SR West Country and Battle of Britain classes

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
SR Un-rebuilt West Country/Battle of Britain classes[1]
Side-and-front view of a large 4-6-2 steam locomotive with a tender. The locomotive boiler is hidden by a casing of flat metal side sheets.
Un-rebuilt West Country class No. 34007 Wadebridge, as preserved, in British Railways lined green express passenger livery
Type and origin
Power type Steam
Designer Oliver Bulleid
Builder
  • SR/BR Brighton Works (104)
  • BR Eastleigh Works (6)
Build date 1945–1951
Total produced 110
Specifications
Configuration 4-6-2 (Pacific)
Gauge 4 ft 8 12 in (1,435 mm)
Leading wheel
diameter
3 ft 1 in (0.940 m)
Driver diameter 6 ft 2 in (1.880 m)
Trailing wheel
diameter
3 ft 1 in (0.940 m)
Length 67 ft 4.75 in (20.54 m)
Locomotive weight 86 long tons (87.4 t)
Fuel type Coal
Fuel capacity 5.00 long tons (5.1 t)
Water capacity 4,500 imp gal (20,460 L; 5,400 US gal)
Boiler pressure 280 psi (1.93 MPa)
Firegrate area 38.25 sq ft (3.55 m2)
Cylinders 3
Cylinder size 16.375 in × 24 in (416 mm × 610 mm)
Performance figures
Tractive effort 31,000 lbf (137.9 kN)
Career
Operator(s)
Class SR / BR: Light Pacifics
Power class
  • BR (January 1949): 6MT
  • BR (December 1953): 7P5F
  • BR (November 1957): 7P6F
Number(s)
  • SR: 21C101 – 21C170
  • BR: 34001–34110
Locale Great Britain
Withdrawn 1963–1967

The SR West Country and Battle of Britain classes, collectively known as Light Pacifics or informally as Spam Cans, are air-smoothed 4-6-2 Pacific steam locomotives designed for the Southern Railway by its Chief Mechanical Engineer Oliver Bulleid. Incorporating a number of new developments in British steam locomotive technology, they were amongst the first British designs to use welding in the construction process, and to use steel fireboxes, which meant that components could be more easily constructed under wartime austerity and post-war economy.[2]

They were designed to be lighter in weight than their sister locomotives, the Merchant Navy class, to permit use on a wider variety of routes, including in the south-west of England and the Kent coast. They were a mixed-traffic design, being equally adept at hauling passenger and freight trains, and were used on all types of services, frequently far below their capabilities. A total of 110 locomotives were constructed between 1945 and 1950, named after West Country resorts and Royal Air Force (RAF) and other subjects associated with the Battle of Britain.

Due to problems with some of the new features, such as the Bulleid chain-driven valve gear, sixty locomotives were rebuilt by British Railways during the late 1950s.[3] This produced a design highly similar to the rebuilt Merchant Navy class.[4] The classes operated until July 1967, when the last steam locomotives on the Southern Region were withdrawn. Although most were scrapped, twenty locomotives found new homes on heritage railways in Britain.

Background[edit]

The financial success enjoyed by the Southern Railway during the 1930s was based on the completion of its London suburban electrification scheme in 1929 and the subsequent electrification of the main lines to Brighton and the Sussex Coast and to Guildford and Portsmouth.[5] Plans to electrify the main lines to the Kent coast resorts and Channel ports followed by the South Western main line to Southampton and Bournemouth had been made, but were interrupted by the outbreak of the Second World War.[citation needed]

Despite electrification plans, the Southern Railway's less heavily used lines in the West Country beyond Salisbury did not merit this cost. Lines in Devon and Cornwall were meandering, heavily graded, and although with heavy summer holiday traffic were lightly used during the winter months.[5] The seasonality of railway traffic meant that the West Country branches were worked by the ageing T9 class 4-4-0 and the versatile N class 2-6-0, which could be better utilised on mixed-traffic services elsewhere.[6] As a result, an order was placed with Brighton railway works in April 1941 for twenty passenger locomotives of a type to be determined.[6] However, the works was involved in heavy freight locomotive construction for the war effort, resulting in a four-year delay.[citation needed]

During 1943, Bulleid began planning for the post-war locomotive requirements of the railway and identified the need for a stop-gap steam locomotive design for those main lines in South East England scheduled for electrification had the Second World War not taken place. Although the new Merchant Navy class was available for the heaviest Continental expresses, the resumption of frequent passenger services over poorly maintained infrastructure following the war would require a lighter locomotive with wider route availability.[6]

At the same time there would be a continuing need for fast freight locomotives capable of operating on both electrified and non-electrified routes without impeding the intensive use of the system by passenger trains.[7] Suburban electrification used electric multiple units, which had no equivalent freight design. Although Bulleid built two prototype electric locomotives in 1941 these were as yet unproven, and freight haulage would be undertaken by steam traction for the foreseeable future.[7]

Design[edit]

The detailed design work for the new mixed-traffic locomotives was undertaken at Brighton railway works where they were scheduled to be constructed. The earliest drawings were for a moderately sized 2-6-0 with similarities to the London and North Eastern Railway K4 class, which Bulleid had helped design for the West Highland Line when he was Nigel Gresley's assistant.[6] However, such a design would have been inadequate for the Kent Coast lines, which required a powerful 2-6-2 or 4-6-0 class.[8] It is not clear why the design was subsequently enlarged to become a smaller version of the Merchant Navy class 4-6-2 as the likely traffic requirement did not warrant such lavish provision, but the incorporation of components from that class enabled standardisation during wartime production difficulties.[8]

Bulleid's standard components[edit]

An almost solid disc (not spoked) locomotive wheel with a series of cast-in radial indentations and prominent round holes intended to reduce its weight.
The distinctive Bulleid Firth Brown wheels, seen here on 34072 257 Squadron

Based on the mechanical experience gained from the Merchant Navy locomotives, Bulleid incorporated his chain-driven valve gear into what became the new design.[9] This now-infamous component was unique in British locomotive design.[10] It gained notoriety because it was difficult to access when things went wrong and, in tandem with the fast-moving Bulleid steam reverser, could cause irregular valve movements.[9] The entire system was in a sealed oil bath, another unique design, that provided constant lubrication to the moving parts.[1]

The locomotive also carried a similar "air-smoothed" casing to the Merchant Navy class. This was not regarded as streamlining by Bulleid, a fact demonstrated by the flat front end.[1] Authorities differ as to the purpose of the casing. According to Creer it was intended to be an aid in cleaning the locomotive with carriage washers to reduce labour requirements during the post-war period,[11] whereas Bradley asserts that the intention was to lift the steam and exhaust gases away from the cab.[12] Because of their utilitarian appearance, enhanced by the flat, boxy casing, the class soon gained the nickname of their larger siblings, "Spam Cans", due to the resemblance to the distinctive tin cans in which "SPAM" was sold.[citation needed]

The smokebox was an integral part of the air-smoothed casing, being a sheet metal fabrication to the same profile as the firebox that acted as a former to maintain the shape of the casing.[12] In between, the casing was supported by channel-section steel crinolines (strengtheners used to maintain the shape) attached to the frames. The smokebox housed the five-nozzle Lemaître blastpipe arranged in a circle within a large-diameter chimney.[12]

As with the Merchant Navy class, electric lighting was provided on both locomotive and footplate, powered by a steam-powered generator below the footplate.[9] The gauges were lit by ultra-violet light. This enabled clearer night-time vision of the boiler steam pressure gauge and the brake pipe vacuum pressure gauge whilst eliminating dazzle, making it easier for the crew to see signals along the track.[9] Close attention was paid to the ergonomics of the cab, which was designed with the controls required for operation grouped according to the needs of both driver and fireman, thus promoting safe operation.[13] As an aid to the fireman, a treadle used steam pressure to open the firehole doors, where the coal is shovelled into the firebox.[9] The footplate was entirely enclosed, improving crew working conditions in winter. Other refinements and innovations used on the Merchant Navy class included steam-powered clasp brakes and the unusual 6 ft 2 in (1.88 m) Bulleid Firth Brown (BFB) wheels.[9]

Frames, boiler, cylinders and welded firebox[edit]

To increase the route availability over the Merchant Navy class, weight-saving came from the use of shorter frames.[7] This reduced the wheelbase to 35 ft 6 in (10.820 m), allowing the design to operate on routes where the Maunsell 2-6-0s were the largest permitted locomotives.[14] The boiler was similar in length to the Merchant Navy version, retaining the 280 psi (1.93 MPa) operating pressure and riveted construction.[15] The boiler was of slightly smaller diameter at the smokebox end, and the cylinders were smaller at 16.375 in × 24 in (416 mm × 610 mm).[16]

The inner and outer Belpaire firebox was smaller than the Merchant Navy class.[14] These were constructed using welded steel as opposed to the riveting that was more common practice, making for cheaper construction and easier maintenance.[16] Two welded steel Thermic syphons were implemented to improve water circulation between the boiler and the top of the firebox (the "crown").[9]

Tender[edit]

34016 Bodmin taking water at Alton

Bulleid designed a reduced capacity tender based upon the Merchant Navy version. It could carry 4,500 imp gal (20,460 L; 5,400 US gal) water and 5.00 long tons (5.1 t) of coal on a six-wheel underframe.[17] It retained the BFB wheels and streamlining panels, or "raves", that gave the top of the tender a similar cross-sectional outline to carriages.[1] As with the Merchant Navy class, the water tank was of welded sheet construction to save weight, and the tender was fitted with vacuum braking equipment of a clasp-type similar to that on the locomotive.[17] Four train-brake vacuum reservoirs of cylindrical construction were grouped on the tank top, behind the coal space.

Construction[edit]

For construction history of the class, see: List of SR West Country and Battle of Britain class locomotives

The first batch of twenty locomotives was ordered in April 1941, although the changes in design to the Light Pacific arrangement meant that production was delayed until late 1944.[8] Due to wartime contract work at Brighton works, the boilers were built under contract at the North British Locomotive Company.[16] Before the first of the class had been delivered, the order was increased to thirty, with a second batch of ten ordered in September 1944.[8] Deliveries from Brighton works began in May 1945 with prototype No. 21C101 Exeter, and proceeded at the rate of about two locomotives per month.[8] The class was gradually run in on the Central Section until October 1945, when they were successfully trialled on Plymouth and Kentish services. By the time the first fifteen had entered traffic a further order of fifteen was placed, with these entering service between June and October 1946.[17] From this batch onwards, traction was improved by the addition of steam sanding to the front driving wheel, with covers added to protect the motion from sand falling from the filler pipes.[18]

A third batch of twenty-five was ordered and designated the Battle of Britain class. These were identical to the West Country class and the new designation was purely concerned with giving the locomotives names that befitted their intended allocation to the Eastern Section.[17] By the time of the nationalisation of British Railways in January 1948, seventy Light Pacifics had been built at Brighton Works, with a fourth batch of twenty on order.[19] There was a delay in production during the first three months of British Railways control but the last twenty ordered by the Southern Railway entered traffic between April 1948 and February 1949.[19]

In March 1949, British Railways ordered a final 20 from Brighton works despite a pressing need for smaller tank locomotives.[20] This imbalance was rectified by building forty-one examples of the LMS Fairburn 2-6-4T for the Southern Region.[20] Also at this time Brighton works staff were embroiled in the difficulties associated with Bulleid's experimental and problematic Leader class.[20] As a result, Brighton sought assistance from the other Southern Region works to complete this final order. Ashford works cut the frames and constructed the tenders, and Eastleigh works constructed six of the final batch of locomotives.[20]

34110 66 Squadron, the last of the class built, leaving Salisbury in 1963

The completion of the final locomotive, No. 34110 66 Squadron, in January 1951 was delayed for several months pending consideration of proposals from British Railways management for a major modification to a standard two-cylinder design without the chain-driven valve gear.,[20] but the locomotive entered service as Bulleid intended.

Subsequent modifications[edit]

The first six locomotives were initially fitted with plywood sheeting over the cab-side windows as a wartime material-saving measure, with No. 21C107 Wadebridge the first to receive glass windows.[21] Two of the front route indicator irons (of which there are five) were originally located on the smoke deflectors, which meant that the indicator discs stood proud of the casing. This necessitated a trial relocation to the smokebox door at the three and nine o'clock positions on No. 21C109 Lyme Regis, and fitted as standard from No. 21C118 Axminster onwards.[21] The batch constructed between June and October 1946 received a modified steam regulator and LMS-style parallel buffer casings.[17]

As with the Merchant Navy class, they were fitted with a new design of cab front spectacle plates from mid–1947 due to poor forward visibility. The small windows on the front face of the cab were redesigned to an angled profile, giving improved visibility to the driver. This was a feature fitted to all Bulleid-designed locomotives post-nationalisation.[11] They were introduced in Britain in 1934 with the Gresley-designed Cock o' the North.[11] Over the next decade the revised design was fitted to existing members of the class.[22] Another modification was the reduction of boiler pressure to 250 psi (1.72 MPa) to reduce maintenance costs.[9]

The Southern Railway-built batches had a narrow 8 ft 6 in (2.591 m) footplate due to the width-restricted Hastings Line between Tonbridge and Hastings[23] but these were never used on this duty and the cab was widened to 9 ft (2.743 m) on the British Railways batch.[24] The tenders of Nos. 21C166–21C170 were fitted with TIA ("Traitement Integral Armand") chemical feed-water equipment that precipitated scale-forming constituents in the hard water of southern England into a non-adhesive mud that could be cleared using a manual "blow-down" valve.[25] This equipment was retrospectively fitted to earlier members of the class. In 1948 the tender design was enlarged to provide a water capacity of 5,500-imperial-gallon (25,000 L; 6,610 US gal).[19]

To ease maintenance and lubrication, panels of air-smoothed casing ahead of the cylinders were removed from 1952, and the front sanders were blanked off.[9] This coincided with the removal of the tender "raves" on all but five locomotives, as they obstructed the packing of coal into the bunker and restricted the driver's view when reversing.[26] The resultant "cut-down" tender included new, enclosed storage for fire-irons and glass spectacle plates to protect the crew from flying coal dust when running tender-first.[27]

When the rebuilding programme (see below) was halted in 1961, further modifications were made to the unrebuilt locomotives. The most notable was on No. 34064 Fighter Command, which was fitted with a Giesl ejector in 1962 on the grounds that a desired spark arrestor would "suffocate" an ordinary blastpipe.[28] Following some adjustment, the ejector improved smoke deflection and fuel consumption, allowing it to steam well with low-grade coal.[29] As a consequence of the positive experience with No. 34064, preserved No. 34092 City of Wells was similarly fitted in the mid-1980s.[30]

Numbering and naming the locomotives[edit]

Bulleid employed the same idiosyncratic numbering scheme that he had used for the Merchant Navy class, beginning at No. 21C101 and reaching No. 21C170 at the time of nationalisation. His scheme was abolished by British Railways, which renumbered existing these 34001-34070 and new locomotives 34071-34110.

A 'West Country' class enamelled metal nameplate and shield mounted on flat metal casing covering the locomotive boiler. The nameplate comprises a scroll, and below this is a shield containing a picture of a coat-of-arms. A second scroll is below the shield, allowing identification as a member of the 'West Country class'.
Nameplate configuration 1:
West Country (34007 Wadebridge)

The first 48 members of the class were named after places in the West Country served by its trains or close to its lines. This represented a publicity success due to many of the locomotives being able to visit their namesake areas.[31] Many 'West Country' locomotives sported an additional plaque with the coat of arms of the town or region the locomotive was named after. This plaque was mounted on the casing between the gunmetal locomotive nameplate and the West Country Class scroll, above the middle driving wheel.[31] Several members of the class had only the nameplate and the "West Country Class" scroll, a gap being left where a crest would have been mounted.[32] The background of the nameplate was usually painted red, though sometimes examples could be found in black if the locomotive works undertaking overhaul of the engine could not locate the correct colour paint.[33]

A 'Battle of Britain' class enamelled metal nameplate and crest mounted on flat metal casing covering the locomotive boiler. The nameplate forms a representation of aircraft wings, with a small rectangle attached to the middle-lower edge allowing identification as a member of the 'Battle of Briain' class. Below this is an oval-shaped plate with a crest.
Nameplate configuration 2:
Battle of Britain (34081 92 Squadron)

Once it became clear that the locomotives would be used further afield than the West Country, a decision was made to name the remainder after RAF squadrons, airfields, commanders and aircraft that had participated in the Battle of Britain over Kent, Surrey and Sussex.[17] 'Battle of Britain' nameplates incorporated the name of the locomotive with the class name below, in a design that resembled the wings of an aircraft. This was painted Air Force blue, though other colours were sometimes substituted for the same reasons as above.[34] An enamelled crest of the aircraft, personality or squadron was placed below the nameplate, in the same position as the West Country class equivalent.

The first locomotives constructed by British Railways were of the Battle of Britain class, but the naming policy reverted to the West Country for Nos. 34091–34108.[35] The final two locomotives were Battle of Britain class, No. 34109 Sir Trafford Leigh-Mallory and No. 34110 66 Squadron. The result of the delay in completing was that the squadron crest for 66 Squadron was never made, as the manufacturer had retired during the intervening period.[35] Thus 66 Squadron was the only Battle of Britain class member not to have a crest.

Operational details[edit]

The original intention was to base the first batch of locomotives at Exmouth Junction depot at Exeter for use on the West of England Main Line to Salisbury and Plymouth, and secondary lines to Barnstaple, Bude and other holiday resorts in Devon and Cornwall.[2] By the winter of 1945, there was a more pressing need for them on Kent Coast services.[21] The class also began to be used on Continental Boat Trains to and from Dover and Folkestone once these were resumed in 1946.[25] Later batches were used on cross-country services such as the Brighton to Bournemouth, Cardiff and Plymouth trains or the Somerset and Dorset Joint Railway trains from Bournemouth to Wells and Bath.[2]

Because of the good route availability the locomotives could be used on non-electrified lines between London and Brighton.[19] These included the Oxted Line, and occasionally the Bluebell Line between East Grinstead and Lewes, where they were also used for freight and parcels traffic, and excursion trains over electrified lines.[2] Thus the original intention for the West Country class locomotives to work in South West England and the Battle of Britain class in Kent, Hampshire, Sussex and Surrey was never operationally practical and both classes were to be found all over the network.[9] The most important journey undertaken by a member of the class occurred on 30 January 1965, when No.34051 Winston Churchill hauled the funeral train of its namesake from Waterloo station to his final resting place, close to Blenheim Palace in Oxfordshire.[36]

Performance of the unrebuilt locomotives[edit]

34067 Tangmere working a Poole-Cardiff charter train west of Bath on 11 June 2011

As with the Merchant Navy class, they could generate great power using mediocre quality fuel, due largely to Bulleid's excellent boiler. They also ran smoothly at high speed, but they were also beset with the same technical problems of their larger sisters.[37] These may be summarised as follows:

  • Adhesion problems. The lighter loading on their driving axles meant that they were even more prone to wheelslip than the Merchant Navy class, requiring very careful control when starting a heavy train. Once underway they were noted for their free running, excellent steam production and rapid turn of speed.[9]
  • Maintenance problems. The chain-driven valve gear proved to be expensive to maintain and subject to rapid wear. Leaks from the oil bath onto the wheels caused oil to splash onto the boiler lagging.[9] Once saturated with oil, the lagging attracted coal dust and ash, which provided combustible material, and sparks from heavy braking would set the lagging on fire underneath the air-smoothed casing.[38] The fires were also attributed to oil overflowing from axlebox lubricators onto the wheels when stationary, to be flung upwards into the boiler lagging in service.[38] In either case, the local fire brigade would be called to put the fire out, with cold water coming into contact with the hot boiler causing stress to the casings. Many photographs show an un-rebuilt locomotive with warped casings, the result of a lagging fire.[1]
  • High fuel consumption. This was highlighted during the 1948 locomotive exchanges undertaken by British Railways, and very apparent at Exmouth Junction shed where the Light Pacifics burned 47.9 lb (21.73 kg) of coal per mile (13.5 kg/km) compared to 32 lb (14.51 kg) (9.02 kg/km) for the T9 class that they replaced.[39]
  • Restricted driver visibility due to the air-smoothed casing and soft steam exhaust from the multiple-jet blastpipe. The exhaust problem was never adequately resolved, and smoke continued to beat down onto the casing while moving, obscuring the driver's vision.[11] There was much experimentation in order to resolve this problem, with varying degrees of success, and photographic evidence shows the many guises of this project.[40]

Accidents and incidents[edit]

For the Lewisham rail crash, see the subsection below.
  • On 30 October 1959, locomotive No. 34020 Seaton was hauling a passenger train that overran signals and was derailed by trap points at St Denys, Hampshire.[41]
  • On 12 December 1950, locomotive No. 34022 Exmoor was hauling a passenger train that overran signals and was derailed by trap points at St Denys. Two people were injured.[42]
  • On 11 April 1961, locomotive No. 34040 Crewkerne was in a head-on collision with an electric multiple unit at Waterloo station, London after the latter overran signals. One person was killed and fourteen were injured.[43]
  • On 2 September 1961, locomotive No. 34045 Ottery St Mary was derailed by trap points at Bournemouth Central, Hampshire.[41]

The Lewisham railway disaster[edit]

Restricted driver visibility was mentioned in the report on the disastrous Lewisham rail crash on 4 December 1957 outside St John's railway station, in which 90 people were killed and 173 injured.[44] The driver of No. 34066 Spitfire had failed to see one yellow and one double-yellow "caution" signal in foggy conditions and was travelling too fast to stop when he saw a red signal,[45] and the train crashed into the back of a stationary local train. Members of the class were later fitted with Automatic Warning System equipment, a recommendation of the incident report; fitting of trackside equipment was already underway, but with priority given to routes equipped with semaphore signals, not electric "colour-light" signals as at Lewisham.[46]

The report on the disaster indicated that with the signals concerned being on the right hand side of the train, it was necessary, because of the limited visibility from the left hand side of a steam locomotive, for either the fireman to observe those signals (but with the driver being responsible for asking him to do so) or for the driver to cross over the footplate from his left hand driving position to observe them from the other side. In the event neither happened and neither looked out for the aspect of the signals. The report ascribed blame to the driver, but recommended that the class be fitted with wider windscreens to improve visibility, noting that in fog with less than 80 yards' visibility the three signals involved would not be visible at all from the driver's side of the footplate; however, it noted that even from a Schools class locomotive with its much smaller boiler, it would be unlikely that these signals could be seen from the driver's side in the dense foggy conditions of the incident.[47] The report did not suggest that poor lifting of smoke obstructed visibility.

Rebuilding[edit]

BR Rebuilt West Country/Battle of Britain classes[1]
A posed side-and-front view of the rebuilt form of the locomotive, standing in the sidings of a locomotive depot. The locomotive is of conventional appearance, with a visible boiler and no flat covering plates. Smoke deflectors are fitted at the front of the locomotive.
Preserved Rebuilt Battle of Britain class No. 34059 Sir Archibald Sinclair. at Sheffield Park, Bluebell Railway
Type and origin
Power type Steam
Designer R. G. Jarvis (after Oliver Bulleid)
Rebuilder SR Brighton/Eastleigh Works
Rebuild date 1955–1961
Number rebuilt 60
Specifications
Configuration 4-6-2 (Pacific)
Gauge 4 ft 8 12 in (1,435 mm)
Leading wheel
diameter
3 ft 1 in (0.940 m)
Driver diameter 6 ft 2 in (1.880 m)
Trailing wheel
diameter
3 ft 7 in (1.092 m)
Length 67 ft 4.75 in (20.54 m)
Locomotive weight 91.16 long tons (92.6 t)
Fuel type Coal
Fuel capacity 5.00 long tons (5.1 t)
Water capacity 5,200 imp gal (23,640 L; 6,240 US gal)
Boiler pressure 250 psi (1.72 MPa)
Firegrate area 38.25 sq ft (3.55 m2)
Cylinders 3
Cylinder size 16.375 in × 24 in (416 mm × 610 mm)
Performance figures
Tractive effort 27,720 lbf (123.3 kN)
Career
Operator(s) Southern Region of British Railways
Class BR: Rebuilt Light Pacifics
Power class
  • BR (June 1957): 7P5F
  • BR (November 1961): 7P6F
Locale Great Britain
Withdrawn 1964–1967

Due to the problems experienced with the class, and following the success of the rebuilt Merchant Navy class designed by R. G. Jarvis, British Railways ordered the rebuilding of sixty locomotives to a more conventional design at Eastleigh between 1957 and 1961.[48] The first locomotive to be rebuilt was No. 34005 Barnstaple, which adopted many features from the BR 'Standard' locomotive classes.[49] The casing was removed and replaced with conventional boiler cladding, boiler pressure reduced to 250 psi (1.72 MPa) and the chain-driven valve gear was replaced with modified Walschaerts valve gear fitted between the frames.[16] The rapid onset of the 1955 Modernisation Plan during the early 1960s meant that the remaining fifty locomotives were not rebuilt, and continued in as-built condition until withdrawal.[50]

Performance of the rebuilt locomotives[edit]

The rebuilding solved most of the maintenance problems whilst retaining the excellent features of the original design. Repair costs were reduced by up to 60%, and coal consumption was reduced by up to 8.4%.[51] However the Walschaerts valve gear made the rebuilds heavier and prone to hammerblow on the track, a complaint that was not evident with the original design.[1] The increased weight reduced their route availability, meaning that they could not be used on certain routes available to un-rebuilt examples, such as the line to Ilfracombe.[52]

Withdrawal[edit]

The electrification of the Chatham Main Line to Dover and Ramsgate in 1959 deprived the class of some of its work, as did the transfer of the lines west of Salisbury to the Western Region on 30 December 1962.[52] This resulted in the withdrawal of several unrebuilt locomotives stabled at Exmouth Junction shed in June 1963.[52] By the end of the year ten had been withdrawn, including the 12 year-old No. 34110 66 Squadron, having travelled only 600,000 miles.[53] Most of the unrebuilt locomotives were withdrawn over the next three years but seven survived until 1967 and the end of steam on the Southern Region.[52] Many rebuilt locomotives were withdrawn soon after their rebuilding. The first was No. 34028 Eddystone in May 1964, having run only 287,000 miles since rebuilding.[54] Other early withdrawals included No. 34109 Sir Trafford Leigh-Mallory which had only travelled 162,000 miles in the three and a half years since its rebuilding.[54]

Preservation[edit]

For location details and current status of the preserved locomotives, see: List of West Country and Battle of Britain class locomotives.
A side-and-rear view of a large 4-6-2 steam locomotive with flat metal side sheets, although some fittings are missing. It is without a tender and stored awaiting purchase for restoration.
34073 249 Squadron at Woodhams' Scrapyard in 1984

Had it not been for Woodham Brothers' scrapyard in Barry, South Wales, no rebuilt Light Pacifics would have been preserved.[9] Twenty still exist in varying states of preservation,[55] ten in original condition and ten rebuilds.[56] The class has proved to be useful for preservation societies due to its good route availability and ample power, with some having returned to the main line to haul special trains.[56] It is not certain that all of the preserved locomotives will be restored to working order due to the very poor condition some of them were in when purchased and the increasing cost of materials.[56]

Other relics of both classes that have survived are nameplates, which were removed towards the end of steam on the British Railways Southern Region in the 1960s. As a result, many exist in private collections, and several have been seen at auction, selling for several thousands of pounds.[16]


Number BR Number SR Name Shape Current Location Status
34007 21C107 Wadebridge Unrebuilt Mid Hants Railway Operational
34010 21C110 Sidmouth Rebuilt Herston Works, Swanage Awaiting Restoration
34016 21C116 Bodmin Rebuilt West Coast Railway's Carnforth Undergoing Mainline Standard Restoration
34023 21C123 Blackmoor Vale Unrebuilt Bluebell Railway Awaiting Overhaul
34027 21C127 Taw Valley Rebuilt Severn Valley Railway Nearing completion of overhaul
34028 21C128 Eddystone Rebuilt Swanage Railway Awaiting Overhaul
34039 21C139 Boscastle Rebuilt Great Central Railway Undergoing Overhaul
34046 21C146 Braunton Rebuilt Crewe Operational, Mainline Certified
34051 21C151 Winston Churchill Unrebuilt National Railway Museum Static Display
34053 21C153 Sir Keith Park Rebuilt Severn Valley Railway Operational
34058 21C158 Sir Frederick Pile Rebuilt Mid Hants Railway Undergoing Restoration
34059 21C159 Sir Archibald Sinclair Rebuilt Bluebell Railway Undergoing Overhaul
34067 21C167 Tangmere Unrebuilt West Coast Railway's Carnforth Operational, Mainline Certified
34070 21C170 Manston Unrebuilt Swanage Railway Operational
34072 257 Squadron Unrebuilt Herston Works, Swanage Undergoing Overhaul
34073 249 Squadron Unrebuilt West Coast Railway's Carnforth Undergoing Mainline Standard Restoration
34081 92 Squadron Unrebuilt Nene Valley Railway Undergoing Overhaul
34092 City of Wells Unrebuilt Keighley and Worth Valley Railway Operational, with plan to go on mainline
34101 Hartland Rebuilt North Yorkshire Moors Railway Undergoing Overhaul
34105 Swanage Unrebuilt Mid Hants Railway Undergoing Mainline Standard Restoration

Livery and numbering[edit]

Southern Railway[edit]

Livery was Southern Railway malachite green with "Sunshine yellow" horizontal lining. A circular cast brass plate with a red background on the smokebox door featured the word "Southern" and the date of manufacture.[57] Bulleid advocated a continental style of numbering, basing this upon his experiences at the French branch of Westinghouse Electric before the First World War, and his tenure in the rail operating department during that conflict. The Southern Railway number adapted the UIC classification system where "2" and "1" refer to the number of un-powered leading and trailing axles respectively, and "C" refers to the number of driving axles, in this case three.[58] However, since "21C" was the prefix already used by the Merchant Navy class, the suffix "1" was added; these locomotives carried numbers that started "21C1" followed by the individual two-digit identifier.[58]

British Railways[edit]

A front view of another 4-6-2 steam locomotive with a tender hauling carriages away from a station. The locomotive is one of the preserved rebuilt examples, and is newly restored.
Rebuilt Battle of Britain class 34059 Sir Archibald Sinclair, restored and running on the Bluebell Railway, pictured in Sheffield Park station, Sussex October 2009

Initial livery after nationalisation in 1948 was British Railways malachite green and "Sunshine yellow" lining and lettering, with British Railways on the tender. No. 34090 Sir Eustace Missenden, Southern Railway was given commemorative malachite green livery that included green-painted wheels with yellow rims and the early British Railways crest on the tender.[34] The Bulleid numbering system was temporarily retained on the first seventy locomotives with the addition of an "s" prefix (e.g. s21C101). The classes were given several power classifications in their careers, beginning with 6MT (Mixed Traffic) in 1949.[59] In December 1953 they were reclassified 7P 5FA, the "A" denoting brake power when used on unfitted (non-vacuum braked) goods trains.[60] The rebuilt locomotives retained this classification until all received the classification of 7P6F between November 1957 and November 1961.[61]

The locomotives were turned out in British Railways Brunswick green livery with orange and black lining with the British Railways crest on the tender side, after their first overhaul under new ownership. This was unlike the Merchant Navy class, which was initially turned out in British Railways experimental express passenger blue livery. By this stage, the Southern Railway-built locomotives were re-liveried and renumbered from 34001–34070.[61] The rebuilt locomotives were also in British Railways Brunswick green with orange and black lining, and crest on the tender side, whilst the nameplates were placed on a custom-made mounting on the running plate due to the absence of a flat surface.

Some of the locomotives had additional embellishments. No. 34050 Royal Observer Corps was presented with an ROC long-service medal in July 1961. The ceremony took place at Waterloo Station, and included Commandant ROC Air Commodore Wight-Boycott.[62] The cab side was given a representation of the medal and its ribbon, which was displayed until the engine was withdrawn from service and scrapped in the late 1960s. The original nameplate and crest were recovered and displayed in the entrance hall of ROC Headquarters at RAF Bentley Priory until 1996 when they were transferred to the RAF Museum at Hendon. Another locomotive that featured a second crest was 34067 Tangmere, which was given the airfield's crest for the cab side, as it did not feature on the nameplate crest.

Operational assessment[edit]

Rebuilt 34048 Crediton leading a double-headed Summer Saturday holiday express on the heavy gradients of the Somerset and Dorset Joint Railway in 1959

The class in both unrebuilt and rebuilt forms has been the subject of divergent opinions.[6] The use of welded steel construction and the various innovations that had not previously been seen in British locomotive design meant that the class earned Bulleid the title "Last Giant of Steam".[13] The constant concern for ease of maintenance and utility had not previously been seen on locomotives, whilst their efficient boilers represented the ultimate in British steam technology, the hallmark of a successful design.[63] Their light axle-loading also meant widespread use over the Southern network, and they were capable of fast running.

Despite these successes, the number of innovations introduced at the same time made the class unreliable and difficult to maintain. A great deal of money was wasted on resolving the problems of a class designed for duties that could have been undertaken by cheaper 2-6-2 or 4-6-0 mixed-traffic locomotives.[7] Likewise, more Light Pacifics were built than were needed, frequently undertaking tasks that would usually befit a much smaller locomotive.[9] A curious but common sight west of Exeter during the winter months was a Light Pacific hauling a local stopping service with a single carriage to destinations as diverse as Padstow and Wadebridge.[9] Finally, too much money was spent on the expensive rebuilding programme when dieselisation and modernisation meant the locomotives would have very limited lives in their new guise.[9]

Models[edit]

Kitmaster produced an unpowered polystyrene injection-moulded kit for 00 gauge from 1960. In late 1962, the brand was sold to Airfix, which resumed production in 1968. The moulds later passed to Dapol, which continues to produce the kit.[64] Hornby manufactures ready-to-run rebuilt and un-rebuilt examples of the class and caters for all the major detail variations. Graham Farish produces ready-to-run models in N gauge, and Dapol has announced its intention to produce models in N gauge, slated for release in May 2012. Hornby Dublo produced diecast metal "rebuilt" West Countries in the 1960s, and those became Triang-Wrenn, and ultimately Wrenn Railways. Wrenn produced air-smoothed versions and rebuilt versions, right through to their demise (and subsequent sale to Dapol) in the early 1990s.

References[edit]

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ a b c d e f g Herring (2000), pp. 160–161
  2. ^ a b c d Arlett (1989), p. 29–30
  3. ^ Fairclough & Wills (1970), p. 11
  4. ^ Fairclough & Wills (1970), p. 34
  5. ^ a b Whitehouse & Thomas (2002), p. 34
  6. ^ a b c d e Bradley (1976), p. 55
  7. ^ a b c d Whitehouse & Thomas (2002), p. 60
  8. ^ a b c d e Bradley (1976), p. 56
  9. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p Bulleids in Retrospect
  10. ^ Chain-driven valve gear diagram, retrieved April 13, 2007 Archived December 30, 2006 at the Wayback Machine
  11. ^ a b c d Creer & Morrison (2001), p. 13
  12. ^ a b c Bradley (1976), p. 10
  13. ^ a b Day-Lewis (1964), pp. 149–150
  14. ^ a b Bradley (1976), p. 57
  15. ^ Fairclough & Wills (1970), p. 5
  16. ^ a b c d e Glover (1965), p. 224
  17. ^ a b c d e f Bradley (1976), p. 59
  18. ^ Bradley (1976), p. 67
  19. ^ a b c d Bradley (1976), p. 74
  20. ^ a b c d e Bradley (1976), p. 76
  21. ^ a b c Bradley (1976), p. 58
  22. ^ Bradley (1976), pp. 60–61
  23. ^ Fairclough & Wills (1970), p. 10
  24. ^ Southern E-Group (2004) Footplate sizes, retrieved April 13, 2007
  25. ^ a b Bradley (1976), p. 61
  26. ^ Southern E-Group (2004) Removal of raves, retrieved September 13, 2009
  27. ^ Southern E-Group (2004) Tender modifications, retrieved September 13, 2009
  28. ^ Nine Elms (2009) The Giesl experiment on 34064 Fighter Command, retrieved September 13, 2009
  29. ^ Nine Elms (2009) Locomotive crew recollections of Giesl-fitted No. 34064, retrieved September 13, 2009
  30. ^ Siviter (2003), p. 106
  31. ^ a b Burridge (1975), p. 72
  32. ^ Burridge (1975), p. 66
  33. ^ Burridge (1975), p. 68
  34. ^ a b Burridge (1975), pp. 72–78
  35. ^ a b Burridge (1975), p. 74
  36. ^ Southern E-Group (2004) 34051 preparing for Churchill's funeral train, retrieved April 13, 2007
  37. ^ Bradley (1976), pp. 66–70
  38. ^ a b Southern E-Group (2004) Bulleid MN "Merchant Navy" Class 4-6-2: Notes from a Bulleid Fundamentalist, Retrieved April 16, 2007. For the cause of the lagging fires which were common on both Merchant Navys and Light Pacifics.
  39. ^ Bradley (1976), p. 66
  40. ^ Creer & Morrison (2001), pp. 72–73
  41. ^ a b Trevena 1981, p. 43.
  42. ^ Bishop 1984, p. 55.
  43. ^ Earnshaw 1991, p. 40.
  44. ^ Langley 1958, p. 1.
  45. ^ Langley 1958, pp. 7-8.
  46. ^ Langley 1958, pp. 23-24.
  47. ^ Langley 1958, pp. 9,23-25.
  48. ^ Derry (2004), p. 70
  49. ^ Creer & Morrison (2001), pp. 84–87
  50. ^ Southern E-Group (2004) Discontinuation of rebuilding programme, retrieved April 13, 2007
  51. ^ Bradley (1976), p. 97
  52. ^ a b c d Arlett (1989), p. 32
  53. ^ Bradley (1976), p. 88
  54. ^ a b Bradley (1976), p. 102
  55. ^ Arlett (1989), p. 150
  56. ^ a b c Langston (2008), p. 115
  57. ^ Harvey (2004), p. 93
  58. ^ a b Burridge (1975), p. 60
  59. ^ Ian Allan Abc 1949 "WC/BB"
  60. ^ Ian Allan Abc 1954 "WC/BB"
  61. ^ a b Ian Allan Abc 1958–59 "WC/BB"
  62. ^ Medal ceremony
  63. ^ Whitehouse & Thomas (2002), p. 47
  64. ^ Knight (1999), pp. 7, 9, 26–27, 46, 66, 69

Bibliography[edit]

  • Arlett, Mike: The Train Now Departing: Personal memories of the last days of steam (London: BBC Books, 1989) ISBN 0-563-20696-9
  • Bradley, D. L.: Locomotives of the Southern Railway: Part 2, (London:Railway Correspondence and Travel Society, 1976) ISBN 0-901115-31-2
  • Bulleids in Retrospect, Transport Video Publishing, Wheathampstead, Hertfordshire
  • Burridge, Frank: Nameplates of the Big Four (Oxford Publishing Company: Oxford, 1975) ISBN 0-902888-43-9
  • Creer, S. & Morrison, B.: The Power of the Bulleid Pacifics (Oxford Publishing Company: Oxford, 2001) ISBN 0-86093-082-3
  • Day-Lewis, S: Bulleid, Last Giant of Steam (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1964)
  • Derry, Richard: The Book of the West Country and Battle of Britain Pacifics (Irwell Press, 2004) ISBN 1-903266-23-8
  • Earnshaw, Alan (1991). Trains in Trouble: Vol. 7. Penryn: Atlantic Books. ISBN 0-906899-50-8. 
  • Fairclough, T. & Wills, A.: Southern Steam Locomotive Survey: Bulleid Light Pacifics (Kings Langley: Enterprise Transport Books Ltd., 1970) ISBN 0-85153-272-1
  • Glover, F. Graham: 'British Locomotive Design, 1923–1947' (The Railway Magazine, 1965 (March)), pp. 222–225
  • Harvey, R. J.: Bulleid 4-6-2 Merchant Navy Class (Locomotives in Detail series volume 1) (Hinckley: Ian Allan Publishing, 2004), ISBN 0-7110-3013-8
  • Herring, Peter: Classic British Steam Locomotives (Abbeydale Press: London, 2000) Section "WC/BB Class" ISBN 1-86147-057-6
  • Ian Allan ABC of British Railways Locomotives, winter 1949 edition
  • Ian Allan ABC of British Railways Locomotives, winter 1954 edition
  • Ian Allan ABC of British Railways Locomotives, winter 1958–59 edition
  • Knight, Stephen: Let's Stick Together: An Appreciation of Kitmaster and Airfix Railway Kits (Clophill: Irwell Press, 1999) ISBN 1-871608-90-2
  • Langston, Keith: British Steam Preserved: Illustrated Comprehensive Listing of Ex-British Railways Steam Locomotives (Horncastle: Morton's Media Group Ltd., 2008)
  • Langley, Brig. C.A. (1958). Report on the collision which occurred on 4th December 1957 near St Johns station, Lewisham (Report). Her Majesty's Stationery Office. http://www.railwaysarchive.co.uk/documents/MoT_Lewisham1957.pdf. Retrieved 16 December 2013.
  • Siviter, Roger: Mainline Steam in the 1980s (Sutton Publishing: Stroud, 2003) ISBN 0-7509-3391-7
  • The Railway Magazine (May, 2007), p. 85
  • Trevena, Arthur (1981). Trains in Trouble: Vol. 2. Redruth: Atlantic Books. ISBN 0-906899 03 6. 
  • Whitehouse, Patrick & Thomas, David St.John: SR 150: A Century and a Half of the Southern Railway (Newton Abbot: David and Charles, 2002)

External links[edit]