If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by [[:Richard e. kelley|visiting the page]] and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with [[Wikipedia:List of policies|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]]. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request [[WP:RFUD|here]]. <!-- Template:Db-spam-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> [[User:Alexius08|Alexius08]] ([[User talk:Alexius08|talk]]) 07:12, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by [[:Richard e. kelley|visiting the page]] and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with [[Wikipedia:List of policies|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]]. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request [[WP:RFUD|here]]. <!-- Template:Db-spam-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> [[User:Alexius08|Alexius08]] ([[User talk:Alexius08|talk]]) 07:12, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
This is an automated message from [[User:CorenSearchBot|CorenSearchBot]]. I have performed a web search with the contents of [[:Clara villarosa]], and it appears to include material copied directly from http://claravillarosa.com/?page_id=152.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not [[Wikipedia:Public domain|public domain]] or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our [[Wikipedia:Copyrights|copyright policy]] for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see [[Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials]] for the procedure.)<!--This template located at Template:Csb-notice-pageincludes--> [[User:CorenSearchBot|CorenSearchBot]] ([[User talk:CorenSearchBot|talk]]) 16:40, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
Hello. Dr. Fisher. I have just reviewed the OTRS permission ticket for the article Harold Mendelsohn. I see that you were given some code to paste on the talk pages of articles you create to help avoid confusion over the copyright status of the content. I have pasted this code (with slight modification, to identify the university) on your user page, at User:Steven Paul Fisher. You should be able to just copy-paste it (curly brackets and all) to the article's talk pages. Please be sure you are logged in when you do this - these tags are not generally supposed to be applied by individuals who are not OTRS agents, and I fear that your doing so as an IP edtor is likely to cause some confusion. If people are confused by your doing so under your named account, you can simply point them to your user page and note that the template was placed there by somebody who is an OTRS agent. --Moonriddengirl(talk) 19:46, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Archiving
As an additional note, I noticed your talk page was getting a bit long and unwieldy. Since I see you've edited in response to your last notice, I have taken the great liberty of archiving it for you. This is meant to be helpful to you; if this is unwelcome, I do apologize and will happily restore your talk page to the condition it was in. :) None of the contents have been deleted; they are simply now located at User talk:Steven Paul Fisher/Archive 1. We generally do not encourage deletion of talk page contents, but archival is common. I'd encourage you to transfer anything from your talk page that you are finished reading and no longer want or need to that subpage.
Happy editing, and do please feel free to stop by my talk page if I can be of assistance. I would also encourage you to visit the Wikipedia:Teahouse if you need help. This is meant to be a welcoming environment for newcomers. --Moonriddengirl(talk) 19:52, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Is there a way to determine how many times a page I created was visited/hit?
Thanks. One of the frustrating things about creating entries for Wikipedia is you never get the same editor and so you get conflicting information and feedback.
16:09, 15 March 2015 (UTC)24.9.139.246 (talk)Steven Paul Fisher
Hi - thank you - you are a big help. I had a couple of Sandbox questions - is it really three weeks before a response? I was encouraged to use Sandbox rather than creating a new articles directly, but three weeks is very long. Also - is it ok to post more than one article draft in Sandbox at a time?
If you go to other encyclopedias you will notice that the first sentence of an article often defines the topic. Would you add such a sentence to Deatt Hudson? MicroPaLeo (talk) 23:13, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I have an unrlated question. I currently have an article in Sandbox awaiting review. Can I start on a draft of another article in Sandbox? I don't see where to start/edit/submit another article.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Robert Earl Roeder and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
Hello! Steven Paul Fisher,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 (talk) 22:48, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CraigyDavi was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Robert Earl Roeder and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Graeme Bartlett was:
The OTRS must be confirmed by a OTRS volunteer here. The template for OTRS should have been added by an OTRS volunteer.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Robert Earl Roeder and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
The problem is the use of the OTRS tagging on the article draft. That suggests that it is copied from somewhere else. Given that you have a number it means that you have a response. However only an OTRS volunteer can confirm that it is OK and correct. I did not see any OTRS volunteer put it there. However if you can point out to me where the volunteer did place that template on Wikipedia then I could change my mind. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:27, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Robert Earl Roeder, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
You made my day! Thank you 24.9.139.246 (talk) 12:22, 12 March 2015 (UTC)Steven Paul Fisher[reply]
My article draft in Sandbox was accepted and posted to Wikipedia. How do I now remove it from Sandbox and begin a new draft there? Steven Paul Fisher Steven Paul Fisher (talk) 14:56, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
If you click on User:Steven Paul Fisher/sandbox now, you are taken to the article; but at the top, just under the title, is a line "(Redirected from User:Steven Paul Fisher/sandbox)". That is a link, and clicking on it will take you back to the actual sandbox page, which you can edit to remove the "redirect" that is there, and add something new.
You don't have to use the same sandbox page for each article: you can make as many WP:User subpages as you like, each starting with "User:Steven Paul Fisher/". A good way is to click on Help:Userspace draft and fill in the title, which will make a draft page for you with a link to useful advice and a button to send it for review when it is ready. JohnCD (talk) 18:11, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
OK -I made a new Sandbox page and have a draft on it. One question - I am not ready to submit it yet but I do not see where you do that. I recall seeing a submit tab (or something similar) in my first Sandbox page. Steven Paul Fisher (talk) 18:28, 13 March 2015 (UTC)Steven Paul Fisher[reply]
Put {{User sandbox}} at the top of the page. That will produce a "sandbox" template including a "submit" button for when you are ready. JohnCD (talk)
Not sure where you mean - can you be more specific?130.253.229.146 (talk) 19:11, 13 March 2015 (UTC)Steven Paul Fisher[reply]
Hi, Professor Fischer. Thanks for creating this article. I have edited it a bit to add some footnotes to the references.
About creating new pages, maybe I could explain the method I use. You can create a user subpage with the name of the article that you want to create, say User:Steven Paul Fisher/draft MyNewArticle. See User subpages for instructions on how to do this. Basically you search for the name of the page you want to create, and it won't exist yet, so Wikipedia will offer to create it. I use this method because it makes it easier to manage multiple drafts and to delete them after the draft is moved to the main article space. And it leaves my sandbox for experimenting with various things. If you you have multiple subpages off of your user page, adding {{subpages}} to your user page makes them easier to find. You can see my user page for an example of how to do this. – Margin1522 (talk) 19:23, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you SO MUCH for the great changes you made to my entry. It looks GREAT!24.9.139.246 (talk) 22:13, 13 March 2015 (UTC) Steven Paul Fisher[reply]
And thank you for creating this. It was an interesting article. – Margin1522 (talk) 14:55, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Can you be my only reviewer? 24.9.139.246 (talk) 15:03, 14 March 2015 (UTC)Steven Paul Fisher[reply]
I'd be happy to, but I'm not a member of the reviewers project yet. But I can stop by from time to time to see if there is anything that needs to be addressed. Generally the reviewers are more concerned with the sources than the formatting, so the best way to make them happy is to give lots of details about the sources that you already have. – Margin1522 (talk) 15:49, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by the reviewer was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.}}
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JMHamo was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Steven Paul Fisher/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Matt Bond and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
Please don't use Wikipedia on there as that is not a link that goes there, thank you. Wgolf (talk) 20:30, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Then why was I asked to add links to other related Wikipedia entries? I did andd one and it worked earler - now it is not there.130.253.229.146 (talk) 20:38, 23 March 2015 (UTC)Steven Paul Fisher[reply]
Hello, Steven Paul Fisher. Please don't forget to use the code you were given on the talk pages of articles into which you paste copied content. A good bit of Emmit McHenry, for instance, is copied from the alumni page (See [1]). Without that notice, I'm afraid that content like this may be deleted at any time.
Again, the code is on your user page. If you don't understand how to use it, please leave a note at my talk page, and I am happy to explain. I do need to ask you, though, to please place the code on the talk pages of this and any other article you've created by copying content from your employer's website that does not bear this notice already. --Moonriddengirl(talk) 21:13, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wikiisawesome was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Matt Bond and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
Hi Steven, regarding Levette J. Davidson, you said that this article text comes from [2] (which I have visited the site and seen where it is available under the "Historical or Biographical Note" section) and that "This is a public domain, open access site with no copyright." That is not correct. Any creative work published in the United States beginning in 1989 is copyrighted, regardless of whether or not it bears a copyright notice. In order to accept this text, we would have to have proven that one of the following is the case: (a) it was published before 1978 with no copyright notice, (b) it was published before 1989 with no copyright notice AND the copyright was not subsequently registered, or (c) it was published before 1964 and the copyright was not renewed. From merely looking at the text on a website, we have no idea if any of those might be true and, accordingly, I have deleted the article. --B (talk) 13:12, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, B . :) Ticket:2015010610010681 applies to this. Mr. Fisher has a template he can put on the talk pages of new articles, but I'm afraid that this particular article predated the delivery of that template. He is the University Historian at the University of Denver. --Moonriddengirl(talk) 13:24, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Moonriddengirl: I have restored it. Will one of you please add the template and remove or modify the message claiming that being published on the web makes it public domain? --B (talk) 13:30, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Since Mr. Fisher hasn't logged in for a while, happy to! Thanks. :) --Moonriddengirl(talk) 13:33, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:05, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Doug scrivner requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Iamahashtag (talk) 18:06, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Carrie morgridge, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:24, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Needs a second reliable source to pass WP:GNG (currently has one reliable-seeming bizjournals.com source and a press release, the latter not meeting WP:RS).
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:32, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Navin Dimond requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from https://www.hotelschool.cornell.edu/industry/centers/cref/board/dimond.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. reddogsix (talk) 20:49, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:57, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
A page you started (Nevin dimond) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Nevin dimond, Steven Paul Fisher!
Wikipedia editor Jersey92 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Nevin dimond, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
It appears to be a clear copyright infringement. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jersey92 (talk) 14:59, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
To reply, leave a comment on Jersey92's talk page.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:56, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Nevin dimond requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from https://www.hotelschool.cornell.edu/industry/centers/cref/board/dimond.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bazj (talk) 19:35, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Peter a. gilbertson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Alexius08 (talk) 07:07, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Alexius08 (talk) 07:11, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Richard e. kelley, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Alexius08 (talk) 07:12, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:40, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
