Submarine power cable

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Submarine power cables are major transmission cables for carrying electric power below the surface of the water.[1] These are called "submarine" because they usually carry electric power beneath salt water (arms of the ocean, seas, straits, etc.) but it is also possible to use submarine power cables beneath fresh water (large lakes and rivers). Examples of the latter exist that connect the mainland with large islands in the St. Lawrence River.

Contents

[edit] Design technologies

Most power systems use alternating-current. This is due mostly to the simplicity of the AC transformer, which allows AC voltages to be easily stepped up and down. When the voltage is stepped up, current through the line is reduced, and since resistive losses in the line are proportional to the square of the current, stepping up the voltage significantly reduces the resistive line losses. The lack of a simple DC transformer made DC systems impractical in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. As technology improved, DC transformers became possible, though even today they are much more complex than AC transformers. A DC transformer often consists of an oscillator or inverter to convert the DC to AC, an AC transformer to do the actual voltage stepping, and then a rectifier and filter stage to convert the AC back to DC.[2]

DC switch gear is also more expensive to produce, since arc suppression is more difficult. When a high voltage AC line is switched off, the voltage will arc across the switch contacts. Once the contacts get far enough apart, the arc will naturally extinguish itself since the voltage drops to zero twice during the AC sine wave cycle. Since DC is constant and doesn't cycle to zero, a DC switch will draw a much longer arc, and suppressing this arc requires more expensive switching equipment.[3]

DC power transmission does have some advantages over AC power transmission. AC transmission lines need to be designed to handle the peak voltage of the AC sine wave. However, since AC is a sine wave, the effective power that can be transmitted through the line is related to the root mean squared (RMS) value of the voltage, which for a sine wave is only 0.7 times the peak value. This means that for the same size wire and same insulation on standoffs and other equipment, a DC line can carry 1.4 times as much power as an AC line.[4]

AC power transmission also suffers from reactive losses, due to the natural capacitance and inductive properties of wire. DC transmission lines do not suffer reactive losses. The only losses in a DC transmission line are the resistive losses, which are present in AC lines as well.

For an overall power transmission system, this means that for a given amount of power, AC requires more expensive wire, insulators, and towers but less expensive equipment like transformers and switch gear on either end of the line. For shorter distances, the cost of the equipment outweighs the savings in the cost of the transmission line. Over longer distances, the cost differential in the line starts to become more significant, which makes high-voltage direct current (HVDC) economically advantageous.[5]

For underwater transmission systems, the line losses due to capacitance are much greater, which makes HVDC economically advantageous at a much shorter distance than on land.[6]

[edit] Operational submarine power cables

[edit] Alternating current cables

Alternating-current (AC) submarine cable systems for transmitting lower amounts of three phase electric power can be constructed with three-core cables in which all three insulated conductors are placed into a single underwater cable. Most offshore-to-shore wind-farm cables are constructed this way.

For larger amounts of transmitted power, the AC systems are composed of three separate single-core underwater cables, each containing just one insulated conductor and carrying one phase of the three-phase electric current. A fourth identical cable is often added in parallel with the other three, simply as a spare in case one of the three primary cables is damaged and needs to be replaced. This damage can happen, for example, from a ship's anchor carelessly dropped onto it. The fourth cable can substitute for any one of the other three, given the proper (and complicated) electrical switching system.

[edit] Direct current cables

[edit] Longest

[edit] Proposed submarine power cables

[edit] See also

[edit] References

  1. ^ a b c Underwater Cable an Alternative to Electrical Towers, Matthew L. Wald, New York Times, 2010-03-16, accessed 2010-03-18.
  2. ^ "Introduction to Modern Power Electronics" By Andrzej M. Trzynadlowski
  3. ^ "The electric power engineering handbook" By Leonard L. Grigsby
  4. ^ "Advances in high voltage engineering" By D. F. Warne, Institution of Electrical Engineers
  5. ^ "High voltage direct current transmission" By J. Arrillaga
  6. ^ "AC/DC: the savage tale of the first standards war" By Tom McNichol
  7. ^ http://www.basslink.com.au/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=58&Itemid=82
  8. ^ Bright Future for Long Island
  9. ^ http://af.reuters.com/article/energyOilNews/idAFL5E8CN25B20120123
  10. ^ Transmission Developers Inc. (2010-05-03), Application for Authority to Sell Transmission Rights at Negotiated Rates and Request for Expedited Action, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, p. 7, http://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/common/opennat.asp?fileID=12337760, retrieved 2010-08-02 
  11. ^ Territory study linking power grid between Puerto Rico and Virgin Islands
  12. ^ [1]
  13. ^ "Offshore Wind Power Line Wins Praise, and Backing" article by Matthew L. Wald in The New York Times October 12, 2010, Accessed October 12, 2010
  14. ^ "Historic hydro pact signed between N.L., N.S". CBC News. 2010-11-18. http://www.cbc.ca/canada/newfoundland-labrador/story/2010/11/18/nl-muskrat-deal-1118.html. 
  15. ^ [2]

[edit] External links

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Interaction
Toolbox
Print/export
Languages