Scotts bluff national monument.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Scotts bluff national monument.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:09, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Butte college wildlife refuge.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Butte college wildlife refuge.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:14, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Kashmir, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Shovon (talk) 06:30, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Yahoo! Answers, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. SQGibbon (talk) 23:37, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011

Possibly unfree File:Location_of_fly_geyser.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Location_of_fly_geyser.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —RP88 ^(talk) 00:24, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Table mountain near oroville california.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Table mountain near oroville california.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:52, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lamb of God (band). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. GunMetal Angel 03:05, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use of File:Going wild with jeff corwin.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Going wild with jeff corwin.jpg. However, there is a concern that the use of the image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. Details of this problem, and which specific criteria that the image may not meet, can be obtained by going to the image description page. If you feel that this image does meet those criteria, please place a note on the image description or talk page explaining why. Do not remove the {{di-fails NFCC}} tag itself.

An administrator will review this file within a few days, and having considered the opinions placed on the image page, may delete it in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion or remove the tag entirely. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Moe ε 04:47, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re:

First, you should have said that on the article's talk page, not on mine.

Look, I don't care which exact pictures will get into the article, as long as they're 1) of good quality and representative 2) of modest amount and well-fit into the article, which yours aren't. Wikipedia is not mere collections of photographs or media files with no text to go with the articles. If you are interested in presenting a picture, please provide an encyclopedic context, or consider adding it to Wikimedia Commons. After you added your holiday photos, we have 6 photos stacked on the right, 4 of them from the town, with relevant Diamantidis photo half a screen below the text. The article is now a state similar to a Facebook wall. So, go ahead, pick images of relevance to the text, and delete the rest (there already was too many even before you get along) and I won't object. I can't spend so much effort cleaning up after everyone's drive-by photo adding, which is not improving the quality of the encyclopedia. No such user (talk) 08:06, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Cave at phantom falls.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:16, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Cherokee Ruins On Table Mountain.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:30, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Church in tecate, bc.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:35, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Cliffs of meteora.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:08, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Oroville ishi mural.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Oroville ishi mural.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Copyright violation. There is no freedom of panorama in the United States. This painting was installed after March 1989, per public art and copyrights in the US. See [1].

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:35, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Cerveny Klastor (disambiguation)

A tag has been placed on Cerveny Klastor (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 209.249.5.140 (talk) 22:10, 4 May 2017 (UTC).[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Cerveny Klastor (disambiguation)

A tag has been placed on Cerveny Klastor (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 03:20, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Church in tecate, bc.jpg

The file File:Church in tecate, bc.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused. Horrendous quality. Superseded by File:Parroquia (5625883935).jpg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 11:40, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]