Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Requests: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Gixce93 (talk | contribs)
m →‎=Midtown Madness: Section header 3.
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 147: Line 147:
===[[Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace]]===
===[[Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace]]===
Good Article that I hope to restore to featured status, any prose cleanup is welcome. [[User:Igordebraga|igordebraga]] [[User_talk:Igordebraga|≠]] 16:49, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Good Article that I hope to restore to featured status, any prose cleanup is welcome. [[User:Igordebraga|igordebraga]] [[User_talk:Igordebraga|≠]] 16:49, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

===[[Midtown Madness]]===
Featured article that is now undergoing a [[WP:FAR|FAR]]. "Gameplay" needs more detail, "Development" has to be improved, and "Reception" must be grammatically updated. The whole article needs a copyedit. <s>}I[[User:Mr. Gonna Change My Name Forever|<span style="font-family:Times New Roman;color:#d4c00b;">'''Mr*'''</span>]]&#124;[[User talk:Mr. Gonna Change My Name Forever|<span style="font-family:Times New Roman;color:#808000;">(''6''0nna)</span>]]I{</s> 04:00, 9 May 2014 (UTC)


<!--ADD REQUESTS ABOVE THIS LINE. THE CODE BELOW TRANSCLUDES THE FOOTER BOX-->
<!--ADD REQUESTS ABOVE THIS LINE. THE CODE BELOW TRANSCLUDES THE FOOTER BOX-->

Revision as of 04:00, 9 May 2014

Guild homeHow to copy editTemplatesBarnstarsParticipantsCoordinators
RequestsDrivesBlitzesMailing listNewsletters
Guild of Copy Editors' requests page

On this page, you can request that the Guild of Copy Editors copy-edit specific articles.

Instructions for requesters

To make a request, remove any existing {{copy edit}} tags from the article, then click this button and follow the instructions:

Please remove any existing {{copy edit}} tags from the article to avoid edit conflicts during the copy edit.

Please note:

  • No request by an unregistered editor will be accepted unless the IP has done significant work on the article. Drive-by IP requests already on the list may be declined by any editor.
  • The average waiting time is two or so months. Please be patient and feel free to improve your requested article while you wait.
  • If you plan to nominate the article for good article, A-class or featured article status, please wait until the copy edit is complete before nominating it.
  • Having your article copy edited by our team does not guarantee that the prose will be considered acceptable during any of the above reviews.
  • You may have up to two open requests at any one time. This is enforced so that every request can have a fair chance of being fulfilled within a reasonable period.

Requests may be declined if the article is:



March 2014

This article's recent unsuccessful FA nomination noted some copyediting inconsistencies. Appreciated if they could be resolved, including any I may have missed. JJARichardson (talk) 21:18, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Working Chaosdruid (talk) 18:59, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Still on it, had to break over an editing issue (VisEd) and then for work being done by the editor/s. Continuing ce again as of now. Chaosdruid (talk) 18:49, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Am back on it again, see note on talk page Chaosdruid (talk) 19:30, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

The section Huolongjing#Historical perspective seems particularly convoluted. -Arb. (talk) 23:09, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This article about a King of Hungary, who was blinded and became an alcoholic, also needs a bold copy edit before GAN. Thank you for your time in advance. Borsoka (talk) 03:07, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Major expansion, not the best writing. --TIAYN (talk) 11:59, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting, not so long history article. Did a first pass copy editing, but additional, professional help is needed. It would be great if the copy editor could also take a look also at Eurasian Avars in an attempt to better structure the content and possibly remove redundancies. Thanks --Codrin.B (talk) 06:44, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Significant expansion within the next week, just putting in this request because I'm not the best with copyeditting. :3 —  dainomite   01:30, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I did a peer review on this article back in February, and the editor is trying to get it in shape to nominate it for a GA status. I think it needs a thorough copy edit before they do, however. I'm a bit burned out on looking at it, and would really appreciate it if someone could give it a going over. Thanks. Onel5969 (talk) 00:00, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Working --Demiurge1000 (talk) 21:28, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! This article was once edited by a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on March 10, 2013. I have worked a lot on this article. I thing that the article needs someone who is a master at copy-editing and additional professional help. As it is a article on a daily soap opera it regular target for users, especially IP address users to add day to day synopsis of episodes, changing the cast order and adding several names for a single character making it look confusing and clumsy. the article is in need of professional help. --Tamravidhir (talk) 08:06, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting copy editing for the article of the 1980 monster movie Humanoids from the Deep. Thanks.NeoBatfreak (talk) 06:26, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

it's currently a GA, and i'm plan ning on nominating it for FAC. I think it needs some c/e to give it better cohesion and flow, however, i'm not all that good at such things. thanks. -- Aunva6talk - contribs 20:22, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This article has been a stable GA for years and I'm hoping to nominate it at FAC, but needs a bit more polish in the prose. — Rod talk 08:19, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to submit this GA for A-class review, and would appreciate a copyedit beforehand. Cheers--Tomobe03 (talk) 13:09, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article has been expanded many fold since the last copy-edit. Hoping to make it a FA after a previous review stalled. Could benefit a c/e from the experienced lot. Thanks. Sriram speak up 02:29, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This article is currently classified as a Good Article, and it was successfully nominated for DYK. I would like to improve the overall quality and flow of the article, and I feel a thorough copy edit is in order. Any guidance or suggestions for further improvement would be greatly appreciated! Thank you for all your continued hard work, copy editors! -- Caponer (talk) 11:05, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've requested a peer review but no one participated on it. :( So, I hope here at GoCE someone can help to improve it. :) Gabriel Yuji (talk) 00:53, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I made a pass at copyediting! Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:41, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Even though Wirgman Building has passed reviews for both Good Article and Did you know?, I'd like to request that the wonderfully talented and detail-oriented copy editors review this article to ensure it flows well and meets all Wikipedia criteria. Thank you in advance! -- Caponer (talk) 04:05, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I worked on this article a while ago and would like to see it improved. According to its talk page it needs work on structure and grammar in order to be a B article. I specifically a request to get it up to B standards, after which it is changed to a B article. Thank you.Deoliveirafan (talk) 18:31, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to submit this GA for A-class review, and would appreciate a copyedit beforehand. Thanks.--Tomobe03 (talk) 20:32, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting copy edit on article of Julia Roberts and John Cusack's 2001 romantic comedy America's Sweethearts. Thanks.--NeoBatfreak (talk) 07:15, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Article was nominated at GAN but was ignored. I think it's not ready yet so here I am, asking willing copy editors to c/e this article. I would also like to get the whole article's prose fixed (if you find some problems, awkward wordings, etc) so I can renominate it. Thanks in advance for fulfilling this request. :) - unsigned request added by Mediran, 21 April 2014

This is a Good Article that I plan to take to FAC at some point in the near future. I would appreciate having a copy-edit to ensure that the article's prose is "brilliant" and clear. CR4ZE (tc) 13:18, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Request copied from talk page. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 00:03, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
May I please request someone to copy/edit the article on Sally Kellerman, that I have worked tremendously hard on. I am trying to make her article meet GA standards. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by ‎Avario87 (talkcontribs) 23:38, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This request was added by ‎Avario87 on 26 April 2014, not by me. The article should be a quick copy edit. It's in good shape. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:34, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have a question. How will I know the articles are ready after an editor has reviewed them?— Preceding unsigned comment added by ‎Avario87 (talkcontribs) 14:23, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Avario87:Some copy-editors (including me) will add a template to your talk page to inform you. Otherwise, place the article on your watchlist and you should find out when it's copy-edited. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 22:57, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I would like to get the article to GA status. I would like to get the whole article's prose fixed (if there are some problems, awkward wordings, etc). Thanks in advance for fulfilling this request. :) — Mediran [talk] 04:42, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Recently converted to prose-style article (from timeline-style). Needs to be checked for consistency/grammar/wording/tense, and also make sure that the presentation of events makes sense in relation to the timeframe. RGloucester 16:33, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Needs c/e and probably a review of the overall prose and style/structure of the article which at the present is a bit "fan page"-like.--BabbaQ (talk) 09:19, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Needs c/e before being nominated to GA.Tintor2 (talk) 20:29, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Political scandal in Argentina Cambalachero (talk) 18:00, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Needs a c/e before GAN Vensatry (ping) 14:13, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Article is currently at GAN but the review is yet to begin. It would be nice if someone copy-edits before the review. Vensatry (ping) 07:08, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am looking to take this article eventually to FA status. At the moment I have it undergoing a peer review before making a GAN.

Over the last few months, the article has near enough doubled in size so it is definitely in need of a copyedit to trim the fluff and tweak the prose. Any issues, drop me a line on my talkpage or the article's.

Thanks for your time. EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 00:38, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting copy edit of this GA in advance of FA nomination. Thanks C679 08:57, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It probably needs a copyedit. Thanks, Gabriel Yuji (talk) 17:50, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Recently promoted to GA, would appreciate copy edit to help further quality improvement process. — Cirt (talk) 19:08, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted to GA quality in early April, would really like a copy edit to help improve it more. — Cirt (talk) 19:10, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article needs a copyedit before it can be nominated for an FL status. Thanks. ごだい (会話) 06:18, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This article, and The Holocaust in Belgium, forms part of a good topic on Belgium's involvement in World War II. It is naturally a GA, but I am concerned that both articles - indeed, perhaps the entire series - have small syntax and spelling errors/inconsistencies which undermine its content. I would be very grateful if both could be looked at by the Guild. Brigade Piron (talk) 09:11, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article is really important, particularly considering the recent events in Ukraine. It should be promoted to FA and your help in this will be appreciated. In particular, grammar and syntax may need some attention. UA Victory (talk) 10:42, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is already a good article. I would like a second check on prose before asking for a FAC. Cambalachero (talk) 13:20, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article that I hope to restore to featured status, any prose cleanup is welcome. igordebraga 16:49, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Featured article that is now undergoing a FAR. "Gameplay" needs more detail, "Development" has to be improved, and "Reception" must be grammatically updated. The whole article needs a copyedit. }IMr*|(60nna)I{ 04:00, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]