Jump to content

User talk:Kailash29792: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
User:Kailash29792: Careful, there may be sarcasm at the end of my comment
Undid revision 603158951 by Ravensfire (talk)
Line 367: Line 367:
Hello, thanks to thank my edits. Recently i saw, there was Wiki War for languages. I reverted the languages for [[Taare Zameen Par]], [[3 Idiots]], [[Bombay Boys]] in Hindi. Also, Bombay Boys was a Hinglish film, i kept it Hindi. And one thing, The category and page [[English-language Indian films]] must be put for deletion in respect to Hindi language films. Thanks
Hello, thanks to thank my edits. Recently i saw, there was Wiki War for languages. I reverted the languages for [[Taare Zameen Par]], [[3 Idiots]], [[Bombay Boys]] in Hindi. Also, Bombay Boys was a Hinglish film, i kept it Hindi. And one thing, The category and page [[English-language Indian films]] must be put for deletion in respect to Hindi language films. Thanks
[[User:RajanSinghSidhu|R★S★S]] ([[User_talk:RajanSinghSidhu|Your Precious Reply]]) 14:32, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
[[User:RajanSinghSidhu|R★S★S]] ([[User_talk:RajanSinghSidhu|Your Precious Reply]]) 14:32, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
::See [[WP:Sockpuppet investigations/TekkenJinKazama]]. Also, note the discussion [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Technical_13#Discussion here] where RSS claimed you are "sole responsible for Edit war." Amazing how a fairly new editor knows all of this, isn't it? <b><font color="darkred">[[User:Ravensfire|Ravensfire]]</font></b> <font color="black">([[User talk:Ravensfire|talk]])</font> 14:51, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:04, 7 April 2014

Hope you are doing fine. You may be interested in this. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 10:59, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@Evano1van Under 2013, I have fixed Ethiri En 3, Kalavadiya Pozhuthugal, Muriyadi and Veeram. The rest doesn't seem to have an article in enwiki. Btw, Yohan never took off. So, I don't think it should have an article in the tamil wiki. Hope you can take care of it and update your userpage too. Thanks. Regards. -- Sriram speak up 14:39, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Sriram fixing. Yes, I will report incorrect ones once I finish with interwiki links. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 10:13, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Thanks for putting image for Mahabharat 3D Film Nehapant19 (talk) 06:23, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey pal! Since there are only two films, I think a hatnote would be enough and a disambiguation page isn't required. I could add the hatnote for one of them, but don't know what to do with the disam page. So I'm gonna let you can take care of it. Thanks. -- Sriram speak up 14:02, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So you gonna delete the disam page? -- Sriram speak up 14:14, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah. I may create the article in the near future. But, regarding the disam page, shall I make a request at the Teahouse? -- Sriram speak up 14:30, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah. WP:2DABS says there isn't a need for disam pages if there are only two topics. I'm gonna make a req at teahouse. And if I create the other article (too!), I'll pay attention about the year. -- Sriram speak up 14:52, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mullum Malarum

Hi, you are doing a commendable job by expanding the article. This book might be helpful. Also you could take some of these articles to WP:DYK, an interesting project in wiki, which I think you might be aware of. If you need any help in this regard ping me. Vensatry (Ping me) 16:28, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Brother, I don't really know much about that. Did you write all that in the article? Thanks dude. I love Mahendran's films, this, Uthiripookkal (my favorite) and Johnny, and I so wanted to expand the articles but I could not find much. I think you have done a brilliant job, for me it looks great and I can't tell if it's all right or whether it needs to be edited. Good luck, hope you can improve the other articles too. Veera Dheera Sooran (talk) 18:13, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Balu Mahendra in his blog shares his experience working in the film. Might be helpful. Vensatry (Ping me) 13:50, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
@Vensatry: the best u can do is translate the most useful trivia of Mullum Malarum and paste it here. ---- Kailash29792 (talk) 15:24, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I'll develop that in my sandbox. Meanwhile, you can also edit. Vensatry (Ping me) 16:31, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
In the development section, you've included an image of the crew members. I think the reviewers might question you on adding this non-free image in addition to the poster. It could have been okay if you had included the image of Jayalakshmi and Shoba as they are no more (also there's a strong contrast between the two characters'). Vensatry (Ping me) 07:55, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the original link for Vikatan review. Only a preview in shown though for non subscribers! -- Sriram speak up 18:23, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Btw, the Thina Thanthi review is also avl in ref 34 in the article. I suggesr you use it instead of the rajnifans link. -- Sriram speak up 18:29, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Sriram Vikram, I cannot find "தந்தி" in ref 34, which is this ---- Kailash29792 (talk) 03:27, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It can only mean that the rajnifans link could have wrongly mentioned the review to be from Thinathanthi. After translating the reviews, I was checking the article if they have been already used. That is when I stumbled upon ref 34 whose contents are exactly the same as in the rajnifans link under thinathanthi review. -- Sriram speak up 09:10, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You haven't used the link for Vikatan review. The Dhananjayan book doesn't have a preview in google books. So, I suggest you use this link. I'm afraid the rajnifans link could be of problem when the GA review happens. Its my opinion; you decide. -- Sriram speak up 11:49, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This link that you have posted in the talk page says the film was dubbed and released in Russia. -- Sriram speak up 03:13, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Can't we just mention that it was dubbed and released in Russia? An encyclopaedia is supposed to be encyclopaedic. Whatever info is available, put it in there. -- Sriram speak up 03:29, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Have you checked this out yet? The book..? -- Sriram speak up 01:01, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I saw the reference in the article. I was asking about the book. Will let you know if I find the book or get to know where to buy one. -- Sriram speak up 02:35, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
FYI, if you are in Chennai: The Chennai Book fair is currently happening at the YMCA, Nandanam. Great place for finding film related books. I will be going in a day or two. -- Sriram speak up 02:40, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Something for you. [1] -- Sriram speak up 17:40, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Director Shankar says "I entered with dreams of directing films such as `Mullum Malarum.'" Here Think it can be added somewhere? -- Sriram speak up 14:54, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Well, the article is your work. I leave it to you to decide whether it is worth mentioning. -- Sriram speak up 15:02, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Since I felt the sentence was too long, I have rephrased it a little. But, feel free to revert it if you aren't satisfied. -- Sriram speak up 00:47, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Conversations with Mani Ratnam

Hi, do you have the physical copy of the book? Vensatry (Ping me) 07:47, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I have a hardcover of Conversations with Mani Ratnam at home. However, I am at work and I will back home only by around 6 or 7pm. BTW, what is the book needed for? ---- Kailash29792 (talk) 07:52, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
That'll be handy to take Mani Ratnam to FAC in the future. Also could you fill those missing awards in this page. Vensatry (Ping me) 07:55, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
@User:Vensatry, I'll do the best I can after coming home. BTW, the book has a free preview on Google Books. Try that, or u can buy the book online for around 400 (less expensive that the physical purchase). ---- Kailash29792 (talk) 08:03, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It has only limited preview. Just expand the awards won by him when you get time. Vensatry (Ping me) 08:10, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This came in today's paper. Could you bother yourself and update the article? Thanks. -- Sriram speak up 02:31, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I would have did it myself had the article been titled 'Adhi'. But since it isn't, and the above reference pertains only to Adhi, I don't know how to put it. A very long time ago, I had left a comment in its talk page. Regards. -- Sriram speak up 02:44, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

CIFF

Also Vensatry. Hiya again! If you are in Chennai, if you are free and if you are interested, the 11th Chennai International Film Festival (CIFF) organised by the Indo Cine Appreciation Foundation (ICAF) begins next week. Here goes the films to be premiered. The 'Indian Panorama' might be of interest to you. There is also a 'Tamil film competition' at the page bottom. Regards. -- Sriram speak up 16:14, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your wishes. Sorry dude. I was unwell for a couple of days. And I have just created the CIFF page. If you would like to check out. 11th Chennai International Film Festival. -- Sriram speak up 16:07, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
And for your vacation, Bon Voyage. -- Sriram speak up 16:07, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting review AFC - Oruththi - List of missing Indian Films

Hi Can you please review https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Oruththi It has been more than 3 weeks since the article was created and is in review pending state . It would be great if you can review . Any help on improving the article or suggestions welcome and I am ready to improve . This is an entry in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Film/List_of_films_without_article/List_of_missing_Indian_Films:L-Q#O — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rajeevanand (talkcontribs) 07:03, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks , should this be moved from WP:Articles for Creation for it to be created in a easier way ? How do you usually create new articles (just asking to get more information on the process , as you have done lot of work in wikipedia) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rajeevanand (talkcontribs) 07:14, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Xmas mate

. Soham (talk) 13:20, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Merry Christmas

Merry Christmas and New Year to you too!!♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:28, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year, Kailash29792

--Pratyya (Hello!) 13:40, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sholay main page

I had put it up right after FA and it was rejected. I then asked one of the editors who puts them up and he said he would keep it in mind, but it never happened. Seems hard to get a film article up there. I will try to ping him again, but what do you think needs to be done now, and how could it lose FA? BollyJeff | talk 01:11, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You and I will notice. It's on my watchlist. BollyJeff | talk 02:12, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Check out this: User:ColonelHenry/FA2013analysis. It seems that the wait can be very long. BollyJeff | talk 00:50, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Do to the timing of the 3D release and a note that I left with this particular editor, I have re-nominated Sholay at WP:TFAR. We will see if it makes it this time, keep your fingers crossed. BollyJeff | talk 01:23, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It failed to place again, due to too many other films being nominated, and this one not having enough interest/support. What a bummer! Seems we will never see old Indian films on the front page. BollyJeff | talk 14:54, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I know what you mean. Why should I bother to make any more FAs? They did say that there are 1,320 FA that have yet to make it, so we are not alone. BollyJeff | talk 16:07, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It appears to be Wikipedia:Today's_featured_article/March_8,_2014. I don't know how that happened, but I am happy. BollyJeff | talk 13:17, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It is not allowed to have copyrighted pictures on TFA for whatever reason. That's why I changed it from the poster to this. BollyJeff | talk 13:23, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mullum Malarum

A few

  • "Mullum Malarum also established cinema as a visual medium that can be made without melodrama, fights, duets or excessive dialogue and with realism integrated into it." - feel this statement is superlative.
  • "—upon whom he dotes—were orphaned during their childhood, and have no close family." - split such statements.
  • "Kumaran has developed a liking for Vall" - rephrase
  • "Kali gives Kumaran and Valli" - can be sth like "Kali is moved by the affection of Valli and.."
  • "he story was about the intimate feelings in the relationship of a brother and sister" - rephrase
  • "because of Rajinikanth's dark complexion and because " - removed the second because
  • "1978's Bairavi—his first film as a main hero—and Ilamai Oonjal Aadukirathu were exceptions though." - rephrase
  • The pic in the theme section doesnt seem relevant.
  • Theme needs a rewrite
  • Refs - i have made some adjustments - tamilstar, blog of Balu Mahendra,desimartini,twitter - you can look at replacing them. Also, sfn is used for some books, while it is not for others - try to streamline it.Ssriram mt (talk) 14:22, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Latha, the actress, feels that she had good relationship with both Rajini and his wife Latha. She feels bad for not able to act in Mullum Malarum due to other committments. Ssriram mt (talk) 15:27, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kalidas

Information icon Hello, I'm Marchoctober. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Kalidas_(film) without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Marchoctober (talk) 23:06, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Kalidas_(film), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.
Marchoctober (talk) 19:42, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Kalidas_(film), you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Marchoctober (talk) 02:47, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Amazing Spider-Man 2 Poster

Hello,

The version you have uploaded is the international version. On behalf of Sony Pictures Studios, I am uploading the official approved studio one-sheet. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at fgloriani@sonypictures.com.

-Faye — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fgloriani (talkcontribs) 18:16, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
Thanks, been a great editor. Soham 08:03, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
For you constant efforts in finding and uploading posters for old Tamil films Vensatry (Ping) 06:23, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Special Barnstar
For making the 1978 Tamil classic Mullum Malarum a GA. Way to go! Vensatry (Ping) 17:29, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
What next? Nayakan (1987 film), Mouna Raagam or Thalapathi Vensatry (Ping) 17:30, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Congrats. And sorry for posting my opinions after the GA has been done with. Blame my short break for the delay. -- Sriram speak up 17:46, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The lead states that the film was a romantic drama. Is it so? Vensatry (Ping) 06:57, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Have you seen my comments at the talk page? -- Sriram speak up 14:56, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Shaku India returns

Before the MeA FAC, I asked User:Dr. Blofeld to review the colourisation section, and he did make significant changes, so I assumed that it must be correct now. I don't know what else to do. BollyJeff | talk 13:18, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I did check and reedited/added content. Venstary or somebody else can still double check if in doubt. But a few errors if possible wouldn't constitute removing an entire section, it's vandalism, clearly.♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:23, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Dear Bollyjeff and Der Dr BIofeld,

I aver that the edits made by me ( on Mughal-e-Azam) are 100% correct and they have been done after discussions with the authority of the matter i.e. the producers of the film. If I you still feel that my edits are not correct, we can jointly verity it with the producers i.e. Sterling Investment Corp Pvt Ltd ( Shapoorji Pallonji group). I hope you appreciate that it is in the interest of the users of wikipedia that correct information is posted on the site.

I am ready for a joint and open discussion with Sterling Investment Corp Pvt Ltd (Shapoorji Pallonji Group). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shaku india (talkcontribs) 12:34, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Gemini

Hey man! Can you explain this? Will it be okay if mentioned under 'Box office'? -- Sriram speak up 12:30, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It says "Do not quote comments from members of the general public (e.g., user comments from Amazon.com, the Internet Movie Database or personal blogs), as they are self-published and have no proven expertise or credibility in the field. Polls of the public carried out by a reliable source in an accredited manner, such as CinemaScore, may be used. Do not include user ratings submitted to websites such as the Internet Movie Database or Rotten Tomatoes, as they are vulnerable to vote stacking and demographic skew." And I don't think I have violated them. Then why? -- Sriram speak up 12:48, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Take a look at this: Wikipedia:Mos#Linking. During the article's FA review, Bollyjeff decried using links within quotes. -- Sriram speak up 09:44, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Can you do me a favour? There are two articles for Surya Vamsam. Can you group the content in one and make a redirect from the other, thereby merging them? -- Sriram speak up 18:59, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
For making many Tamil film articles reach the status of GA with your contributions and for working on many lost films. This needs to be given to you for your Appreciable efforts on Tamil film articles and for the help you extended to Sriram for Gemini (2002 film). :D Pavanjandhyala (talk) 12:01, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Special Barnstar
For taking Kalidas to GA-status, and for all your "thanks". You are a great asset to Wikipedia. Keep up the good work! KRIMUK90  14:24, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Congratulations. :) -- KRIMUK90  15:30, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Special Barnstar
For taking Kalidas (film), a film of historical significance, to GA status. Hats off! Sriram speak up 14:25, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Special Barnstar
Congratulations for getting Kalidas (film) to GA status. It's a very important film. Continue the good work. Cheers! Dwaipayan (talk) 16:17, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

Hi Kailash, congrats for getting the article to GA. Are you willing to take this to the DYK section? We forgot Mullum Malarum after it passed GA! Vensatry (Ping) 03:58, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I keep forgetting your rule, or I am just not able to follow it instinctively. Yes, what fact from Mullum Malarum can be added to DYK? Kailash29792 (talk) 04:32, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) I was taking about Kalidas, not Mullum Malarum. MM cannot be considered as articles should be nominated with in five days. Vensatry (Ping) 04:34, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
As for the hook, shall I frame it as Kalidas was the first sound film produced in South India or anything as you suggest. Vensatry (Ping) 04:37, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
All right Vensatry, what looks so useful from Kalidas that we can add? That it featured 50 songs, or despite being seen as a Tamil film it featured dialogues in Hindi and Telugu as well? Kailash29792 (talk) 04:39, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I've nominated the article. You're welcome to come up with more hooks by proposing ALTs. Good luck! Vensatry (Ping) 06:42, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Writer's Barnstar
5 consecutive GA's are not a matter of joke. Excellent— Keep going. —Soham (talk) 13:39, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bhakta Prahalda

Hi, the discussion seems to be archived. I suggest you start one more discussion after some time but before that discuss the same at Wikipedia talk:INCINE. Vensatry (Ping) 04:40, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Vensatry: Despite containing more "Support" tags than "Oppose" tags, the move suggestion of Bhakta Prahladha was closed, with the admin claiming "no consensus", even though it was nearly like a Tamil film fight — one man (Marchoctober) taking on several others, unarmed and unsupported. I have opened this matter at the Indian cinema taskforce over here. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:06, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Consensus is not arrived be means of votes. I'll comment at the INCINE talk page. Vensatry (Ping) 05:15, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You could also add the vernacular sources which I used in the article's talk page. Vensatry (Ping) 05:20, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Consider posting this at WT:INB too Vensatry (Ping) 08:24, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kochadaiiyaan

Is Rajiv Menon really a part of the film? Vensatry (Ping) 06:04, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Vensatry, these sources [2] [3] and [4] state that he is involved in the film. Any reason u believe he is not? Kailash29792 (talk) 06:09, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, there are quite a few good number of old sources. But I cannot find his name anywhere in the teaser or trailer. Vensatry (Ping) 06:11, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
A small piece of advice: You should stop appreciating edits which violate our policies. Vensatry (Ping) 01:50, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hey Kailash mate, how was my C/e of the article? winkSoham (talk) 15:19, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the bubble tea but was it of GOCE standards? – Soham (talk) 16:00, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Kalidas (film)

The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

archive -- Sriram speak up 13:28, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Have you watched this film? Is there any stuff available to expand this article. Vensatry (Ping) 07:46, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Vensatry, I would love to see the film, but I have some data I'll share with u soon. Kailash29792 (talk) 08:53, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GA

Hey! Would you like to review "In My City".—Prashant 05:26, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! for the review. Im happy that you did it so fast. Ill soon review MCU (i have Viva tommorrow, so i cant do it today).—Prashant 14:07, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! Shouldn't the talk page have a transclusion of the review? -- Sriram speak up 14:10, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Sriram Vikram: Actually yes, and a bot adds that every time. Don't know what went wrong this time. Kailash29792 (talk) 14:45, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. Why don't you do it yourself? -- Sriram speak up 14:51, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I do have alternatives of deadlinks. Ill add it dont worry. Today ill review MCU. Thanks for your wishes as my viva exam ended with excellent grade.—Prashant 03:18, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ra.One's history

Quite obviously, Ra.One language is most discussed topic now. Mr. Kailash, Jin Kazama one of the editors got blocked for edit war. As per you, Internet Movie DataBase is not a reliable source. So i want to discuss this matter with you on behalf. Let us take example of Jackie Chan's CZ12. As per my concern the film is in completely Cantonese but somehow it has a list of Language spoken in it. When i reverted they said this is languages used in it. More than 2 languages were added. Another example of Bollywood film is Taare Zameen Par. Let me clarify that that film is Hindi only film. So how come English added there? Another thing Ra.One's languages are Hindi no doubt. But has English use too. As per Jin's edits i don't want to speak on it. And that source is only one of Imdb. One thing again i clarify, there are dubbed versions of Ra.One in Cantonese, Tamil & Telugu but this languages are not counted respectively. Only used languages are counted. And i got to know from Ra.One's talk page you said English is used but in first half. It is used. Waiting for your reply Mr.Kailash. mall (talk) 06:59, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ra.One's history (continued)

Yeah Kailash i know. I didn't added Cantonese , Tamil or Telugu because it does not count on original release. I just added English respectively. But Mr.Kailash tell me one thing This film released in several, in several English speaking states. Even The infobox stated that before release in India, it released in UAE & Canada. And most probably title is in English whereas brother Ra.One is dubbed only in Cantonese, Tamil and Telugu. It also debuted in Japan too in late 2012 also in Japanese dub. So you cannot say It was dubbed in English. Original posters are marketed in English Language but the main plot is in Hindi. In fact, Khan played a Tamil Speaking guy in it. Though he spoke just 1 or 2 lines of Tamil. So i have a doubt too. Why the edit gets reverts of Taare Zameen Par of English. Because few days back i removed English from it but they reverted it back? Was it a bilingual fiction? mall (talk) 10:06, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As of now i added Consensus on talk page. Why you still revert it? Brother, you still reverting and will lead to 3 Revert Rule. Check the talk page respectively

mall (talk) 12:58, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

So you will try to unilaterally declare consensus? I do not think that word means what you think it means. You do not have consensus. You do not have policy supporting your view. And most particularly, you do not have reliable sources supporting your view. Just ask the other editor did, you ignore every point made by others and repeat yourself over and over, ignoring WP:BRD. Discussion means not making the change that has been reverted until the discussion on the talk page uses reliable sources and Wikipedia policies and guidelines. And all of this should be on the talk page. Ravensfire (talk) 17:48, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Also, I've reverted your unilateral consensus declaration. Let's move this to the article talk page folks. Ravensfire (talk) 17:50, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

KNI

Hey! I always wanted to ask this. Is there a rule preventing the use of slang terms? And one more thing. I remember that when you requested a c/e for Santhosh Subramaniam at GOCE, you had mentioned that the plot should be less than 700 words. While there is a necessity to keep the plot short and brief, there seem to be no such word constraint mentioned here. Could you explain, is it an unwritten rule or just a rule of thumb? -- Sriram speak up 09:57, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oh...okay. So, it there someway to count the no. of words without doing it manually? And can you tell if the plot summaries are within the specified range in Gemini and KNI? -- Sriram speak up 11:25, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Btw, I have a serious suggestion for you. Can you pls keep the conversations in the same place by replying where it began? Take it as an advice from myself and Vensatry -- Sriram speak up 11:27, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I do accept that 'wannabe' is slang. But, I find no nobility in wanting to be a don or a gangster to consider them as an aspiration and that is the reason why I preferred using 'wannabe'. -- Sriram speak up 11:31, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Sriram Vikram, You can paste the entire plot of any film in MS word, and it will show the total no of words below. As for ur talk page, any ideas of reducing the clutter? Kailash29792 (talk) 11:35, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yup. Will be doing it soon. Am busy with something else right now, my next suprise if I can say so! -- Sriram speak up 11:39, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The talk page of Hyderabad, a FA, says that the article is written in Indian English. So, why should KNI need British English when Indian English suits better here? -- Sriram speak up 12:06, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Because British and Indian English are not very different from each other, and the GOCE member will know to edit the article in BrE. Kailash29792 (talk) 12:37, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Kailash, even your page looks cluttered. Try archiving older posts :) Vensatry (Ping) 10:29, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not satisfied with the article yet. And, I find myself unable to wait for the c/e to happen. For one, I find the plot section to be vague and that someone who hasn't seen the film won't be able to understand it clearly. Then, the 2nd para under 'Filming'. I strongly feel it needs to be rewritten professionally. Would be glad if someone could do that. I don't think the people at GOCE will do that. -- Sriram speak up 12:29, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And regarding your last edit, I would like to remind you again... Wikipedia:Mos#Linking. Thanks -- Sriram speak up 12:32, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Sriram Vikram: Well, the plot is less than 700 words and that has not violated WP:FILMPLOT. Did you read the plot given in Dhananjayan's book? If the GOCE member reads the plot from there, then maybe he can edit understandingly and without changing key details. Meanwhile, I'll see what I can do in filming. Kailash29792 (talk) 12:42, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The article had exactly the same plot as in the book before I edited it. -- Sriram speak up 12:57, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please report all of TekkenJinKazama's block evasion activities here. - Areaseven (talk) 03:39, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, can you copy-edit the "Film career" when you find time. Feels a little uncomfortable since it's been a while since I edited biographies. Vensatry (Ping) 09:19, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Vensatry, yes at the moment I'll c/e it. I remember u once asked me for info on Andha Naal. I have a few articles that would be useful. By the end of this week, I promise to share them with you. Kailash29792 (talk) 09:32, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks :) Andha Naal is a very important film in the history of Tamil cinema. Vensatry (Ping) 09:35, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Apologies, was a bit preoccupied. As long as the info isn't trivial, it should be fine. Rusted AutoParts 15:08, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Kailash29792

Hello, thanks to thank my edits. Recently i saw, there was Wiki War for languages. I reverted the languages for Taare Zameen Par, 3 Idiots, Bombay Boys in Hindi. Also, Bombay Boys was a Hinglish film, i kept it Hindi. And one thing, The category and page English-language Indian films must be put for deletion in respect to Hindi language films. Thanks R★S★S (Your Precious Reply) 14:32, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]