User talk:Hog Farm: Difference between revisions
Line 404: | Line 404: | ||
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid lightsteelblue;" | On behalf of the Milhist coordinators, I hereby award you the WikiChevrons, for placing first in the '''December 2022''' [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Contest|Military History Article Writing Contest]], achieving '''52''' points from '''six''' articles. A great effort to finish off the year! [[User:Zawed|Zawed]] ([[User talk:Zawed|talk]]) 02:49, 5 January 2023 (UTC) |
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid lightsteelblue;" | On behalf of the Milhist coordinators, I hereby award you the WikiChevrons, for placing first in the '''December 2022''' [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Contest|Military History Article Writing Contest]], achieving '''52''' points from '''six''' articles. A great effort to finish off the year! [[User:Zawed|Zawed]] ([[User talk:Zawed|talk]]) 02:49, 5 January 2023 (UTC) |
||
|} |
|} |
||
== The Military History Writers' Contest Cup: 2022 Winner! == |
|||
{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: DCDCDC;" |
|||
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" | [[File:Milhist Writers' Cup Trophy.png|100px]] |
|||
|rowspan="2" | |
|||
|style="font-size:x-large; padding: ; vertical-align:middle; height:1.1em;" | '''[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Contest|The Military History Writers' Contest Cup]]''' |
|||
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" | [[File:Waricon.svg|100px]] |
|||
|rowspan="2" | |
|||
|- |
|||
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Congratulations on a great effort in the 2022 Milhist Writer's Contest Cup! On behalf of the behalf of the Wikiproject Military History coordinators, I am pleased to award you the Contest Cup having taken first place overall (from yours truly, grrr!), with a total of 488 points from 61 articles. We hope to see a similar effort for 2023! [[User:Zawed|Zawed]] ([[User talk:Zawed|talk]]) 03:05, 5 January 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:05, 5 January 2023
- Things to review
- Things to write
- User:Hog Farm/Siege of Vicksburg
- Engagement at Fredericktown - MHR article and unit history; needs trip to library
- Fort Pemberton (Mississippi)
- CSS Colonel Lovell
- Current projects
- CSS General Earl Van Dorn - Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/CSS General Earl Van Dorn
Four Award
Four Award | ||
Congratulations! You have been awarded the Four Award for your work from beginning to end on Duckport Canal. — Bilorv (talk) 22:55, 4 November 2022 (UTC) |
Congrats! Next time it'll be a leaderboard spot. — Bilorv (talk) 22:55, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day!
Happy First Edit Day! Hi Hog Farm! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:09, 5 November 2022 (UTC) |
Congratulations - October 2022 MilHist Article Writing Contest
The WikiChevrons | ||
On behalf of the Milhist coordinators, I hereby award you the WikiChevrons, for placing first in the October 2022 Military History Article Writing Contest, achieving 40 points from six articles. Well done! Zawed (talk) 03:55, 6 November 2022 (UTC) |
This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 13 December 2022. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/December 2022, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/December 2022. I suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from two days before it appears on the Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work!—Wehwalt (talk) 16:52, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXCIX, November 2022
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 10:33, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
October promotion question
Hi -- I noticed the other day that John Raymond science fiction magazines, which you promoted in October, wasn't listed at WP:WBFAN; I thought this edit would fix it but it doesn't appear to have done so. Looking at the October log I think the problem is just that it was never added. Is that the only issue? Or are there other places it needs to be added? Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 11:28, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) Yes, it's probably not adding it to Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/October 2022 that caused it to be missed. I've put it in now and will need to adjust the FA stats page too; as to the promotion bot doing its thing at this late stage (which I assume will lead to WBFAN getting updated), we might be in the realm of black magic there -- Hawkeye...? Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 12:06, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks! I'm curious how these things get spotted -- if a coord missed a step a few months ago, is there some count that is off somewhere that would allow it to be noticed? Or is it possible we're missing a couple of others in the logs? Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 12:11, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
- Mike Christie - SandyGeorgia caught me making a similar step some time ago; I think the totals at WP:FAS provide a check figure. Hog Farm Talk 15:27, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
- OK, good to know there's a cross-foot. Thanks. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 15:29, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
- Mike Christie - SandyGeorgia caught me making a similar step some time ago; I think the totals at WP:FAS provide a check figure. Hog Farm Talk 15:27, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks! I'm curious how these things get spotted -- if a coord missed a step a few months ago, is there some count that is off somewhere that would allow it to be noticed? Or is it possible we're missing a couple of others in the logs? Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 12:11, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
I think that should solve the problem, no? I'll push this into my restoration queue. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.2% of all FPs. Currently celebrating his 600th FP! 06:36, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Adam Cuerden: - Thanks for finding that! I'm hoping to do some work on Cairo's article in the future, although it probably won't be until after the new year. Hog Farm Talk 02:58, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
Update on me and Vicksburg campaign inactivity
@Hog Farm, BusterD, Kges1901, Djmaschek, and TwoScars: Except for two small edits on September 1, I have been offline since August 16, just after I finished the end of the Civil War issue, left a message here and volunteered to help on the Vicksburg campaign project. I thought I should give you an explanation for my absence and lack of activity though I hesitate to write about such things. I know you are all busy and this is off topic. I am truly unhappy about not being able to keep contributing regularly recently and I do hope to return soon. I have been in a quagmire of seemingly never ending health problems. I had the injury to my knee and thigh, previously mentioned, then a rotator cuff impingement. I became weak with other symptoms and was hardly able to continue physical therapy. Then I had a surgery (different problem) in early October, digestive issues and caught a bacterial infection - in the hospital no doubt. I have perhaps recovered from that after a course of antibiotics but I am now having some worrisome recurring symptoms. I have had trouble keeping up with everyday activities most days and have some catching up to do. Holiday preparations, a few doctor visits and restarting physical therapy are also on the immediate agenda. Nonetheless, hope springs eternal. I have a few small edits to make to my book list and perhaps elsewhere. This is my main hobby and I want to get back to it in a more meaningful way, including helping finish work on the Vicksburg campaign. I hope I can do that soon. I also hope all of you are doing well. Donner60 (talk) 09:15, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
- No deadline, brother. Thanks for keeping us up. We are glad that despite your setbacks you are improving. Because of RL issues I have not been able to contribute as much as I would like either. I hope you are able to move through the PT phase; just do the exercises as requested. This group cares more about any teammate than a work product. Get better, read a bunch, and check in as desired. And relax. Enjoy your holidays, dude. BusterD (talk) 11:50, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
- I agree with BusterD. RL is much more important than Wikipedia, and you cannot neglect your health (or your family). I had to do PT in 2019 to get my wrist to bend after breaking it in three places. I recommend doing the PT as early in the day as possible—get it over with for the day. You may find that you like exercising. I currently work out three times per week—first thing in the morning, before breakfast. Get a good workout (or PT), but do not go so hard that you do not feel like working out again. Relax, enjoy the holidays, do not spend all day in front of a computer. Wikipedia will be here when you are ready. TwoScars (talk) 15:44, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
- @BusterD and TwoScars: Thanks. I appreciate your encouragement and advice. I hope everyone here has a great holiday season as well. Donner60 (talk) 02:24, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Donner60: - sorry for the late reply; I just got back from a trip to rural Louisiana visiting family (I got to visit Vicksburg along the way, as well as Jenkins Ferry, Mansfield LA, and Fort Southerland). I second what Buster and TwoScars say about health, please take care of yourself before anything on-wiki. I let a back injury fester from late 2018 to early 2020 and live to regret putting that off most days (and I'm in my early 20s and according to the doctor shouldn't be that messed up in the back and neck).
- I started on User:Hog Farm/Siege of Vicksburg in October and got to where I'm ready for the orbat section, but life got hectic in November and I haven't gotten back to it. Any commentary about what's been written so far would be very appreciated. (I probably won't get back to this until a few weeks. I borrowed a book about tinclads from a local library and want to try to get some more articles resourced from their current state of being just DANFS copies before the book needs to go back in mid-December). Hog Farm Talk 03:13, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for the reply and best wishes. I hope you can do something to relieve and reverse your back and neck pain. I have had some chiropractic work for my back and neck. It can be a relief, and in some cases, not just temporary. I had a back problem a few years ago which could have resulted in surgery. The chiropractor relieved the problem. The orthopedic surgeon was at least mildly surprised. Some insurance can cover chiropractic treatment, at least for specific injuries or problems.
- As I wrote above, I hope I can have more time and energy to get back to more regular Wikipedia writing and editing soon. I think it would be too optimistic for me to expect to do much for the rest of the year considering the holidays, catching up on a few things and a few more doctor visits and physical therapy.
- I have enough books on Vicksburg to do some reasonably thorough research and with any luck to comment on or contribute to the articles. I have read part of the short "Siege of Jackson, Mississippi" book. I think I at least have a grasp of the preliminary moves up to the start of the siege. From there, it appears to be straightforward enough. For the next few days, I plan to catch up with listing some books that I bought earlier in the year.
- You seem to have had a good tour of interesting battlefields on your recent trip. I hope you had good weather along the way. Donner60 (talk) 04:16, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
- @BusterD and TwoScars: Thanks. I appreciate your encouragement and advice. I hope everyone here has a great holiday season as well. Donner60 (talk) 02:24, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Fort Curtis (Arkansas)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Fort Curtis (Arkansas) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 10:03, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of USS Marmora (1862)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article USS Marmora (1862) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 12:04, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
In further appreciation
The Premium Reviewer Barnstar | ||
By the authority vested in me by myself it gives me great pleasure to present you with a bar to this barnstar in further recognition of the vast number of thorough, detailed and actionable reviews you have carried out. This work continues to be very much appreciated. Gog the Mild (talk) 20:27, 28 November 2022 (UTC) |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
DYK for Fort Curtis (Arkansas)
On 30 November 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Fort Curtis (Arkansas), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Fort Curtis's 24-pounder guns were taken away for use in the Vicksburg campaign? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Fort Curtis (Arkansas). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Fort Curtis (Arkansas)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 00:02, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
Two years! |
---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:54, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – December 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2022).
- Consensus has been found in an RfC to automatically place RfAs on hold after one week.
- The article creation at scale RfC has been closed.
- An RfC on the banners for the December 2022 fundraising campaign has been closed.
- A new preference named "Enable limited width mode" has been added to the Vector 2022 skin. The preference is also shown as a toggle on every page if your monitor is 1600 pixels or wider. When disabled it removes the whitespace added by Vector 2022 on the left and right of the page content. Disabling this preference has the same effect as enabling the wide-vector-2022 gadget. (T319449)
- Eligible users are invited to vote on candidates for the Arbitration Committee until 23:59 December 12, 2022 (UTC). Candidate statements can be seen here.
- The proposed decision for the 2021-22 review of the discretionary sanctions system is open.
- The arbitration case Reversal and reinstatement of Athaenara's block has been closed.
- The arbitration case Stephen has been opened and the proposed decision is expected 1 December 2022.
- A motion has modified the procedures for contacting an admin facing Level 2 desysop.
- Tech tip: A single IPv6 connection usually has access to a "subnet" of 18 quintillion IPs. Add
/64
to the end of an IP in Special:Contributions to see all of a subnet's edits, and consider blocking the whole subnet rather than an IP that may change within a minute.
Thanks for your hard work on USS Marmora (1862) (I got pinged when you linked to Concordia, Mississippi). Cheers. Magnolia677 (talk) 09:26, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks! Hog Farm Talk 14:48, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Fort Curtis (Arkansas)
The article Fort Curtis (Arkansas) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Fort Curtis (Arkansas) and Talk:Fort Curtis (Arkansas)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 10:03, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of USS Marmora (1862)
The article USS Marmora (1862) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:USS Marmora (1862) for comments about the article, and Talk:USS Marmora (1862)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 22:44, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article USS Romeo you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Djmaschek -- Djmaschek (talk) 05:04, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CC, December 2022
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:56, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of USS Glide (1862)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article USS Glide (1862) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 11:24, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
The article USS Romeo you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:USS Romeo for comments about the article, and Talk:USS Romeo/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Djmaschek -- Djmaschek (talk) 04:45, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Barnstar of Diligence | |
For your thorough work on auditing the sourcing of Ontario Highway 8 and other FACs. (t · c) buidhe 18:44, 12 December 2022 (UTC) |
Your GA nomination of USS Glide (1862)
The article USS Glide (1862) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:USS Glide (1862) for comments about the article, and Talk:USS Glide (1862)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 20:22, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Highway 8
Just so it doesn't get lost in the archiving, I'm going to copy it here: Since WP:PR is kind of a dead horse, do you perhaps have any recommendations where I can get someone to make these kind of audits (particularly that outside-the-box take that is scrupulous of refs, which I'd look at and say "oh, yeah, common denominator"). The insider perspective is lost on me. Floydian τ ¢ 00:15, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Floydian: - Unfortunately, there's not a consistent place to go to that I can think of off the top of my head. The average peer review doesn't go into sources like that, and even many FACs don't get that thorough of reviews. I just make a habit of looking into sources when I can when reviewing FACs, and found a few pagination issues early on so I kept going on Highway 8. Normally I'd offer to go through Highway 8 when I have time (thanks to the Wikipedia Library, I can access most of the sources used), but I'm fighting a pinched nerve in my neck right now and am trying to finish up a userspace draft before I have to return a key book to the library on Friday, so I'm unfortunately not in a position to look over Highway 8 in the short term. Buidhe or Gog the Mild may have ideas on where to go for something like this. Sorry if this doesn't make much sense or isn't helpful, but that nerve is causing enough problems this evening it's hard for me to focus on writing coherently. Hog Farm Talk 02:04, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
- I hope you feel better, and I appreciate the time you have taken. I can appreciate the follies of old age, here's hoping to the singularity! - Floydian τ ¢ 02:09, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
TFA
new year |
Thank you today for your share of CSS Baltic, introduced: "An object lesson in what happens when you try to DIY an ironclad. I believe that this is the first FAC for a warship of the Confederate States."! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:54, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
... and today for Battle of Van Buren, introduced "After Battle of St. Charles and Marmaduke-Walker duel, here is another Confederate failure in Arkansas. Of the three primary Southern figures at Van Buren, you have department commander Holmes who was kicked upstairs for incompetence elsewhere, army commander Hindman who has managed to completely alienate the state where he was once a popular politician, and outpost commander Crump who drew guard duty despite past poor performances in that area."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:11, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Fort Curtis (Arkansas)
The article Fort Curtis (Arkansas) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Fort Curtis (Arkansas) for comments about the article, and Talk:Fort Curtis (Arkansas)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Zawed -- Zawed (talk) 08:40, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
I think I've been about as cooperative as could possibly be desired, albeit a little slow. The article is surely way over the quality bar for FA. --Dweller (talk) Old fashioned is the new thing! 17:15, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Dweller: - I'll take a look over it either tonight or tomorrow. From a skim it looks like it's in good shape. Hog Farm Talk 17:31, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
- Fab thanks --Dweller (talk) Old fashioned is the new thing! 17:35, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
Seasons Greetings
Whatever you celebrate at this time of year, whether it's Christmas or some other festival, I hope you and those close to you have a happy, restful time! Have fun, Donner60 (talk) 00:16, 23 December 2022 (UTC)}} |
Donner60 (talk) 23:39, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
Hello Hog Farm: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:05, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:05, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
Citation bot solution
Citation bot is making on the order of one million edits per year, usually in large batches, and checking two or three times as many without editing the articles. The best solution is to put a nobots template on articles that the bot makes bad edits to. I see you have already done something similar. Abductive (reasoning) 18:04, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you! Hog Farm Talk 18:45, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
Congratulations from the Military History Project
The Military history A-Class medal with oak leaves | ||
On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the A-Class medal with Oak Leaves for Duckport Canal, CSS Missouri, and Battle of Helena. Gog the Mild (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 00:30, 31 December 2022 (UTC) |
Happy New Year, Hog Farm!
Hog Farm,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (talk) 21:34, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Abishe (talk) 21:34, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
Happy New Year!
Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia, and a Happy New Year to you and yours! CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:13, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
- – Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year}} to user talk pages.
CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:13, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
Happy Kalends of January
Happy New Year! | ||
Wishing you and yours a Happy New Year, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and distraction-free and may Janus light your way. Ealdgyth (talk) 13:50, 1 January 2023 (UTC) |
Your GA nomination of Battle of Richmond, Louisiana
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Battle of Richmond, Louisiana you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pickersgill-Cunliffe -- Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 23:43, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
DYK for USS Romeo
On 2 January 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article USS Romeo, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Romeo and Juliet both served in the Union Navy? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/USS Romeo. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, USS Romeo), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Z1720 (talk) 00:03, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
New Pages Patrol newsletter January 2023
Hello Hog Farm,
- Backlog
The October drive reduced the backlog from 9,700 to an amazing 0! Congratulations to WaddlesJP13 who led with 2084 points. See this page for further details. The queue is steadily rising again and is approaching 2,000. It would be great if <2,000 were the “new normal”. Please continue to help out even if it's only for a few or even one patrol a day.
- 2022 Awards
Onel5969 won the 2022 cup for 28,302 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 80/day. There was one Gold Award (5000+ reviews), 11 Silver (2000+), 28 Iron (360+) and 39 more for the 100+ barnstar. Rosguill led again for the 4th year by clearing 49,294 redirects. For the full details see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone!
Minimum deletion time: The previous WP:NPP guideline was to wait 15 minutes before tagging for deletion (including draftification and WP:BLAR). Due to complaints, a consensus decided to raise the time to 1 hour. To illustrate this, very new pages in the feed are now highlighted in red. (As always, this is not applicable to attack pages, copyvios, vandalism, etc.)
New draftify script: In response to feedback from AFC, the The Move to Draft script now provides a choice of set messages that also link the creator to a new, friendly explanation page. The script also warns reviewers if the creator is probably still developing the article. The former script is no longer maintained. Please edit your edit your common.js or vector.js file from User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js
to User:MPGuy2824/MoveToDraft.js
Redirects: Some of our redirect reviewers have reduced their activity and the backlog is up to 9,000+ (two months deep). If you are interested in this distinctly different task and need any help, see this guide, this checklist, and spend some time at WP:RFD.
Discussions with the WMF The PageTriage open letter signed by 444 users is bearing fruit. The Growth Team has assigned some software engineers to work on PageTriage, the software that powers the NewPagesFeed and the Page Curation toolbar. WMF has submitted dozens of patches in the last few weeks to modernize PageTriage's code, which will make it easier to write patches in the future. This work is helpful but is not very visible to the end user. For patches visible to the end user, volunteers such as Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have been writing patches for bug reports and feature requests. The Growth Team also had a video conference with the NPP coordinators to discuss revamping the landing pages that new users see.
- Reminders
- Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
- There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
- Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
- If you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
- To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Congratulations - December 2022 MilHist Article Writing Contest
The WikiChevrons | ||
On behalf of the Milhist coordinators, I hereby award you the WikiChevrons, for placing first in the December 2022 Military History Article Writing Contest, achieving 52 points from six articles. A great effort to finish off the year! Zawed (talk) 02:49, 5 January 2023 (UTC) |
The Military History Writers' Contest Cup: 2022 Winner!
The Military History Writers' Contest Cup | ||||
Congratulations on a great effort in the 2022 Milhist Writer's Contest Cup! On behalf of the behalf of the Wikiproject Military History coordinators, I am pleased to award you the Contest Cup having taken first place overall (from yours truly, grrr!), with a total of 488 points from 61 articles. We hope to see a similar effort for 2023! Zawed (talk) 03:05, 5 January 2023 (UTC) |