User talk:Danger/Archive 12

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 5 ← Archive 10 Archive 11 Archive 12 Archive 13 Archive 14 Archive 15

There's a page that needs to be created

A Wiki page needs to be created for Carrie Underwood's fourth studio album, Blown Away. The tracklist, cover art, and many more details have already been revealved so there's suffiecient things to add into it's page. Nobody has made a page for it yet. I don't know how, so i was hoping you could do it or place the task on someone you know will do it.

Thank you, Gay4RKOGay4RKO (talk) 16:22, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

You still need to change your username, please. If you didn't get my previous message about it, it's in my talk archive. You can create an article using the article creation wizard, which will guide you through the process. If you can't manage that, you could put it onto the list of requested articles, which is massively backlogged, or simply wait for someone else to create it. She's a popular musician; it won't take long. Danger High voltage! 16:35, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Can you please

keep an eye on this IP. Owner of this IP deletes references without any proofs.--Gomada (talk) 11:45, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

COI templates

Hi, got your message regarding the username COI template. Are you only concerned with COI usernames that are editing only within two weeks of the present day? Are you not concerned about corporate-like usernames even if they have an intermittent editing habit? Just wondering if this is a policy issue or time/resource issue (ie. enough admins to enforce). Thanks. --Drm310 (talk) 22:23, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

My position is that only users who persist in editing after they've been warned that their username is against policy should be blocked. I think blocking on sight is unnecessarily bitey. Once the category I mentioned becomes large enough, it's no longer useful as a tracking category, so even if those warned users continue editing, we won't know about it by having them in the category.
There's nothing specific in the policy about this; some admins do block on sight for violations, some are more lenient than I am. It's pretty much a resource issue; there aren't enough admins inclined to block on sight to take care of all the promotional usernames and without a good way to track the accounts, we might as well just wait until they actually do edit again. Danger High voltage! 22:37, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
Fair enough, thanks for the explanation. I think I will still flag those usernames, if only to dissuade them from future editing and hopefully motivate them to change their username. I'll check their editing history and remove them from CAT:UAA if their last edits were more than two weeks old. --Drm310 (talk) 04:41, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
Yes, by all means continue to flag them! I should have been clearer about that. Thanks for your work in this area; it is definitely appreciated. Danger High voltage! 08:00, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on User talk:Draeco/Dubin

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on User talk:Draeco/Dubin. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 13:15, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Regarding the Korean Prostitude issue

The whole Chinese section is the same thing as Human Trafficking and I don't know whey they try to keep it coming back again and again and again. Is there anyway to protect this page? Thanks (Smiling Demon Lord (talk) 16:59, 9 April 2012 (UTC))

Yes, you could ask on requests for page protection. Danger High voltage! 17:27, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks(Smiling Demon Lord (talk) 22:23, 9 April 2012 (UTC))

I tried and it was protected but they just coming back. even adding more Korea sources that I dont understand......god, this guy must have one brain cell onlySmiling Demon Lord (talk) 09:48, 11 April 2012 (UTC)


A kitten for you!

searching for light

Smiling Demon Lord (talk) 09:52, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Science lovers wanted!

Science lovers wanted!
Hi! I'm serving as the wikipedian-in-residence at the Smithsonian Institution Archives until June! One of my goals as resident, is to work with Wikipedians and staff to improve content on Wikipedia about people who have collections held in the Archives - most of these are scientists who held roles within the Smithsonian and/or federal government. I thought you might like to participate since you are interested in the sciences! Sign up to participate here and dive into articles needing expansion and creation on our to-do list. Feel free to make a request for images or materials at the request page, and of course, if you share your successes at the outcomes page you will receive the SIA barnstar! Thanks for your interest, and I look forward to your participation! Sarah (talk) 19:35, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

81.178.38.169

I wouldn't consider your revocation of the talk page access "rash", but I'd certainly prefer like a 1-month semi-protection instead.--Jasper Deng (talk) 05:46, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

It seems like there might be some unspoken frown-upon against revoking talk page access for IPs or something (otherwise why would one semi the page instead?). I'm just not sure and on further consideration I'd like someone more familiar with the norms of protection/IP blocking to take care of it. And thus do the backlogs never get cleared. Alas. Many apologies. I hope that the situation gets sorted eventually. If history holds, we have a few months before he graces us with his presence again. Danger High voltage! 06:54, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

HOW CAN SOMEONES BIO BE A COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT

HOW CAN SOMEONES BIO BE A COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT? THE BIO WAS PUT OUT BY THE ARTIST FOR PUBLIC USE. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Execdriz (talk • contribs) 00:32, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Please don't shout. Copy text from outside sources without compatible licenses is not allowed. Text that is published–including on the internet–is fully copyrighted unless it is explicitly released under a freer license (like your original contributions to Wikipedia). There was no evidence that the text you copied was released under a free license. I hope that clears up your question. Danger High voltage! 00:54, 23 April 2012 (UTC)


IM NOT SHOUTING. I JUST WRITE IN CAPS BECAUSE I HATE HOLDING THE SHIFT KEY AND THINGS LOOK PROPER IN ALL CAPS AS OPPOSED TO ALL LOWERCASE.SO WHATS THE BEST WAY TO PROVE TO YOU THAT THIS IS HIS BIO AND NOT AN ORIGINAL TEXT FROM THAT SITE YOU QUOTED.GOOGLE HIS NAME AND THAT BIO COMES UP ON NUMEROUS SITES. THE PAGE YOU REFERENCED WAS A PAGE FULL OF BIOS — Preceding unsigned comment added by Execdriz (talk • contribs) 01:16, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

The best way of proving it to him (or rather, to Wikipedia in general), is to have the correct person fill out the form at Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries, including all the necessary information, and email it to the email address on that page. And then reply sensibly to any replies you get, and wait as long as necessary... --Demiurge1000 (talk) 01:20, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
I could not have put it better than Demiurge. Danger High voltage! 01:45, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Mike Martinez

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Mike Martinez. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 14:15, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks.

Thanks for the speedy delete. VanIsaacWScontribs 06:46, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

You're welcome. Danger High voltage! 09:07, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Han dynasty - vandalism

Hi I have tried to find how to blockade vandal and revert his/her changes on page. But it is hard to do. Especially when you are not native speaker. User 24.16.71.52 destroyed feature article Han Dynasty. He/she edited very much changes without sense for example: Date of end of Han Dynasty 220 CE → 279 CE, date of reign of emperor Gaozu of Han form 202-195 → 202-175, Cao cao date of death 220 → 279. He/she enjoyed a lot or try to prove that wiki is unreliable source of information. It makes no sense to correct every change of that user and I want to back to version of article before vandalism. And try to stop vandal (blockade?). How to do it? Birkeen (talk) 12:05, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

The way to revert a lot of vandalism at once is to go into the page history (the "history" tab at the top of your screen) and find the last version before the vandalism started. Then, you click on the date of that version, so you're looking at the old version of the article. Then you click "edit" and you'll see a warning that says something like "you're editing an old version of this page. If you save, any changes made since then will be undone", which is good because that's what you want to do. Save the page, using an edit summary like "rv to clean version" or something like that. If you enable the gadget Twinkle on your preferences screen, there's also a way to do this with one click. You can find more information here.
To deal with a single vandal like in this case, you should make sure to warn them that they are not being helpful and that they can be blocked if they continue. If they keep vandalising, you can report them to the admin board. For more information, go here. I hope this makes sense and was helpful. Danger High voltage! 16:22, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
Thank you Birkeen (talk) 16:30, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Review Ellen van Dijk

Dear Danger, I saw on the Wikipedia:Peer review/volunteers page, that you're willing to review articles. I recently improved the article of Ellen van Dijk a lot , however I'm a novice on Wikipedia and I'm not a native speaker. Are you willing to review the article? Thank you in advance, Sander.v.Ginkel (talk) 18:33, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Help needed: Jayne Mansfield

Peers needed to peer review the article (here) on this peerless actor

A mid-importance article supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers that was reviewed by Version 1.0 Editorial Team and selected for Version 0.7 and subsequent release versions. The article has come a long way from a fan boy mish mash to a fair enough GA. Now is the time to take it to the next level. Currently it's going through another peer review. Serious help is needed to clean up the copy. PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE. Aditya(talk • contribs) 06:16, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Black mamba

Have you reached a decision on the Black mamba reassessment, it has been quite a months. AIRcorn (talk) 12:14, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Yes. I apologize; I wasn't sure when/how to close. Danger! High voltage! 18:34, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
Thanks. If you can give me more information on what parts of the instructions you found confusing I will have a go at simplifying them. AIRcorn (talk) 21:31, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
I guess the question I had was "when should one close an individual GAR and who does that". I'm at a loss to think of another wiki-process where the opener does the closing as well. Danger! High voltage! 21:48, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

A brownie for you!

Thanks for notifying me of my mistake in a respectful manner and tone! WheresTristan 00:16, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
OM NOM NOM NOM! Thank you! Danger! High voltage! 00:24, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Brian Camelio

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Brian Camelio. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 14:15, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Reporting a User

Danger,

Will you please review my request for WP:AIV for Urbshor? This user is on a quick vandal rampage and has once removed their name from the WP:AIV page. I noticed that you were the last one to comment on this page, so I thought I would contact you to see if you would be able to make a note of this quickly. Thank you. swinquest (talk) 18:38, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

Hi there. Sorry, I stepped out for a bit. It looks like TerriersFan has taken care of it with an indef block. Danger! High voltage! 19:18, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

{{Wikify}}

I'm sorry, I made a mistake. I accidentally repeated the word category in my edit request so Category:Category:Articles that need to be wikified with reasons given was created. Can you go back into {{Wikify/tutorial}} and change it to Category:Articles that need to be wikified with reasons given. I'm sorry about the extra trouble. Ryan Vesey Review me! 22:20, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

No trouble at all. I really should have caught that myself. Danger! High voltage! 16:54, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Special Barnstar
Thanks for your contributions, Danger. SwisterTwister talk 03:34, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
Thank you! Danger! High voltage! 08:54, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Deletion of 'The Indian Chamber of Commerce Hong Kong'

Hi,

I saw that you deleted the Indian Chamber of Commerce Hong Kong page I had created last night. I agree that the contents were copied and it was intended that way. We are trying to get the ICCHK page on the Wikipedia. How do I ensure that you dont delete again? Will an official mail from the Secretary General of ICCHK confirm that the intent was bona fide. Even I dont intend to repeat the text and working on more elaborate contents. I wanted to keep the basic placeholder while we are working on other contents.

Since I am new to Wikipedia editing, I am not sure if I should be leaving my email on this talk page. My login is associated with my personal id and feel free to drop a note.

Regards, Ajay — Preceding unsigned comment added by Insomnya (talk • contribs) 03:49, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Hello Ajay, yes, this is a good place to leave a message. If you would like to donate the text, you should follow the directions here. However, it is unlikely that the text the ICCHK uses is appropriate for a Wikipedia article and it's also unlikely that the ICCHK is an appropriate topic for a Wikipedia article. I'm also concerned that you may have a conflict of interest regarding the ICCHK and encourage you to read this page on how to proceed if you have a conflict of interest on a topic that you'd like to write about. Best, Danger! High voltage! 05:05, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Cto

Template:Cto has been nominated for deletion. Template:Cto creates a conditional topic overview linkbox for the See also section of an article with links to (1) the topic article, (2) the outline of the topic, (3) the index of topic-related articles, (4) the bibliography of the topic, and (5) the Wikipedia book on the topic. You are invited to comment on the discussion at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion#Template:Cto. Yours aye,  Buaidh  20:00, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Black Mamba

Hi! Sorry to disturb you.

I've put my suggestions on the talk page of the black mamba article, where I believe there're several problems existing, for a long time but it seems that no one gives a response.

So, may I have your comments there so that I can know if the suggestions are valid or not.

Thank you and sorry to add such work for you.

User:Toxic Walker (talk) 0:08, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

Uploading images

When uploading an picture of a toy, that I have taken with my camera. Do I upload it as "my own work"? Or which license type do I use? Kind regards. — ıʇɐʞǝɐdʌɐиƭɐqǝoɟʎouɹqoɐʇ [✉] 03:05, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Strangely enough, toys are generally copyrighted. So you would have to upload it under fair use, if it qualifies. You would tag it with {{Non-free fair use in}} and add a rationale. Danger! High voltage! 07:02, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
Ah ok, thank you for your help. — ıʇɐʞǝɐdʌɐиƭɐqǝoɟʎouɹqoɐʇ [✉] 21:36, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Please comment at Ya Kun Kaya Toast's ongoing peer review!

Since you have listed yourself as a peer review volunteer interested in copyediting articles, would you like to support the quest to counter systemic bias on Wikipedia by giving a thorough review of the short, but interesting, article about Ya Kun Kaya Toast, a multinational kaya toast chain and Singaporean cultural icon? Thanks! 谢谢！Terima kasih! நன்றி! --J.L.W.S. The Special One (talk) 10:09, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

My RfA

Thank you for participating in my RfA. I really appreciate that you took the time to consider me as a candidate, and the effort you put into offering me advice for next time.

I remember seeing you at my second editor review. Still haven't actually given 3O or dispute resolution a shot, but I have every intention of doing so, you know, just to give it a go. Who knows? I might well find something else I enjoy on this project besides article work.

Take care. =) Master&Expert (Talk) 12:04, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

User talk:Alive Party Bus

Why when [1] and [2]? Just so I know for next time. Thanks. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 22:07, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

I usually don't bother blocking promotional accounts that haven't been active in over a week and didn't persist after being warned. This is kind of a borderline case, I guess, since they did make one edit after you left them a note. Danger! High voltage! 22:13, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Fair enough. Many thanks. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 22:17, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Need previous version of photo deleted.

Hi I need some help with a photo I uploaded. Is there a way you could delete all the previous version of the photo I uploaded except the newest one (which is being used in the article) It's just duplicate unneccesary copies of the photo.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Clairecorletteverfreenw2012.jpg

Just delete all the photos except Current 16:33, August 23, 2012

Thanks. Meme3234 (talk) 22:24, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Don't shoot!

Thanks - I was sure it was 'art spam' - or intended to be... Peridon (talk) 23:03, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Heh. I've never heard the term art spam; I like it. Danger! High voltage! 23:13, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Barnstar

The Barnstar of Good Humor
For this unblock denial. — Daniel Case (talk) 14:55, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

User page

Can I get my user page back yet? It's been over 3 years now.--Otterathome (talk) 10:32, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

What? Danger! High voltage! 17:07, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Hey parent...

...been a while but I could do with a check of this, with respect to this policy Fayedizard (talk) 19:29, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

That's a mighty display of patience. Words fail me sometimes when viewing such incomprehensible disputes. I think you're handling it well. Danger! High voltage! 21:53, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 08 October 2012

Microscopic whales

I liked 65.130.176.190 's contribution to sperm whale.[3] Didn't stop me from reverting him, but it was pretty good. As is his feedback that cats are intergalactic pop tart travelers. On a serious note, how much vandalism is needed before blocking someone like this? Just curious. TheBlueCanoe (talk) 03:07, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

The standard is four warnings. I think this is unnecessary in cases of blatant vandalism and would give this user levels two, three, and four warnings before blocking. Danger! High voltage! 14:11, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 October 2012

Please comment on User talk:Homunq/WP voting systems

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on User talk:Homunq/WP voting systems. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 18:15, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

Greetings (heading added by Danger)

hey!! Ketaki Pole 17:31, 22 October 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ketaki Pole (talk • contribs)

Hello. Can I help you with something? Danger! High voltage! 21:50, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Kupdung's talk page

Don't worry, I've fixed it. (It was hilarious while it lasted...)

I'm mentioning that here rather than there because for some reason he's asked me not to post on his talk page. That won't stop me pilfering the remains of the gin off his page, though. Cheers! --Demiurge1000 (talk) 21:12, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

  • blinks* What is that I don't even... though if anyone is going to hand out trout, it should be Kudpung. Enjoy the gin; if it runs out, there's much more where that bottle came from. Danger! High voltage! 21:56, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
There's another one today. In deference to my having banned Demiurge from my page for PA, I won't leave him any messages, but if he is behind this disruption in any way, he's going to find himself on a short leash. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:01, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
Looks like Mediran copied your talk page header template and forgot to modify the talk page link. Danger! High voltage! 02:24, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
Yes I did, I copied some regarding the link, it has slipped on my mind to modify it because I'm in a hurry. Sorry for that but thanks for reminding me! Mediran talk to me! 02:41, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
While I'm flattered that my talk page header has been copied for the 17th time, it would be nice if Mediran could perhaps apologise to me. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:04, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

A brownie for you!

Thanks for your concern and for whacking me a wet trout! Have a nice day! :) Mediran talk to me! 02:38, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Copying

thanks for letting me know that if I copy material from a wiki page into my sandbox, I have to reference it. does this apply if I don't plan on using the copied material in my edited version? Qwertyasdf99 (talk) 01:03, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Yes, just in case. *shrug* It's just one of those things. :-) Danger! High voltage! 01:05, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Rape and pregnancy controversies in the 2012 United States elections

I wanted to see if you would help provide general edits for Rape and pregnancy controversies in the 2012 United States elections. Your name was listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Feminism as someone to contact to help with general edits. I would like to improve this article and wanted to ask you for assistance. Casprings (talk) 18:04, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

I'll take a look, but I would suggest asking at least one other editor to do so as well; I'm not confident in my ability to be strictly impartial on this topic and I might unintentionally overlook biased wording. Also, US Thanksgiving is this week, so I won't be able to get to this until next week. Danger! High voltage! 03:28, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Thank you. Any suggestions on who to ask? Thanks again for taking a look. Casprings (talk) 03:31, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
I would ask, in this order, Roscelese, Cindamuse, Gobonobo, or Wadewitz. (Ordered in by how interested I think they would be in the task.) I have immense respect for all these editors and I think any of them would do an excellent job. Danger! High voltage! 19:41, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
Thank you. I will contact at least one. Casprings (talk) 22:53, 19 November 2012 (UTC)


I started a discussion on this at WP:ORN on user:Arzel edits on Rape and pregnancy controversies in United States elections, 2012. It can be found here. Thanks for your help in the articleCasprings (talk) 00:49, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Crescat scientia...

... vita excolatur, eh? --Orange Mike | Talk 18:34, 18 December 2012 (UTC) (x' 1972)

Eh, it's not the world's worst motto, nor the world's worst mascot. Booth, I take it? Danger! High voltage! 18:41, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
Gods, no! I was a hippie-hick from a tiny rural public school that thought you were lucky to get into Memphis State, and ambitious to the point of hubris if you aspired to Vanderbilt; I was all starry-eyed about Prof. Masaryk, the squash court, Fritz Leiber, etc. I got the legendary U of C lack of support and help for freshmen, crashed and burned quietly but painfully, and didn't get my B.A. until 33 years later, at UW-Milwaukee. --Orange Mike | Talk 20:41, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
It is where fun goes to die. Sadly, I never managed to have money on hand when a particularly popular t-shirt was on sale; it depicted a cartoon Brontosaurus labeled "UofC" stomping on a cartoon human labeled "my soul". I'm glad you got better. It has, I think, gotten better. I had many professors who didn't outright mock students and was only told once by a professor that I was too stupid to be there. They've even got counseling and advisers now! Thank heavens for the UWs. Danger! High voltage! 21:42, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

A brownie for you!

Thank you for your work in the Articles for creation. Your efforts are indispensable. Happy editing! ComputerJA (talk) 19:23, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
Thank you. Brownies are my favorite. Danger! High voltage! 21:43, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

Actually,

On the removal of the alleged 'harassment'. He is my best friend, we wrote it together for a school Wikipedia reliability project. Though we have succeeded in proving the uptight maintenance of Wikipedia by its users, we can and WILL not guarantee the ceasing of future edits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jewnicorn592 (talk • contribs) 05:25, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

Re uptight maintenance: You're welcome. Remember the next time you're cribbing paragraphs for your term papers off of Wikipedia, it's uptight people who make sure that you're not turning in a paper replete with random insertions of "penis" and "poo". Danger High voltage! 05:43, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
I just saw this as I was working my way to the bottom. ;o) Very nicely phrased. My favorte might be the since-removed spam verbiage in the IBM Blue Genie-line Top 500 (or 100?) supercomputer. The defacement (vandalism?) said that that the O/S it ran on was Windows 95. I giggle at that just thinking about it! Oh, and the talk page for the somewhat silly 68-95-99 article (or is it 67.6-96.4-99.? article?) has a silly joke about being a 3-smegma outlier. --FeralOink (talk) 03:21, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

Article that you cleaned up

This is terribly sketchy. I just wanted you to know that you did a good job on that British rock band Afc which I rejected. I wanted to let you know that I left a message for the author, user Barry Shrimpton, with much more detail about what I was objecting to, as I didn't realize the problem with the 31 seemingly missing reference links that weren't truly missing. I am in a very big hurry right now, must empty dishwasher and cook dinner else will be in trouble. Sorry for brevity, dropped articles! --FeralOink (talk) 05:04, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

Thank you! I had to do a double take; I've never seen references listed like that, but, oh well. Thanks for leaving Shrimpton a note. Good luck with the dinner; if you celebrate Christmas, merry Christmas to you. Danger High voltage! 16:38, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the useful feedback

Just wanted to say thank you for pointing me in the right direction and providing some quality feedback. Appreciate you and your work! AChrisTurner (talk) 18:30, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Thank you. If you do decide to write about the case, WikiProject SCOTUS cases has a WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases/Style guide that might be relevant to you. Most of the text you've already written seems like it could be copied over into a new article. Danger High voltage! 18:46, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
That sounds like something I would like to do. I will research a few more secondary references and change the focus. AChrisTurner (talk) 19:33, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Morabito scheme

I have inserted 2 sources. can be published now? Thanks http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Morabito_scheme — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.54.36.65 (talk) 20:27, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Given that the word "Morabito" doesn't even appear in your first reference, no. You have to provide sources that actually talk about the topic. Danger High voltage! 23:24, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

Redirect request, Danger or stalkers

Thanks for moving Bay of Saint Louis into main space so quickly.

I forgot to request redirects on the form. Can you, or one of your talk-page stalkers, create these redirects:

Thanks!

--68.107.134.74 (talk) 16:43, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Done. Danger High voltage! 17:00, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Thanks. --68.107.134.74 (talk) 17:01, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

reply to today's Thanks

That was intriguing, including with the reverting. Thank you. If it was plagiarized from Wikipedia, I hope for the best. There are more contributions coming, including a large one that I hope to have ready in a few months. Nick Levinson (talk) 17:14, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Ah, I look forward to seeing that work. The plagiarism: just someone trying to pass of your Wikipedia research as their own in a forum discussion, nothing particularly long lasting or extensive. The revert: well, sometimes I don't practice the best pseudonym hygiene and having my internet personas linked would be rather unfortunate. Danger High voltage! 17:39, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

RaykGlobal Page declined

Thanks for your review on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:A326150512/RaykGlobal !

I wrote this article with a mere purpose to introduce an organization with the tag "RaykGlobal", therefore I would want to keep this article short and simple and easy to read, which led to the references to be a few. Much like this article(perhaps) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SKB_Cases In the meantime I was hoping this would enrich the wiki China Business project, I would like to take more time to enhance the references in the future, but for now I deleted all the "top page references" as editer Danger informed.


Once again, thanks for all your time to edit this!

A326150512 (talk) 04:13, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for alerting me to the existence of the SKB Cases article. It does not appear to meet Wikipedia's standards for inclusion and I have nominated it for deletion. It is not a good model for an article that you are trying to create.
Reliable sources are required in all articles. Danger High voltage! 06:23, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/The_known_stranger

This is the page i have been trying to create to increase the awareness of my debut novel which has been nominated to Commonwealth book Prize by the Publisher. Despite several attempts the page submission has been declined what should i do more? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.213.200.13 (talk) 11:15, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

First, it is not appropriate to use Wikipedia to promote your book. All article subjects are required to be "notable", which is Wikipedia jargon for "has been written about in independent sources" and not a statement of the quality or importance of the subject. If the book has not been covered in the press and has not actually won any prizes, I suggest that you do not continue editing this draft, as it is extremely unlikely that it will be accepted. I would hate for you to waste your time. Danger High voltage! 06:26, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Udhao film article deleted....

Hello, my article Udhao was deleted. I am the director and I wrote that article for my film. I cpied the summary from our facebook page, both which is my writing. i can change that information in new words, but please reinstate the article I worked really hard on it. I would be frustrated if I had to do it again. Thanks. -Amit Ashraf Udhao Movie (talk) 18:50, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Hello Mr. Ashraf. Please read our guide for editors with a conflict of interest. Creating articles about your own work is strongly discouraged. I suggest that you make a request for someone else to create an article about your film at Requested Articles. There are many editors here interested in Indian cinema who may write that article. Danger High voltage! 19:23, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Sam Toney

Dr. Sam Toney was born in Pensacola, Florida on August 1st 1958. He graduated magna cum laude with a B.S. degree in Biology from the University of South Alabama in 1980. Dr. Toney received his M.D. degree from the University of South Alabama College of Medicine in 1984 and went on to complete his residency in Psychiatry at the University of South Florida in 1988. He began his career in the private practice of general adult psychiatry with a clinical focus on anxiety disorders in Tampa, Florida. Dr. Toney then pursued a career in administrative medicine by founding Place One Counseling Center in 1989. Place One provided multidisciplinary behavioral health care for the Tampa Bay Area. In 1992 Dr. Toney was recruited as Medical Director for Mental Health Programs which was later acquired by the Comprehensive Care Company CompCare/(Accesscare, Inc.) where he continued as National Medical Director and Vice President of Clinical Operations. In 1995 Dr. Toney was recruited to establish the Florida office of the Heritage Medical Group based in Bakersfield, California. After serving as president of Heritage Southeast Medical Group for one year he then founded Health Integrated (CMS HealthCare) in 1996. Dr. Toney continues to serve as Vice Chairman and Chief Medical Officer for Health Integrated to the present. In his capacity as Chief Medical Officer at Health Integrated, Dr. Toney has developed several integrated care management programs, medical necessity criteria sets and ROI methodologies. Dr. Toney is licensed to practice medicine in 27 states and is also board-certified in Utilization Review and Quality Assurance. Dr. Toney also serves on several medical advisory boards across the country and is a nationally recognized public speaker in the area of integrated care management. He served on the faculty of the Harvard School of Medicine's conference on Care Coaching in 2009 and has published a number of peer reviewed articles on integrated care coaching. Dr. Toney also has over 20 years experience in the music industry and has composed and produced for a variety of recording artists. His credits include the dance oriented composition "Stay in Love" performed by recording artist Mon a Q which went on to chart in Billboard magazine in 1997. He is the founder of Tone 1 Records ( a division of the Tone 1 Music Group), an independent record label based in Odessa, Florida.


http://welltekinc.com/investor-relations/leadership.php

http://www.healthintegrated.com/team.html

http://cme.med.harvard.edu/cmeups/pdf/02914207.pdf

http://www.amcp.org/data/jmcp/JMCPSupp%20A_N-D%2007_S16-S22.pdf

http://www.catasyshealth.com/PDF/Care_Coaching-An_Alternative_Approach_to_Managing_Comorbid_Depression.pdf

http://www.tone1music.com

http://www.discogs.com/artist/Sam+Toney

http://www.billboard.com/charts/dance-club-play-songs#/artist/mon-a-q/260391


Tag PC (talk) 20:57, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

If you'd like to resubmit your article to Articles for Creation, please do that on the original article page. Danger High voltage! 05:20, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Copyright

Hello, my name is Keith L T Alexander, and my submission about my book Forgery of the Month Club was rejected by wikipedia on copyright infringement grounds. However, I own the publisher Seaborn Assets,LLC which owns the copyright and hereby grant myself permission to use any part of the description contained on Amazon.com on wikipedia. If this will satisfy wikipedia, please approve my submission forthwith and enjoy my thanks. very truly yours, keith lt alexander ChiefChief4444 (talk) 14:21, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

The copyright requirements for Wikipedia are a much stricter than that; content on Wikipedia must be available for use by anyone for any purpose. Furthermore, unless Seaborn Assets owns the copyright to the description, you can't donate it to Wikipedia.
You should also know that it is highly unlikely that a self-published e-book will be suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia. For more information about inclusion criteria for books, see here. Danger High voltage! 03:32, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Re:En ti

Ok,thanks by advice,is proving difficult to find references,but I will thanks! :) Carliitaeliza TALK 20:48, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

You're welcome. It's possible that the album is not notable, even if the groups' other albums are. Remember that Spanish language sources are also acceptable, if you can access them. Danger High voltage! 03:23, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
Most people have heard the album,but most part of references are in Spanish,thanks,have a nice day! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Carliitaeliza (talk • contribs) 12:26, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
I'm sorry, I forgot, it was just when I refreshed the page, was signed thanks Carliitaeliza TALK 12:33, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

AFC submition: Glossary of Video Terms

Danger- thanks for the quick work on Glossary_of_Video_Terms. I appreciate the action to create the article. I was trying to be patient with the previous decliner. Best regards, Mejbp (talk) 02:55, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Just make sure in the future to note any public domain sources that you copy. Danger High voltage! 03:22, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
Message received and understood. I noticed the addition of the governmnet source notice under "References". I will know how to do that in the future. Newby here...lots to learn. Thanks!

Mejbp (talk) 03:55, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

References in "En ti" by Tercer Cielo

Hi Danger,we've added (with the user Dcoetzee) some reference to article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Carliitaeliza/En_ti from their official website,regards! Carliitaeliza TALK 14:55, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Manifesto

I'm extremely puzzled as to how you came across my name. I don't speak Italian beyond "buon giorno" and I'm fairly certain I've never claimed otherwise. If you could give me a link to the page you found me on, I'd like to be able to remove my name from it. Danger High voltage! 08:36, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

I couldn't find it either, honestly this was certainly my mistake, I apologize. I was probably copying over a user name and missed a character or two, beginners mistake. My error, stay warm, If I can't figure out how to get this done I may be back to ask for guidance but would prefer to try myself. thanks. Dhaddonpearson (talk) 14:55, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

No problem at all. You stay warm too. If you need any help, feel free to ask (I don't know much about translation here, but I could probably point you in the right direction). Danger High voltage! 15:19, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Request for the closure of FFD

Hello sir. My name is Srikanth aka (Raghu). My humble request is please review this FFD : FFD December 19, 2012. There are three Files, not deleted since a month and 3 days. Actually i requested a couple of admin's, but it seems that they are not interested to close the discussion. So i am asking you this help sir. If you have free time please see the above FFD. Hope you will reply soon. Thank you for reading. Raghusri (talk) 10:04, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Mexicali Rose v. Superior Court

Hey Danger, I was hoping to get your eyes or guidance on where to go next with the article in my sandbox. Thanks again!! AChrisTurner (talk) 19:14, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

User:AChrisTurner

It seems Mr. Turner would like to speak with you. Cheers, m.o.p 21:32, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Page upload

Hello, We are an Israeli company in the digital packaging industry. (Highcon Systems Ltd.) For the past few weeks we have been trying to upload a new page, and keep being rejected due to unreliable sources. Could you kindly let me know if i provide a letter from a solicitor confirming the company is listed at the Registrar of Companies will it be considerate as reliable source? Thank you, Ravitlevy (talk) 08:23, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

No, that would not be considered a reliable source. Sources on Wikipedia must be published. Danger High voltage! 14:50, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

Professortimithy

I notice that you previously blocked user Professortimithy for personal attacks. I reverted one of his edits using Stiki and realize that he has been blanking his Talk page. I left a note asking him not to do that in the future, but I'm not sure if it is a warning-worthy offense. Andrew327 17:38, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

The only thing he's not allowed to blank from his page are active block notices and a couple of other things which don't apply in this case. I've informed him that your warning is not accurate. Danger High voltage! 14:58, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

Please help me which sources are causing the 'not so reliable sources'.

I was having hard time trying to add an article for creation 'Bae, Kim & Lee LLC'. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Bae,_Kim_%26_Lee_LLC#Bae.2C_Kim_.26_Lee_LLC It says I need to insert citation for more reliable sources however I am not sure which one is not. Would you possibly help me to improve the article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.103.207.42 (talk) 05:03, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

At the moment, the question is more which of your listed sources are both independent and reliable and have significant coverage of the organisation. So for example I don't feel this source offers significant independent coverage of the organisation, because it's really just a listing of information provided by the organisation itself. ("BKL is able to deliver swift, focused advice in every area of commercial interest" is the phrase that gives that away.) It's worth keeping as a reference, because such listings tend to be accurate, but it doesn't solve the problem of needing significant independent coverage. You also cite the law firm's own website several times - that's obviously not independent. Make sure you click on the "golden rule" link to see what's required.
As a law firm with presumably a thousand or so employees, the firm is probably notable by Wikipedia's standards. If it were a UK firm, I would look in publications like The Lawyer for significant coverage - as an industry magazine, it's both reliable and independent. Perhaps there are similar publications in Korea or China? (Sources don't have to be in the English language.)
Your article submission also has multiple different versions of the article all on the same page; you should sort that out. Click Edit at the top, not on the right, and edit the page so that there is only one copy of the submission.
Finally, you might want to format your references so that there is more information about what each item is. For an example, look at how the references are formatted on Rajinder Kaur Bhattal - that will also show you how to name a reference so that it doesn't show up more than once in the references list when it's used multiple times in different places in the article. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 09:45, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
Thank you Demiurge1000. I think you've covered everything. Danger High voltage! 14:59, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

Discussion on the AFT5 Request for Comment

Hey Danger - this is to notify you that there is a discussion starting on the Article Feedback RfC talkpage that has ramifications for the RfC itself. Your input is much appreciated :). Thanks! and apologies if I've missed anyone Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 16:37, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

feefo page and notabilty

Hi. I am struggling with the comment that Feefo is not 'notable'. I read over the golden rules and they are a significant player. They won the Travolution Award as the rising brand for the travel industry at the end of 2012 and many of their clients are notable enough to have Wikipedia entries in their own right.

In your own guidelines this says that their products and services are a valid subject for a separate wikipedia article dedicated solely to that organisation or product. It is used by up to 80,000 people per day leaving reviews (alexa figures as at 28.01.13) and is growing very fast.

I have made some further small updates but please can you advise me what more I need to do next? Johndesmond (talk) 18:18, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Winning a non-notable award sponsored by the company itself is not particularly good evidence of notability. Being a member of an organization that anyone can pay to join is also not good evidence of notability. If that's the extent of this company's objective achievements, then the only option is to find independent coverage of the company in reliable sources. That means that the sources can't be associated with Feefo (ie paid PR reviews don't count, nor do self-published pieces by people associated with Feefo) and the coverage has to be more than reprints of press releases. If these sorts of sources don't exist, then the company does not meet our inclusion criteria. Danger High voltage! 18:40, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Keralafilmacademy

They're requesting unblock. Is there a diff with something showing a connection to the username? Otherwise I don't see a problem with their actual editing, although I would of course ask them the usual questions before going as far an unblock. Daniel Case (talk) 18:32, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

No. Go ahead. Danger High voltage! 22:25, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Talk:New World vulture/GA1

Danger, this review seems to have gotten stalled: can you please see whether it's ready to promote, needs more work, or perhaps should be wrapped up as unlisted? Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:59, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Done. Apologies for falling off the face of the planet. Danger High voltage! 00:20, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Rejection of Article

Hi.

I'm part of a group which submitted this article about Connie Varnhagen for our University project. Just to clarify, which sections are in need of independent sources? As this will enable us to correct the issues as quickly as possible.

Many thanks for the quick update about the problems with the page.

Bellsniff123 (talk) 16:43, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

The article needs independent sources to prove notability. Unless her work has been discussed at length in the wider academic community or she has received one of the honors listed at WP:PROF, an article about Varnhagen herself may not be appropriate for Wikipedia. (Updating other articles to reflect her research is a different matter.) Does this make sense? Danger High voltage! 17:36, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Yeah that's helped to clarify things for us. Sorry for being such a pain . . . thanks again Bellsniff123 (talk) 19:46, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
You're welcome. Trust me. You're not being a pain. The 14-year-olds who write fake biographies of themselves are pains. :-) If y'all need any help, just let me know. I see that you are a bit short on time, but five days is definitely enough time to write a good short article or make a significant update to an existing one. Danger High voltage! 20:18, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

"Teflon Don (rapper)" article

Hi Danger.

  • Thank you for helping out at AfC.
  • Are you sure that this article which you approved met all three criteria listed in WP:42?
  • Which references fulfilled the second criterion? :-)
  • When you reply, please notify me on my talk page. The best way to do this is to use cut-and-paste to cut this entire conversation off your talk page and to paste it onto mine. When I reply, I can do the same — I can move the entire conversation back to your talk page.

Kind regards, Unforgettableid (talk) 17:01, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

The Tri-State Defender and Billboard are certainly reliable sources. The SEA Entertainment Awards is reliable for the information that it's used to source. I'm not at all invested in this article and would consider it borderline for notability. Danger High voltage! 17:24, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Monumental Myths

Hello Danger, Wondering if you could review the edited Monumental Myths article. I removed "non-objective" language and uploaded the copywrited image (which I own) to the WikiCommons site. Thanks.Tomtrinley (talk) 17:42, 14 March 2013 (UTC) Tomtrinley

Hello Tom. I don't believe that Monumental Myths meets our inclusion guidelines for films. Please let me know if you have any questions about this. Danger High voltage! 14:35, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

ITN / Zillur Rahman

Hi Danger,

Thanks for posting Rahman, and welcome to ITN. Usually once an item is posted, the admin will add a line to the bottom of the section:

  • Posted <admin signature>

Its helpful to add a marker to the discussion in case it continues after posting (ie pull requests, problems with a posted article, etc).

Cheers,

--IP98 (talk) 16:21, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the info. I just didn't want it to sit up there too long without being changed. Danger High voltage! 17:54, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Barnstar thanks!

Sorry it took me a while to acknowledge your barnstar. I always try to do so; I just had a crazy long weekend. Thanks! Always glad to make someone smile! Daniel Case (talk) 17:45, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Well thank you. I've been amused by many of your comments at UAA lately. Danger High voltage! 00:21, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

In midst of Doubts !!

I have created a new Wiki account Kingwikibot, which had problem with the Policies of Wikipedia. So I changed my user name and it came that the account has been verified by Danger(you) !! But !! i noticed that the username at the top of the page is the same as the one which was blocked .... 

  Hope you reply to this !!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kingwikibot (talk • contribs) 16:12, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi there. So, only a very small number of users have the technical ability to do name changes; I'm not one of them. What I did is unblock the account "Kingwikibot" so that you can go and make a request at the change of username boards, which the users who can change names (called Bureaucrats) watch. You'll need to use this account to make an edit requesting a change of name. Does that make sense? Danger High voltage! 19:50, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 May 2013

Jamie Kugelman

His argument is a variant of the little brother defense, which is a compromised account argument, and the usual response is to leave the compromised account blocked. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:04, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Yes, I'm aware. That's what I did. Did I unblock the account and not notice? It's possible; cough syrup is a strange substance after all. Danger High voltage! 16:12, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

University Philosophical Society issue.

Currently there's an issue on University Philosophical Society page regarding certain important dates (this is a long standing issue). However recently and unfortunately this has resulted in a semi edit-war between myself and 46.7.236.155. I've taken the issue to Talk:University Philosophical Society page (outlined the argument as best I can), however the user seems to be unwavering and doesn't seem to want to discuss the issue but rather agrues the same point over and over.

I've tried my best to sort the problem and recently bulked up the Dublin Philosophical Society page with more than enough references, but still to no avail.

Could you help in resolving the issue in some way?

Thanks, KountKurly (talk) 18:15, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

You did not take the issue to talk. I did. I argue the same point over and over because there is only one salient point: You are continuously removing cited material and replacing it with original research. 46.7.236.155 (talk) 19:30, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Uh, I'm not sure. How did you get this number? Danger High voltage! 21:45, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Axona Wikipedia article

Hello Danger, thank you for reaching out. It is great to work a Wikipedia administrator to be sure everything is done correctly. This is the former AxonaForAD account, under a new name. Now that I have a new name, please let me know if the edits proposed on the Axona article are permissible and any thoughts you have moving forward. I am working to submit further revision requests for the Axona article that should be ready next week. I look forward to working with you and hearing back. Thanks! BKWiki17992 (talk) 18:00, 17 May 2013 (PST)

Hi. I should probably clarify that, as an admin, I have no special status above other editors. I do, however, have the technical ability to block accounts and thought that mentioning my adminship was more polite than saying "I am watching and I will block this account if you don't change you name now". :-)
I've made some comments on the talk page. You should read the "Plain and simple conflict of interest guide" very carefully. And then read it again. That's the best advice I can give for your work on Axona specifically, but I'd encourage you to get a feel for how Wikipedia works by exploring and maybe editing subjects that you're interested in personally. Danger High voltage! 21:42, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Danger/Archive_12&oldid=1148819610"